ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 53,523
- 54,299
- 3,615
- Thread starter
- #61
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really? Quote a Republican saying any of those. Considering that you're a total douchebag, we know you can't.Considering that Republicans also used the words boy tar baby and uppity it puts puts their use of monkey into context.I just love these false equivalency type threads and posts that USMB Republicans and self-proclaimed conservatives are so very fond of.Sen. Angus King
Chuck Schumer
McCurry
John Kerry
Robert Byrd
Bernie Sanders
Adam Schiff
on and on and on.....
Liberals are hypocrites.....new flash....
AND JOE BIDEN SAID THAT OBAMA WAS ARTICULATE!
FUCKING HYPOCRITES
For the record, I don't think Gillum is articulate at all. He is VERY INARTICULATE and corrupt.
He rambles on and on about socialist nonsense that doesn't make any sense at all.
#LOLGOP #TooFunny
He has no history of it even though being in the public, What don’t you get. Yeah, on my tablet now. Sorry for your suffering.![]()
Liberals crack me up with their “dog whistle” hunts. They will map anything.
Google is your friend. Must I do everything for you?I understand African-Americans being sensitive to any term involving 'monkey' when it comes to criticism directed toward them; but, I feel like this is being overly sensitive.
Same as Trump-suckers buying up stock in cry booths over any criticism of their Orange Messiah
Liberals crack me up with their “dog whistle” hunts. They will map anything.
Ironic post from the same wag who this time a week ago tried to do the exact opposite with a McCain quote you didn't even remember and make that into a 'dog whistle' that never existed.
Having it both ways: Priceless.
Liberals crack me up with their “dog whistle” hunts. They will map anything.
Ironic post from the same wag who this time a week ago tried to do the exact opposite with a McCain quote you didn't even remember and make that into a 'dog whistle' that never existed.
Having it both ways: Priceless.
“that one” was a dog whistle. How am I having it both ways? I’ve been consistent.... liberals site dog whistles anytime they can to perpetuate the race card.
"When used in this context" means it has never been used as a racial epithet. You obviously can't find an example where it was.Liberals crack me up with their “dog whistle” hunts. They will map anything.
Ironic post from the same wag who this time a week ago tried to do the exact opposite with a McCain quote you didn't even remember and make that into a 'dog whistle' that never existed.
Having it both ways: Priceless.
“that one” was a dog whistle. How am I having it both ways? I’ve been consistent.... liberals site dog whistles anytime they can to perpetuate the race card.
You're having it both ways by trying to make "that one" into some kind of racial epithet, which it's never been, while simultaneously trying to deny the same status to "monkey this up" as it was used in its context.
Again ---- can't have it both ways. If you're going to hair-trigger on "that one" then you have to be all over "monkey this up". If you're giving "monkey this up" a pass, then you have even less ground than none to stand on for "that one".
Can't have both. Gotta pick one.
It's actually not your friend if you are right of center.Google is your friend. Must I do everything for you?I understand African-Americans being sensitive to any term involving 'monkey' when it comes to criticism directed toward them; but, I feel like this is being overly sensitive.
Same as Trump-suckers buying up stock in cry booths over any criticism of their Orange Messiah
"When used in this context" means it has never been used as a racial epithet. You obviously can't find an example where it was.Liberals crack me up with their “dog whistle” hunts. They will map anything.
Ironic post from the same wag who this time a week ago tried to do the exact opposite with a McCain quote you didn't even remember and make that into a 'dog whistle' that never existed.
Having it both ways: Priceless.
“that one” was a dog whistle. How am I having it both ways? I’ve been consistent.... liberals site dog whistles anytime they can to perpetuate the race card.
You're having it both ways by trying to make "that one" into some kind of racial epithet, which it's never been, while simultaneously trying to deny the same status to "monkey this up" as it was used in its context.
Again ---- can't have it both ways. If you're going to hair-trigger on "that one" then you have to be all over "monkey this up". If you're giving "monkey this up" a pass, then you have even less ground than none to stand on for "that one".
Can't have both. Gotta pick one.
So you have no evidence that it was ever used in a racial context, but you think that proves it was meant to be a racial epithet?"When used in this context" means it has never been used as a racial epithet. You obviously can't find an example where it was.Liberals crack me up with their “dog whistle” hunts. They will map anything.
Ironic post from the same wag who this time a week ago tried to do the exact opposite with a McCain quote you didn't even remember and make that into a 'dog whistle' that never existed.
Having it both ways: Priceless.
“that one” was a dog whistle. How am I having it both ways? I’ve been consistent.... liberals site dog whistles anytime they can to perpetuate the race card.
You're having it both ways by trying to make "that one" into some kind of racial epithet, which it's never been, while simultaneously trying to deny the same status to "monkey this up" as it was used in its context.
Again ---- can't have it both ways. If you're going to hair-trigger on "that one" then you have to be all over "monkey this up". If you're giving "monkey this up" a pass, then you have even less ground than none to stand on for "that one".
Can't have both. Gotta pick one.
I've already said 245 times that I've never heard it used before, in any context. No one has.
That's exactly why it stands out.
Anyone of them use "monkey up"?
So you have no evidence that it was ever used in a racial context, but you think that proves it was meant to be a racial epithet?"When used in this context" means it has never been used as a racial epithet. You obviously can't find an example where it was.Ironic post from the same wag who this time a week ago tried to do the exact opposite with a McCain quote you didn't even remember and make that into a 'dog whistle' that never existed.
Having it both ways: Priceless.
“that one” was a dog whistle. How am I having it both ways? I’ve been consistent.... liberals site dog whistles anytime they can to perpetuate the race card.
You're having it both ways by trying to make "that one" into some kind of racial epithet, which it's never been, while simultaneously trying to deny the same status to "monkey this up" as it was used in its context.
Again ---- can't have it both ways. If you're going to hair-trigger on "that one" then you have to be all over "monkey this up". If you're giving "monkey this up" a pass, then you have even less ground than none to stand on for "that one".
Can't have both. Gotta pick one.
I've already said 245 times that I've never heard it used before, in any context. No one has.
That's exactly why it stands out.
What am I missing here?
You and the other snowflakes are going out of your way to be offended.So you have no evidence that it was ever used in a racial context, but you think that proves it was meant to be a racial epithet?"When used in this context" means it has never been used as a racial epithet. You obviously can't find an example where it was.“that one” was a dog whistle. How am I having it both ways? I’ve been consistent.... liberals site dog whistles anytime they can to perpetuate the race card.
You're having it both ways by trying to make "that one" into some kind of racial epithet, which it's never been, while simultaneously trying to deny the same status to "monkey this up" as it was used in its context.
Again ---- can't have it both ways. If you're going to hair-trigger on "that one" then you have to be all over "monkey this up". If you're giving "monkey this up" a pass, then you have even less ground than none to stand on for "that one".
Can't have both. Gotta pick one.
I've already said 245 times that I've never heard it used before, in any context. No one has.
That's exactly why it stands out.
What am I missing here?
Again, I have no evidence that it was ever used in ANY context. In other words DeSantis made it up.
When you make something up, you have to intend to mean something. Obviously the phrases "mess this up" and "screw this up" and "foul this up" and "fuck this up" all existed already in common parlance. He declined all of them and went for "monkey" specifically.
Why he chose that route you'd have to ask him, but obviously he did choose it.
You and the other snowflakes are going out of your way to be offended.So you have no evidence that it was ever used in a racial context, but you think that proves it was meant to be a racial epithet?"When used in this context" means it has never been used as a racial epithet. You obviously can't find an example where it was.You're having it both ways by trying to make "that one" into some kind of racial epithet, which it's never been, while simultaneously trying to deny the same status to "monkey this up" as it was used in its context.
Again ---- can't have it both ways. If you're going to hair-trigger on "that one" then you have to be all over "monkey this up". If you're giving "monkey this up" a pass, then you have even less ground than none to stand on for "that one".
Can't have both. Gotta pick one.
I've already said 245 times that I've never heard it used before, in any context. No one has.
That's exactly why it stands out.
What am I missing here?
Again, I have no evidence that it was ever used in ANY context. In other words DeSantis made it up.
When you make something up, you have to intend to mean something. Obviously the phrases "mess this up" and "screw this up" and "foul this up" and "fuck this up" all existed already in common parlance. He declined all of them and went for "monkey" specifically.
Why he chose that route you'd have to ask him, but obviously he did choose it.
Constant pretzel twisting to find a way to be offended. Must be tiring.You and the other snowflakes are going out of your way to be offended.So you have no evidence that it was ever used in a racial context, but you think that proves it was meant to be a racial epithet?"When used in this context" means it has never been used as a racial epithet. You obviously can't find an example where it was.You're having it both ways by trying to make "that one" into some kind of racial epithet, which it's never been, while simultaneously trying to deny the same status to "monkey this up" as it was used in its context.
Again ---- can't have it both ways. If you're going to hair-trigger on "that one" then you have to be all over "monkey this up". If you're giving "monkey this up" a pass, then you have even less ground than none to stand on for "that one".
Can't have both. Gotta pick one.
I've already said 245 times that I've never heard it used before, in any context. No one has.
That's exactly why it stands out.
What am I missing here?
Again, I have no evidence that it was ever used in ANY context. In other words DeSantis made it up.
When you make something up, you have to intend to mean something. Obviously the phrases "mess this up" and "screw this up" and "foul this up" and "fuck this up" all existed already in common parlance. He declined all of them and went for "monkey" specifically.
Why he chose that route you'd have to ask him, but obviously he did choose it.
C
Constant pretzel twisting to find a way to be offended. Must be tiring.You and the other snowflakes are going out of your way to be offended.So you have no evidence that it was ever used in a racial context, but you think that proves it was meant to be a racial epithet?"When used in this context" means it has never been used as a racial epithet. You obviously can't find an example where it was.
I've already said 245 times that I've never heard it used before, in any context. No one has.
That's exactly why it stands out.
What am I missing here?
Again, I have no evidence that it was ever used in ANY context. In other words DeSantis made it up.
When you make something up, you have to intend to mean something. Obviously the phrases "mess this up" and "screw this up" and "foul this up" and "fuck this up" all existed already in common parlance. He declined all of them and went for "monkey" specifically.
Why he chose that route you'd have to ask him, but obviously he did choose it.
An easier method is to be confident and just brush the comment off but that would required strength of character and we all know how that goes in libbie land
I know you're not offended. It's just an act.You and the other snowflakes are going out of your way to be offended.So you have no evidence that it was ever used in a racial context, but you think that proves it was meant to be a racial epithet?"When used in this context" means it has never been used as a racial epithet. You obviously can't find an example where it was.
I've already said 245 times that I've never heard it used before, in any context. No one has.
That's exactly why it stands out.
What am I missing here?
Again, I have no evidence that it was ever used in ANY context. In other words DeSantis made it up.
When you make something up, you have to intend to mean something. Obviously the phrases "mess this up" and "screw this up" and "foul this up" and "fuck this up" all existed already in common parlance. He declined all of them and went for "monkey" specifically.
Why he chose that route you'd have to ask him, but obviously he did choose it.
I can't be "offended". He wasn't talking about me.
And what are you going out of your way to do?