About the dire warnings of a second Trump presidency.

[SeaMajor7]

You display your detachment from reality with every post.

PROJECTION MONKEY SAYS WHAT????????

 

[Billiejeens]

How about the 51 former "intelligence" weenies that claimed Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation and the ensuing full court press by leftist operatives in the DOJ manipulating social media to make it seem so?

Pepperidge Farms remembers......Oh but let's go on about 1/6 which was mostly just a somewhat spirited protest till a BLM loving cop murdered an unarmed woman.

Not for nothing - a few of those, we now know, were technically not former but were currently contract workers for the agency.

 

[BULLDOG]

Hyperbole much?

Trump is evil. No hyperbole there.

 

[berg80]

It means absolute immunity for actions taken in his Role as President.

What you're missing is the expansive interpretation he applies to his role. He would have you believe designing a plot to install himself as prez by using fake electors is part of his official duties. It isn't. But then, as you have proven, you're the most gullible sap on the board so you believe the disinformation you've been spoon fed.

 

[22lcidw]

Whatever happened behind the scenes I do not know. However, Trump was a good President and he kept us at peace. The purposeful release of COVID derailed it to degree. It was the thrill of victory and the agony of hearing about it on TV from the Prog media/entertainers/politicians.

 

[Billiejeens]

What you're missing is the expansive interpretation he applies to his role. He would have you believe designing a plot to install himself as prez by using fake electors is part of his official duties. It isn't. But then, as you have proven, you're the most gullible sap on the board so you believe the disinformation you've been spoon fed.

The biggest problem with you is probably your lack of any knowledge of how things work in the real world.

There were documented irregularities in the process leading up to the election.
To not be prepared to challenge the results would have been a dereliction of duty on President Trump part.

Congress has a Constitutional Duty to do that.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Trump is evil. No hyperbole there.

Show us on the doll where Trump hurt you.

 

[jc456]

They are out there and they are out there in droves. The people who are making them come from all quarters, including former members of his first administration.

Former Trump officials are among the most vocal opponents of returning him to the White House​

NEW YORK (AP) — Former Defense Secretary Mark Esper has called him a “threat to democracy.” Former national security adviser John Bolton has declared him “unfit to be president.” And former Vice President Mike Pence has declined to endorse him, citing “profound differences.”

As Donald Trump seeks the presidency for a third time, he is being vigorously opposed by a vocal contingent of former officials who are stridently warning against his return to power and offering dire predictions for the country and the rule of law if his campaign succeeds.

It’s a striking chorus of detractors, one without precedent in the modern era, coming from those who witnessed first-hand his conduct in office and the turmoil that followed.

Sarah Matthews, a former Trump aide who testified before the House Jan. 6 committee and is among those warning about the threat he poses, said it’s “mind-boggling” how many members of his senior staff have denounced him.

Former Trump officials are among the most vocal opponents of returning him to the White House

As Trump seeks the presidency a third time, he’s being shadowed by a chorus of people who served in his administration who have become sharp critics, some offering dire predictions about his return to power.

apnews.com

The reasons for the warnings are as varied as the people making them. Some point to Project 2025, an authoritarian playbook centering on tearing down what is widely referred to as the "administrative state." Replacing it with those who pass a test of loyalty to the person who would head up an unitary executive with newly, expansive power. Some point to his immorality, some to witnessing first hand his incompetence and impetuous behavior, some to the virtually incomprehensible times he has run afoul of the law and basic decency. They all boil down to the same thing. They fear he will break us.

My answer to those concerns is, we are already broken.

We, the people, can not agree on who the legitimate leader of the country is. We can not agree on how to view the events that transpired on Jan. 6 nor who is responsible for them. We no longer agree adherence to a basic moral code is a prerequisite for holding high office. We do not agree on whether both threats and acts of violence in someone's name should be condemned by that person. We are at virtual polar opposite sides when it comes to environmental, immigration, gun control, and abortion policies. We can't agree on elemental facts, making constructive discourse and effective governance impossible. We do not agree as to the reasons for historic congressional inaction while there is a pressing need for action on many fronts. We can not agree on the best way to move forward. That is not sustainable.

Can we be fixed? I believe we can. We are on the cusp of deciding whether to begin that process this coming November.

can't have trump do back what was done to him right? That's the fear. You can't hide that. you aren't that smart.

 

[BULLDOG]

The biggest problem with you is probably your lack of any knowledge of how things work in the real world.

There were documented irregularities in the process leading up to the election.
To not be prepared to challenge the results would have been a dereliction of duty on President Trump part.

Congress has a Constitutional Duty to do that.

There is no constitutional duty to attack congress in an attempted insurrection.

 

[Billiejeens]

There is no constitutional duty to attack congress in an attempted insurrection.

Poor bulldog

 

[BULLDOG]

Show us on the doll where Trump hurt you.

Cute. dumb as hell, but cute.

 

[berg80]

The biggest problem with you is probably your lack of any knowledge of how things work in the real world.

There were documented irregularities in the process leading up to the election.
To not be prepared to challenge the results would have been a dereliction of duty on President Trump part.

Congress has a Constitutional Duty to do that.

By the time he committed crimes related to Jan. 6 any possibility of alleged "irregularities" having a consequential affect on the election had been thoroughly investigated and shown to be baseless.
He availed himself of the opportunity to challenge the results in various courts of law. He lacked credible evidence so his efforts failed.
It was after he had exhausted the legal means to challenge the outcome that he resorted to illegal means. Now he claims he is immune from prosecution for those actions.

Your fatuous spin isn't working. Have you noticed?

 

[Billiejeens]

By the time he committed crimes related to Jan. 6 any possibility of alleged "irregularities" having a consequential affect on the election had been thoroughly investigated and shown to be baseless.
He availed himself of the opportunity to challenge the results in various courts of law. He lacked credible evidence so his efforts failed.
It was after he had exhausted the legal means to challenge the outcome that he resorted to illegal means. Now he claims he is immune from prosecution for those actions.

Your fatuous spin isn't working. Have you noticed?

It is all in the timing -
Congress was about to address the impropriety regarding the election at the exact moment that the chaos happened.

Because of the chaos they were never heard, and Biden was installed.

Did the chaos help or hurt President Trump?

This is an easy one -

The possible answers are -

Help
Hurt


Pick one.

 

[Billiejeens]

By the time he committed crimes related to Jan. 6 any possibility of alleged "irregularities" having a consequential affect on the election had been thoroughly investigated and shown to be baseless.
He availed himself of the opportunity to challenge the results in various courts of law. He lacked credible evidence so his efforts failed.
It was after he had exhausted the legal means to challenge the outcome that he resorted to illegal means. Now he claims he is immune from prosecution for those actions.

Your fatuous spin isn't working. Have you noticed?

I've noticed that the country is in a spiral free fall and that President Trump is on track to regain the Presidency.

 

[berg80]

It is all in the timing -
Congress was about to address the impropriety regarding the election at the exact moment that the chaos happened.

Because of the chaos they were never heard, and Biden was installed.

Did the chaos help or hurt President Trump?

This is an easy one -

The possible answers are -

Help
Hurt


Pick one.

There was no impropriety. That had already been proven. Biden was elected, not installed.

As I said earlier, the entire construct of your belief system is founded on lies. All you're doing now is proving me right.

 

[Billiejeens]

There was no impropriety. That had already been proven. Biden was elected, not installed.

As I said earlier, the entire construct of your belief system is founded on lies. All you're doing now is proving me right.

Hurt
Help

Pick one.

 

[Billiejeens]

There was no impropriety. That had already been proven. Biden was elected, not installed.

As I said earlier, the entire construct of your belief system is founded on lies. All you're doing now is proving me right.

Again your biggest problem may be the fact that you don't know what goes on in the real world and how things work.

 

[Nostra]

They are out there and they are out there in droves. The people who are making them come from all quarters, including former members of his first administration.

Former Trump officials are among the most vocal opponents of returning him to the White House​

NEW YORK (AP) — Former Defense Secretary Mark Esper has called him a “threat to democracy.” Former national security adviser John Bolton has declared him “unfit to be president.” And former Vice President Mike Pence has declined to endorse him, citing “profound differences.”

As Donald Trump seeks the presidency for a third time, he is being vigorously opposed by a vocal contingent of former officials who are stridently warning against his return to power and offering dire predictions for the country and the rule of law if his campaign succeeds.

It’s a striking chorus of detractors, one without precedent in the modern era, coming from those who witnessed first-hand his conduct in office and the turmoil that followed.

Sarah Matthews, a former Trump aide who testified before the House Jan. 6 committee and is among those warning about the threat he poses, said it’s “mind-boggling” how many members of his senior staff have denounced him.

Former Trump officials are among the most vocal opponents of returning him to the White House

As Trump seeks the presidency a third time, he’s being shadowed by a chorus of people who served in his administration who have become sharp critics, some offering dire predictions about his return to power.

apnews.com

The reasons for the warnings are as varied as the people making them. Some point to Project 2025, an authoritarian playbook centering on tearing down what is widely referred to as the "administrative state." Replacing it with those who pass a test of loyalty to the person who would head up an unitary executive with newly, expansive power. Some point to his immorality, some to witnessing first hand his incompetence and impetuous behavior, some to the virtually incomprehensible times he has run afoul of the law and basic decency. They all boil down to the same thing. They fear he will break us.

My answer to those concerns is, we are already broken.

We, the people, can not agree on who the legitimate leader of the country is. We can not agree on how to view the events that transpired on Jan. 6 nor who is responsible for them. We no longer agree adherence to a basic moral code is a prerequisite for holding high office. We do not agree on whether both threats and acts of violence in someone's name should be condemned by that person. We are at virtual polar opposite sides when it comes to environmental, immigration, gun control, and abortion policies. We can't agree on elemental facts, making constructive discourse and effective governance impossible. We do not agree as to the reasons for historic congressional inaction while there is a pressing need for action on many fronts. We can not agree on the best way to move forward. That is not sustainable.

Can we be fixed? I believe we can. We are on the cusp of deciding whether to begin that process this coming November.

Grab your Binky and stay under your bed, Buttercup.

 

[berg80]

Again your biggest problem may be the fact that you don't know what goes on in the real world an how things work.

IRONY ALERT!

 

[Billiejeens]

IRONY ALERT!

Help
Hurt

Pick one.