no they don’tOh silly one, they have the testimony of others on it....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
no they don’tOh silly one, they have the testimony of others on it....
I gave you a link. Directly from their mouths to Peter Alexander, not an unnamed source. The way to settle what they said or didn't say, put them under oath and ask them if Hutchinson is a lying sack of tampons.Lets see them testify UNDER OATH again, they've both done so previously...
No reporting on these two denying it to the press, only an unnamed source saying they are...but not from their mouths directly to journalists....that's a second hand source, hearsay.
^ Full retard.And when you “testify” as to testimony provided by others then it’s hearsay. That testimony is not proven fact and when you pass on what you heard, and in your case try to present as fact, then you are wrong in two ways including hearsay
At the rally, dope.of the riot not the rally. I am just trying to find someone to support her claim about the rally…so far most of her testimony has been. discredited
The rally was 2 miles from the Capitol, at the Ellipse.More excuses. They knew the rally was there.......and should have added security. It has been proven the even the FBI incited riots. A complete setup
I've watched videos of them opening the doors. letting them in.
This is just like Russia and Ukraine.........MORE BS.
so. Was a big freaking rally. They knew it was large and DID NOTHING............They knew WTF they were doing.The rally was 2 miles from the Capitol, at the Ellipse.
Nope, he requested that the magnetometer be taken down, to let the armed followers in to the half empty, fenced off, Ellipse rally area.....Trump views life in video, and the video of a half empty rally was unacceptable to him.... Thus his demand, to let the armed protesters in, to fill the Ellipse rally area.... They were his protesters and he said he had no worries of them hurting him.... (the heck with concern for others....).![]()
A distinction with no relevance.You are correct. It is not proven untrue; it is proven hearsay
As you attempt repeatedly to apply the evidentiary standards of a court proceeding.Will pass the torch and let others do the battle with lib loons who are trying to redefine and mis apply the word hearsay
there is literally no evidence of that. The best you have is a already debunked aid making the claim she overheard someone say something.
Pretty telling that so many did not want to interact with magnetometers. No?there might of been people around the rally but they weren’t in it
You sure are treating it like one
This isn’t court, fool.
Maybe her sights are set on something else.Liz is screwed in Wyoming. Maybe CNN will hire her.
One can disagree with that, but it's a fact. No one who was arrested for being inside the Capitol building has been charged with being in possession of a firearm.That is not true. No one inside the Capitol building has been charged with being armed inside the capitol building.
He did? When?Doesn't matter. Trump confirmed it.