Ravi
Diamond Member
- Feb 27, 2008
- 90,899
- 14,008
Maybe, but he still isn't the criminal in this story.
Wow, you actually do have a functioning brain. Not much else, prolly, but at least your mental connections are working.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe, but he still isn't the criminal in this story.
You don't see them robbing the well-to-do in Mexico, do you?
Why? Because they'd kill the shit out of them.
And that is the most horrible of all the arguments the pro-abortionists have for promoting abortion. That the babies deserve to die because they'll all be criminals. You think shooting someone in the back when they're committing a crime is bad? I think it's much worse to dismember babies before they've done anything wrong at all. Based upon the assumption that those babies are bad.
The authorities disagree with you.
That makes you wrong.
Because protecting your neighbor or neighbor's property from crime is SO wrong...I've no problem with homeowners protecting their homes. That isn't what this guy did.
And if we eliminate all liberals we will stop having pansy law enforcement restrictions and pandering for criminals... or for that matter, less violent criminals... lord knows we know which party welfare handout takers and violent criminals want in officeIf we abort all babies crime will decrease as well.
Retard alert , RETARD ALERT.
Because protecting your neighbor or neighbor's property from crime is SO wrong...![]()
Yes, if we eliminate liberals everything will be perfect.And if we eliminate all liberals we will stop having pansy law enforcement restrictions and pandering for criminals... or for that matter, less violent criminals... lord knows we know which party welfare handout takers and violent criminals want in office
Because protecting your neighbor or neighbor's property from crime is SO wrong...![]()
And if we eliminate all liberals we will stop having pansy law enforcement restrictions and pandering for criminals... or for that matter, less violent criminals... lord knows we know which party welfare handout takers and violent criminals want in office
Brilliant post, per usual. Drivel, blather, and sneering.
He did warn them, he told them to stop. They moved towards him and when they saw he had a gun, they turned.
Sorry, I don't think it's "moral" to insist that people who are being intimidated by criminals carefully check to make sure a person isn't armed before you defend yourself from them.
With children, there's an understanding that kids will sometimes kill because they PERCEIVE themselves to be in a life or death situation.....though adults can see that there is no such immediate danger, it doesn't matter because the perception of a child who has been traumatized is such that they honestly believe it's kill or be killed. When you have a situation like this where people are uncertain and afraid, I don't think it's realistic to accuse someone of "murder" if they think they are defending themselves. The bad guys were the burglars. The guy with the gun told the 911 operator he "wasn't going to die over this" when the operator told him not to do anything. That says to me he apparently felt he was in danger. Was he? Who knows? The criminals shouldn't have been there. They scared him and he shot them.
No, that isn't wrong. And it also isn't what the guy did.
Yes, if we eliminate liberals everything will be perfect.
Yeah, by shooting them in the back when the police told you to stay in your house.
pansy laws?
proof positive that gun wackos confuse guns with their genitalia.....
(and no, i'm not talking about normal gun owners).
welfare? blah blah blah blah....
and if you get rid of democracy, you won't ever have to worry about someone voting in disagreement with you.
Yippie cahyay!! woooo hoooo!
![]()
no, the police told him TO STAY INSIDE 14 FRICKING TIMES, not once, not twice, not three times, not 4 times, not even 5 times, BUT 14 FRICKING TIMES....the police dispatch told mr horn to stay in the house, ALONG with telling mr HORN that killing someone over property WAS NOT WORTH IT....No... the dispatcher told him to stay in his house... a typical SAFETY precaution in their training
and yes... pansy laws that try and limit law abiding citizens and weaken them in comparison with the criminals...
and for confusion about weaponry and genitalia.... even in Basic training we learned "This is my weapon, this is my gun. This one's for fighting, this one's for fun."... weapons are not to prove manhood or to compensate... they are for hunting, sport, and protection.... you know... protecting yourself, your property, your neighbor, you neighbor's property... ooopps, that is what this guy DID... stopped a criminal invading and stealing his neighbor's property....
and lest you not forget... the US is not a Democracy... it is a constitutional republic with democratically elected officials.... it was set up that way to defend against the inherent tyranny that can resort by popular whim