Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, he didnt the Bank said that they dont assume the ESTIMATE given by an applicant is always right so do their own assessment. It was an estimate, and EVERYONE estimates high when asking for loans EVERYONE.And lied on the paperwork.
I win.
She took large sums of money out of her campaign ... and kept some of the cash .. she explicitly stated "I took out a large amount of money on my first campaign ..I kept some of the cash of that .." she admitted to using campaign funds to fund her sexual exploits. You can spin it however you want .. she embezzled funds and admitted it. Oops.Thank you for the link. The word campaign exists exactly once at the link.
Here is the quote: "When I took out a large amount of money on my first campaign, I kept some of the cash of that. Like, to tell you, I just have cash in my house. I don't have as much today as I would normally have, but I'm building back up now. So you just put money in. It's a very good practice. I would advise it to all women."
That is not saying she took money out of her campaign finances (i.e. donor money). It's say she took a large amount of money out of her personal accounts, kept part of it in cash, AND THEN used the remainder (i.e. $50,000) to give to the campaign for funding.
If I take $60,000 out of my personal accounts, keep $10,000, and then donate $50,000 -- that does not mean I took $10K from a campaign account.
The key is she said she took money out (of her personal accounts) "on my first campaign", which does not mean took money FROM the campaign.
WW
.
.
.
View attachment 904911
Again, for the slow and amazingly STUPID, Trump did not accuse her of anything, another defendant brought the Charges and Trump and several of the other Defendents joined the case.If Willis is removed from the case, the prosecution will likely never happen. It definitely won't happen before the election and that's the whole point of the exercise, - to delay this case until after the election and Trump wins, or seizes power.
The ONLY way Trump can have Willis removed from the case is to prove the she is financially benefitting from her prosecution of this case. She has to be proven to be making money from the prosecution.
To that end, Trump is claiming that Ms. Willis, who reports a net worth of $8 million and annual income of $1.5 million from multiple investments and sources, is prosecuting Donald Trump in order to obtain less than $20,000 in free travel benefits from Fulton County over the past 2+ years.
See also slut shaming. How dare this woman who has been divorced since 2005, have sex with a co-worker in 2022, who separated from his wife in 2019. What a slattern!! These black women have no morals.
Notice how "morality" is always defined by sex with these assholes. A woman who has sex is "immoral". A man who has sex is a real stud.
She took large sums of money out of her campaign ... and kept some of the cash .. she explicitly stated "I took out a large amount of money on my first campaign ..I kept some of the cash of that .." she admitted to using campaign funds to fund her sexual exploits. You can spin it however you want .. she embezzled funds and admitted it. Oops.
Unethical, sexual driven encounter using campaign funds to have sexual encounters.
She can't even explain how she paid for her outstanding lean .. so sorry that your hope in Georgia isn't going well for you.That isn't saying what you are trying to imply.
Took money out "ON my first campaign" not took money out "OF my first campaign".
"What I was talking about is I ran for judge. When I ran for judge, I took $50,000 of my personal money out of my retirement and that money ended up being lost. And I know when you bet on yourself, you're going to have to bet money on yourself. And so, what I was talking about was not wanting to go to the personal financial expense of running for office. By no means that I think that I was going to be financially in a bad position once I won. Let's talk about what I was up against because it's important to understand that comment."
Read the transcript and look at the context, she is clearly talking about her own money. She took out extra. If I take $60,000 out of my personal accounts, keep $10,000, and then donate $50,000 -- that does not mean I took $10K from a campaign account.
I mean at the end of the day, you are free to believe as you wish, but you claim is not what she said and the Judge will rule based on what's was presented in court and is in the transcripts.
WW
She can't even explain how she paid for her outstanding lean .. so sorry that your hope in Georgia isn't going well for you.
Wrong.Oh - "different" kind of crook... uh-huh, so only Trumps kind of crookedness is what matters.
Gotcha
Willis admitted she was had cash shortages .. It's laughable you're defending this unethical district attorney. Too many questions and not enough answers. How convenient she only pays cash for sexual ventures.View attachment 904918
Who cares how she paid off a tax bill, the woman is worth $8M and paid off a tax lien of $4600 at some point in the past.
Whoopie.
WW
Correct. There is nothing here that has a real impact on the Trump case. I’ve even heard the Trumpers try to claim that it was corrupt for her to hire her underqualified boyfriend. Well underqualified helps Trump so that argument is meaningless. I’ve asked several times for somebody to explain the actual connection to the case and nobody can. They just like to call her corrupt and demean her… red meatI am wondering what this has to do with the Georgia case against Trump and others.
I havent been following it closely so I might have missed something.
But she had an affair with a colleague on the case. That is not unusual in any walk of life. It seems that there are questions about some receipts.
But how does it impact on the case against trump. Ms Willis has already scalped several of the conspirators in this case. It doesnt look good for those who are still standing.
If she is brought down surely someone else would take up the case and see it to its conclusion ?
That is what would happen in a civilised country that is run by the rule of law.
I cant see a link between Ms Willis and the case against trump. It seems to be clutching at strawx.
Trump DA Fani Willis fights back on the stand in Georgia election interference case: 'I'm not on trial.'
Fani Willis took the stand Thursday, testifying about her relationship with Nathan Wade, the lead lawyer in Trump's Georgia election interference case.uk.news.yahoo.com
Was this guy staff or a private attorney hired as an outside contractor (special prosecutor)? Seem like a grey areaAlso Fani violated another legal statute by not disclosing the relationship. They had her read the stipulation for a D.A. to report any relationships with other lawyers on staff they are dating. She seemed to have no idea that law existed.
Huh? Where are you getting 100s of thousands from?We are talking hundreds of thousands of cash gains. . . was that reported?
She is an obviously a corrupt individual who brought a corrupt prosecution to court. We cant believe anything from her investigation.I am wondering what this has to do with the Georgia case against Trump and others.
I havent been following it closely so I might have missed something.
But she had an affair with a colleague on the case. That is not unusual in any walk of life. It seems that there are questions about some receipts.
But how does it impact on the case against trump. Ms Willis has already scalped several of the conspirators in this case. It doesnt look good for those who are still standing.
If she is brought down surely someone else would take up the case and see it to its conclusion ?
That is what would happen in a civilised country that is run by the rule of law.
I cant see a link between Ms Willis and the case against trump. It seems to be clutching at strawx.
Trump DA Fani Willis fights back on the stand in Georgia election interference case: 'I'm not on trial.'
Fani Willis took the stand Thursday, testifying about her relationship with Nathan Wade, the lead lawyer in Trump's Georgia election interference case.
Dude, this is why the open ended credit line to Zelensky keeps growing.If Trump is a crook, so is 95% of all U.S. Presidents if this is your measure.
She was disgruntled after being fired for what?That was a claim by a disgruntled employee that was given the choice or resign or be fired.
All of this is just distracting tabloid static.Again, for the slow and amazingly STUPID, Trump did not accuse her of anything, another defendant brought the Charges and Trump and several of the other Defendents joined the case.
That’s the great thing about the courts. You don’t just believe the prosecutors… they need to prove their case using evidence. I know it’s a wild concept for you Trumpers but that’s how it works.She is an obviously a corrupt individual who brought a corrupt prosecution to court. We cant believe anything from her investigation.
Willis admitted she was had cash shortages .. It's laughable you're defending this unethical district attorney. Too many questions and not enough answers. How convenient she only pays cash for sexual ventures.
Well, nobody has proven he broke the law.
And yes, this impacts Trump case, and well..every case she's brought...she is now proven to have committed a fraud on the court. Nothing she touched can be credible
Much like when you all put your faith in Michael Avanitti....I am starting to see a trend among the Dembots and their "get trump" heroes .... they are all crooked
Yes he was in private practice with two other lawyers at the time.Was this guy staff or a private attorney hired as an outside contractor (special prosecutor)? Seem like a grey area
