saintmichaeldefendthem
Gold Member
So nuke Tehran instead. Let's stop pretending this country can't be stopped.The one thing that stuck out to me was when he said something like "Israel can now protect itself if it has to."Listening to excerpts from Benny, I gotta say he sounds like he wants war with Iran. But he knows he can't win such a war without US involvement.
From what I've heard, it doesn't have the means to act unilaterally to do that. I dunno.
.
They don't. Their "big deterrent" is a sub-based MAD sorta defense. Conventional forces vs conventional forces though aren't even in the same category as Iran's - Israel is vastly outclassed.
What worked fine against Iraq way back was against one location. Iran has so many facilities contributing to their nuclear program plus many in hardened underground bases no airstrike even WITH nuclear wepaons can destroy them.
Nuclear weapons effects are really good at obliterating things on the surface, but don't penetrate for crap. And no conventional 'bunker buster' goes deep enough to hit anything either. Iran simply found out how deep bunker busters go, and built their primary facilities deeper.
Only realistic solution for Iran is negotiation and in effect buying them off. Remove economic sanctions and monitor their program's ceasing to enrich and move towards weapons-grade uranium. But if you attack, all you achieve is guaranteeing they seek nuclear weapons so you don't attack any more as with DPRK. Once DPRK tested a nuke, US objection melted away. At least publicly. You don't poke and prod and provoke crazy countries with nuclear weapons and nothing to lose.
And you're wrong about bunker buster bombs. It doesn't have to penetrate to destroy. The shock is massive enough to bury alive anything underneath it.
Last edited: