Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
39% is up from 35%????Where do we find increasing acceptance/popularity at 39%?Holy crap! This is just the craziest thing ever!I know, I know. Partisans don't like people who think for themselves.You can't ever satisfy a fence sitter.
Because they aren't interested in reality. They're just interested in hovering between right and wrong, without ever having to cast a line out themselves. They reject accountability for everything, and they think they can get out of accountability by whining over and over "everybody is equally stupid/evil/wrong" whatever.
Always happy to give a clear and specific accounting of my stand on any issue at any time. All ya gotta do is ask.
So polls matter again, right?
.
"Partisans don't like people who think for themselves."
I know that the Nazis hated partisans in enemy-occupied Yugoslavia, Italy, and parts of eastern Europe....
...I hope there's nothing auto-biographical in your post!
PC starts a thread about polls that favor her guy (kind of, for him), but refuses to say whether polls even matter!
I love this place!
.
You see, normal people, those who actually have an opinion might say why they agree that Trump's increasing acceptance/popularity is good or bad.
Not you!
You'll latch on to anything but an articulate position....
What are you so afraid of: no one knows who you are.
You didn't know that?
What is radical about his agenda, in your own words?Fake, dupe. DUHHHHHHH.Yeah, I'm a joke in Dupe World. But you all are a joke the real world. TY, TYVM. So Soros is a Nazi? lol.It's the GOP way- Low profile thievery, incompetence, corruption and pander to the rich, high profile attacks and wars, bs propaganda and character assassination- works great for about 8 years, then wrecks the world...
Really, from a shill from the party whose motto is "lie, cheat, and steal" and "the end justifies the means"?
I think not, sorry. Your last OP is a candidate for worst ever of all time. Maybe you should reconsider your relevancy.
Boy you're as sharp as a marble.
Speak for yourself. lol. You dupes NEVER learn...Yeah, I'm a joke in Dupe World. But you all are a joke the real world. TY, TYVM. So Soros is a Nazi? lol.It's the GOP way- Low profile thievery, incompetence, corruption and pander to the rich, high profile attacks and wars, bs propaganda and character assassination- works great for about 8 years, then wrecks the world...
Really, from a shill from the party whose motto is "lie, cheat, and steal" and "the end justifies the means"?
I think not, sorry. Your last OP is a candidate for worst ever of all time. Maybe you should reconsider your relevancy.
Boy you're as sharp as a marble.
Was George Soros an SS Officer in Nazi Germany? - Snopes.com
www.snopes.com/george-soros-ss-nazi-germany/
Nov 28, 2016 - A viral image purportedly showing a young George Soros in a Nazi SS uniform actually depicts an Auschwitz guard named Oskar Groening.
As a prominent political activist and supporter of left-wing causes, Hungarian-born billionaire financierGeorge Soros has frequently been the target of smear campaigns, none more ridiculous than the claim (which first surfaced in November 2016) that he served as an officer of the Schutzstaffel (SS) in Nazi Germany during World War II.
The rumor made the social media rounds in late 2016 in the form of a black-and-white photograph of a young man — supposedly Soros — wearing an SS uniform, accompanied by this descriptive text:
.. I give you George Soros. A SS in the National Socialist German workers party. Nazi party. He served under Adolf Hitler and Heinrich Himmler. He said it was the best time of his life. The destruction and agony around him was euphoric to him. This man was making policy with Hillary Clinton. And some of you think Trump is dangerous. Wow!
Wow, indeed. As hoaxes go, this one was neither plausible nor hard to disprove. Given that Soros — bornin 1930 — was only nine years old when World War II began and 14 when the war ended in Europe in 1945, he couldn’t have joined the SS, whose minimum age requirement was 17, even if he had wanted to. Moreover, Soros would never have met the SS requirement for pure “Aryan” heritage. Quite to the contrary, Soros grew to adolescence as a persecuted Jew in Nazi-occupied Budapest.
So how old WAS he when he was helping Jews to escape, dupe?
Congratulations on being a stupid turd!.
LOL
You suck, shillboy.
Human Events’ readers, in an online poll, recently voted billionaire financier George Soros “the single most destructive leftist demagogue in the country.” Here are the Top 10 Reasons George Soros Is Dangerous:
1. Gives billions to left-wing causes: Soros started the Open Society Institute in 1993 as a way to spread his wealth to progressive causes. Using Open Society as a conduit, Soros has given more than $7 billion to a who’s who of left-wing groups. This partial list of recipients of Soros’ money says it all: ACORN, Apollo Alliance, National Council of La Raza, Tides Foundation, Huffington Post, Southern Poverty Law Center, Soujourners, People for the American Way, Planned Parenthood, and the National Organization for Women.
2. Influence on U.S. elections: Soros once said that removing President George W. Bush from office in 2004 was the “central focus of my life.” He put his money where his mouth is, giving $23.58 million to various 527 groups dedicated to defeating Bush. His early financial support helped jump-start Barack Obama’s political career. Soros hosted a 2004 fund-raiser for Obama when he was running for the Illinois Senate and gave the maximum-allowed contribution within hours of Obama’s announcement that he was running for President.
3. Wants to curtail American sovereignty: Soros would like nothing better than for America to become subservient to international bodies. He wants more power for groups such as the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, even while saying the U.S. role in the IMF should be “downsized.” In 1998, he wrote: “Insofar as there are collective interests that transcend state boundaries, the sovereignty of states must be subordinated to international law and international institutions.”
4. Media Matters: Soros is a financial backer of Media Matters for America, a progressive media watchdog group that hyperventilates over any conservative view that makes it into the mainstream media. Now its founder, David Brock, has openly declared war on Fox News, telling Politico that the group was mounting “guerrilla warfare and sabotage” against the cable news channel, and would try to disrupt the commercial interests of owner Rupert Murdoch—an odd mission for a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt educational foundation that is barred from participating in partisan political activity.
5. MoveOn.org: Soros has been a major funder of MoveOn.org, a progressive advocacy group and political action committee that raises millions for liberal candidates. This is the group that had on its website an ad comparing President George W. Bush to Adolf Hitler and ran the infamous “General Betray Us” ad in the New York Times, disparaging the integrity of Gen. David Petraeus.
6. Center for American Progress: Headed by John Podesta, White House chief of staff under President Clinton, the Center for American Progress has been instrumental in providing progressive talking points and policy positions for the Obama administration. There has also been a revolving door between the White House and the Soros-funded think tank, with Obama staffing his administration with many CAP officials.
7. Environmental extremism: Former Obama green jobs czar Van Jones and his leftist environmental ideas have been funded by Soros’ money at these groups: the Ella Baker Center, Green For All, the Center for American Progress, and the Apollo Alliance, which was instrumental in getting $110 billion in green initiatives included in Obama’s stimulus package. Soros also funds the Climate Policy Initiative to address global warming and gave Friends of the Earth money to “integrate a climate equity perspective in the presidential transition.”
8. America Coming Together: Soros gave nearly $20 million to this 527 group with the express purpose of defeating President Bush. A massive get-out-the-vote effort, ACT’s door-to-door canvassing teams included numerous felons, its voter registration drives were riddled with fraud, and it handed out incendiary fliers and made misleading taped phone calls to voters. ACT was fined $775,000 by the Federal Election Commission for violations of various federal campaign finance laws.
9. Currency manipulation: A large part of Soros’ multibillion-dollar fortune has come from manipulating currencies. During the 1997 Asian financial crisis, Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir bin Mohamad accused him of bringing down the nation’s currency through his trading activities, and in Thailand he was called an “economic war criminal.” Known as “The Man who Broke the Bank of England,” Soros initiated a British financial crisis by dumping 10 billion sterling, forcing the devaluation of the currency and gaining a billion-dollar profit.
10. Delusions: Soros has repeatedly said that he sees himself as a messianic figure. Who but a megalomaniac would make these comments? “I admit that I have always harbored an exaggerated view of my self-importance—to put it bluntly, I fancied myself as some kind of god” or “I carried some rather potent messianic fantasies with me from childhood, which I felt I had to control, otherwise I might end up in the loony bin.” If only the loony bin were an option. As it is, one of the wealthiest men in the world is using his billions to impose a radical agenda on America.
Trump won with 54% of the vote, we need to deduct illegal aliens and "The Stupid Vote"
Okay, so we're back to polls mattering again?
Or in reality, Hillary won by 3%, and if you subtract the dupes who believe she's corrupt and is going to be locked up for imaginary scandals that have all been investigated and NOTHING!!!, she won by about 25%...Oh well, having Trump in and all your bs being revealed to him and the country may be even better in the long run...at least I was spot on a year before the election where I saw a 56/44 ass whooping landslide,,,,,and deducting the illegal/dead and stupid votes
1. Seems that Trump got 46% of the vote...
"Donald Trump, With 46 Percent of the Vote, Is the First Sore Loser to Be Elected President"
Donald Trump, With 46 Percent of the Vote, Is the First Sore Loser to Be Elected President
That was in November....
2. ...and for weeks we heard this:
"Donald Trump Is the Least Popular President-Elect in Modern History ..."
Donald Trump Is the Least Popular President-Elect in Modern History
And they've worked hard to keep that going.
3. But.....this morning:
"The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Monday shows that 50% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance."
Daily Presidential Tracking Poll - Rasmussen Reports™
Soooo......lots who didn't vote for President Trump, over 5 million likely voters.....seem to have changed their minds.
Even with the full-court press by the the press!!!!
Democrats.....crying towels ready?
You can't ever satisfy a fence sitter.Okay, so we're back to polls mattering again?
Geeeee.....you're never happy!
I provided polls from both sides.....that should satisfy a fence-sitter like you.
Because they aren't interested in reality. They're just interested in hovering between right and wrong, without ever having to cast a line out themselves. They reject accountability for everything, and they think they can get out of accountability by whining over and over "everybody is equally stupid/evil/wrong" whatever.
I love needling him with this:
"There's Nothing in the Middle of the Road but Yellow Stripes and Dead Armadillos"
Jim Hightower-TX writer-politician
I wonder why such a straightforward question has you spinning and deflecting so hard.Okay, does two plus two usually equal four?So do polls matter again?Oh that's a new twist. "If you have an opinion, you can't think for yourself. But if you think everybody is stupid, then you're insightful!"
You sound like a retard.
Boy, sure is tough getting a direct answer around here!
.
I am startin' to worry about you....perseveration is a sign of schizophrenia....
Just checking here!
.
You're worried about your total number of cerebral neurons???
Too late.
At least it's down to a manageable number.
Oh, I'm just kidding.
I know why.
.
1. Seems that Trump got 46% of the vote...
"Donald Trump, With 46 Percent of the Vote, Is the First Sore Loser to Be Elected President"
Donald Trump, With 46 Percent of the Vote, Is the First Sore Loser to Be Elected President
That was in November....
2. ...and for weeks we heard this:
"Donald Trump Is the Least Popular President-Elect in Modern History ..."
Donald Trump Is the Least Popular President-Elect in Modern History
And they've worked hard to keep that going.
3. But.....this morning:
"The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Monday shows that 50% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance."
Daily Presidential Tracking Poll - Rasmussen Reports™
Soooo......lots who didn't vote for President Trump, over 5 million likely voters.....seem to have changed their minds.
Even with the full-court press by the the press!!!!
Democrats.....crying towels ready?
I believe Gallup over Rasmussen any day.
Majority in US No Longer Thinks Trump Keeps His Promises
Thanks, much appreciated.I wonder why such a straightforward question has you spinning and deflecting so hard.Okay, does two plus two usually equal four?So do polls matter again?
Boy, sure is tough getting a direct answer around here!
.
I am startin' to worry about you....perseveration is a sign of schizophrenia....
Just checking here!
.
You're worried about your total number of cerebral neurons???
Too late.
At least it's down to a manageable number.
Oh, I'm just kidding.
I know why.
.
I am going to give you an answer------> Yes polls matter, for about 10 minutes. They show a snapshot in time, nothing else. A poll can say one thing today, and with a gaff or change of wording, it can say something else next week.
The most important part of a poll is the trend, as that is more accurate then the percentage. As long as the trend is going in the direction you want, you are succeeding.
As far as the percentage, you draw a baseline; in this case the % of the vote Trump got to win. Most competent people would take 10 snapshots a week apart, average them out, and see if he is above his baseline. In this case, I do not think he is.
Hope this help you. Everyone loves to cherry pick polls, this poll, that poll, or the other poll. What they fail to watch is the trend! With a decent sample size of data points, you can usually tell what is going on. With that, let me say------------->there was NEVER a doubt that Trump would win the Presidency from Hillary, IF he could pick when the vote was. The trends showed he was constantly closing on her, but it was felt that her lead was big enough he could not catch her before November the 8th. The Democrats knew it too, trust me, I know-) So it wasn't a shocker he won, just that he was able to win in November. Unfortunately for him, that is when the election is/was. He was lucky, but then so was Obama when he faced Romney, lol. But that is a different story!
Thanks, much appreciated.I wonder why such a straightforward question has you spinning and deflecting so hard.Okay, does two plus two usually equal four?I am startin' to worry about you....perseveration is a sign of schizophrenia....
Just checking here!
.
You're worried about your total number of cerebral neurons???
Too late.
At least it's down to a manageable number.
Oh, I'm just kidding.
I know why.
.
I am going to give you an answer------> Yes polls matter, for about 10 minutes. They show a snapshot in time, nothing else. A poll can say one thing today, and with a gaff or change of wording, it can say something else next week.
The most important part of a poll is the trend, as that is more accurate then the percentage. As long as the trend is going in the direction you want, you are succeeding.
As far as the percentage, you draw a baseline; in this case the % of the vote Trump got to win. Most competent people would take 10 snapshots a week apart, average them out, and see if he is above his baseline. In this case, I do not think he is.
Hope this help you. Everyone loves to cherry pick polls, this poll, that poll, or the other poll. What they fail to watch is the trend! With a decent sample size of data points, you can usually tell what is going on. With that, let me say------------->there was NEVER a doubt that Trump would win the Presidency from Hillary, IF he could pick when the vote was. The trends showed he was constantly closing on her, but it was felt that her lead was big enough he could not catch her before November the 8th. The Democrats knew it too, trust me, I know-) So it wasn't a shocker he won, just that he was able to win in November. Unfortunately for him, that is when the election is/was. He was lucky, but then so was Obama when he faced Romney, lol. But that is a different story!
Finally some intellectual honesty here.
.
That's probably at least the fifth or sixth time you've posted to me on this thread, after I asked you a clear and direct question. So you're still in avoidance mode.Thanks, much appreciated.I wonder why such a straightforward question has you spinning and deflecting so hard.Okay, does two plus two usually equal four?
Just checking here!
.
You're worried about your total number of cerebral neurons???
Too late.
At least it's down to a manageable number.
Oh, I'm just kidding.
I know why.
.
I am going to give you an answer------> Yes polls matter, for about 10 minutes. They show a snapshot in time, nothing else. A poll can say one thing today, and with a gaff or change of wording, it can say something else next week.
The most important part of a poll is the trend, as that is more accurate then the percentage. As long as the trend is going in the direction you want, you are succeeding.
As far as the percentage, you draw a baseline; in this case the % of the vote Trump got to win. Most competent people would take 10 snapshots a week apart, average them out, and see if he is above his baseline. In this case, I do not think he is.
Hope this help you. Everyone loves to cherry pick polls, this poll, that poll, or the other poll. What they fail to watch is the trend! With a decent sample size of data points, you can usually tell what is going on. With that, let me say------------->there was NEVER a doubt that Trump would win the Presidency from Hillary, IF he could pick when the vote was. The trends showed he was constantly closing on her, but it was felt that her lead was big enough he could not catch her before November the 8th. The Democrats knew it too, trust me, I know-) So it wasn't a shocker he won, just that he was able to win in November. Unfortunately for him, that is when the election is/was. He was lucky, but then so was Obama when he faced Romney, lol. But that is a different story!
Finally some intellectual honesty here.
.
Many of us are still awaiting some intellectual courage, on your part.
Can we get our hopes up???
Mainly 10 days after the scumbag GOP FBI director said she was being investigated- against all protocol and absolutely idiotic. Caused a 6% collapse. He could have said at any time that Russian hacking of Dems was real and there was interest in Trump campaign connections, but NOOOOOO....ay caramba. Crap, with a 6% win we could have a tax hike on the bloated rich, investment in cheap training for 4-6 million tech jobs going begging, free or very cheap public and community college and college loans, a huge infrastructure bill with millions of jobs, a living wage and tax cuts for the middle class, legal and taxed pot, reform of ACA and cost regulation and higher subsidies with more competition, closing background check loopholes etc etc. So enjoy the tax cut for the rich!I wonder why such a straightforward question has you spinning and deflecting so hard.Okay, does two plus two usually equal four?So do polls matter again?
Boy, sure is tough getting a direct answer around here!
.
I am startin' to worry about you....perseveration is a sign of schizophrenia....
Just checking here!
.
You're worried about your total number of cerebral neurons???
Too late.
At least it's down to a manageable number.
Oh, I'm just kidding.
I know why.
.
I am going to give you an answer------> Yes polls matter, for about 10 minutes. They show a snapshot in time, nothing else. A poll can say one thing today, and with a gaff or change of wording, it can say something else next week.
The most important part of a poll is the trend, as that is more accurate then the percentage. As long as the trend is going in the direction you want, you are succeeding.
As far as the percentage, you draw a baseline; in this case the % of the vote Trump got to win. Most competent people would take 10 snapshots a week apart, average them out, and see if he is above his baseline. In this case, I do not think he is.
Hope this help you. Everyone loves to cherry pick polls, this poll, that poll, or the other poll. What they fail to watch is the trend! With a decent sample size of data points, you can usually tell what is going on. With that, let me say------------->there was NEVER a doubt that Trump would win the Presidency from Hillary, IF he could pick when the vote was. The trends showed he was constantly closing on her, but it was felt that her lead was big enough he could not catch her before November the 8th. The Democrats knew it too, trust me, I know-) So it wasn't a shocker he won, just that he was able to win in November. Unfortunately for him, that is when the election is/was. He was lucky, but then so was Obama when he faced Romney, lol. But that is a different story!
