Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL. Is that what you believe?
Which type of demagoguery do you feel, "this article is a prime example of demagoguery in action"?
Here's a reference which may help, or expose you:
Demagoguery An Attempt at Classification -
*Boom*Not sure how you consistently post the most worthless drivel. Is it a talent?Rabbi logic in a nutshell --> Oh, look ... that tree is green ... that car is green ... that must mean that car is a tree.Carter was a liberal. Carter won the same states Wallace did.
Facts really suck when you're wrong, don't they?
People voted for Wallace for a variety of reasons. People also voted for Carter for a variety of reasons.
It is irrelevant and a stupid argument.
The salient point is that once you strip out the racist baggage Wallace was a progressive. He supported big government and higher expenditures on projects to produce jobs in his states. About what Obama proposes now.
Thanks so much for sharing Wabbit.
I do need to apologize for insulting all Bunnies, I had no intention to insult the intelligence of those ladies who work for Mr Heffner. They are women of substance, Wabbit's substance is the stuff kaopectate was developed to prevent.
Tell me Wabitt, how many people voted for Wallace only because he was a racist? How do you know what motivated people to vote for Wallace? You barely have enough information to properly tie your shoes.
Not sure how you consistently post the most worthless drivel. Is it a talent?Rabbi logic in a nutshell --> Oh, look ... that tree is green ... that car is green ... that must mean that car is a tree.Carter was a liberal. Carter won the same states Wallace did.Was Jimmy Carter a liberal?
The question was, did George Wallace win 5 states in the South because he was a liberal?
Jimmy Carter was a Southern moderate, and Gerald Ford was a Republican moderate.
Facts really suck when you're wrong, don't they?
People voted for Wallace for a variety of reasons. People also voted for Carter for a variety of reasons.
It is irrelevant and a stupid argument.
The salient point is that once you strip out the racist baggage Wallace was a progressive. He supported big government and higher expenditures on projects to produce jobs in his states. About what Obama proposes now.
So Wallace's progressivism, or populism, or both, did not include his racism/segregationist beliefs. That is what you're saying.
That is what we're saying.
LOL (again) another new effort by a RWer to establish a universal truth which isn't, by an appeal to ignorance and an appeal to authority.
BTW, have you yet figured out the type of demagoguery you alleged?
"The civil rights movement, while a victory on many levels, was also the origin of our present morass.
"It spawned a powerful national 'white resistance' countermovement that decisively altered the racial geography of American politics, pushing the national Democratic and Republican parties off center and toward their ideological margins, undermining the centrist policy convergence of the postwar period and setting the parties on the divisive course they remain on today.
"Many will blame today’s unprecedented political polarization on recent events, such as the rise of the Tea Party or Obama’s election in 2008, but they will be wrong.
"The seeds of America’s dysfunction were planted 50 years ago. And the ugly politics of race had everything to do with it.
Race and the Modern GOP - Doug McAdam and Karina Kloos - POLITICO Magazine
Conservatives, Democrat and Republican alike, overwhelmingly supported the status quo of racial segregation fifty years ago just as they support racist attacks on Islam today.
Somethings never change
Is that the sound of reality crashing your tiny brain with the realization that once you strip out the racial angle Wallace was a progressive/populist and therefore right at home in today's Democrat Party? You know, what I've been saying here for pages and pages?*Boom*Not sure how you consistently post the most worthless drivel. Is it a talent?Rabbi logic in a nutshell --> Oh, look ... that tree is green ... that car is green ... that must mean that car is a tree.
People voted for Wallace for a variety of reasons. People also voted for Carter for a variety of reasons.
It is irrelevant and a stupid argument.
The salient point is that once you strip out the racist baggage Wallace was a progressive. He supported big government and higher expenditures on projects to produce jobs in his states. About what Obama proposes now.
Thanks so much for sharing Wabbit.
I do need to apologize for insulting all Bunnies, I had no intention to insult the intelligence of those ladies who work for Mr Heffner. They are women of substance, Wabbit's substance is the stuff kaopectate was developed to prevent.
Tell me Wabitt, how many people voted for Wallace only because he was a racist? How do you know what motivated people to vote for Wallace? You barely have enough information to properly tie your shoes.
Not sure how you consistently post the most worthless drivel. Is it a talent?Rabbi logic in a nutshell --> Oh, look ... that tree is green ... that car is green ... that must mean that car is a tree.Carter was a liberal. Carter won the same states Wallace did.The question was, did George Wallace win 5 states in the South because he was a liberal?
Jimmy Carter was a Southern moderate, and Gerald Ford was a Republican moderate.
Facts really suck when you're wrong, don't they?
People voted for Wallace for a variety of reasons. People also voted for Carter for a variety of reasons.
It is irrelevant and a stupid argument.
The salient point is that once you strip out the racist baggage Wallace was a progressive. He supported big government and higher expenditures on projects to produce jobs in his states. About what Obama proposes now.
So Wallace's progressivism, or populism, or both, did not include his racism/segregationist beliefs. That is what you're saying.
That is what we're saying.
LOL (again) another new effort by a RWer to establish a universal truth which isn't, by an appeal to ignorance and an appeal to authority.
BTW, have you yet figured out the type of demagoguery you alleged?
Again, I point out that democrats are shameless liars. Anyone who cares to check can easily confirm that the segregationists were leftists. Will you humiliate yourself for your filthy party by claiming that Fritz Hollings was "conservative?"
Ernest Hollings - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Oh but that doesn't count, right? I mean whitey votes Republican - democrats hate whitey - ergo the Segregationists were Republican. Party above all, amirite?
So what about Faubus? You lying fucks love to claim he was "conservative," doncha?
Orval Faubus - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
How do you explain the electoral swing between 1956 and 1964 if not for national white resistance to the Civil Rights Act?"The civil rights movement, while a victory on many levels, was also the origin of our present morass.
"It spawned a powerful national 'white resistance' countermovement that decisively altered the racial geography of American politics, pushing the national Democratic and Republican parties off center and toward their ideological margins, undermining the centrist policy convergence of the postwar period and setting the parties on the divisive course they remain on today.
"Many will blame today’s unprecedented political polarization on recent events, such as the rise of the Tea Party or Obama’s election in 2008, but they will be wrong.
"The seeds of America’s dysfunction were planted 50 years ago. And the ugly politics of race had everything to do with it.
Race and the Modern GOP - Doug McAdam and Karina Kloos - POLITICO Magazine
Conservatives, Democrat and Republican alike, overwhelmingly supported the status quo of racial segregation fifty years ago just as they support racist attacks on Islam today.
Somethings never change
It's funny that this was all settling - until Barack Obama and his brand of racist hatred came on the scene.
Oh and WHAT national white resistance? Like most leftists, McAdam is making shit up out of thin air.
When old Abe and the Republican party raised that slavery thing, self respecting conservative southerners became Democrats. They were Democrat in name but not in philosophy, but they had no other place to go. So the Democrat party ended up with the solid south conservatives voting Democratic those Democrats had different beliefs than the Democratic party. Then FDR started the splitting those Southern Democrats off from the Democratic party. Oh they wanted the votes but just not them. Truman gave the Southern conservative Democrats the biggest shove out of the party. It was tough to lose all those southern votes but it was done. The south tried their own party but it didn't work so they bit the bullet and joined the (ugh) party of Lincoln. The conservative southerner is now a Republican in name and philosophy, but that split causes as much confusion, as did the liberals of the founding period calling themselves Republicans. Conservatives today love to play with those names because they can make Jefferson a conservative and George Wallace a Democrat.
More rich people are liberals than conservative, Nimrod.
The RWnuts say that Southern segregationists were liberals, the Nazis were liberals, Stalin was a liberal...
...and it's the Democrats who are trying to rewrite history?
lol
LOL, anyone wonder why I believe Rabbi is dumb as a bunny; from now on he's Wabbit to me.
Translation: It's true but I need to say something witty that sounds like a refutation.More rich people are liberals than conservative, Nimrod.
Koch Brothers tell 'ya that?
Says the guy who has faked his entire resume here.LOL, anyone wonder why I believe Rabbi is dumb as a bunny; from now on he's Wabbit to me.
Rabbi isn't dumb, he's a shill.
"Orval Faubus joined the Communist party... Al Gore was a Klansman....Bull Conner was a self-described Socialist."A typically misleading article that the rubes on the Left eat up.
What does it mean to be "left" or "right" on civil rights issues today? It sure isnt the same thing it meant in 1965. In 1965 those on the "right" presumably were in favor of racial restrictions, in favor of racial quotas. In 2014 those same positions are held by those on the "left".
Racism never left the Democratic Party.
The "left" and the "right" meant exactly the same thing in 1950-65 as it does today.
Orval Faubus - the democrat who famously brought out the Arkansas national guard to block black students from entering Little Rock high school, only to be kicked back into the DNC gutter by Republican Dwight Eisenhower is often claimed by leftists to be a "conservative." Except a little research and one finds that Faubus, a bona fide hero of WWI, came back from the war and joined the COMMUNIST PARTY. When FDR was elected, Faubus switched to the democrats, stating the the goals of FDR and the goals of Communism were one and the same.
So was Faubus a "Conservative Communist?" It's utter stupidity - part of the "big lie" campaign of the filthy democratic party. But Faubus is just one democrat scumbag, what about others? What about Fritz Hollings - famous Klansman and racist? I mean, he was surely conservative, right? Well no, Hollings was leader of the far left through the Clinton Administration. How about Klansman Albert Gore - father of Algore - Pope of the AGW religion. Also far left, big government, welfare state advocate. Or maybe the infamous Eugene "Bull" Connor? Nope, Connor was a self-described Socialist. He viewed Negroes as a natural menial labor force for a Socialist state,
The Segregationists were the radical left of the party - racism and leftism are Siamese twins,
This thread gets funnier by the minute.
Counting on the stupid people to not know better unny?
Is that the sound of reality crashing your tiny brain with the realization that once you strip out the racial angle Wallace was a progressive/populist and therefore right at home in today's Democrat Party? You know, what I've been saying here for pages and pages?*Boom*Not sure how you consistently post the most worthless drivel. Is it a talent?
People voted for Wallace for a variety of reasons. People also voted for Carter for a variety of reasons.
It is irrelevant and a stupid argument.
The salient point is that once you strip out the racist baggage Wallace was a progressive. He supported big government and higher expenditures on projects to produce jobs in his states. About what Obama proposes now.
Thanks so much for sharing Wabbit.
I do need to apologize for insulting all Bunnies, I had no intention to insult the intelligence of those ladies who work for Mr Heffner. They are women of substance, Wabbit's substance is the stuff kaopectate was developed to prevent.
Tell me Wabitt, how many people voted for Wallace only because he was a racist? How do you know what motivated people to vote for Wallace? You barely have enough information to properly tie your shoes.
Not sure how you consistently post the most worthless drivel. Is it a talent?Rabbi logic in a nutshell --> Oh, look ... that tree is green ... that car is green ... that must mean that car is a tree.Carter was a liberal. Carter won the same states Wallace did.
Facts really suck when you're wrong, don't they?
People voted for Wallace for a variety of reasons. People also voted for Carter for a variety of reasons.
It is irrelevant and a stupid argument.
The salient point is that once you strip out the racist baggage Wallace was a progressive. He supported big government and higher expenditures on projects to produce jobs in his states. About what Obama proposes now.
So Wallace's progressivism, or populism, or both, did not include his racism/segregationist beliefs. That is what you're saying.
That is what we're saying.
Ideologies remain the same.
Parties throughout history, change.
It's the ideology that matters.
Also, when it comes to the Civil Rights shift in our country, it's sectional north/south.
Conservatives can't seem to grasp these factors and it's really not all that complex, but apparently a little too complex for some of them to wrap their heads around.
Thanks for admitting he was a populist/progressive.Is that the sound of reality crashing your tiny brain with the realization that once you strip out the racial angle Wallace was a progressive/populist and therefore right at home in today's Democrat Party? You know, what I've been saying here for pages and pages?*Boom*Thanks so much for sharing Wabbit.
I do need to apologize for insulting all Bunnies, I had no intention to insult the intelligence of those ladies who work for Mr Heffner. They are women of substance, Wabbit's substance is the stuff kaopectate was developed to prevent.
Tell me Wabitt, how many people voted for Wallace only because he was a racist? How do you know what motivated people to vote for Wallace? You barely have enough information to properly tie your shoes.
Not sure how you consistently post the most worthless drivel. Is it a talent?Rabbi logic in a nutshell --> Oh, look ... that tree is green ... that car is green ... that must mean that car is a tree.
People voted for Wallace for a variety of reasons. People also voted for Carter for a variety of reasons.
It is irrelevant and a stupid argument.
The salient point is that once you strip out the racist baggage Wallace was a progressive. He supported big government and higher expenditures on projects to produce jobs in his states. About what Obama proposes now.
So Wallace's progressivism, or populism, or both, did not include his racism/segregationist beliefs. That is what you're saying.
That is what we're saying.
Wallace was a states rights populist. That usually sells pretty good in the South.
Democrat good, republican bad. Neither party will do much to stop the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer. Still, a democrat will help you when you're down, a republican will kick you when you're down, as many posts on these forums prove. This thread is about repubs accusing dems trying to reinvent themselves. All I see is the opposite. Republicans trying to compare democrats to nazis, kkk'ers, racists, on and on. Please mr. nigg... I mean black man, come to the warm embrace of the loving republicans, we're the ones that set you free and all that. Get your lazy asses off welfare, then register republican.
