The big question about life on other planets: 1000000000000000000000 planets in the universe

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Welp, it looks like I broke Unkotare .

 

[Unkotare]

Welp, it looks like I broke Unkotare .

Stop crying, sissy.

 

[FA_Q2]

Uh... wat?

He has not seen an electron therefore it does not exist.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Uh... wat?

He has not seen an electron therefore it does not exist.

Ha, okay. We all await his superior model.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Uh... wat?

He has not seen an electron therefore it does not exist.

It dreams up straw therefore it posts.

 

[FA_Q2]

Uh... wat?

He has not seen an electron therefore it does not exist.

Ha, okay. We all await his superior model.

Might be even one up from declaring that the milky way is the center of the universe.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Hello, hello, hello, how low
Hello, hello, hello, how low
Hello, hello, hello, how low
Hello, hello, hello
With the lights out, it's less dangerous
Here we are now, entertain us
I feel stupid and contagious
Here we are now, entertain us

 

[Grumblenuts]

It would hardly seem we could be alone though based on the odds and even plain randomness.

Probability, being a powerful feature of nature (not a bug),.. testable odds describe reality better than any dichotomy. Science rules.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Life on earth is utterly beyond the pale of possible explanation by any naturalistic means.

Humans alone have ~5,000 proteins, ranging from a few hundred amino acids in length to titin, 33,450 amino acids in length.

NOBODY has ever nor will ever explain how the smallest one of say 300 amino acids long was formed by adding 1 out of a possible 20 amino acids in succession, or in other words 1/20 to the 300th power. That's impossible and what does it say about repeating the process with ever greater exponents, five thousand times? It's impossible. We're ONLY here because Nature's God put us here.

"IN GO WE TRUST"

Class is over.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Given favorable conditions and millions of years with seemingly nothing better to do.. Probability dictates the following quite naturally developing..

 

[james bond]

Second interstellar comet examined. No signs of aliens .

"Our solar system's second known interstellar visitor appears to be keeping quiet, just like the first.

The Breakthrough Listen SETI (search for extraterrestrial intelligence) project has scanned the interstellar Comet Borisov for "technosignatures" but come up empty so far, scientists announced today (Feb. 14).

'Oumuamua, the first confirmed interstellar object ever spotted in our solar system. The null results may be disappointing to alien enthusiasts out there, but they're valuable all the same, project team members said."

SETI search of interstellar Comet Borisov finds no sign of alien 'technosignatures' | Space

 

[Grumblenuts]

Indeed, tumbling regularly while outgassing material is the smart way to stay relatively clean and well ahead of the constipated masses.

 

[watchingfromafar]

I was able to compare what the Bible said and what evolution said and I thought the Bible was the real science. Science backs it up.

James, we agree on something-- while the adds of this were 1/100,0000,000
go figure -

 

[watchingfromafar]

The Breakthrough Listen SETI (search for extraterrestrial intelligence) project has scanned the interstellar Comet Borisov for "technosignatures" but come up empty so far, scientists announced today

our communication skills are a bit naive. It's like trying to talk to a flock of birds only in this case we be da birds
-

 

[james bond]

Creation scientists say that God didn't create aliens on any of the creation days. They haven't had to spend much money to promote this. OTOH, NASA says we'll find alien life or evidence of past alien life by 2025 because they have spent a fortune in space exploration, telescopes and other high technology, and probes. Even dead Hawking and his multimillionaire Russian buddy have set 2025 as the end point for their $100 million spending. Creation scientists are right. NASA, dead Hawking, and Russian billionaire Yuri Milner are wrong.

 

[james bond]

I was able to compare what the Bible said and what evolution said and I thought the Bible was the real science. Science backs it up.

James, we agree on something-- while the adds of this were 1/100,0000,000
go figure -

I believe in...

the Bible, and Jesus didn't die for aliens.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Creation scientists say that God didn't create aliens on any of the creation days. They haven't had to spend much money to promote this. OTOH, NASA says we'll find alien life or evidence of past alien life by 2025 because they have spent a fortune in space exploration, telescopes and other high technology, and probes. Even dead Hawking and his multimillionaire Russian buddy have set 2025 as the end point for their $100 million spending. Creation scientists are right. NASA, dead Hawking, and Russian billionaire Yuri Milner are wrong.

Creation scientists say

Meh.

 

[james bond]

Creation scientists say that God didn't create aliens on any of the creation days. They haven't had to spend much money to promote this. OTOH, NASA says we'll find alien life or evidence of past alien life by 2025 because they have spent a fortune in space exploration, telescopes and other high technology, and probes. Even dead Hawking and his multimillionaire Russian buddy have set 2025 as the end point for their $100 million spending. Creation scientists are right. NASA, dead Hawking, and Russian billionaire Yuri Milner are wrong.

Creation scientists say

Meh.

Who is right tho? You just need to and stop believing in evolutionary fairy tales. Better to spend money on lessening air and water poullution, i.e. making the Earth better.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Creation scientists say that God didn't create aliens on any of the creation days. They haven't had to spend much money to promote this. OTOH, NASA says we'll find alien life or evidence of past alien life by 2025 because they have spent a fortune in space exploration, telescopes and other high technology, and probes. Even dead Hawking and his multimillionaire Russian buddy have set 2025 as the end point for their $100 million spending. Creation scientists are right. NASA, dead Hawking, and Russian billionaire Yuri Milner are wrong.

Creation scientists say

Meh.

Who is right tho? You just need to and stop believing in evolutionary fairy tales. Better to spend money on lessening air and water poullution, i.e. making the Earth better.

Who is right tho?

Not a "scientist" who gets his facts from a creation story.

 

[james bond]

Creation scientists say that God didn't create aliens on any of the creation days. They haven't had to spend much money to promote this. OTOH, NASA says we'll find alien life or evidence of past alien life by 2025 because they have spent a fortune in space exploration, telescopes and other high technology, and probes. Even dead Hawking and his multimillionaire Russian buddy have set 2025 as the end point for their $100 million spending. Creation scientists are right. NASA, dead Hawking, and Russian billionaire Yuri Milner are wrong.

Creation scientists say

Meh.

Who is right tho? You just need to and stop believing in evolutionary fairy tales. Better to spend money on lessening air and water poullution, i.e. making the Earth better.

Who is right tho?

Not a "scientist" who gets his facts from a creation story.

That's why I say atheists are usually wrong. It's not a story, but what actually happened in history. However, aside from the Bible we do not have any witnesses there, except God, so it's the Bible theory. If the facts fit, then it becomes a best theory. However, God's nemesis Satan made up the lie of evolution through the Antibible that most of the people believe. You believe in the Antibible theory which you call evolution theory. The facts do not fit it as there are no aliens.