The Bolton Bombshell (from his book)

[protectionist]

huh? dude, too fking special.

You didn't know that?

know what?

Testimony before the House exonerated Biden. You didn't know that?

What??????

Shoulda read the testimony. The idea to fire Shokin didn’t come from Biden. It pulls out the lynchpin from the accusation.

That's not what Biden said (on video)

 

[protectionist]

know what?

Testimony before the House exonerated Biden. You didn't know that?

What??????

Shoulda read the testimony. The idea to fire Shokin didn’t come from Biden. It pulls out the lynchpin from the accusation.

No it doesn't.....only to a partisan hack would it

The accusation is that Biden got Shokin fired to help
Hunter.

If Biden wasn’t the one who came up with the idea to fire Shokin, it destroys the accusation.

What "if"?
Biden claimed he was the one. Case closed.

 

[protectionist]

The White House is now trying to suppress Bolton's book. I wonder why...LOL

Trump is afraid. Afraid of the truth being revealed. The truth that his entire administration is a one big shitshow.

It seems to be a crime syndicate, run by a mob boss.... imo.

You mean the Bidens' ?

 

[Lakhota]

Who needs to hear witnesses when you’ve already made up your mind about the case against Trump?

President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial is hurtling toward a showdown over whether the Senate will call witnesses to testify ― namely, former national security adviser John Bolton, who has written a book manuscript that effectively confirms the quid pro quo at the heart of the impeachment charges.

Republican senators argue that calling Bolton or virtually any other witnesses would be a waste of time — because their vote won’t change. That argument is an accidental admission of the essential truth of this trial: Republicans are prepared to acquit Trump no matter what.

TRUMP DEFENSE MESS: ‘CORRUPTION’ EXCUSE FALLS APART

So what. Get over it.

 

[protectionist]

Yeah right, baby biden got the job two days after Devon Archer met with poppa joe at the WH. Shoken was fired shortly after Devon Archer met with Kerry at the State Dept. Burisma bought access to the maobama regime, it's just that simple. Also it's been proven that 4 other close relatives of poppa joe made millions while poppa joe was VP. The bidens are drity as hell.

.

Does anyone at the State Dept back up your version of events?

Yep.

.

Please tell. Who?

State dept emails and visitor list released under FOIA.

.

Still looking for evidence anyone did anything wrong. Devon Archer meeting with Kerry isn't illegal. Neither is a lawyer from Burisma meeting with the State Dept. The allegation is that Burisma got the Biden's to fire Shokin. There's no evidence that happened. Actually evidence to the contrary.

The evidence is the Biden video, bragging about extorting the Ukranians to do his bidding.

 

[protectionist]

Oh it's still a part of the story. But the concern about Shokin's corruption came from the bottom up. The embassy staff in Ukraine had been getting fed up with Shokin's corruption and brought their concern to Biden and recommended that he be removed. Biden agreed and helped

And you know this how?

No one in the State Dept says that they were pressured by Burisma or Joe Biden to get Shokin fired.

The State Department did not issue an ultimatum to Ukraine officials....Joe Biden did.

Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story

Joe Biden issued the ultimatum at the recommendation of the State Dept.

Which implicates Obama and Hillary in addition to Biden. You want testimony ? How about the Durham report ?

 

[protectionist]

ever heard of legal remedies to fix that? Why didn't he show up? he didn't work for the white house why the sudden change?
To sell books maybe?

Yes. The legal remedy is to call his as a witness during the Senate trial.

Good luck with that. I am going to laugh my ass off when you dipshits call him and he agrees with Trump that there was no quid pro quo..

What do we expect?.
Deferment cowards stick together

Deferments? Why are you hung up on something that hasn't existed in over 40 years?

When and where did you serve, or is your lack of service an embarrassment for you that you project on others?

Cowards got deferments.
I presume you know the cons dad gave the doctor an apt in exchange for the bone spur diagnosis?
As for me darlin I had the crap bombed out of me as a child. Saw dead neighbors in the next shelter.
Dad away 10 years fighting in Burma and Middle East.
Yes, I am hung up
You??

So that's what did it , huh ?

 

[protectionist]

View attachment 303102 And we’re investigating the greatest president in the history of America

Read the book, Profiles in Corruption to learn about the Biden FAMILY.

What has that got to do with the con??

What does your retarded posting have to do with this thread?

Retarded? Stupid insult!!
Dead giveaway for zero college?
Just commentating on the stupid pic and...because Biden is an idiot, that makes the wife raper ok??
And omg I might have guessed, Peter sweitzer!!!
Books loaded with errors and bias?
Clinton Cash Author Peter Schweizer's Long History Of Errors, Retractions, And Questionable Sourcing

"Long history of redactions and errors??"
How's the gateway pundit these days??

View attachment 303102 And we’re investigating the greatest president in the history of America

Read the book, Profiles in Corruption to learn about the Biden FAMILY.

What has that got to do with the con??

What does your retarded posting have to do with this thread?

Retarded? Stupid insult!!
Dead giveaway for zero college?
Just commentating on the stupid pic and...because Biden is an idiot, that makes the wife raper ok??
And omg I might have guessed, Peter sweitzer!!!
Books loaded with errors and bias?
Clinton Cash Author Peter Schweizer's Long History Of Errors, Retractions, And Questionable Sourcing

"Long history of redactions and errors??"
How's the gateway pundit these days??

Gateway pundit is in excellent health.

 

[flacaltenn]

Chaos defines the first three years of the Trump Administration, it has now infected the members of the Trump's Lawyers, from Rudy to the current crop of lawyers now putting all watchers to sleep.

In wake of Bolton book news, White House allies say Trump lawyers bungled defense


Reports that John Bolton has written a firsthand account of the president’s direct involvement in withholding aid to Ukraine has left some Republicans confused and angry over the legal strategy by the president’s defense team — which has devoted much of its arguments in the Senate impeachment trial to arguing that no such firsthand evidence existed.

One Republican operative who advises the White House said he was “flabbergasted at how stupidly they have handled this.”

Trump attorney Mike Purpura argued Saturday that “not a single witness testified that the president himself said that there was any connection between any investigations and security assistance, a presidential meeting or anything else.”

Oh great.. Michael Isakoff... Cough cough...

This reminds me of one of the ORIGINAL "Golden Oldie" fake news stories... The one about the new WH staff being SO DUMB, they were meeting in dark rooms because they couldn't find the light switch....

That's when I knew the "mainstream media" had caught the derangement pandemic...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Our idiot President weighs in:

"if I listened to him, we would be in World War Six by now, and goes out and IMMEDIATELY writes a nasty & untrue book. All Classified National Security. ..."

All untrue, yet all classified information. Amazing.

Our President is an utter moron.

 

[miketx]

Chaos defines the first three years of the Trump Administration, it has now infected the members of the Trump's Lawyers, from Rudy to the current crop of lawyers now putting all watchers to sleep.

In wake of Bolton book news, White House allies say Trump lawyers bungled defense


Reports that John Bolton has written a firsthand account of the president’s direct involvement in withholding aid to Ukraine has left some Republicans confused and angry over the legal strategy by the president’s defense team — which has devoted much of its arguments in the Senate impeachment trial to arguing that no such firsthand evidence existed.

One Republican operative who advises the White House said he was “flabbergasted at how stupidly they have handled this.”

Trump attorney Mike Purpura argued Saturday that “not a single witness testified that the president himself said that there was any connection between any investigations and security assistance, a presidential meeting or anything else.”

Need butt hurt cream?

 

[WEATHER53]

So his book is considered evidence enough to qualify him as a witness?

 

[flacaltenn]

Chaos defines the first three years of the Trump Administration, it has now infected the members of the Trump's Lawyers, from Rudy to the current crop of lawyers now putting all watchers to sleep.

In wake of Bolton book news, White House allies say Trump lawyers bungled defense


Reports that John Bolton has written a firsthand account of the president’s direct involvement in withholding aid to Ukraine has left some Republicans confused and angry over the legal strategy by the president’s defense team — which has devoted much of its arguments in the Senate impeachment trial to arguing that no such firsthand evidence existed.

One Republican operative who advises the White House said he was “flabbergasted at how stupidly they have handled this.”

Trump attorney Mike Purpura argued Saturday that “not a single witness testified that the president himself said that there was any connection between any investigations and security assistance, a presidential meeting or anything else.”

Well for chaos he's done a damned find job.

UE is the lowest its been in 50 years, there are jobs all across the country and the economy is doing great. Hell those that play the stock market are doing fine as well.

I'll take that chaos all day every day. LOL

What evidence will you provide to prove anything trump has done to benefit the middle class, working class who live pay check to pay check and the very poor who work two or more part time jobs at minimum wage with no benefits?

I'll answer for you. Nothing. trump brags about the economy, based solely on the Stock Market, and only when it is growing. Have you noticed it too is chaotic?

Sadly no evidence has been put forth to prove trump has done anything to benefit , "the middle class, working class who live pay check to pay check and the very poor who work two or more part time jobs at minimum wage with no benefits"

All they have are single data points if and only if they support something The President feels will impress his biddable base. Anything which report a failure, such as the massive deficit left us by trump during the past fiscal year is never mentioned.

You wont see the effects unless you look dynamically at the YEAR OVER YEAR curves for wages versus inflation or wages versus CPI --- but it IS THERE.. Along with employment numbers that DRIVE wage inflation..

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So his book is considered evidence enough to qualify him as a witness?

No, the fact that he was NSA and has first-hand testimony qualifies him as a witness. The book is a sneak peek into his testimony.

 

[Faun]

When did they take that subpoena to court to have it enforced?

It is just a figment of your pathetically screwed imagination.

The asked them to appear, the only subpoena that was issued was taken to court and the commies withdrew it.

.

That's not true. Article 2 of the impeachment says this:
(1) Directing the White House to defy a lawful subpoena by withholding the production of documents sought therein by the Committees.

(2) Directing other Executive Branch agencies and offices to defy lawful subpoenas and withhold the production of documents and records from the Committees — in response to which the Department of State, Office of Management and Budget, Department of Energy, and Department of Defense refused to produce a single document or record.

(3) Directing current and former Executive Branch officials not to cooperate with the Committees — in response to which nine Administration officials defied subpoenas for testimony, namely John Michael “Mick” Mulvaney, Robert B. Blair, John A. Eisenberg, Michael Ellis, Preston Wells Griffith, Russell T. Vought, Michael Duffey, Brian McCormack, and T. Ulrich Brechbuhl.

Wow, I notice Bolten isn't on that list, but you also need to check the facts and stop relying on commie lies. But let's assume that is correct, why didn't the commies go to court to enforce their subpoenas? They are the ones that tried to shortcut the system. Now they're asking the senate to do the job the chose not to do.

.

Since when does Congress have to go to court to enforce a subpoena? Court is an option, but it's not their only option.

Separation of powers says they do.

The Constitution gives the Congress oversight of the president.

 

[Faun]

When did they take that subpoena to court to have it enforced?

It is just a figment of your pathetically screwed imagination.

The asked them to appear, the only subpoena that was issued was taken to court and the commies withdrew it.

.

That's not true. Article 2 of the impeachment says this:
(1) Directing the White House to defy a lawful subpoena by withholding the production of documents sought therein by the Committees.

(2) Directing other Executive Branch agencies and offices to defy lawful subpoenas and withhold the production of documents and records from the Committees — in response to which the Department of State, Office of Management and Budget, Department of Energy, and Department of Defense refused to produce a single document or record.

(3) Directing current and former Executive Branch officials not to cooperate with the Committees — in response to which nine Administration officials defied subpoenas for testimony, namely John Michael “Mick” Mulvaney, Robert B. Blair, John A. Eisenberg, Michael Ellis, Preston Wells Griffith, Russell T. Vought, Michael Duffey, Brian McCormack, and T. Ulrich Brechbuhl.

Wow, I notice Bolten isn't on that list, but you also need to check the facts and stop relying on commie lies. But let's assume that is correct, why didn't the commies go to court to enforce their subpoenas? They are the ones that tried to shortcut the system. Now they're asking the senate to do the job the chose not to do.

.

Since when does Congress have to go to court to enforce a subpoena? Court is an option, but it's not their only option.

Yep, the other option is to hold the person in contempt, we've seen how effective that is.

.

And another option, when it involves the president, VP, or civil officer -- is impeachment.

 

[beagle9]

So his book is considered evidence enough to qualify him as a witness?

No, the fact that he was NSA and has first-hand testimony qualifies him as a witness. The book is a sneak peek into his testimony.

His (Bolton's testimony), is compromised, and it's worthless because of the events that turned him into a hostile witness that is to be based upon his dismissal from his position in the administration. The demos know this, yet they grab for any straw they can grab for in their charade, even if it is somehow thought to be found in the hands of their conflicted always hated opposition.

 

[beagle9]

The asked them to appear, the only subpoena that was issued was taken to court and the commies withdrew it.

.

That's not true. Article 2 of the impeachment says this:
(1) Directing the White House to defy a lawful subpoena by withholding the production of documents sought therein by the Committees.

(2) Directing other Executive Branch agencies and offices to defy lawful subpoenas and withhold the production of documents and records from the Committees — in response to which the Department of State, Office of Management and Budget, Department of Energy, and Department of Defense refused to produce a single document or record.

(3) Directing current and former Executive Branch officials not to cooperate with the Committees — in response to which nine Administration officials defied subpoenas for testimony, namely John Michael “Mick” Mulvaney, Robert B. Blair, John A. Eisenberg, Michael Ellis, Preston Wells Griffith, Russell T. Vought, Michael Duffey, Brian McCormack, and T. Ulrich Brechbuhl.

Wow, I notice Bolten isn't on that list, but you also need to check the facts and stop relying on commie lies. But let's assume that is correct, why didn't the commies go to court to enforce their subpoenas? They are the ones that tried to shortcut the system. Now they're asking the senate to do the job the chose not to do.

.

Since when does Congress have to go to court to enforce a subpoena? Court is an option, but it's not their only option.

Separation of powers says they do.

The Constitution gives the Congress oversight of the president.

You mean that do nothing Congress that may have been compromised over the years ??

 

[Faun]

Since when is getting to the truth a waste of time?

The commies said they had a slam dunk case, what happened to that? The truth is the bidens are dirty as hell, you folks don't seem to interested in learning the facts about that.

.

There was more than enough testimony in front of the House to indict Trump. Republicans have a higher standard of proof than normal people so we really are going to have to slap them in the face with it.

There was more than enough testimony before the House to tell us that Biden wasn't doing anything wrong. You don't seem interested in acknowledging that.

Yeah right, baby biden got the job two days after Devon Archer met with poppa joe at the WH. Shoken was fired shortly after Devon Archer met with Kerry at the State Dept. Burisma bought access to the maobama regime, it's just that simple. Also it's been proven that 4 other close relatives of poppa joe made millions while poppa joe was VP. The bidens are drity as hell.

.

Idiot, we had been trying to get Shokin out for six months before he was finally sacked. Others had been trying even longer. Shokin wasn't pursuing Zelensky but Shokin's replacement did. Getting Shokin out had nothing to do Archer, Kerry or Hunter Biden.

Then why wasn't the ultimatum given much earlier, the loan guarantees were authorize more than a year earlier. BTW why would Shokin be investigating Zelensky?

.

Because the funds were not yet appropriated back then. Also, Poroshenko has said he would get rid of Shokin so there was no need to play hardball. But then 6 months later, funds were appropriated and Poroshenko had still not gotten rid of Shokin.

 

[Faun]

Still looking for evidence anyone did anything wrong. Devon Archer meeting with Kerry isn't illegal. Neither is a lawyer from Burisma meeting with the State Dept. The allegation is that Burisma got the Biden's to fire Shokin. There's no evidence that happened. Actually evidence to the contrary.

Really, possibly the most corrupt business in Ukraine had access to some of the highest levels of our government. You don't see that as a problem? Then you have our government officials violating the tenants of the UN charter by interfering in the internal affairs of another country. You don't see that as a problem?

.

There is no tenant in the UN charter that prevents us from creating conditions to our monetary aid.

A lawyer at Burisma might have gotten a meeting with someone you've never heard of before. I'd be more worried if they actually affected policy. Which they didn't.

LMAO, they got the prosecutor in Ukraine fired not too long after he raided the home of the Burisma owner. I'd say they affected policy. And meetings with the VP and Sec of State are almost as high as you can go in our government. Burisma spent their money well.

.

That "raid" first occurred more than a year earlier. If that was the catalyst to get Biden to force out thd Prosecutor General, then why didn't Biden do that when the Ukrainian government first seized Zelensky's assets??

Why don't you figure out which "Z" names you wish to discuss and get back to me. Zelensky wasn't even in the picture at that time, you do know he assumed the office of Ukraine's president in May 2019, right? I'm beginning to think you're too senile to even bother with. LMAO

.

Sorry, meant Zlochevsky....

That "raid" first occurred more than a year earlier. If that was the catalyst to get Biden to force out thd Prosecutor General, then why didn't Biden do that when the Ukrainian government first seized Zlochevsky's assets??