The GOP bombs Iran. What are the unintended consequences?

[rdean]

Remember when historians and Middle Eastern experts told Bush that if he attacks Iraq, that will leave Iran as the strongest country in the Middle East?

And there you have it. Add Iraq's meager strength to Iran and you have a very powerful Middle Eastern country.

And once Republicans scuttle the Iran deal, our so called allies will end the sanctions, and the US and Israel will become isolated with Iran throwing their oil into the world market and watch the money pour in. And Republicans will look like fools to everyone but their ignorant base who they will convince this is Obama's fault for not having a good deal to begin with.

So they manage to gain the presidency and they bomb Iran.

Then what?

When Republicans bombed Iraq, they drove the Sunni from power and made Shiites THE power in Iraq which of course led to Isis and a strong Iran.

If they bomb Iran back to the stone age, they will leave Isis as the strongest military force in the Middle East.

Talk about unintended consequence. How could they possibly leave Isis as THE major power in the Middle East?

 

[HenryBHough]

Care to share with us what element of the ISIS recruitment drive you found most attractive?

 

[AmericanFirst1]

Remember when historians and Middle Eastern experts told Bush that if he attacks Iraq, that will leave Iran as the strongest country in the Middle East?

And there you have it. Add Iraq's meager strength to Iran and you have a very powerful Middle Eastern country.

And once Republicans scuttle the Iran deal, our so called allies will end the sanctions, and the US and Israel will become isolated with Iran throwing their oil into the world market and watch the money pour in. And Republicans will look like fools to everyone but their ignorant base who they will convince this is Obama's fault for not having a good deal to begin with.

So they manage to gain the presidency and they bomb Iran.

Then what?

When Republicans bombed Iraq, they drove the Sunni from power and made Shiites THE power in Iraq which of course led to Isis and a strong Iran.

If they bomb Iran back to the stone age, they will leave Isis as the strongest military force in the Middle East.

Talk about unintended consequence. How could they possibly leave Isis as THE major power in the Middle East?

Obuthole is responsible for Isis. Retard

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The results?

Rderp, the resident retard, makes up more outlandish threads trolling the forums.

For evidence look here:
The GOP bombs Iran. What are the unintended consequences? | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

 

[konradv]

Care to share with us what element of the ISIS recruitment drive you found most attractive?

First, tell us which side you favor, ISIS or Iran?

 

[rdean]

Care to share with us what element of the ISIS recruitment drive you found most attractive?

First, tell us which side you favor, ISIS or Iran?

I prefer the US side. But since the GOP got rid of the Sunni's in Iraq and made Iran so powerful, I'm sensing they were on the side of the Shiites. Or are they just ignorantly running around bombing anything that moves?

 

[rdean]

Remember when historians and Middle Eastern experts told Bush that if he attacks Iraq, that will leave Iran as the strongest country in the Middle East?

And there you have it. Add Iraq's meager strength to Iran and you have a very powerful Middle Eastern country.

And once Republicans scuttle the Iran deal, our so called allies will end the sanctions, and the US and Israel will become isolated with Iran throwing their oil into the world market and watch the money pour in. And Republicans will look like fools to everyone but their ignorant base who they will convince this is Obama's fault for not having a good deal to begin with.

So they manage to gain the presidency and they bomb Iran.

Then what?

When Republicans bombed Iraq, they drove the Sunni from power and made Shiites THE power in Iraq which of course led to Isis and a strong Iran.

If they bomb Iran back to the stone age, they will leave Isis as the strongest military force in the Middle East.

Talk about unintended consequence. How could they possibly leave Isis as THE major power in the Middle East?

Obuthole is responsible for Isis. Retard

No, disbanding the Iraq military is.

 

[JakeStarkey]

ISIS is all Bush all the way all the time.

Every high school and college student knows that.

 

[konradv]

Care to share with us what element of the ISIS recruitment drive you found most attractive?

First, tell us which side you favor, ISIS or Iran?

I prefer the US side. But since the GOP got rid of the Sunni's in Iraq and made Iran so powerful, I'm sensing they were on the side of the Shiites. Or are they just ignorantly running around bombing anything that moves?

It's a fair question. After all, during the Reagan administration they sold weapons to Iran AND backed Saddam against Iran. You never know what those wascally Wepublicans are going to do!!!

 

[rdean]

Care to share with us what element of the ISIS recruitment drive you found most attractive?

First, tell us which side you favor, ISIS or Iran?

I prefer the US side. But since the GOP got rid of the Sunni's in Iraq and made Iran so powerful, I'm sensing they were on the side of the Shiites. Or are they just ignorantly running around bombing anything that moves?

It's a fair question. After all, during the Reagan administration they sold weapons to Iran AND backed Saddam against Iran. You never know what those wascally Wepublicans are going to do!!!

Because they are wascals.

 

[Jantje_Smit]

Talk about unintended consequence. How could they possibly leave Isis as THE major power in the Middle East?

And what makes you think that would be unintended?

 

[bedowin62]

libs are such freaking idiots

the last time a Democrat President said he had a "deal" preventing a nation from getting a nuclear bomb, it was made by the last two Dem Presidents, Carter on behalf of Clinton. everything the Left is saying about this deal was said about that one; how the freed up money was an incentive for them to play fair....etc. In no time at all North Korea exploded a nuclear bomb


it's going to be a worse situation this time though; when IRAN DOES GET THEIR BOMB, and that is almost a gaurantee; it will lead to a nuclear arms race among oil-rich Muslim states in the region. Saudia Arabia will get one at a minimum

libs are losers who lie to themselves

 

[bedowin62]

Care to share with us what element of the ISIS recruitment drive you found most attractive?

First, tell us which side you favor, ISIS or Iran?

I prefer the US side. But since the GOP got rid of the Sunni's in Iraq and made Iran so powerful, I'm sensing they were on the side of the Shiites. Or are they just ignorantly running around bombing anything that moves?

It's a fair question. After all, during the Reagan administration they sold weapons to Iran AND backed Saddam against Iran. You never know what those wascally Wepublicans are going to do!!!

of course you are the same kind of idiot that says out of the other side of his mouth that that kind of thing was preferable to taking saddam out

both iran and russia were soviet client states
saddams BAATH Party took power in a CIA-backed 1963 coup; dems were in the white house and both chambers of congress

Jimmy Carter is the father of the SHIITE ISLAMO-FASCIST STATE when he pulled his support for the Shah and supported the Ayatollah Khomeini

 

[Jantje_Smit]

the last time a Democrat President said he had a "deal" preventing a nation from getting a nuclear bomb, it was made by the last two Dem Presidents, Carter on behalf of Clinton. everything the Left is saying about this deal was said about that one; how the freed up money was an incentive for them to play fair....etc. In no time at all North Korea exploded a nuclear bomb..

Pssst

The US Government has announced that it will release $95m to North Korea as part of an agreement to replace the Stalinist country's own nuclear programme, which the US suspected was being misused.

Under the 1994 Agreed Framework an international consortium is building two proliferation-proof nuclear reactors and providing fuel oil for North Korea while the reactors are being built.

In releasing the funding, President George W Bush waived the Framework's requirement that North Korea allow inspectors to ensure it has not hidden away any weapons-grade plutonium from the original reactors.

President Bush argued that the decision was "vital to the national security interests of the United States".

BBC News | ASIA-PACIFIC | US grants N Korea nuclear funds

 

[bedowin62]

the last time a Democrat President said he had a "deal" preventing a nation from getting a nuclear bomb, it was made by the last two Dem Presidents, Carter on behalf of Clinton. everything the Left is saying about this deal was said about that one; how the freed up money was an incentive for them to play fair....etc. In no time at all North Korea exploded a nuclear bomb..

Pssst

The US Government has announced that it will release $95m to North Korea as part of an agreement to replace the Stalinist country's own nuclear programme, which the US suspected was being misused.

Under the 1994 Agreed Framework an international consortium is building two proliferation-proof nuclear reactors and providing fuel oil for North Korea while the reactors are being built.

In releasing the funding, President George W Bush waived the Framework's requirement that North Korea allow inspectors to ensure it has not hidden away any weapons-grade plutonium from the original reactors.

President Bush argued that the decision was "vital to the national security interests of the United States".

BBC News | ASIA-PACIFIC | US grants N Korea nuclear funds

pssssst. are you saying bush made that agreement and not carter for clinton leftard???

 

[Jantje_Smit]

pssssst. are you saying bush made that agreement and not carter for clinton leftard???

You've got a reading problem?

President George W Bush waived the Framework's requirement that North Korea allow inspectors.....

But of course it's Clinton's fault....

 

[bedowin62]

pssssst. are you saying bush made that agreement and not carter for clinton leftard???

You've got a reading problem?

President George W Bush waived the Framework's requirement that North Korea allow inspectors.....

But of course it's Clinton's fault....

relevance leftard: none

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I start off asking, "Is Dean nuts?" and before you finish the thought you realize it's not even a question

 

[rdean]

pssssst. are you saying bush made that agreement and not carter for clinton leftard???

You've got a reading problem?

President George W Bush waived the Framework's requirement that North Korea allow inspectors.....

But of course it's Clinton's fault....

relevance leftard: none

That's the only thing that is relevant. What the fuck is wrong with you? North Korea didn't explode nuclear bombs until Bush's SECOND term.

 

[PredFan]

The unintended consequences of bombing Iran?

There won't be any.

To say that it would make ISIS the #1 power in the ME is retarded.

Bombing Iran might very well take a lot of support away from ISIS as Iran is obviously one of its backers.

Even if not it certainly won't make ISIS stronger since Iran is in no way holding ISIS back.

How anyone can be stupid enough to believe the OP's nonsense is beyond me.