How many homeless would we have, if a person could simply ask for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed?
As many as we have now. Because a mortgage is very expensive and rent isn’t much better (worse in some cases such as Manhattan) and those people would use that money on drugs, alcohol, cigarettes, pornography, and frivolous stuff.

There is a reason they are unemployed in 95% of the cases.
 
Except that we already established that it’s not “capitalism” for the government to pay people not to work.

Seriously...how many times are you going to make that mistake? :lmao:
full employment of resources is merely using capitalism for all of its capital worth.
Whose resources?!? Mine? hadit ’s? Are you under the misguided left-wing impression that you’re somehow entitled to my resources? :uhh:

You’re entire schtick has just grown old. We’ve debunked every idiotic thing you’ve said (and when we do that, you post a nonsensical response that has nothing to do with the issue - as you just did here).
 
Capitalism works.
Now that is true. Capitalism does work. The problem is, you keep pitching communism under the guise of “capitalism”. Only the left is that stupid, snowflake. Conservatives know communism when they see it. The government paying people not to work is not “capitalism”. It’s not even close.
inequality is not better.
And you finally admit you’ve been lying this entire time. Boom. Capitalism doesn’t focus on “equality”. It focuses on making money through innovation, and the delivery of products and services through improved efficiencies.

What you want - like all left-wing idiots - is communism. And this entire time you’ve been pretending to be a capitalist and trying desperately (though terribly) to convince everyone that you’re communist “ideas” were actually capitalism in action.

You’re out of your league here, junior. We all smelled you out in your first post. Your arrogance lead you to believe that you could trick everyone. Your ignorance is exceeded only by your arrogance.
 
inequality is not better.
There is no “inequality”, snowflake. None. Those with Bill Gates IQ and Bill Gates work ethic get Bill Gates equal success.

The real problem is that you don’t want to put in the equal time and the equal work, but you want the equal results. Sorry, doesn’t work that way. Deal with it.
 
Compensation for a natural rate of capital unemployment is a solution.
So what is that “natural rate”? If it’s so natural and well known it should be second nature to everybody. And yet, you can’t tell us what it is and you can’t even find it despite scouring the internet for weeks and weeks now. :laugh:
Natural rate of unemployment - Wikipedia

Why is the onus put upon the Poor? there should be no impediment to equal protection of the law.
 
How many homeless would we have, if a person could simply ask for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed?
As many as we have now. Because a mortgage is very expensive and rent isn’t much better (worse in some cases such as Manhattan) and those people would use that money on drugs, alcohol, cigarettes, pornography, and frivolous stuff.

There is a reason they are unemployed in 95% of the cases.
just right wing fantasy? every guy knows, it merely requires money.
 
Except that we already established that it’s not “capitalism” for the government to pay people not to work.

Seriously...how many times are you going to make that mistake? :lmao:
full employment of resources is merely using capitalism for all of its capital worth.
Whose resources?!? Mine? hadit ’s? Are you under the misguided left-wing impression that you’re somehow entitled to my resources? :uhh:

You’re entire schtick has just grown old. We’ve debunked every idiotic thing you’ve said (and when we do that, you post a nonsensical response that has nothing to do with the issue - as you just did here).
lol. quit. don't whine.
 
Capitalism works.
Now that is true. Capitalism does work. The problem is, you keep pitching communism under the guise of “capitalism”. Only the left is that stupid, snowflake. Conservatives know communism when they see it. The government paying people not to work is not “capitalism”. It’s not even close.
inequality is not better.
And you finally admit you’ve been lying this entire time. Boom. Capitalism doesn’t focus on “equality”. It focuses on making money through innovation, and the delivery of products and services through improved efficiencies.

What you want - like all left-wing idiots - is communism. And this entire time you’ve been pretending to be a capitalist and trying desperately (though terribly) to convince everyone that you’re communist “ideas” were actually capitalism in action.

You’re out of your league here, junior. We all smelled you out in your first post. Your arrogance lead you to believe that you could trick everyone. Your ignorance is exceeded only by your arrogance.
laws are not capitalism. neither is Government. your ignorance is worse.
 
inequality is not better.
There is no “inequality”, snowflake. None. Those with Bill Gates IQ and Bill Gates work ethic get Bill Gates equal success.

The real problem is that you don’t want to put in the equal time and the equal work, but you want the equal results. Sorry, doesn’t work that way. Deal with it.
it is about equality and equal protection of the law.
 
Compensation for a natural rate of capital unemployment is a solution.
So what is that “natural rate”? If it’s so natural and well known it should be second nature to everybody. And yet, you can’t tell us what it is and you can’t even find it despite scouring the internet for weeks and weeks now. :laugh:
Natural rate of unemployment - Wikipedia
I didn’t ask for a definition, dumb ass. I asked for the rate.
 
Except that we already established that it’s not “capitalism” for the government to pay people not to work.

Seriously...how many times are you going to make that mistake? :lmao:
full employment of resources is merely using capitalism for all of its capital worth.
Whose resources?!? Mine? hadit ’s? Are you under the misguided left-wing impression that you’re somehow entitled to my resources? :uhh:

You’re entire schtick has just grown old. We’ve debunked every idiotic thing you’ve said (and when we do that, you post a nonsensical response that has nothing to do with the issue - as you just did here).
lol. quit. don't whine.
Quit? Is that your answer to everything in life? No wonder you’re a failure. I asked a simple question: whose resources? Why can’t you answer?
 
inequality is not better.
There is no “inequality”, snowflake. None. Those with Bill Gates IQ and Bill Gates work ethic get Bill Gates equal success.

The real problem is that you don’t want to put in the equal time and the equal work, but you want the equal results. Sorry, doesn’t work that way. Deal with it.
it is about equality and equal protection of the law.
We already have that. The poor is just as “equally protected” under the law as the wealthy. You can’t murder the poor. You can’t rape the poor. You can’t steal from the poor. See? Equal protection.

Why are you so ignorant?
 
Compensation for a natural rate of capital unemployment is a solution.
So what is that “natural rate”? If it’s so natural and well known it should be second nature to everybody. And yet, you can’t tell us what it is and you can’t even find it despite scouring the internet for weeks and weeks now. :laugh:
Natural rate of unemployment - Wikipedia
I didn’t ask for a definition, dumb ass. I asked for the rate.
it doesn't really matter; it is the concept that has to be solved for to simplify Government and its Cost.

self-selection is the most ideal for Individuals.
 

Forum List

Back
Top