The Electoral College is as outdated as the 2nd Amendment

[Lakhota]

The Reason for the Electoral College

Q: Why does the U.S. have an Electoral College?

A: The framers of the Constitution didn’t trust direct democracy.

The reason that the Constitution calls for this extra layer, rather than just providing for the direct election of the president, is that most of the nation’s founders were actually rather afraid of democracy. James Madison worried about what he called “factions,” which he defined as groups of citizens who have a common interest in some proposal that would either violate the rights of other citizens or would harm the nation as a whole. Madison’s fear – which Alexis de Tocqueville later dubbed “the tyranny of the majority” – was that a faction could grow to encompass more than 50 percent of the population, at which point it could“sacrifice to its ruling passion or interest both the public good and the rights of other citizens.” Madison has a solution for tyranny of the majority: “A republic, by which I mean a government in which the scheme of representation takes place, opens a different prospect, and promises the cure for which we are seeking.”

As Alexander Hamilton writes in “The Federalist Papers,” the Constitution is designed to ensure “that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications.” The point of the Electoral College is to preserve “the sense of the people,” while at the same time ensuring that a president is chosen “by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station, and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice.”

In modern practice, the Electoral College is mostly a formality. Most electors are loyal members of the party that has selected them, and in 26 states, plus Washington, D.C., electors are bound by laws or party pledges to vote in accord with the popular vote. Although an elector could, in principle, change his or her vote (and a few actually have over the years), doing so is rare.

The Reason for the Electoral College - FactCheck.org

So, the framers of the Constitution didn't trust democracy. How nice. In reality, the Electoral College doesn't protect us from anything - since it is mostly a formality and most electors are loyal members of the party that selected them.

Wrong! The electoral college guarantees us a 100% United States when electing a president.

EXACTLY..


Otherwise , NY and California, the most leftist states , will be the ones electing a president.


.

Duh, the people would be the ones electing a president. One person - one vote!

 

[Sun Devil 92]

So, thanks to the founders' lack of foresight - we're going to get fucked tomorrow!

Well, actually some think they avoided getting screwed.

To bad Lakkyhota......sucks to be you.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

The Reason for the Electoral College

Q: Why does the U.S. have an Electoral College?

A: The framers of the Constitution didn’t trust direct democracy.

The reason that the Constitution calls for this extra layer, rather than just providing for the direct election of the president, is that most of the nation’s founders were actually rather afraid of democracy. James Madison worried about what he called “factions,” which he defined as groups of citizens who have a common interest in some proposal that would either violate the rights of other citizens or would harm the nation as a whole. Madison’s fear – which Alexis de Tocqueville later dubbed “the tyranny of the majority” – was that a faction could grow to encompass more than 50 percent of the population, at which point it could“sacrifice to its ruling passion or interest both the public good and the rights of other citizens.” Madison has a solution for tyranny of the majority: “A republic, by which I mean a government in which the scheme of representation takes place, opens a different prospect, and promises the cure for which we are seeking.”

As Alexander Hamilton writes in “The Federalist Papers,” the Constitution is designed to ensure “that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications.” The point of the Electoral College is to preserve “the sense of the people,” while at the same time ensuring that a president is chosen “by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station, and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice.”

In modern practice, the Electoral College is mostly a formality. Most electors are loyal members of the party that has selected them, and in 26 states, plus Washington, D.C., electors are bound by laws or party pledges to vote in accord with the popular vote. Although an elector could, in principle, change his or her vote (and a few actually have over the years), doing so is rare.

The Reason for the Electoral College - FactCheck.org

So, the framers of the Constitution didn't trust democracy. How nice. In reality, the Electoral College doesn't protect us from anything - since it is mostly a formality and most electors are loyal members of the party that selected them.

Wrong! The electoral college guarantees us a 100% United States when electing a president.

EXACTLY..


Otherwise , NY and California, the most leftist states , will be the ones electing a president.


.

Duh, the people would be the ones electing a president. One person - one vote!

Presidents should be elected based on national popular votes - not electoral votes based on acreage and just rubber-stamped by partisans!

Popular vote - not acres!

In each state, whichever party garners a majority of popular votes, regardless of how narrow the margin, wins all the electoral votes. By forcing residents in each state ultimately to vote as a block, the system is supposed to ensure that small states' interests are not drowned out by those of larger states.

U.S. Electoral Vote Map

But they'll be around long after you are gone and finally being the compost you are destined to become.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

The Reason for the Electoral College

Q: Why does the U.S. have an Electoral College?

A: The framers of the Constitution didn’t trust direct democracy.

The reason that the Constitution calls for this extra layer, rather than just providing for the direct election of the president, is that most of the nation’s founders were actually rather afraid of democracy. James Madison worried about what he called “factions,” which he defined as groups of citizens who have a common interest in some proposal that would either violate the rights of other citizens or would harm the nation as a whole. Madison’s fear – which Alexis de Tocqueville later dubbed “the tyranny of the majority” – was that a faction could grow to encompass more than 50 percent of the population, at which point it could“sacrifice to its ruling passion or interest both the public good and the rights of other citizens.” Madison has a solution for tyranny of the majority: “A republic, by which I mean a government in which the scheme of representation takes place, opens a different prospect, and promises the cure for which we are seeking.”

As Alexander Hamilton writes in “The Federalist Papers,” the Constitution is designed to ensure “that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications.” The point of the Electoral College is to preserve “the sense of the people,” while at the same time ensuring that a president is chosen “by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station, and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice.”

In modern practice, the Electoral College is mostly a formality. Most electors are loyal members of the party that has selected them, and in 26 states, plus Washington, D.C., electors are bound by laws or party pledges to vote in accord with the popular vote. Although an elector could, in principle, change his or her vote (and a few actually have over the years), doing so is rare.

The Reason for the Electoral College - FactCheck.org

So, the framers of the Constitution didn't trust democracy. How nice. In reality, the Electoral College doesn't protect us from anything - since it is mostly a formality and most electors are loyal members of the party that selected them.

Wrong! The electoral college guarantees us a 100% United States when electing a president.

EXACTLY..


Otherwise , NY and California, the most leftist states , will be the ones electing a president.


.

Duh, the people would be the ones electing a president. One person - one vote!

Nope.

 

[Contumacious]

The Reason for the Electoral College

Q: Why does the U.S. have an Electoral College?

A: The framers of the Constitution didn’t trust direct democracy.

The reason that the Constitution calls for this extra layer, rather than just providing for the direct election of the president, is that most of the nation’s founders were actually rather afraid of democracy. James Madison worried about what he called “factions,” which he defined as groups of citizens who have a common interest in some proposal that would either violate the rights of other citizens or would harm the nation as a whole. Madison’s fear – which Alexis de Tocqueville later dubbed “the tyranny of the majority” – was that a faction could grow to encompass more than 50 percent of the population, at which point it could“sacrifice to its ruling passion or interest both the public good and the rights of other citizens.” Madison has a solution for tyranny of the majority: “A republic, by which I mean a government in which the scheme of representation takes place, opens a different prospect, and promises the cure for which we are seeking.”

As Alexander Hamilton writes in “The Federalist Papers,” the Constitution is designed to ensure “that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications.” The point of the Electoral College is to preserve “the sense of the people,” while at the same time ensuring that a president is chosen “by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station, and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice.”

In modern practice, the Electoral College is mostly a formality. Most electors are loyal members of the party that has selected them, and in 26 states, plus Washington, D.C., electors are bound by laws or party pledges to vote in accord with the popular vote. Although an elector could, in principle, change his or her vote (and a few actually have over the years), doing so is rare.

The Reason for the Electoral College - FactCheck.org

So, the framers of the Constitution didn't trust democracy. How nice. In reality, the Electoral College doesn't protect us from anything - since it is mostly a formality and most electors are loyal members of the party that selected them.

Wrong! The electoral college guarantees us a 100% United States when electing a president.

EXACTLY..


Otherwise , NY and California, the most leftist states , will be the ones electing a president.


.

Duh, the people would be the ones electing a president. One person - one vote!

BULLSHIT, I DON'T TRUST YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKERS


NOT UNTIL A BLOODY CIVIL WAR GETS RID OF THE STUPID SONS OF BITCHES WHO CLAIM THAT FREE PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS TO DEFEND THEIR LIVES



As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.


.

 

[Lakhota]

The Reason for the Electoral College

Q: Why does the U.S. have an Electoral College?

A: The framers of the Constitution didn’t trust direct democracy.

The reason that the Constitution calls for this extra layer, rather than just providing for the direct election of the president, is that most of the nation’s founders were actually rather afraid of democracy. James Madison worried about what he called “factions,” which he defined as groups of citizens who have a common interest in some proposal that would either violate the rights of other citizens or would harm the nation as a whole. Madison’s fear – which Alexis de Tocqueville later dubbed “the tyranny of the majority” – was that a faction could grow to encompass more than 50 percent of the population, at which point it could“sacrifice to its ruling passion or interest both the public good and the rights of other citizens.” Madison has a solution for tyranny of the majority: “A republic, by which I mean a government in which the scheme of representation takes place, opens a different prospect, and promises the cure for which we are seeking.”

As Alexander Hamilton writes in “The Federalist Papers,” the Constitution is designed to ensure “that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications.” The point of the Electoral College is to preserve “the sense of the people,” while at the same time ensuring that a president is chosen “by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station, and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice.”

In modern practice, the Electoral College is mostly a formality. Most electors are loyal members of the party that has selected them, and in 26 states, plus Washington, D.C., electors are bound by laws or party pledges to vote in accord with the popular vote. Although an elector could, in principle, change his or her vote (and a few actually have over the years), doing so is rare.

The Reason for the Electoral College - FactCheck.org

So, the framers of the Constitution didn't trust democracy. How nice. In reality, the Electoral College doesn't protect us from anything - since it is mostly a formality and most electors are loyal members of the party that selected them.

Wrong! The electoral college guarantees us a 100% United States when electing a president.

EXACTLY..


Otherwise , NY and California, the most leftist states , will be the ones electing a president.


.

Duh, the people would be the ones electing a president. One person - one vote!

BULLSHIT, I DON'T TRUST YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKERS


NOT UNTIL A BLOODY CIVIL WAR GETS RID OF THE STUPID SONS OF BITCHES WHO CLAIM THAT FREE PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS TO DEFEND THEIR LIVES



As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.


.

You dumb fucking NRA gun nutters are the greatest threat to my future gun rights! No one needs an AR-15 with a 30-round magazine - or should even be allowed to own them.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

The Reason for the Electoral College

Q: Why does the U.S. have an Electoral College?

A: The framers of the Constitution didn’t trust direct democracy.

The reason that the Constitution calls for this extra layer, rather than just providing for the direct election of the president, is that most of the nation’s founders were actually rather afraid of democracy. James Madison worried about what he called “factions,” which he defined as groups of citizens who have a common interest in some proposal that would either violate the rights of other citizens or would harm the nation as a whole. Madison’s fear – which Alexis de Tocqueville later dubbed “the tyranny of the majority” – was that a faction could grow to encompass more than 50 percent of the population, at which point it could“sacrifice to its ruling passion or interest both the public good and the rights of other citizens.” Madison has a solution for tyranny of the majority: “A republic, by which I mean a government in which the scheme of representation takes place, opens a different prospect, and promises the cure for which we are seeking.”

As Alexander Hamilton writes in “The Federalist Papers,” the Constitution is designed to ensure “that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications.” The point of the Electoral College is to preserve “the sense of the people,” while at the same time ensuring that a president is chosen “by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station, and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice.”

In modern practice, the Electoral College is mostly a formality. Most electors are loyal members of the party that has selected them, and in 26 states, plus Washington, D.C., electors are bound by laws or party pledges to vote in accord with the popular vote. Although an elector could, in principle, change his or her vote (and a few actually have over the years), doing so is rare.

The Reason for the Electoral College - FactCheck.org

So, the framers of the Constitution didn't trust democracy. How nice. In reality, the Electoral College doesn't protect us from anything - since it is mostly a formality and most electors are loyal members of the party that selected them.

Wrong! The electoral college guarantees us a 100% United States when electing a president.

EXACTLY..


Otherwise , NY and California, the most leftist states , will be the ones electing a president.


.

Duh, the people would be the ones electing a president. One person - one vote!

BULLSHIT, I DON'T TRUST YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKERS


NOT UNTIL A BLOODY CIVIL WAR GETS RID OF THE STUPID SONS OF BITCHES WHO CLAIM THAT FREE PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS TO DEFEND THEIR LIVES



As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.


.

You dumb fucking NRA gun nutters are the greatest threat to my future gun rights! No one needs an AR-15 with a 30-round magazine - or should even be allowed to own them.

You drinking again ?

You sound more stupid that usual.

Why don't you explain how they are a danger.

 

[Lastamender]

Presidents should be elected based on national popular votes - not electoral votes based on acreage and just rubber-stamped by partisans!

Popular vote - not acres!

Yeah? Well, you know, I'm not just like a lazy bowler on welfare, man!

So you don't bowl?

Shoot pool - but no bowling.

Collect welfare?

 

[Contumacious]

The Reason for the Electoral College

Q: Why does the U.S. have an Electoral College?

A: The framers of the Constitution didn’t trust direct democracy.

The reason that the Constitution calls for this extra layer, rather than just providing for the direct election of the president, is that most of the nation’s founders were actually rather afraid of democracy. James Madison worried about what he called “factions,” which he defined as groups of citizens who have a common interest in some proposal that would either violate the rights of other citizens or would harm the nation as a whole. Madison’s fear – which Alexis de Tocqueville later dubbed “the tyranny of the majority” – was that a faction could grow to encompass more than 50 percent of the population, at which point it could“sacrifice to its ruling passion or interest both the public good and the rights of other citizens.” Madison has a solution for tyranny of the majority: “A republic, by which I mean a government in which the scheme of representation takes place, opens a different prospect, and promises the cure for which we are seeking.”

As Alexander Hamilton writes in “The Federalist Papers,” the Constitution is designed to ensure “that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications.” The point of the Electoral College is to preserve “the sense of the people,” while at the same time ensuring that a president is chosen “by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station, and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice.”

In modern practice, the Electoral College is mostly a formality. Most electors are loyal members of the party that has selected them, and in 26 states, plus Washington, D.C., electors are bound by laws or party pledges to vote in accord with the popular vote. Although an elector could, in principle, change his or her vote (and a few actually have over the years), doing so is rare.

The Reason for the Electoral College - FactCheck.org

So, the framers of the Constitution didn't trust democracy. How nice. In reality, the Electoral College doesn't protect us from anything - since it is mostly a formality and most electors are loyal members of the party that selected them.

Wrong! The electoral college guarantees us a 100% United States when electing a president.

EXACTLY..


Otherwise , NY and California, the most leftist states , will be the ones electing a president.


.

Duh, the people would be the ones electing a president. One person - one vote!

BULLSHIT, I DON'T TRUST YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKERS


NOT UNTIL A BLOODY CIVIL WAR GETS RID OF THE STUPID SONS OF BITCHES WHO CLAIM THAT FREE PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS TO DEFEND THEIR LIVES



As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.


.

You dumb fucking NRA gun nutters are the greatest threat to my future gun rights! No one needs an AR-15 with a 30-round magazine - or should even be allowed to own them.

As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.


I need an AK47 with a 60-round magazine.


There are a lot of stupid retarded motherfuckers out there


There was very little difference between Thomas Jefferson and John Adams


The difference between Trump and Hillary .is the same as the one between life and death.


.


.

 

[Norman]

Presidents should be elected based on national popular votes - not electoral votes based on acreage and just rubber-stamped by partisans!

Popular vote - not acres!

In each state, whichever party garners a majority of popular votes, regardless of how narrow the margin, wins all the electoral votes. By forcing residents in each state ultimately to vote as a block, the system is supposed to ensure that small states' interests are not drowned out by those of larger states.

U.S. Electoral Vote Map

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH! My candidate didn't win!

Edition #252342

Will they ever get over it?

 

[Yarddog]

Presidents should be elected based on national popular votes - not electoral votes based on acreage and just rubber-stamped by partisans!

Popular vote - not acres!

In each state, whichever party garners a majority of popular votes, regardless of how narrow the margin, wins all the electoral votes. By forcing residents in each state ultimately to vote as a block, the system is supposed to ensure that small states' interests are not drowned out by those of larger states.

U.S. Electoral Vote Map

Sure, you say that now, but had Hillary won the electorial votes it would not be an issue with you. All these threads should have started before the election not after, and anyways, both Candidates knew what they were getting into before hand. Th eelectoral college was no supprise to anyone. Hillary herself defeated Sanders even though he got more votes than she did. She got the super delegates, so why is that fair? Time for her to pack it in, sorry.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

The Reason for the Electoral College

Q: Why does the U.S. have an Electoral College?

A: The framers of the Constitution didn’t trust direct democracy.

The reason that the Constitution calls for this extra layer, rather than just providing for the direct election of the president, is that most of the nation’s founders were actually rather afraid of democracy. James Madison worried about what he called “factions,” which he defined as groups of citizens who have a common interest in some proposal that would either violate the rights of other citizens or would harm the nation as a whole. Madison’s fear – which Alexis de Tocqueville later dubbed “the tyranny of the majority” – was that a faction could grow to encompass more than 50 percent of the population, at which point it could“sacrifice to its ruling passion or interest both the public good and the rights of other citizens.” Madison has a solution for tyranny of the majority: “A republic, by which I mean a government in which the scheme of representation takes place, opens a different prospect, and promises the cure for which we are seeking.”

As Alexander Hamilton writes in “The Federalist Papers,” the Constitution is designed to ensure “that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications.” The point of the Electoral College is to preserve “the sense of the people,” while at the same time ensuring that a president is chosen “by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station, and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice.”

In modern practice, the Electoral College is mostly a formality. Most electors are loyal members of the party that has selected them, and in 26 states, plus Washington, D.C., electors are bound by laws or party pledges to vote in accord with the popular vote. Although an elector could, in principle, change his or her vote (and a few actually have over the years), doing so is rare.

The Reason for the Electoral College - FactCheck.org

So, the framers of the Constitution didn't trust democracy. How nice. In reality, the Electoral College doesn't protect us from anything - since it is mostly a formality and most electors are loyal members of the party that selected them.

Wrong! The electoral college guarantees us a 100% United States when electing a president.

EXACTLY..


Otherwise , NY and California, the most leftist states , will be the ones electing a president.


.

Duh, the people would be the ones electing a president. One person - one vote!

BULLSHIT, I DON'T TRUST YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKERS


NOT UNTIL A BLOODY CIVIL WAR GETS RID OF THE STUPID SONS OF BITCHES WHO CLAIM THAT FREE PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS TO DEFEND THEIR LIVES



As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.


.

You dumb fucking NRA gun nutters are the greatest threat to my future gun rights! No one needs an AR-15 with a 30-round magazine - or should even be allowed to own them.

I guess you wish the 2nd Amendment should say 'The Right To Bear Bows And Arrows'.

 

[Yarddog]

Wrong! The electoral college guarantees us a 100% United States when electing a president.

EXACTLY..


Otherwise , NY and California, the most leftist states , will be the ones electing a president.


.

Duh, the people would be the ones electing a president. One person - one vote!

BULLSHIT, I DON'T TRUST YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKERS


NOT UNTIL A BLOODY CIVIL WAR GETS RID OF THE STUPID SONS OF BITCHES WHO CLAIM THAT FREE PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS TO DEFEND THEIR LIVES



As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.


.

You dumb fucking NRA gun nutters are the greatest threat to my future gun rights! No one needs an AR-15 with a 30-round magazine - or should even be allowed to own them.

As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.


I need an AK47 with a 60-round magazine.


There are a lot of stupid retarded motherfuckers out there


There was very little difference between Thomas Jefferson and John Adams


The difference between Trump and Hillary .is the same as the one between life and death.


.


.

Spot on ! and it would have been unfair to the unemployed workers in the midwest if California Got to dictate all of their futures. I dont trust the votes coming out of San Jose and Los Angeles. its easy enough for Illegals to vote and they actually had a lot at stake in this election. These psudo - Liberals ( which they are not really Liberals) are incapable of understanding the concept

 

[Contumacious]

Wrong! The electoral college guarantees us a 100% United States when electing a president.

EXACTLY..


Otherwise , NY and California, the most leftist states , will be the ones electing a president.


.

Duh, the people would be the ones electing a president. One person - one vote!

BULLSHIT, I DON'T TRUST YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKERS


NOT UNTIL A BLOODY CIVIL WAR GETS RID OF THE STUPID SONS OF BITCHES WHO CLAIM THAT FREE PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS TO DEFEND THEIR LIVES



As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.


.

You dumb fucking NRA gun nutters are the greatest threat to my future gun rights! No one needs an AR-15 with a 30-round magazine - or should even be allowed to own them.

I guess you wish the 2nd Amendment should say 'The Right To Bear Bows And Arrows'.

I do not know why the stupid fuck chose the handle "lakota"

The Lakota Indians were proud independent people who took shit from no one.

He should change his handle to something effeminate like "lilypad"


.


.

 

[Lakhota]

Wrong! The electoral college guarantees us a 100% United States when electing a president.

EXACTLY..


Otherwise , NY and California, the most leftist states , will be the ones electing a president.


.

Duh, the people would be the ones electing a president. One person - one vote!

BULLSHIT, I DON'T TRUST YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKERS


NOT UNTIL A BLOODY CIVIL WAR GETS RID OF THE STUPID SONS OF BITCHES WHO CLAIM THAT FREE PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS TO DEFEND THEIR LIVES



As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.


.

You dumb fucking NRA gun nutters are the greatest threat to my future gun rights! No one needs an AR-15 with a 30-round magazine - or should even be allowed to own them.

I guess you wish the 2nd Amendment should say 'The Right To Bear Bows And Arrows'.

Not necessary - but as written it should only apply to weapons in existence at the time it was ratified.

And not shit like this...

Trying to live modern life according to the Constitution is much like trying to live modern life according to the Bible. Both are subject to vast interpretation.

 

[Yarddog]

EXACTLY..


Otherwise , NY and California, the most leftist states , will be the ones electing a president.


.

Duh, the people would be the ones electing a president. One person - one vote!

BULLSHIT, I DON'T TRUST YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKERS


NOT UNTIL A BLOODY CIVIL WAR GETS RID OF THE STUPID SONS OF BITCHES WHO CLAIM THAT FREE PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS TO DEFEND THEIR LIVES



As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.


.

You dumb fucking NRA gun nutters are the greatest threat to my future gun rights! No one needs an AR-15 with a 30-round magazine - or should even be allowed to own them.

I guess you wish the 2nd Amendment should say 'The Right To Bear Bows And Arrows'.

I do not know why the stupid fuck chose the handle "lakota"

The Lakota Indians were proud independent people who took shit from no one.

He should change his handle to something effeminate like "lilypad"


.


.

I thought Lakhota was a female poster? no?

 

[Contumacious]

EXACTLY..


Otherwise , NY and California, the most leftist states , will be the ones electing a president.


.

Duh, the people would be the ones electing a president. One person - one vote!

BULLSHIT, I DON'T TRUST YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKERS


NOT UNTIL A BLOODY CIVIL WAR GETS RID OF THE STUPID SONS OF BITCHES WHO CLAIM THAT FREE PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS TO DEFEND THEIR LIVES



As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.


.

You dumb fucking NRA gun nutters are the greatest threat to my future gun rights! No one needs an AR-15 with a 30-round magazine - or should even be allowed to own them.

I guess you wish the 2nd Amendment should say 'The Right To Bear Bows And Arrows'.

Not necessary - but as written it should only apply to weapons in existence at the time it was ratified.

And not shit like this...

It applies to the right of FREE PEOPLE to defend their lives by any means necessary.


By your stupid logic we should be communicating with each other using smoke signals


Shut the fuck up


.

 

[Contumacious]

Duh, the people would be the ones electing a president. One person - one vote!

BULLSHIT, I DON'T TRUST YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKERS


NOT UNTIL A BLOODY CIVIL WAR GETS RID OF THE STUPID SONS OF BITCHES WHO CLAIM THAT FREE PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS TO DEFEND THEIR LIVES



As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.


.

You dumb fucking NRA gun nutters are the greatest threat to my future gun rights! No one needs an AR-15 with a 30-round magazine - or should even be allowed to own them.

I guess you wish the 2nd Amendment should say 'The Right To Bear Bows And Arrows'.

I do not know why the stupid fuck chose the handle "lakota"

The Lakota Indians were proud independent people who took shit from no one.

He should change his handle to something effeminate like "lilypad"


.


.

I thought Lakhota was a female poster? no?

Dunno.

.

 

[Lakhota]

Things are really messed up.

 

[Norman]

EXACTLY..


Otherwise , NY and California, the most leftist states , will be the ones electing a president.


.

Duh, the people would be the ones electing a president. One person - one vote!

BULLSHIT, I DON'T TRUST YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKERS


NOT UNTIL A BLOODY CIVIL WAR GETS RID OF THE STUPID SONS OF BITCHES WHO CLAIM THAT FREE PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS TO DEFEND THEIR LIVES



As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.


.

You dumb fucking NRA gun nutters are the greatest threat to my future gun rights! No one needs an AR-15 with a 30-round magazine - or should even be allowed to own them.

I guess you wish the 2nd Amendment should say 'The Right To Bear Bows And Arrows'.

Not necessary - but as written it should only apply to weapons in existence at the time it was ratified.

And not shit like this...

Trying to live modern life according to the Constitution is much like trying to live modern life according to the Bible. Both are subject to vast interpretation.

Good thing that the constitution doesn't tell you how to live then...

Only thing it does is that it obstructs the federal government from taking away the state's rights. USA is a republic, if you don't like that, move to Somalia.