Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
I literally don't have time for your stupidity. Remember the OJ Simpson trial and how LA detective were put on the witness stand even though no one claimed they were responsible for killing Nicole Simpson Brown?If she’s not on trial, why do you want people to testify about her behavior?
This isn’t about her. It’s about Trump.
No one is stopping witnesses from the Schiff Sham inquiry.Not his job to conduct further investigations.Bolton certainly has put the pressure on Moscow Mitch to allow witnesses...and that's not good for Trump
In this country, trials have witnesses that testify.
Could you get more wrong in a single post?Drafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.
WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.
NYT: Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Demands for Inquiries, Bolton Book Says
John Bolton Reportedly Recalls Trump Tying Ukraine Aid To Biden Investigation
How can Republicans not vote for witnesses after this? By Maggie Haberman and Michael S. Schmidt. They are two of the Times best and most credible reporters.
It is not evidence. You realize this right?
He wrote a book, and conveniently "leaked" a claim that he remembers Trump saying something that just happens to be in the media limelight. But never said a word until his book was published.
What a coincidence.
I backed it up by repeating who my source was, who I already identified as my source. So no, that's not a lie. Try harder next time.I'm not buying this lie: "Yes, I did, ya flaming gay moron."If you think I'm telling lies, feel free to quote them. I shan't hold my breath though.You promote and coverass criminals in government. And you do it so well, yes your ability to pass lies are frightening, but no, I'll take whatever lies you throw at me in lieu of this reality you think I'm afraid of.Too bad if reality scares you.You speak poorly of the bestand most impeccable patriots here.LOLOL
Yes, I did, ya flaming gay moron.
"From Impeached Trump himself..." ~ Faun
I knew I shouldn't have taken you off ignore after 3 days.
Could you get more wrong in a single post?Drafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.
WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.
NYT: Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Demands for Inquiries, Bolton Book Says
John Bolton Reportedly Recalls Trump Tying Ukraine Aid To Biden Investigation
How can Republicans not vote for witnesses after this? By Maggie Haberman and Michael S. Schmidt. They are two of the Times best and most credible reporters.
It is not evidence. You realize this right?
He wrote a book, and conveniently "leaked" a claim that he remembers Trump saying something that just happens to be in the media limelight. But never said a word until his book was published.
What a coincidence.
He didn't leak it. He hasn't said a word about this in public. And his book has not been published yet.
Maybe you haven't heard because all the leakers are gone.All this does want more exposure of the Bidens
I wonder why the Admin still hasn't started an official investigation into the Bidens. Curious.
Of course it isNot his job to conduct further investigations.Bolton certainly has put the pressure on Moscow Mitch to allow witnesses...and that's not good for Trump
LOLOLCould you get more wrong in a single post?Drafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.
WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.
NYT: Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Demands for Inquiries, Bolton Book Says
John Bolton Reportedly Recalls Trump Tying Ukraine Aid To Biden Investigation
How can Republicans not vote for witnesses after this? By Maggie Haberman and Michael S. Schmidt. They are two of the Times best and most credible reporters.
It is not evidence. You realize this right?
He wrote a book, and conveniently "leaked" a claim that he remembers Trump saying something that just happens to be in the media limelight. But never said a word until his book was published.
What a coincidence.
He didn't leak it. He hasn't said a word about this in public. And his book has not been published yet.
Yeah and no one ever said their car started this morning either, but it happened.
Amazon released presale access, and within hours it "leaked".
How convenient.
But that is semantics.
It isn't evidence. Despite you zeal, you don't enter evidence into a trial for what someone wrote in a book
, but it happened.
Amazon released presale access, and within hours it "leaked".
How convenient.
Schiff claimed for 2.5 years he had direct evidence of crimes committed by the President....until he was FORCED to admit he was engaging in SEDITION the whole time - he LIED HIS ASS OFF...which would NOT be the last time.Drafts of the book outline the potential testimony of the former national security adviser if he were called as a witness in the president’s impeachment trial.
WASHINGTON — President Trump told his national security adviser in August that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens, according to an unpublished manuscript by the former adviser, John R. Bolton.
NYT: Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Demands for Inquiries, Bolton Book Says
John Bolton Reportedly Recalls Trump Tying Ukraine Aid To Biden Investigation
How can Republicans not vote for witnesses after this? By Maggie Haberman and Michael S. Schmidt. They are two of the Times best and most credible reporters.
A lying source does not necessarily let you off the hook, and that doesn't make me trying harder. No, I'm not going to read through twelve pages of your bilge. Instead, I am going to make another quilt top for charity. <burp>I backed it up by repeating who my source was, who I already identified as my source. So no, that's not a lie. Try harder next time.I'm not buying this lie: "Yes, I did, ya flaming gay moron."If you think I'm telling lies, feel free to quote them. I shan't hold my breath though.You promote and coverass criminals in government. And you do it so well, yes your ability to pass lies are frightening, but no, I'll take whatever lies you throw at me in lieu of this reality you think I'm afraid of.Too bad if reality scares you.You speak poorly of the bestand most impeccable patriots here.
I knew I shouldn't have taken you off ignore after 3 days.
Not according to the NY Times..., but it happened.
Amazon released presale access, and within hours it "leaked".
How convenient.
NOPE!
Bolton lawyers said the white house is THE ONLY people they released it to.
Nobody stopped Nadddler, Shiffft or Pelosi from supeanoeing Bolton before.Bolton needs to testify.
That’s the problem with having no credibility. No one seriously believes Trump.
Donald J. Trump
✔@realDonaldTrump
I NEVER told John Bolton that the aid to Ukraine was tied to investigations into Democrats, including the Bidens. In fact, he never complained about this at the time of his very public termination. If John Bolton said this, it was only to sell a book. With that being said, the...
84.2K
9:18 PM - Jan 26, 2020
Nobody stopped Nadddler, Shiffft or Pelosi from supeanoeing Bolton before.Bolton needs to testify.
Nobodys stopping them now.
