Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you agree with state Senator Jensen's position?
GOP Lawmaker Says Businesses Should Be Allowed To Deny Services To Black People
Do you believe that a business should have the right to discriminate based on race? Do you believe that business should have the right to serve or not serve anyone, for any reason?
The question wasn't aimed at me, but yes.
We have freedom of association per the 1st Amendment:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The government should not force people to associate against their will. Anyone who is stupid enough to deny their business to others is self-destructive, but the Constitution isn't there to protect an individual from himself.
Glad to see an honest enough conservative/libertarian that admits it's OK to discriminate, we need more of them like you
But YES the Constitution IS there to protect the minority from the majority!
The Constitution is there to protect individuals from government power. It is not there to force individuals to interact with each other. I can just as easily turn your argument back on you by claiming that the Antigay baker is a minority who needs to be protected from the PC majority (which is actually another minority). The the extent The Constitution protects a minority from the majority, it's along the lines of The Right To Be Left Alone.
In the area of rights, the simplest most basic purpose of the Consitution is to protect equal rights, The Constitution was never meant to endorse discrimination.
You clearly have no idea what The Constitution is.
The article, btw, is brilliant,
mostly because it elaborates on exactly what people like myself have been trying to explain to you ineducable fools for years.
Here's the truth
The Conservative Fantasy History of Civil Rights -- NYMag
The civil rights movement was never a far left wing movement. More revisionist history.
REALLY? lol
Yeah, really.
WTF does that have to do with anything lol?Do you believe that a business should have the right to discriminate based on race? Do you believe that business should have the right to serve or not serve anyone, for any reason?
When was the last time that you went to eat at a Chinese restaurant and were served by a red-headed Irish lass or a lanky Ethiopian man?
When was the last time that happened to you? Describe the last waitress who served you at a Chinese restaurant.
Do you agree with state Senator Jensen's position?
GOP Lawmaker Says Businesses Should Be Allowed To Deny Services To Black People
The question wasn't aimed at me, but yes.
We have freedom of association per the 1st Amendment:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The government should not force people to associate against their will. Anyone who is stupid enough to deny their business to others is self-destructive, but the Constitution isn't there to protect an individual from himself.
Glad to see an honest enough conservative/libertarian that admits it's OK to discriminate, we need more of them like you
But YES the Constitution IS there to protect the minority from the majority!
The Constitution is there to protect individuals from government power. It is not there to force individuals to interact with each other. I can just as easily turn your argument back on you by claiming that the Antigay baker is a minority who needs to be protected from the PC majority (which is actually another minority). The the extent The Constitution protects a minority from the majority, it's along the lines of The Right To Be Left Alone.
In the area of rights, the simplest most basic purpose of the Consitution is to protect equal rights, The Constitution was never meant to endorse discrimination.
You clearly have no idea what The Constitution is.
Sure, we'll believe conservatives who NEVER stand on the correct side of ANY history, to be a better judge of the Constitution, lol
Do you believe that a business should have the right to discriminate based on race? Do you believe that business should have the right to serve or not serve anyone, for any reason?
The question wasn't aimed at me, but yes.
We have freedom of association per the 1st Amendment:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The government should not force people to associate against their will. Anyone who is stupid enough to deny their business to others is self-destructive, but the Constitution isn't there to protect an individual from himself.
Glad to see an honest enough conservative/libertarian that admits it's OK to discriminate, we need more of them like you
But YES the Constitution IS there to protect the minority from the majority!
The Constitution is there to protect individuals from government power. It is not there to force individuals to interact with each other. I can just as easily turn your argument back on you by claiming that the Antigay baker is a minority who needs to be protected from the PC majority (which is actually another minority). The the extent The Constitution protects a minority from the majority, it's along the lines of The Right To Be Left Alone.
In the area of rights, the simplest most basic purpose of the Consitution is to protect equal rights, The Constitution was never meant to endorse discrimination.
Do you believe that a business should have the right to discriminate based on race? Do you believe that business should have the right to serve or not serve anyone, for any reason?
The question wasn't aimed at me, but yes.
We have freedom of association per the 1st Amendment:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The government should not force people to associate against their will. Anyone who is stupid enough to deny their business to others is self-destructive, but the Constitution isn't there to protect an individual from himself.
Glad to see an honest enough conservative/libertarian that admits it's OK to discriminate, we need more of them like you
But YES the Constitution IS there to protect the minority from the majority!
The Constitution is there to protect individuals from government power. It is not there to force individuals to interact with each other. I can just as easily turn your argument back on you by claiming that the Antigay baker is a minority who needs to be protected from the PC majority (which is actually another minority). The the extent The Constitution protects a minority from the majority, it's along the lines of The Right To Be Left Alone.
The article, btw, is brilliant,
mostly because it elaborates on exactly what people like myself have been trying to explain to you ineducable fools for years.
Here's the truth
The Conservative Fantasy History of Civil Rights -- NYMag
The civil rights movement was never a far left wing movement. More revisionist history.
REALLY? lol
Yeah, really.
Let me guess, CONSERVATIVES were just misunderstood at the time right? It WASN'T die hard liberal/progress dives who freed the slaves, fought for woman's rights, civil rights, labor laws that stopped child labor? No it was conservatives who stood with US right? lol
Wallace was a progressive.Liberal or Conservative?
Glad to see an honest enough conservative/libertarian that admits it's OK to discriminate, we need more of them like you
But YES the Constitution IS there to protect the minority from the majority!
The Constitution is there to protect individuals from government power. It is not there to force individuals to interact with each other. I can just as easily turn your argument back on you by claiming that the Antigay baker is a minority who needs to be protected from the PC majority (which is actually another minority). The the extent The Constitution protects a minority from the majority, it's along the lines of The Right To Be Left Alone.
In the area of rights, the simplest most basic purpose of the Consitution is to protect equal rights, The Constitution was never meant to endorse discrimination.
You clearly have no idea what The Constitution is.
Sure, we'll believe conservatives who NEVER stand on the correct side of ANY history, to be a better judge of the Constitution, lol
I'll post something that you just might comprehend:
I am rubber
You are glue
Everything you say
Bounces off me
And sticks to you
Do you believe that a business should have the right to discriminate based on race? Do you believe that business should have the right to serve or not serve anyone, for any reason?
The question wasn't aimed at me, but yes.
We have freedom of association per the 1st Amendment:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The government should not force people to associate against their will. Anyone who is stupid enough to deny their business to others is self-destructive, but the Constitution isn't there to protect an individual from himself.
Glad to see an honest enough conservative/libertarian that admits it's OK to discriminate, we need more of them like you
But YES the Constitution IS there to protect the minority from the majority!
The Constitution is there to protect individuals from government power. It is not there to force individuals to interact with each other. I can just as easily turn your argument back on you by claiming that the Antigay baker is a minority who needs to be protected from the PC majority (which is actually another minority). The the extent The Constitution protects a minority from the majority, it's along the lines of The Right To Be Left Alone.
In the area of rights, the simplest most basic purpose of the Consitution is to protect equal rights, The Constitution was never meant to endorse discrimination.
You clearly have no idea what The Constitution is.
No the Constitution ISN'T there to protect FROM ONLY Gov't power!
WTF does that have to do with anything lol?Do you believe that a business should have the right to discriminate based on race? Do you believe that business should have the right to serve or not serve anyone, for any reason?
When was the last time that you went to eat at a Chinese restaurant and were served by a red-headed Irish lass or a lanky Ethiopian man?
When was the last time that happened to you? Describe the last waitress who served you at a Chinese restaurant.
Anti-gay baker Melissa Klein cried at the Values Voter Summit last week over the closing of her business after she and her husband, Aaron, faced severe backlash from their refusal to make a cake for a lesbian couple's wedding.
In January 2013, Sweet Cakes By Melissa, located in Gresham, Ore., refused service to a lesbian couple looking for a wedding cake.
...Following outrage over the business's anti-gay actions, Sweet Cakes By Melissa eventually chose to shut down their storefront rather than serve gay clients but the bakery is currently operating out of a home kitchen and is still taking orders online.
Melissa Klein Anti-Gay Baker Cries At Values Voter Summit Over Business Closing
Colorado Baker Jack Phillips Appeals Order To Provide Gay Wedding Cakes
Colorado Baker Jack Phillips Appeals Order To Provide Gay Wedding Cakes
Do you believe that a business should have the right to discriminate based on race? Do you believe that business should have the right to serve or not serve anyone, for any reason?
The question wasn't aimed at me, but yes.
We have freedom of association per the 1st Amendment:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The government should not force people to associate against their will. Anyone who is stupid enough to deny their business to others is self-destructive, but the Constitution isn't there to protect an individual from himself.
Glad to see an honest enough conservative/libertarian that admits it's OK to discriminate, we need more of them like you
But YES the Constitution IS there to protect the minority from the majority!
The Constitution is there to protect individuals from government power. It is not there to force individuals to interact with each other. I can just as easily turn your argument back on you by claiming that the Antigay baker is a minority who needs to be protected from the PC majority (which is actually another minority). The the extent The Constitution protects a minority from the majority, it's along the lines of The Right To Be Left Alone.
In the area of rights, the simplest most basic purpose of the Consitution is to protect equal rights, The Constitution was never meant to endorse discrimination.
STFU with your totalitarian thought control. You have no authority to tell me what the Constitution means. There is no equal right to be liked. There is a human right to choose one's associations.
You placing the almighty dollar above people's human rights is disgusting.
The question wasn't aimed at me, but yes.
We have freedom of association per the 1st Amendment:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The government should not force people to associate against their will. Anyone who is stupid enough to deny their business to others is self-destructive, but the Constitution isn't there to protect an individual from himself.
Glad to see an honest enough conservative/libertarian that admits it's OK to discriminate, we need more of them like you
But YES the Constitution IS there to protect the minority from the majority!
The Constitution is there to protect individuals from government power. It is not there to force individuals to interact with each other. I can just as easily turn your argument back on you by claiming that the Antigay baker is a minority who needs to be protected from the PC majority (which is actually another minority). The the extent The Constitution protects a minority from the majority, it's along the lines of The Right To Be Left Alone.
In the area of rights, the simplest most basic purpose of the Consitution is to protect equal rights, The Constitution was never meant to endorse discrimination.
You clearly have no idea what The Constitution is.
What? Still pining for the 3/5th clause?
No the Constitution ISN'T there to protect FROM ONLY Gov't power!
If you wife prefers to be examined by a female gynecologist can the government force her to be examined by a male gynecologist in order to prevent her from being a damn,dirty, disgusting sexual discriminator?
Do you believe that a business should have the right to discriminate based on race? Do you believe that business should have the right to serve or not serve anyone, for any reason?
The question wasn't aimed at me, but yes.
We have freedom of association per the 1st Amendment:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The government should not force people to associate against their will. Anyone who is stupid enough to deny their business to others is self-destructive, but the Constitution isn't there to protect an individual from himself.
Glad to see an honest enough conservative/libertarian that admits it's OK to discriminate, we need more of them like you
But YES the Constitution IS there to protect the minority from the majority!
The Constitution is there to protect individuals from government power. It is not there to force individuals to interact with each other. I can just as easily turn your argument back on you by claiming that the Antigay baker is a minority who needs to be protected from the PC majority (which is actually another minority). The the extent The Constitution protects a minority from the majority, it's along the lines of The Right To Be Left Alone.
In the area of rights, the simplest most basic purpose of the Consitution is to protect equal rights, The Constitution was never meant to endorse discrimination.
STFU with your totalitarian thought control. You have no authority to tell me what the Constitution means. There is no equal right to be liked. There is a human right to choose one's associations.
....
You're so easy to prove wrong it's like shooting fish in a barrel.Bull Shit, Wallace was so Conservative he offered to run as VP with Goldwater.Wallace was a progressive.What part of history do you claim that article attempts to rewrite?This is rich. Lefwing hacksite Politico has a bit of racialist propaganda aimed at Low Info types. They are attempting to gin up the GOP Racism canard...with a photo of George Wallace.
Race and the Modern GOP - Doug McAdam and Karina Kloos - POLITICO Magazine
Too funny by half.
View attachment 32421
Of course he was a Democrat.. Geezez.
What ideology was he Stephanie?
Liberal or Conservative?
/oops.
The principal achievement of Wallace's first term was an innovation in Alabama industrial development that several other states later copied: he was the first Southern governor to travel to corporate headquarters in Northern and Northeastern states to offer tax abatements and other incentives to companies willing to locate plants in Alabama.
He also initiated a junior college system that has now spread throughout the state, preparing many students to complete four-year degrees at Auburn University, UAB, or the University of Alabama. Lurleen B. Wallace Community College in Andalusia is named for Wallace's first wife, Lurleen Burns Wallace.
The University of South Alabama, a new state university in Mobile, was chartered in 1963 during Wallace's first year in office as governor.
His platform contained generous increases for beneficiaries of Social Security and Medicare. Wallace's foreign policy positions set him apart from the other candidates in the field. "If the Vietnam War was not winnable within 90 days of his taking office, Wallace pledged an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops ... Wallace described foreign aid as money 'poured down a rat hole' and demanded that European and Asian allies pay more for their defense."[35]]
No the Constitution ISN'T there to protect FROM ONLY Gov't power!
If you wife prefers to be examined by a female gynecologist can the government force her to be examined by a male gynecologist in order to prevent her from being a damn,dirty, disgusting sexual discriminator?
Good spin, NOTHING relevant to YOUR argument however. Try again
