Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Preacher to a dying breed"?
Actually, more Americans than ever, a majority in fact, don't believe the government-sponsored 'official' theory (which alleges a conspiracy between the hijackers and Khaleid Mohamed . . . ) . . .
the space beam line comes from one of your own..Star Wars Energy Weapons 1You don't set the requirements on what I or anyone else needs to do. I don't give a fuck what you, daws or anyone else thinks needs to be proven.That's both arrogant and ignorant. Sorry miss, but you don't write the rules regarding how other people have to think. If someone wants to doubt or question the "official theory" (which is itself a conspiracy) because of any one or more of the numerous inconsistencies, improbabilities or impossibilities, that is their choice.Again...if twoofers want anyone to believe them... they have to come up with a plausible alternative scenario.
In 13 years not one has.
If you or some other miffer want to believe, or pretend to believe, that 2 + 2 = 5 , that is your choice.
Thing is, you can speculate to your heart's content but the only way to dislodge the official explanation is to provide a plausible alternative based on reliable facts. Simply stating that "no planes were hijacked on 9/11" or "the fires were staged and controlled" or "it was a space beam" just doesn't cut it and 13 years later we are stuck with the NIST report because so much of what has emanated from the "Truther" World is 2+2=5.
It would be pretty asinine on your part to be arguing 13 years later with someone that says "it was a space beam", no??
Your motivation is clearly something other than the truth, and you demonstrate your treachery by obstructing those that seek it.
that is also one of the steamiest of conspiracy steaming piles..Once again, the commenters at the link aren't buying it.
#1 Up Voted comment:
"Preacher to a dying breed"?
Actually, more Americans than ever, a majority in fact, don't believe the government-sponsored 'official' theory (which alleges a conspiracy between the hijackers and Khaleid Mohamed . . . ) . . .
(Article is 7 months old too)
Once again, the commenters at the link aren't buying it.
#1 Up Voted comment:
"Preacher to a dying breed"?
Actually, more Americans than ever, a majority in fact, don't believe the government-sponsored 'official' theory (which alleges a conspiracy between the hijackers and Khaleid Mohamed . . . ) . . .
(Article is 7 months old too)
First Americans get the "Ever Changing We Killed Osama" story.
Then they get the "Fast And Furious" Scandal.
Now they get the "Ebola Purposely Let Into The Country" idiocy.
Along with "ISIS isn't Islamic" B.S.
The Gov't has really overplayed it's hand and Americans are really starting to wake up.
lol The "twoof" hurts, eh?You don't set the requirements on what I or anyone else needs to do. I don't give a fuck what you, daws or anyone else thinks needs to be proven.That's both arrogant and ignorant. Sorry miss, but you don't write the rules regarding how other people have to think. If someone wants to doubt or question the "official theory" (which is itself a conspiracy) because of any one or more of the numerous inconsistencies, improbabilities or impossibilities, that is their choice.Again...if twoofers want anyone to believe them... they have to come up with a plausible alternative scenario.
In 13 years not one has.
If you or some other miffer want to believe, or pretend to believe, that 2 + 2 = 5 , that is your choice.
Thing is, you can speculate to your heart's content but the only way to dislodge the official explanation is to provide a plausible alternative based on reliable facts. Simply stating that "no planes were hijacked on 9/11" or "the fires were staged and controlled" or "it was a space beam" just doesn't cut it and 13 years later we are stuck with the NIST report because so much of what has emanated from the "Truther" World is 2+2=5.
It would be pretty asinine on your part to be arguing 13 years later with someone that says "it was a space beam", no??
Your motivation is clearly something other than the truth, and you demonstrate your treachery by obstructing those that seek it.
You have every right to live in your foil-hat fantasy world. I thought your presence here denoted some intent to converse intelligently on the thread's subject. I understand why you are unwilling or unable to support anything you say. Hopefully you understand that the adults here may continue to rain on your silly little parade. Enjoy,!
You don't speak for Americans but if you really hate this place why not have the courage of your convictions and find yourself some workers paradise?
You don't speak for Americans but if you really hate this place why not have the courage of your convictions and find yourself some workers paradise?
Its called loving your country so much as to stay and help improve matters. anybody can run off to live in Argentina ..... or? But those who stay & work for justice, they are the true AMERICANS.
Repent, the end is near!
for at least one of the stated goals of the public school system, they have proven to be a dismal failure. When I was in the public school system, the people who ran the place made it a point to at least attempt to give everyone a "well rounded" education, such that the technology geeks needed to be at least exposed to Biology & Chemistry ( etc ... ad nausum) HOWEVER in terms of this "well rounded" education, I can no more quote Shakespeare than my arts & letters educated neighbor can wrench on diesels.... oh my! What I'm getting at here is that there are some things, by virtue of the sort of education that I have chosen for myself, that qualifies me to see, upon viewing the video of the South & then North tower "collapsing" that there is something VERY wrong with this picture. now other people who maybe majored in music appreciation or fine art in school .... may not see it straight away, but I submit that given anyone of reasonable intelligence ( freshman UC Berkeley student .... or? ) they can be shown the applied physics and the reason why there is something VERY wrong with the picture of the towers "collapsing" and I believe most people can get it. The problem here is much deeper than simply the physical facts of the matter. It has now progressed into serious psychological warfare. and since at present the dark-side has command of the most powerful propaganda machine ever invented ..... its an up-hill battle at best.
for at least one of the stated goals of the public school system, they have proven to be a dismal failure. When I was in the public school system, the people who ran the place made it a point to at least attempt to give everyone a "well rounded" education, such that the technology geeks needed to be at least exposed to Biology & Chemistry ( etc ... ad nausum) HOWEVER in terms of this "well rounded" education, I can no more quote Shakespeare than my arts & letters educated neighbor can wrench on diesels.... oh my! What I'm getting at here is that there are some things, by virtue of the sort of education that I have chosen for myself, that qualifies me to see, upon viewing the video of the South & then North tower "collapsing" that there is something VERY wrong with this picture. now other people who maybe majored in music appreciation or fine art in school .... may not see it straight away, but I submit that given anyone of reasonable intelligence ( freshman UC Berkeley student .... or? ) they can be shown the applied physics and the reason why there is something VERY wrong with the picture of the towers "collapsing" and I believe most people can get it. The problem here is much deeper than simply the physical facts of the matter. It has now progressed into serious psychological warfare. and since at present the dark-side has command of the most powerful propaganda machine ever invented ..... its an up-hill battle at best.
an informed judgment on all the information available.
an informed judgment on all the information available.
Please do, INFORMED .... please!
look at the "collapse" events for WTC1, 2 & 7
look at the crash scene at the PENTAGON
look at the video that is allegedly of an airliner crashing into the wall of the South tower.
OPEN YOUR EYES!
All that's left are a few Internet diehards who absolutely refuse to let go of that silliness.
If that statement could be supported with real evidence,
it would clearly signal that the human race is in deep do-do!
the alleged "silliness" is based on good science and examination of the facts about 9/11/2001. all too often people attempt to counter the arguments, that is INSIDE JOB scenarios with claims that there would have had to be TOO MANY PEOPLE involved and therefore it would have been impossible to pull off, however speculation about how many people would have been required, does not negate the hard evidence that is available and constitutes total show-stopper sorts of info, note the alleged airliner crash "FLT175" and also "FLT77" ( not to mention "FLT11" & "FLT93" ) in all cases the quantity of aircraft wreckage is not sufficient to justify having alleged that an airliner crashed at that location and the authorities have NOT documented the crime scene.
Where is the hard evidence that any of the 4 alleged hijacked airliners existed at all?
I don't know who was behind 911 but it's obvious it wasn't 19 hijackers.
Richard Gage now has 2200 architects and engineers who have put there careers and their good names on the line by signing the petition at AE911 Truth. The 911 Truth Movement only gets stronger. Many people still haven't heard about Building Seven. When I show people they often say "why didn't I ever hear about this?!?!"
Good question!
Not one of the believers of the Official Conspiracy Theory can explain why on 911 two planes knocked down three skyscrapers. That the official reason was fire when no skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire even though there have been thousands of high rise fires, many which burned hotter and longer.
In fact the only thing that has ever caused a high rise building to collapse like the WTC 1,2 & 7 is controlled demolition.
an informed judgment on all the information available.
Please do, INFORMED .... please!
look at the "collapse" events for WTC1, 2 & 7
look at the crash scene at the PENTAGON
look at the video that is allegedly of an airliner crashing into the wall of the South tower.
OPEN YOUR EYES!
Now answer these simple questions. How would in less then an hour would this video be faked?
