The Experiment that finally convinced me AGW is for real

[OohPooPahDoo]

Yes Einstein. tell us again how its physically impossible to test the AGWcult hypothesis because we're unable to build a container larger than 25 meters.

I didn't tell you it was physically impossible. You're a moron and a liar.

So where's the experiment?

Earth.

Your first excuse was the 25 meter upper limit on human construction, then you said that you can only test the 100PPM increase on a planetary scale, that the 100PPM was somehow less effective at anything less than a planet.

You'd have to recreate the same temperature gradient as that which exists in earth's upper atmosphere. You'd also have to alter gravity to scale.

Sorry to use big words

And you still don't get that you're being played. People like Mann are laughing at you

I think you're projecting

 

[daveman]

I didn't tell you it was physically impossible. You're a moron and a liar.

So where's the experiment?

Earth.

Your first excuse was the 25 meter upper limit on human construction, then you said that you can only test the 100PPM increase on a planetary scale, that the 100PPM was somehow less effective at anything less than a planet.

You'd have to recreate the same temperature gradient as that which exists in earth's upper atmosphere. You'd also have to alter gravity to scale.

Sorry to use big words

And you still don't get that you're being played. People like Mann are laughing at you

I think you're projecting

Then you admit you don't have a fucking clue what's going to happen or why.

Sorry. Not going to support global socialism because you "feel" it will help.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I didn't tell you it was physically impossible. You're a moron and a liar.

So where's the experiment?

Earth.

Your first excuse was the 25 meter upper limit on human construction, then you said that you can only test the 100PPM increase on a planetary scale, that the 100PPM was somehow less effective at anything less than a planet.

You'd have to recreate the same temperature gradient as that which exists in earth's upper atmosphere. You'd also have to alter gravity to scale.

Sorry to use big words

And you still don't get that you're being played. People like Mann are laughing at you

I think you're projecting

Earth is the laboratory.

LOL

What a tool.

How does gravity affect the magical temperature raising properties of CO2?

LOL

You just keep making shit up as you go.

LOL

 

[indiajo]

You need to take a couple things into consideration:

1) The only thing that will cause the amount of water in the Earth's atmosphere to change is a change in temperature. That's obviously not true of CO2.

2) Water has an effective residence time in the atmosphere of a few days at most. CO2 has an effective residence time of 5 years and an effective lifespan of decades. Thus the warming potential of a given amount of CO2 is greater than that of the same amount of water vapor.

1. A bit simplified, but yes.
2. No.
Reason:
The atmosphere is a steady state system. It is absolutely irrelevant how long a molecule is there, the only significance is how many molecules of a certain substance are there at any given time.
This is a self regulating process that works now for a few billion years, and we do not have understood all influencing parameters. It leveled out the asteroid catastrophy 65 million years ago, and whilst this may have taken quite some time it still is a pretty astonishing fact.

I don't know where this lifespan story is originated, but it's, sorry, bullshit.

 

[indiajo]

No it doesn't. Exhaled air has a relative humidity of damn near 100%. Co2 and water vapour have similar absorbtion bands.

No, they don't.
And actually, what are relative 100 % at fucking 37 °C? Relative humidity is absolutely irrelevant, what counts is the number of H2O molecules in the respective air quantity and this is expressed as ABSOLUTE humidity.

Besides that, if exhaled air would be damn near 100% everybody in a room below say 35°C would stand in a cloud.
You know, dew point and stuff.

Actually total Co2 provides about 40% of the radiative forcing that total water vapour does.

My dear god, where did you get that from?

 

[indiajo]

It's a matter of very basic principle. I know they exist. The rest of the world knows they exist. You won't admit their existence under any circumstances as it would make you look the fool you are. And I'm not your dancing monkey.

This sound like from the religion thread.

 

[jc456]

It's a matter of very basic principle. I know they exist. The rest of the world knows they exist. You won't admit their existence under any circumstances as it would make you look the fool you are. And I'm not your dancing monkey.

Dang, can't believe I missed this one. That's all you do is dance, you little monkey. What is it you know exist? If that is the evidence to show CO2 drives climate, then by all means send us the experiment so we can stop all of this.