Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump lowered the standard very much, for human beings.There's no honest way you can look at her and not find a better person. She doesn't get sued for ripping people off. And she actually knows how the government works. That's why the majority wanted her not your little king-wannabe Trump.The Electoral College is undemocratic. Trump won the morons like you but lost to the better person. She got more votes.
Hillary....the "better person".....
f-ing hilarious. Pathetic, sad and delusional....but hilarious
He's a troll. Not much there.huh?You two are true idiots. Let me when you grow up and will stand up for - liberty.Of course, the regressives would be screaming RACIST if a right winger had said something like that.Is this liberal nation, founding using liberalism, annoying you again, Korean girl?
.
KG is a true American. RT would be more at home in North Korea.
he got there because he lied about all the folks on the stage trying for the presidency ,,,he talked to his crowds as if they were dummies ,lying to them telling he was going to do things he never could accomplish His tax returns were going to be released ,,,the election for hill was fixed ,,his crowds were the biggest ,obama wasn't a citizen hillary was a murderer etc etc and repubs ate it up huge huge mistakehow did he get there if you're so certain of that opine?why? you think the guy in our wh who has been f-ing over people his whole life is a better person ? Are you on drugs?The Electoral College is undemocratic. Trump won the morons like you but lost to the better person. She got more votes.
Hillary....the "better person".....
Since you don't know...this is the SAME Hillary Clinton who knowingly accepted the Presidential debate questions from the DNC chair...(amongst 1000 other factual nasty traits of hers)
But HEY...she's all golden to you....figures
f-ing hilarious. Pathetic, sad and delusional....but hilarious
the previous president when he put a red line in the sand and walked backward
The line needed to be drawn and even our current President saw the necessity in an attack that was by magnitude 10 times less deadly as the one Obama was responding to. But Obama should have known the hypocritical Republicans would never have his back.
No support from Congress. A no vote by the UK. Republicans overwhelmingly rejected a military strike by Obama, but overwhelmingly supported Trumps even though the magnitude of the Chemical attack was so much less. Nope the GOP left Obama with his dick swinging in the wind. Even still there were war ships heading for the Syrian coast for a strike (like the one Trump authorized I bet) when Kerry made them an offer Putin couldn't refuse.
Seems you've decided to ignore this....his roiling the Middle East due to duplicity, incompetence and his being a crypto-Islamist:
Obama made a huge mistake in refusing to negotiate an agreement to leave US troops in Iraq.
This is the source of the problem with ISIS: they're there because we weren't.
"Obama's 2012 Debate Boast: I Didn't Want to Leave Any Troops in Iraq
Obama then denied that he ever supported a status of forces agreement that would have left troops in Iraq:
MR. ROMNEY: [W]ith regards to Iraq, you and I agreed, I believe, that there should have been a status of forces agreement. Did you —
PRESIDENT OBAMA:That's not true.
MR. ROMNEY:Oh, you didn't — you didn't want a status of forces agreement?
PRESIDENT OBAMA:No, but what I — what I would not have done is left 10,000 troops in Iraq that would tie us down. That certainly would not help us in the Middle East.
"Here's one thing I've learned as commander in chief," Obama said at the end of the exchange. "You've got to be clear, both to our allies and our enemies, about where you stand and what you mean."
[Yeah....he really said that!]
Obama s 2012 Debate Boast I Didn t Want to Leave Any Troops in Iraq The Weekly Standard
a. "This month, Colin Kahl, the senior Pentagon official in charge of Iraq policy at the time, explained why the White House insisted on Iraq’s parliament approving the changes to the SOFA.
He wrote inPolitico Magazinethat in 2011 Iraq’s prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, “told U.S. negotiators that he was willing to sign an executive memorandum of understanding that included these legal protections.
Yet this time around, Obama is willing to accept an agreement from Iraq’s foreign ministry on U.S. forces in Iraq without a vote of Iraq’s parliament. “We believe we need a separate set of assurances from the Iraqis,” one senior U.S. defense official told The Daily Beast on Sunday. This official said this would likely be an agreement or exchange of diplomatic notes from the Iraq’s foreign ministry. “We basically need a piece of paper from them,” another U.S. official involved in the negotiations told The Daily Beast. The official didn’t explain why the parliamentary vote, so crucial three years ago, was no longer needed.”
Obama Does a U-Turn on Immunity for U.S. Troops in Iraq - The Daily Beast
Obama rejected it.
Effectively, he created and supported ISIS.
I knew where the snake's interests lay when I saw this....and not a single bomb or missile from the US:
View attachment 133282
I think you're missing a page.
But for what it's worth, why didn't President Bush secure a long term agreement for a residual force in 2008 when he was forced into negotiating the SOFA that set the time table for our complete withdrawal from their country?
Well, the three of you have that in common - none of you are winning a damn thing.
and yet here you are whining.
You mean - winning. Whatever Trump tries fails.
he beat 18 GOP candidates and then spanked the democrat who felt owned the position. I say that is a lot of winning, then he got a SCOTUS in, deregulated the industries, got the stock market at it's highest ever, got a coal mine opened in Pennsylvania for the first time in a generation. Now tell me what he's lost exactly?
Russian Cyber Hacks on U.S. Electoral System Far Wider Than Previously Known
by
Michael Riley
and
Jordan Robertson
June 13, 2017, 5:00 AM EDT
- Attackers said to take measure of voting systems, databases
- A ‘red phone’ warning to the Kremlin from Obama White House
Russians Breach 39 States in Election Cyberattack
Russian Election Cyberattack Breached 39 U.S. States
Russia’s cyberattack on the U.S. electoral system before Donald Trump’s election was far more widespread than has been publicly revealed, including incursions into voter databases and software systems in almost twice as many states as previously reported.
In Illinois, investigators found evidence that cyber intruders tried to delete or alter voter data. The hackers accessed software designed to be used by poll workers on Election Day, and in at least one state accessed a campaign finance database. Details of the wave of attacks, in the summer and fall of 2016, were provided by three people with direct knowledge of the U.S. investigation into the matter. In all, the Russian hackers hit systems in a total of 39 states, one of them said.
look at this pathetic pos, no evidence to support a claim the president is a traitor. Only in america. now I see why the guy went off yesterday, you must encourage others. we'll have to watch out for thr lefty crazies who where tin foil russia hats.you gotta be kidding ,,,,the pos in office now has not said one discouraging word to or about the russian murderer ,,,putin has trump in his pocket ,,that's why he helped trump defeat herThe candidate who has shown a life-time of 'changing in a NY minute' based on bribes is the one you supported.
It is, in fact, the very reason why Putin and the Kremlin wanted her as President.
Wise up.
When Trump publicly encouraged the Russian government to hack Clinton, it was treasonous.
You imbecile....he said it the way a baseball fan says 'Kill the umpire!"
If he actually meant it....the way I mean that you're an imbecile.....would he have said it out loud?????????
People as stupid as you and Trump tend to say stupid things...and mean it.
If Trump was stupid enough to say this...even in jest...he's too stupid to be President.
And if you support him, your too stupid for words.
But we all knew that already.
Isn't one of the charges against historians is that they are liberal communists?"Communism and Fascism were "progressive" ideologies?"
Of course they are......along with Nazism, Liberalism, and socialism.
hey MORON, did you ever "wonder" (which would take more brain cells than you obviously have) WHY fascism hated communism?
Beside Jews and gypsies, it was communists who wound up in the concentration camps.
....and you know who most hated fascism??? It was the socialists and communists.
Heck, you sound like you never got past 5th grade.
" WHY fascism hated communism?"
Cain and Able, you dunce.
Hitler and Stalin were allies until June 22, 1941.
Stalin provided the resources for Hitler's Blitzkrieg.
Hitler learned about concentration camps from FDR's BFF, Stalin.
Both attacked Poland, one from the East, one from the West.
Gads, you're a moron.
Why is it that Liberals know nothing of history ?
Oh...right....government schooling.
not one of the false russian e mails hurt trump just clintonWe are not stupid enough to believe this. The hacking proved that you are wrong.don't you get it yet jc456? he has no idelogy except for hurray for me fu,,,He'll change in a NY minute if it puts money in his pocketyes, his ideology aligns more with conservatism, but stays away from far right, it's why not all GOPers like him. It's why I love him. yes.
The candidate who has shown a life-time of 'changing in a NY minute' based on bribes is the one you supported.
It is, in fact, the very reason why Putin and the Kremlin wanted her as President.
Wise up.
You must have evidence of same....or you wouldn't claim it.
Do you?
None of the agencies claim to have......
and more winning by PC and me!No, you are an egotistical moron, like the OP. And neither of you know WTF you are speaking of.and I'm popeye!I don't belong to any political party, moron. I'm nonpartisan.
Well, the three of you have that in common - none of you are winning a damn thing.
Actually, the American people won.
LOL (well, a minority did)
The Democrat outpaced PresidentTrump by almost 2.9 million votes, with 65,844,954 (48.2%) to his 62,979,879 (46.1%), according to revised and certified final election results from all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Well, the three of you have that in common - none of you are winning a damn thing.
and yet here you are whining.
You mean - winning. Whatever Trump tries fails.
he beat 18 GOP candidates and then spanked the democrat who felt owned the position. I say that is a lot of winning, then he got a SCOTUS in, deregulated the industries, got the stock market at it's highest ever, got a coal mine opened in Pennsylvania for the first time in a generation. Now tell me what he's lost exactly?
So? The Nazis won a majority of the Reich stag which enabled Hitler to become Chancellor.
Winning by appealing to the stupid has been the Achille's heel of Democracy since Athens.
To Date America has avoided this, for the most part, until 2016.
Winning isn't everything. Being right is.
One cannot be educated by morons beyond gaining a better understanding of - morons.Even Stevie Wonder can see that arguing with (or trying to educate) the willfully ignorant elitist butt licker clowns like rightytighty is a waste of time?
"Liberalism, political doctrine that takes protecting and enhancing the freedom of the individual to be the central problem of politics. Liberals typically believe that government is necessary to protect individuals from being harmed by others; but they also recognize that government itself can pose a threat to liberty. As the revolutionary American pamphleteer Thomas Paine expressed it in “Common Sense” (1776), government is at best “a necessary evil.” Laws, judges, and police are needed to secure the individual’s life and liberty, but their coercive power may also be turned against him. The problem, then, is to devise a system that gives government the power necessary to protect individual liberty but also prevents those who govern from abusing that power."
Who was hacked?We are not stupid enough to believe this. The hacking proved that you are wrong.don't you get it yet jc456? he has no idelogy except for hurray for me fu,,,He'll change in a NY minute if it puts money in his pocketyes, his ideology aligns more with conservatism, but stays away from far right, it's why not all GOPers like him. It's why I love him. yes.
The candidate who has shown a life-time of 'changing in a NY minute' based on bribes is the one you supported.
It is, in fact, the very reason why Putin and the Kremlin wanted her as President.
Wise up.
You must have evidence of same....or you wouldn't claim it.
Do you?
None of the agencies claim to have......
And it's Paine, he was mostly a socialist to you, and I doubt you mean Mason (who wouldn't sign the Constitution). As for Jefferson, he took a knife to the Gospels to remove all the BS about Jesus.Is this liberal nation, founding using liberalism, annoying you again, Korean girl?
You fascists democrats are not "liberal," you are Stalinists. You have nothing in common with Jefferson, Mason or Payne. You are identical in view to Mao, Pol Pot, and Idi Amin. You call the founding fathers "old dead white guys" as you spit on the liberal notions they espoused, while you rush to embrace the feudal structures of a government that owns all and rules over an enslaved peasantry.
You are a totalitarian thug, the polar opposite of "liberal."
They can call themselves whatever they like. It doesn't change American history and the founders being - liberals.One cannot be educated by morons beyond gaining a better understanding of - morons.Even Stevie Wonder can see that arguing with (or trying to educate) the willfully ignorant elitist butt licker clowns like rightytighty is a waste of time?
"Liberalism, political doctrine that takes protecting and enhancing the freedom of the individual to be the central problem of politics. Liberals typically believe that government is necessary to protect individuals from being harmed by others; but they also recognize that government itself can pose a threat to liberty. As the revolutionary American pamphleteer Thomas Paine expressed it in “Common Sense” (1776), government is at best “a necessary evil.” Laws, judges, and police are needed to secure the individual’s life and liberty, but their coercive power may also be turned against him. The problem, then, is to devise a system that gives government the power necessary to protect individual liberty but also prevents those who govern from abusing that power."
This is why they now call themselves "Progressive". They have morphed to Socialism/Communism from textbook Liberalism.
not one of the false russian e mails hurt trump just clintonWe are not stupid enough to believe this. The hacking proved that you are wrong.don't you get it yet jc456? he has no idelogy except for hurray for me fu,,,He'll change in a NY minute if it puts money in his pocketyes, his ideology aligns more with conservatism, but stays away from far right, it's why not all GOPers like him. It's why I love him. yes.
The candidate who has shown a life-time of 'changing in a NY minute' based on bribes is the one you supported.
It is, in fact, the very reason why Putin and the Kremlin wanted her as President.
Wise up.
You must have evidence of same....or you wouldn't claim it.
Do you?
None of the agencies claim to have......
Agrarian Justice - WikipediaAnd it's Paine, he was mostly a socialist to you, and I doubt you mean Mason (who wouldn't sign the Constitution). As for Jefferson, he took a knife to the Gospels to remove all the BS about Jesus.Is this liberal nation, founding using liberalism, annoying you again, Korean girl?
You fascists democrats are not "liberal," you are Stalinists. You have nothing in common with Jefferson, Mason or Payne. You are identical in view to Mao, Pol Pot, and Idi Amin. You call the founding fathers "old dead white guys" as you spit on the liberal notions they espoused, while you rush to embrace the feudal structures of a government that owns all and rules over an enslaved peasantry.
You are a totalitarian thug, the polar opposite of "liberal."
Paine a socialist?
{His basic contention was that the enormous increase in taxation suffered by the people of England in the past few centuries was due to "extravagance, corruption, and intrigue." Maintaining that of the total annual tax bill of 17 million pounds, only one million and a half was necessary, he proceeded to show how the remaining taxes should be disposed of. First of all his plan provided subsidies for children so they might be sent to school, provision for aged persons, payment to families for childbirths and marriages, funeral payments, and accident benefits.
Paine said that the tax on houses and windows should be abolished, and also the commutation tax because these placed heavy burdens upon persons least able to bear them. Instead of the small indirect taxes which lay so heavily on the poor, he thought the principle of the luxury tax should be applied to incomes. He said, "Admitting that any annual sum, say, for instance, a thousand pounds, is necessary to support a family, consequently the second thousand is in the nature of a luxury, the third still more so, and by proceeding on we shall arrive at a sum that may not improperly be called a prohibitable luxury. It would be impolitic to set bounds to property acquired by industry, and therefore it is right to place the prohibition beyond the probable acquisition to which industry can extend; but there ought to be a limit to property or the accumulation of it by bequest." He then proposed a system of graduated taxes upon incomes. The object of such a tax in Paine's mind was twofold: It would first of all eliminate those arduous duties imposed on the poor by the rich which has been screened too much, and secondly it would break up the large estates and return their substance to all the heirs and heiresses which "hitherto the Aristocracy have quartered . . . upon the public in useless posts, places and offices."}
Thomas Paine and Income Taxes ~ ECONOMIC THEORIES
George Mason was a staunch advocate of economic liberty. So much so that a university is named for him.
"Communism and Fascism were "progressive" ideologies?"
Of course they are......along with Nazism, Liberalism, and socialism.
hey MORON, did you ever "wonder" (which would take more brain cells than you obviously have) WHY fascism hated communism?
Beside Jews and gypsies, it was communists who wound up in the concentration camps.
....and you know who most hated fascism??? It was the socialists and communists.
Heck, you sound like you never got past 5th grade.
" WHY fascism hated communism?"
Cain and Able, you dunce.
Hitler and Stalin were allies until June 22, 1941.
Stalin provided the resources for Hitler's Blitzkrieg.
Hitler learned about concentration camps from FDR's BFF, Stalin.
Both attacked Poland, one from the East, one from the West.
Gads, you're a moron.
Why is it that Liberals know nothing of history ?
Oh...right....government schooling.
"Just to point out just how ignorant YOU are:
Concentration camps were first invented and used by the British during the Boar wars. Long before the age of Hitler and Stalin.
Know one knows how or when Hitler first learned about them.
"Just to point out just how ignorant YOU are:
Concentration camps were first invented and used by the British during the Boar wars. Long before the age of Hitler and Stalin.
Know one knows how or when Hitler first learned about them"
You will never....NEVER....know as much as I do.
Let's see:
"The Soviet NKVD trained the SS, taught them how to build concentration camps, as they had been operating for 20 years before the origin of the Nazis." Viktor Suvorov, former Soviet Military Intelligence Officer. "According to Suvorov, Stalin planned to use Nazi Germany as a proxy (the “Icebreaker”) against the West. For this reason Stalin provided significant material and political support to Adolf Hitler, while at the same time preparing the Red Army to “liberate” the whole of Europe from Nazi occupation."
Viktor Suvorov - Wikipedia
In your face, booooyyyyyyeeeeee!!!!
Try learning the facts for a change:
Second Boer War - Wikipedia
I'd call you an ignorant slut, but in your case it would be a complement.
Who was hacked?We are not stupid enough to believe this. The hacking proved that you are wrong.don't you get it yet jc456? he has no idelogy except for hurray for me fu,,,He'll change in a NY minute if it puts money in his pocket
The candidate who has shown a life-time of 'changing in a NY minute' based on bribes is the one you supported.
It is, in fact, the very reason why Putin and the Kremlin wanted her as President.
Wise up.
You must have evidence of same....or you wouldn't claim it.
Do you?
None of the agencies claim to have......
I'm not sure anyone was successfully hacked. The NSA says the 31 states have been subjected to spear phishing attacks, but then name one person who has email who has NOT been the target of the same? Most of us are smart enough not to give our bank routing numbers to the Nigerian prince - Russian Agent John Podesta is just a bit dumber than the average person.
