Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wouldn't be so sure of that.The Jury will find him innocent of this ridiculous charge and he'll be treated like the hero that he is by most of the peopleAntifa BLM
/—-/ And for decades, libtards denied they want to make it illegal to defend yourself.I guess it doesn't matter to you that a 17 year old who is carrying a long gun in public is in violation of WI gun laws
Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At
Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One
Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon
CONTENDER FOR 'DARWIN AWARDS'
Attacker with a skateboard versus someone carrying an AR-15?
- Never bring a skateboard to a gun fight!
'It may be the last thing the skateboard carrier ever did. It appears this man was shot right after attacking the young Rittenhouse with a skateboard. After that he fell to the ground and didn’t move.'
No sympathy here for the violent attackers / terrorists who chose the wrong victim to attack, one carrying an AR-15.
Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft
On Tuesday night two people were killed in the continued violence in Kenosha, Wisconsin. It appears they were killed by the same shooter, a 17-year-old by the name of Kyle Rittenhouse. Another individual shot by Rittenhouse appears to have been carrying a handgun.www.thegatewaypundit.com
The Great Patriot, Defender of Kenosha and Guardian of Republic, Kyle Rittenhouse, will be acquitted by a Jury of his Peers, the townsfolk of Kenosha who have suffered immense harm by the hands of Rioters, Rapists, Arsonists, Looters and Thugs.
/—-/ And the St Louis couple who defended their home? DemocRATs wanted to throw them in jail. Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6./—-/ And for decades, libtards denied they want to make it illegal to defend yourself.I guess it doesn't matter to you that a 17 year old who is carrying a long gun in public is in violation of WI gun laws
Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At
Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One
Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon
CONTENDER FOR 'DARWIN AWARDS'
Attacker with a skateboard versus someone carrying an AR-15?
- Never bring a skateboard to a gun fight!
'It may be the last thing the skateboard carrier ever did. It appears this man was shot right after attacking the young Rittenhouse with a skateboard. After that he fell to the ground and didn’t move.'
No sympathy here for the violent attackers / terrorists who chose the wrong victim to attack, one carrying an AR-15.
Pictures Show Young Rittenhouse Shot At Least Two BLM Rioters in Self Defense, One Rioter Was Carrying a Gun and Is a Convicted Felon | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft
On Tuesday night two people were killed in the continued violence in Kenosha, Wisconsin. It appears they were killed by the same shooter, a 17-year-old by the name of Kyle Rittenhouse. Another individual shot by Rittenhouse appears to have been carrying a handgun.
The Great Patriot, Defender of Kenosha and Guardian of Republic, Kyle Rittenhouse, will be acquitted by a Jury of his Peers, the townsfolk of Kenosha who have suffered immense harm by the hands of Rioters, Rapists, Arsonists, Looters and Thugs.
It's not illegal to defend yourself. it is illegal for a 17 year old to be carrying a firearm in WI.
there is if one disobeys the order to stop by the cop called out to investigate a possible criminal act and enters the car where said knife was. you ain't too bright there kid.where does that say that a cop's stop order can be ignored? BTW, there was probable cause, the man admitted to having a knife in his vehicle. one was found. so again, even with your made up attempt to undermine the debate, there is that. And the cop was called out there, and there's that.post the part that backs your claim. quote the piece.then post the law.That's what you wish. That is not the law.
The Fourth Amendment.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue,but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
There is nothing illegal about having a knife in your car.
I'm glad there will be more people like him fighting back against Antifa and BLM.I wouldn't be so sure of that.The Jury will find him innocent of this ridiculous charge and he'll be treated like the hero that he is by most of the people
He was carrying a gun illegally after all.
BTW, why were the cops called out there? who put the cops there?where does that say that a cop's stop order can be ignored? BTW, there was probable cause, the man admitted to having a knife in his vehicle. one was found. so again, even with your made up attempt to undermine the debate, there is that. And the cop was called out there, and there's that.post the part that backs your claim. quote the piece.then post the law.That's what you wish. That is not the law.
The Fourth Amendment.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue,but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
There is nothing illegal about having a knife in your car.
look it up.Fixed blade knives may not be carried concealed, unless they are a hunting knife and are being carried for such a purpose. ... As well, it is illegal to carry these, concealed or otherwise, in a vehicle unless under the same exceptions.Oct 25, 2017There is nothing illegal about having a knife in your car
No idea where you got that.
Dude you are one fking lazy asshole
.
Are Switchblades Legal? Knife Laws By State | Survival Life
Find out if switchblades are legal in your state. We've listed knife laws by state for switchblades, butterfly knives & other knives for all 50 states.blog.gunassociation.org
But this kid was not law abiding was he?I have no interest in social justice.It was not his property.He was a criminal in violation of WI gun laws.So was pretty much everyone else there. The rioters made the mistake of attacking an armed man.
No jury is going to convict him.
Never underestimate the stupidity of people. The Soros DA will pack an all black, all BLM jury. He should never be charged, armed men chased him brandishing firearms.
Kyle Rittenhouse - TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOT
View attachment 380602
If you think otherwise you are a hypocrite
Procedural bullshit.
People have a right to defend property from lawlessness. Chickenshit gun grabber laws don't stop that.
It's amazing how you ignore the rioters and focus on this guy because he had the audacity to defend himself and someone's property.
Maybe the rioters should visit your property.
He was acting illegally as armed security.
At the point of the attack he was defending himself.
What the hell is even illegal armed security?
Can you point out that law?
I already linked to WI gun laws.
Anyone under 18 cannot legally carry a firearm in public.
If a person under 18 is acting as protection of a public business while carrying a firearm in WI he is doing so illegally.
If the owner of the business hired a 17 tear old to carry a gun on his property he would be breaking the law by illegally hiring a minor to act as armed security. If the minor proclaimed that it was his job to protect a business that someone else owned while carrying a firearm he was acting as illegal armed security.
This is not high level reasoning
Procedural bullshit.
Keep defending rioters you SJW pansy.
I will never support people who loot, riot, or commit arson.
Just like I will never support anyone who illegally carries a firearm.
You are a fucking hypocrite.
You are an equivocator. When the law stops enforcing the law, law abiding people can stand up to take its place.
Anything else is tyranny and anarchy.
No he wasn't because he was illegally carrying a firearm.
Dead looters were ILLEGALLY trying to murder Rittenhouse.I'm not missing the point.You're missing the point, which is that the violence of the protests has been escalating and has reached the point where other citizens no longer are going to allow themselves to be helpless victims. When the power structure prevents those who are charged with keeping the peace from doing that, the citizens will do it themselves. It only gets bloodier from here until either the protests become less violent (and the protesters actively discourage the violence) or the police are allowed to break them up before they become riots. People are going to die is the ultimate point.This whole thing was so predictable from the beginning. The left has for decades been accustomed to holding violent protests, burning things, assaulting people, damaging property, etc, with little or no repercussions. In fact, they have a sympathetic media that focuses more on their cause than their actions. This level of on-going and increasing violence, however, has finally caused a counter reaction. Property owners and innocent bystanders have realized that the official power structure is not going to protect them and they are starting to fight back. I said that it wouldn't be long before these thugs went after somebody that was armed and willing to defend himself, and people would die, and now it has. This won't stop here, either, because the violent protesters have no intention of stopping their violence and will only increase it because they still believe there are a lot of soft targets that won't fight back. The counter reaction will only increase, as it becomes ever more apparent that protection is not to be found. This only stops when the protesters stop being violent.
You can argue that this kid broke the law himself, that he should not have been on the streets with a rifle, but when the police are pulled back, who is going to enforce the laws that the kid broke? The flip side of the argument, of course, is that without the violent protesters in the streets, the kid would never have been walking around carrying an AR-15. Think of how foolish it is for the protesters to, on the one hand, scream that the police need to be defunded and disbanded, while on the other, want those same police to protect them from the inevitable results of their actions.
Circular reasoning.
This kid took it upon himself to illegally arm himself and protect the property of other people.
That does not excuse rioters, looters or arsonists from their crimes.
Rittenhouse was ILEGALLY carrying a firearm in public.
That is a fact and not up for debate.
FACT
So that makes carrying a firearm illegally OK?
Tell me would he have been attacked if he wasn't illegally carrying a firearm ?
Nothing better than blaming the victim, you gutless coward.
FOAD.
He is a criminal.
Do you moan over other criminals who get assaulted while committing a crime?
The kid with the AR-15 was attacked 1st by the criminal thugs / terrorists who attacked him - they should not have initiated violence.The kid with the rifle was breaking the law so you should not be defending him
The kid with the AR-15 was attacked 1st by the criminal thugs / terrorists who attacked him - they should not have initiated violence.The kid with the rifle was breaking the law so you should not be defending him
There was no molotov cocktail. It was a bag of garbage. The victim can be seen shortly before, picking it up. Pay attention to the guy in the red shirt at the 0:56 mark...Ok here's my updated take on this.
1. He wasn't legally allowed to have a gun.
2. He probably shot the first guy in self-defense. I'm not sure what happened leading up to the guy throwing the molotov cocktail if that's really what it was.
3. He definitely shot the other two in self-defense.
Still pretty grey to me. Children shouldn't have guns, but he did defend himself.
Wow.
You are a disingenuous piece of shit.
Burning trash? Molotov cocktail? WHO GIVES A SHIT AT THIS POINT!
As your own video clearly shows. . . from their own words. . . these are NOT peaceful protestors, but rioters and looters bent on destruction. Good lord man, did you even listen to what they were saying? Their intent was to loot and burn that gas station to the ground, they were deterred, so they switched targets to the police station. . .
THEY ARE NOT PROTESTING AT THIS POINT. . . BUT LOOKING FOR TARGETS TO DESTROY!
Your own video clearly shows this!
There was nothing burning, ya moron.
What's that thing on fire flying through the air, then?
There's nothing on fire. The guy threw a plastic bag which was caught by the bright lights coming from the structure behind it. In another angle, the bag is visibly laying harmlessly on the ground as the guy who threw it is being murdered.
The guy who was aggressively chasing down the teenager? With apparently violent intent?
You mean that guy?
Yup.
Yeah..... kid can probably still make a decent case for self defense if he gets a good lawyer.
And I don't think he'll have any trouble paying for one, I bet there are GoFundMe accounts being set up right now.
I think the bigger issue will not having his butthole gape open more than his lawyer retainer
kid dun fucked up
He's a youngster and a cop groupie; the cagekickers at the jailhouse will keep him safe.
LOL
For the rest of his life?
You sure do seem gleeful at the thought of this kid being thrown to the wolves.
What does that say about you?
I remember how I felt when people thought the abuse I suffered as a kid was funny..... you should be careful to never get near me. I'll share some of it with you if you do.
Of course I do. He murdered 2 people. It's too bad Wisconsin doesn't have the death penalty.
He killed 2 people. That's not the same thing.
Nope, he murdered them.
It didn't look that way to me and I know more about this than you ever will.
So you say.
I do.
It's illegal for thugs / terrorists to attack someone. Picking a fight with someone carrying an AR-15, especially when all you have is a skateboard, on your way to burn down someone's business is not justified because you know his carrying a weapon is illegal. Not only is it NOT justified, it is stupid as hell.It's not illegal to defend yourself. it is illegal for a 17 year old to be carrying a firearm in WI.
all he needs to do is post the photo of the dude he thinks was shot. Why hasn't he? ahhh, his tactic to deceive you.Where do you get that info? If so how much underage? It's great how you Leftists defend these disgusting POS.
You can pretty much read between the lines.. 18 year old having sex with a "minor", but no jail time. That's almost always the case.
And that assumes it the same guy...
No jail time? I just posted the RECORD where it clearly says he served a 12.5 YEAR sentence in an Arizona prison. So a 12 and a half year prison sentence. But you defending CHILD RAPISTS is FULLY NOTED.
Those dead rioters should have staid at home.he was a tourist. should have stayed at home, as so many of the idiots on the streets.He was defending a car dealership.does that apply to riot tourists?That's what happens when mayors and governors don't stop the riots, people defend their property....using....
Self-Defense and the Castle Doctrine
Wisconsin law allows deadly force in self-defense in the limited circumstances where the person defending themselves “reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm” to their person.
Wisconsin Court Clarifies New Self-Defense Rule | Gimbel, Reilly, Guerin & Brown, LLP
A Wisconsin court's recent ruling could affect defendants who claim self-defense when facing criminal charges. Call a Milwaukee defense lawyer to learn more.www.grgblaw.com
There is a video of the owner thanking him for volunteering to defend the car dealership from rioters.
His mistake was going alone, he should have had backup.
He was a defender, not a rioter.
There was no molotov cocktail. It was a bag of garbage. The victim can be seen shortly before, picking it up. Pay attention to the guy in the red shirt at the 0:56 mark...Ok here's my updated take on this.
1. He wasn't legally allowed to have a gun.
2. He probably shot the first guy in self-defense. I'm not sure what happened leading up to the guy throwing the molotov cocktail if that's really what it was.
3. He definitely shot the other two in self-defense.
Still pretty grey to me. Children shouldn't have guns, but he did defend himself.
Wow.
You are a disingenuous piece of shit.
Burning trash? Molotov cocktail? WHO GIVES A SHIT AT THIS POINT!
As your own video clearly shows. . . from their own words. . . these are NOT peaceful protestors, but rioters and looters bent on destruction. Good lord man, did you even listen to what they were saying? Their intent was to loot and burn that gas station to the ground, they were deterred, so they switched targets to the police station. . .
THEY ARE NOT PROTESTING AT THIS POINT. . . BUT LOOKING FOR TARGETS TO DESTROY!
Your own video clearly shows this!
There was nothing burning, ya moron.
What's that thing on fire flying through the air, then?
There's nothing on fire. The guy threw a plastic bag which was caught by the bright lights coming from the structure behind it. In another angle, the bag is visibly laying harmlessly on the ground as the guy who threw it is being murdered.
The guy who was aggressively chasing down the teenager? With apparently violent intent?
You mean that guy?
Yup.
Yeah..... kid can probably still make a decent case for self defense if he gets a good lawyer.
And I don't think he'll have any trouble paying for one, I bet there are GoFundMe accounts being set up right now.
I think the bigger issue will not having his butthole gape open more than his lawyer retainer
kid dun fucked up
He's a youngster and a cop groupie; the cagekickers at the jailhouse will keep him safe.
LOL
For the rest of his life?
You sure do seem gleeful at the thought of this kid being thrown to the wolves.
What does that say about you?
I remember how I felt when people thought the abuse I suffered as a kid was funny..... you should be careful to never get near me. I'll share some of it with you if you do.
Of course I do. He murdered 2 people. It's too bad Wisconsin doesn't have the death penalty.
He didn't murder-----and btw Wisconsin has Castle doctrine laws---------he was defending himself and other people because lets face it, blm is a terrorist organization with a now a long history of attacking other people.
LOLOL
You dumbfuck, castle doctrine means you have the right to use lethal force if someone is illegally trying to enter your property. The teen murderer wasn't even in the same state as his residence.
Wisconsin Legislature: 939.48(1m)
docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
The person against whom the force was used was in the process of unlawfully and forcibly entering the actor's dwelling, motor vehicle, or place of business, the actor was present in the dwelling, motor vehicle, or place of business, and the actor knew or reasonably believed that an unlawful and forcible entry was occurring.
You're truly a fucking nut.
Oh brother ...you are slow to the draw aren't you. BLM has been pulling people out of their cars (you know that whole motor vehicle thing) to rob them. My probability assumption is that likely this is what started this chase .........ergo castle doctrine. I am sorry I will try to spell it out better for the slow kids in the class room next time. I forget that the american hating foreigners and libs don't think things through. They just insult over small details----Castile or self defense or being a good samaritarian--the kid is justified and there are plenty of people who will vote to acquit.
Yes, they should have called the cops on him if they thought he was carrying the firearm illegally
Yes, they should have called the cops on him if they thought he was carrying the firearm illegally
Domestic terrorists on the way to burn down someone's business is not going to call the cops on someone they think may be breaking the law....
i.e., crime. Thanks for confirming what I said.It’s a mild Misdemeanor in Wisconsin law.. whoop die do lolNope. Wisconsin self defense laws don't cover folks in the commission of a crime.And now the teen murderer will spend the rest of his life in prison.Good you admitted he crashed him and he paid the price .. View attachment 380406theracist democrat kelts saying nicca .. why?One guy was chasing him, that's it. No mob was chasing him. But then you also saw a twig on the ground and thought it was a hammer. So there's that.Not what I saw .. I saw man in the streetYes, there is. And it shows him being chased by 1 guy, not a mob. Like I said, you're demented.Lol there is video of it,, they were throwing stuff at him one looked like a bottle that was on fireLOLOLHe was tired of running,, no man should run from a mob,, same guy called him a ****** earlier, why did he hide his face with his shirt?Cornered? Where? he ran between two parked cars and then around one of them after shooting his victim. How is that possible if he was cornered?He was chased by the shootee ,, he was cornered, he immediately called the cops and said he killed someone.. than he was chased, again by the mobHe started running after shooting his first victim even though no one was chasing him.He was running from a mob lol it’s on video, One guy was going to execute them at point-blank range if he wasn’t skilled enough to shoot his fucking arm offNope, not self defense. He was fleeing from a felony murder. He did not have the law on his side to kill others attempting to effect a citizen's arrest.I'm still hazy on what happened with the first shooting. That could easily change things.
I think there's a lot of grey in this incident. I can see a final ruling landing somewhere in the middle of both extremes. On one hand, he shouldn't have even been there and this is why we don't let kids play with guns. On the other hand, the second and third shootings were clearly self-defense.
And frankly, I'm not big on the protests for Jacob Blake either, at least with the evidence I've seen so far.
You poor, demented Russian troll, he wasn't running from a mob.
He killed in defense of his life. He will be exonerated if he even goes to trial. The video is very clear.
how the fk do I or the cops know? he stated he had a knife while being questioned. Why would the cops know if it was legal or not? you think they're fking stupid? hahahahahahahahahaha dude, you continue to lose when you debate me. you don't have shit to stand on. Plus, your efforts stink.look it up.Fixed blade knives may not be carried concealed, unless they are a hunting knife and are being carried for such a purpose. ... As well, it is illegal to carry these, concealed or otherwise, in a vehicle unless under the same exceptions.Oct 25, 2017There is nothing illegal about having a knife in your car
No idea where you got that.
Dude you are one fking lazy asshole
.Are Switchblades Legal? Knife Laws By State | Survival Life
Find out if switchblades are legal in your state. We've listed knife laws by state for switchblades, butterfly knives & other knives for all 50 states.
LOL, now he had a switch blade? I suppose that is a step up from the earlier claims that he had a gun.
