The Electoral College Can Be Stolen, But It Won't

Contumacious

Radical Freedom
Aug 16, 2009
19,744
2,473
280
Adjuntas, PR , USA
The Electoral College Can Be Stolen, But It Won't

A public servant in America will not successfully betray such a trusted confidence as the Electoral College, and get away with it.

Maybe one or two electors defect and no one bats an eye.

If more defected, enough to change the outcome of the election, a protest from the right would almost certainly take place. It wouldn’t be about crying on YouTube or knocking over garbage cans

No. Nothing like that. No one will see the protest coming from the right when the right stands up. The faithless electors in that situation won’t survive through Christmas. That’s how protests on the right really look.


_--------_________----------

Well, it appears that some folks will resort to VIOLENCE in order to prevent the EC from being misused. What do you think?


.
 
It's a fake news site.

That said, should the EC choose Hillary the butthurt will be the most epic in history ever.


Yes, indeed.

According to the author


"A public servant in America will not successfully betray such a trusted confidence as the Electoral College, and get away with it."
 
The EC choose Hillary?

Why?

She lost

She did win the popular vote, by more than 2%.

It's not at all likely that the EC will choose her, but they could.

And the only legal problem is a $450 fine, and even that isn't applicable to all of them.


So you people want to have the option to change the rules whenever you want to?

/
 
The EC choose Hillary?

Why?

She lost

She did win the popular vote, by more than 2%.

It's not at all likely that the EC will choose her, but they could.

And the only legal problem is a $450 fine, and even that isn't applicable to all of them.

From what I've read, no faithless elector has ever actually been prosecuted or fined.

Even if there were enough faithless electors to change the election results, I don't think it would be by giving Clinton enough electoral votes. A more likely scenario would be enough electors changing from Trump that neither candidate ends up with enough votes for the win and it is moved to the House, although the chances of even that are vanishingly small.
 
The EC choose Hillary?

Why?

She lost

She did win the popular vote, by more than 2%.

It's not at all likely that the EC will choose her, but they could.

And the only legal problem is a $450 fine, and even that isn't applicable to all of them.


So you people want to have the option to change the rules whenever you want to?

/

Change what rule?


Martial Law or Electoral College?

Clearly, the stage is set to blame Russia for a Trump victory. They are prepping the media who 99% endorse Hillary; the press conspiracy to feed propaganda to the American people is in full swing. Meanwhile, Obama continues to support the Sunni in the civil war with the intent to attack Russian forces in Syria. Our model still shows the largest turnout may take place here in 2016. This scares the blood, no matter how cold, right out of the veins of the career politicians. The American press is committing suicide and have succeeded in becoming indistinguishable from Pravda (“Truth”) of the old Soviet Union. Power corrupts everything, including the press.

There are two scenarios running around behind the curtain. I reported the one that Obama would declare martial law, suspend the constitution and remain in the presidency declining to allow Hillary or Trump to take the throne, he would step aside and hand to Joe Biden. Some counsel that is too extreme. Others are proposing that Obama still blames Russia, but then throw it to the Congress by means of the electoral college and that way keep it under the pretense of being constitutional. Anyway you cut it, this does not look like they will allow Trump to take the White House regardless of the vote."



 
The EC choose Hillary?

Why?

She lost

She did win the popular vote, by more than 2%.

It's not at all likely that the EC will choose her, but they could.

And the only legal problem is a $450 fine, and even that isn't applicable to all of them.


So you people want to have the option to change the rules whenever you want to?

/

Change what rule?


Martial Law or Electoral College?

Clearly, the stage is set to blame Russia for a Trump victory. They are prepping the media who 99% endorse Hillary; the press conspiracy to feed propaganda to the American people is in full swing. Meanwhile, Obama continues to support the Sunni in the civil war with the intent to attack Russian forces in Syria. Our model still shows the largest turnout may take place here in 2016. This scares the blood, no matter how cold, right out of the veins of the career politicians. The American press is committing suicide and have succeeded in becoming indistinguishable from Pravda (“Truth”) of the old Soviet Union. Power corrupts everything, including the press.

There are two scenarios running around behind the curtain. I reported the one that Obama would declare martial law, suspend the constitution and remain in the presidency declining to allow Hillary or Trump to take the throne, he would step aside and hand to Joe Biden. Some counsel that is too extreme. Others are proposing that Obama still blames Russia, but then throw it to the Congress by means of the electoral college and that way keep it under the pretense of being constitutional. Anyway you cut it, this does not look like they will allow Trump to take the White House regardless of the vote."



What does that have to do with Grandma's post and your response about changing the rules?
 
If any GOP electors change their vote they'll most likely vote for Kasich. If no one gets 270, then the house of representative votes between the 3 candidates that got the most electoral votes. That would probably be trump, Clinton and Kasich. Who do you think they choose?
 
If any GOP electors change their vote they'll most likely vote for Kasich. If no one gets 270, then the house of representative votes between the 3 candidates that got the most electoral votes. That would probably be trump, Clinton and Kasich. Who do you think they choose?
That would probably be trump, Clinton and Kasich. Who do you think they choose?

Trump or Kasich
 
The EC choose Hillary?

Why?

She lost

She did win the popular vote, by more than 2%.

It's not at all likely that the EC will choose her, but they could.

And the only legal problem is a $450 fine, and even that isn't applicable to all of them.


So you people want to have the option to change the rules whenever you want to?

/

Change what rule?


Martial Law or Electoral College?

Clearly, the stage is set to blame Russia for a Trump victory. They are prepping the media who 99% endorse Hillary; the press conspiracy to feed propaganda to the American people is in full swing. Meanwhile, Obama continues to support the Sunni in the civil war with the intent to attack Russian forces in Syria. Our model still shows the largest turnout may take place here in 2016. This scares the blood, no matter how cold, right out of the veins of the career politicians. The American press is committing suicide and have succeeded in becoming indistinguishable from Pravda (“Truth”) of the old Soviet Union. Power corrupts everything, including the press.

There are two scenarios running around behind the curtain. I reported the one that Obama would declare martial law, suspend the constitution and remain in the presidency declining to allow Hillary or Trump to take the throne, he would step aside and hand to Joe Biden. Some counsel that is too extreme. Others are proposing that Obama still blames Russia, but then throw it to the Congress by means of the electoral college and that way keep it under the pretense of being constitutional. Anyway you cut it, this does not look like they will allow Trump to take the White House regardless of the vote."



What does that have to do with Grandma's post and your response about changing the rules?


"Here comes the loophole. There is NO constitutional or federal law that compels an elector to honor any “pledge” and that is a hole big enough to fly a fleet of 747 planes through. Therefore, if they bullshit the people enough with the media supporting them, we will see the Electoral College hand it to Hillary regardless of how the people vote. "

.
 
The EC choose Hillary?

Why?

She lost

She did win the popular vote, by more than 2%.

It's not at all likely that the EC will choose her, but they could.

And the only legal problem is a $450 fine, and even that isn't applicable to all of them.

There's no such thing as the popular vote or a popular vote election hence she won jack shit, she lost and lost huge. She couldn't even win three of her own blue states PA, MI, and WI it was pathetic.
 
The EC choose Hillary?

Why?

She lost

She did win the popular vote, by more than 2%.

It's not at all likely that the EC will choose her, but they could.

And the only legal problem is a $450 fine, and even that isn't applicable to all of them.

There's no such thing as the popular vote or a popular vote election hence she won jack shit, she lost and lost huge. She couldn't even win three of her own blue states PA, MI, and WI it was pathetic.


Remember the FASCISTS/SOCIALISTS believe in the electoral process so long as they are the winners.


.
 
It's a fake news site.

That said, should the EC choose Hillary the butthurt will be the most epic in history ever.


It wouldn't be butt hurt it would be all out anarchy like you never have seen before.


.
 
It's a fake news site.

That said, should the EC choose Hillary the butthurt will be the most epic in history ever.


Yes, indeed.

According to the author


"A public servant in America will not successfully betray such a trusted confidence as the Electoral College, and get away with it."

So far Obama has managed to do exactly that but better days are coming.
 

Forum List

Back
Top