The Gravest Threat to World Peace

[SAYIT]

No plane hit bldg. 7.

Why, Tinnie, with two big planes hitting the other buildings, you don't think that Bldg. 7 got hit with some of the debris that made it feasible to pull down. Why not do some research and find out why that building was taken down? And why not read how the person who leased those buildings from the New York Port Authority still had to pay on his lease even though he was not collecting anything from sublessees on the buildings which were no longer there. I don't think even you would pull down a building if you thought you would still have to pay the authorities from whom you leased the building if there was not some good reason to do so.. How nice, though, that there are so many conspiracy nuts in this country!!! Maybe instead of telling us that Elvis is still alive, Tinnie will tell us he spotted Arafat wandering around Pennsylvania.

...you don't think that Bldg. 7 got hit with some of the debris that made it feasible to pull down.

Sure, there was some damage to the building on one side. If that damage was enough to cause a collapse it would have fallen over to that side. Falling straight down was impossible.

Except bldg 7 didn't get knocked over from the debris but rather set ablaze which, after hours of unimpeded burning, weakened the floor supports at the outer walls causing collapse. You knew that TinHorn but lamely attempted to muddy the waters. I consider that lying. To this posting there remains no evidence of demo rigging, no evidence of conspiracy to destroy or cover-up (other than that of al Qaeda) and no evidence of controlled demo, much to the chagrin of al Qaeda apologists like TinHorn. None.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Why, Tinnie, with two big planes hitting the other buildings, you don't think that Bldg. 7 got hit with some of the debris that made it feasible to pull down. Why not do some research and find out why that building was taken down? And why not read how the person who leased those buildings from the New York Port Authority still had to pay on his lease even though he was not collecting anything from sublessees on the buildings which were no longer there. I don't think even you would pull down a building if you thought you would still have to pay the authorities from whom you leased the building if there was not some good reason to do so.. How nice, though, that there are so many conspiracy nuts in this country!!! Maybe instead of telling us that Elvis is still alive, Tinnie will tell us he spotted Arafat wandering around Pennsylvania.

...you don't think that Bldg. 7 got hit with some of the debris that made it feasible to pull down.

Sure, there was some damage to the building on one side. If that damage was enough to cause a collapse it would have fallen over to that side. Falling straight down was impossible.

Except bldg 7 didn't get knocked over from the debris but rather set ablaze which, after hours of unimpeded burning, weakened the floor supports at the outer walls causing collapse. You knew that TinHorn but lamely attempted to muddy the waters. I consider that lying. To this posting there remains no evidence of demo rigging, no evidence of conspiracy to destroy or cover-up (other than that of al Qaeda) and no evidence of controlled demo, much to the chagrin of al Qaeda apologists like TinHorn. None.

So you think an office fire will melt all of the beams in a building at the same time?

 

[Billo_Really]

This last question is tricky because it Israel, a sovereignty, is under siege by an aggressor that is trying to over turn its sovereignty.

A population under the belligerent occupation of a foreign force against its will, is not the aggressor. And Israel is not under siege. When Germany annexed Poland, do you consider them "under siege" from the Poles?

(SIMPLE ANSWERS)

• Q1: Who has the right to the land?
  [Land owners!]

A1: It is a question of rightful ownership. Who owns the land by deed or grant?​

[At the time zionists unilaterally declared themselves a sovereign nation, they only owned 7% of the land in Palestine!]

• Q2: Who has the right to self determination?
  [Everyone. That is universal!]

A2: The population that takes the initiative to pursue it.​

[A population that "pursue's it", just gets their "determination" sooner. A population that doesn't, does not lose that right!]

• Q3: Who has the right to a state?
  [Both. They both have that right!]

A3: This is a question of establishing sovereignty. The authority changes over time. In 1900 the authority rested with the Ottoman Empire. In 1940 it rested with the Mandatory, the Allied Powers and the UN/LoN. Today, since Resolution 181, the Camp David, Dayton, Oslo, it was available through negotiation (Offer and Acceptance). Or,since the offers were declined, annexation.​

[181 was just a proposal. A suggested coarse of action. It carried no legal weight. When it went into the Security Counsul to make it binding, it got shot down!]

• Q4: Who has the right to defend themselves?
  [Everyone has the right to defend themselves!]

A4: Any sovereignty attacked. Article 51.​

Yes. The Palestinian's sovereignty has been attacked for the last 45 years.

BTW, why can't you make your posts more reader friendly? All this formatting and salutations just make it more difficult to understand your point and even more work to respond to. Just sayin...

 

[georgephillip]

georgephillip, et al,

I'm not sure I agree with this, as applied to the US.

Among the most powerful factions in US society are those who profit obscenely from the mass killing of civilians for political means, i.e., terrorism. "Choosing" between Republican OR Democrat in the voting booth will never remove that threat.

(COMMENT)

While we've heard of examples of this, relative to Southeast Asia, the Arab world and Africa, I've not known the US to go on a campaign to target civilians since Hiroshima and Nagasaki. And in war, there are exceptions and situations that constantly evolve.

War profiteering will always be with us; no matter what country you talk about. If it ever engages in war, there is a profit to be made. But generally, the US does not make a profit on civilian casualties. That has an adverse impact on the development of an economy.

Most Respectfully,
R

Rocco...the US has maimed, murdered, displaced, and incarcerated millions of civilians from Korea to Kandahar since Hiroshima and Nagasaki; there have been $billions of war-related profits during that time.

 

[georgephillip]

Why, Tinnie, with two big planes hitting the other buildings, you don't think that Bldg. 7 got hit with some of the debris that made it feasible to pull down. Why not do some research and find out why that building was taken down? And why not read how the person who leased those buildings from the New York Port Authority still had to pay on his lease even though he was not collecting anything from sublessees on the buildings which were no longer there. I don't think even you would pull down a building if you thought you would still have to pay the authorities from whom you leased the building if there was not some good reason to do so.. How nice, though, that there are so many conspiracy nuts in this country!!! Maybe instead of telling us that Elvis is still alive, Tinnie will tell us he spotted Arafat wandering around Pennsylvania.

...you don't think that Bldg. 7 got hit with some of the debris that made it feasible to pull down.

Sure, there was some damage to the building on one side. If that damage was enough to cause a collapse it would have fallen over to that side. Falling straight down was impossible.

Except bldg 7 didn't get knocked over from the debris but rather set ablaze which, after hours of unimpeded burning, weakened the floor supports at the outer walls causing collapse. You knew that TinHorn but lamely attempted to muddy the waters. I consider that lying. To this posting there remains no evidence of demo rigging, no evidence of conspiracy to destroy or cover-up (other than that of al Qaeda) and no evidence of controlled demo, much to the chagrin of al Qaeda apologists like TinHorn. None.

As of this posting there remains no shortage of evidence that proves thermitic materials contributed to the downfall of all three World Trade Center towers on 9/11/01:

"The scientific paper Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe provides, quite simply, proof that explosives were used in the destruction of the Twin Towers.

"Specifically, the paper positively identifies an advanced engineered pyrotechnic material in each of several samples of dust from the destroyed skyscrapers, in the form of tiny chips having red and gray sides and sharing a very specific three-dimensional structure, chemical composition, and ignition behavior."

Only punks and pathics willing to lie regularly in amateurish apologies for a corrupt government claim there's no evidence of controlled demolition on 911, not unlike their treasonous support of Israel's deliberate attack on the USS Liberty in 1967 which killed 34 Americans sailing in international waters.

Active Thermitics Made Simple

 

[irosie91]

thermite is nothing more than oxidized IRON fragments
nothing "advanced" about it ----it can be used in explosives
but then so can NITROGEN BASED FERTILIZERS

there is no evidence of a controlled demolition in the towers

 

[georgephillip]

thermite is nothing more than oxidized IRON fragments
nothing "advanced" about it ----it can be used in explosives
but then so can NITROGEN BASED FERTILIZERS

there is no evidence of a controlled demolition in the towers

Because, so far, the government hasn't seen fit to look for evidence of controlled demolition:

"A Nano-thermite or 'super-thermite'[1] is a metastable intermolecular composite (MICs) characterized by a particle size of its main constituents, a metal and a metal oxide, under 100 Nanometers. This allows for high and customizable reaction rates.

"Nano-thermites contain an oxidizer and a reducing agent, which are intimately mixed on the nanometer scale.

"MICs, including nano-thermitic materials, are a type of reactive materials investigated for military use, as well as for general applications involving propellants, explosives, and pyrotechnics."

Nano-thermite - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Hossfly]

Sure, there was some damage to the building on one side. If that damage was enough to cause a collapse it would have fallen over to that side. Falling straight down was impossible.

Except bldg 7 didn't get knocked over from the debris but rather set ablaze which, after hours of unimpeded burning, weakened the floor supports at the outer walls causing collapse. You knew that TinHorn but lamely attempted to muddy the waters. I consider that lying. To this posting there remains no evidence of demo rigging, no evidence of conspiracy to destroy or cover-up (other than that of al Qaeda) and no evidence of controlled demo, much to the chagrin of al Qaeda apologists like TinHorn. None.

As of this posting there remains no shortage of evidence that proves thermitic materials contributed to the downfall of all three World Trade Center towers on 9/11/01:

"The scientific paper Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe provides, quite simply, proof that explosives were used in the destruction of the Twin Towers.

"Specifically, the paper positively identifies an advanced engineered pyrotechnic material in each of several samples of dust from the destroyed skyscrapers, in the form of tiny chips having red and gray sides and sharing a very specific three-dimensional structure, chemical composition, and ignition behavior."

Only punks and pathics willing to lie regularly in amateurish apologies for a corrupt government claim there's no evidence of controlled demolition on 911, not unlike their treasonous support of Israel's deliberate attack on the USS Liberty in 1967 which killed 34 Americans sailing in international waters.

Active Thermitics Made Simple

Gee, Georgie Boy, many think that only punks and pathetic people wouldn't spend some time researching "debunking the myths of 9/11." As the readers can see, pathetic Georgie Boy, once again has to pull up the Liberty incident in his post. It appears he has so little to place the blame on those he hates that he consistently drag up the same old things. Meanwhile, of course, he closes his eyes to what is happening in the world of today. It is more important to him to pull up stuff which happened more than ten years ago. Just be glad that those radical Muslims didn't have the time to do something drastic to one of the buildings in Los Angeles as they planned as you might have been in the vicinity to be harmed.

 

[georgephillip]

You can grovel from now until your gravest day, but it won't change Physics or History:

"As this simplified summary of the findings of the paper Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe shows, the distinctive red-gray chips found consistently in dust samples from the destroyed Twin Towers are clearly an advanced engineered pyrotechnic material.

"It is not even remotely possible that the material could have been formed spontaneously through any random process such as the total destruction of the Twin Towers. Nor is it possible that the material was present in the Towers for some innocent reason.

"The chips are clearly the unexploded remains of a pyrotechnic material -- likely a high explosive -- that was present in the Twin Towers in large quantities.

"Reasonable estimates of tonnage of material based on the abundance of red-gray chips in the dust range from the tens into the hundreds.

"Although the installation of so much material would require considerable planning and logistics, it would not necessarily be difficult to conceal, as this hypothetical blasting scenario shows."

Active Thermitics Made Simple

 

[irosie91]

BS

who shot kennedy? the lochness monster demanded release---he is
threatening a HUNGER STRIKE

 

[irosie91]

with all that "thermite" why did anyone bother to crash planes into the towers?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Why, Tinnie, with two big planes hitting the other buildings, you don't think that Bldg. 7 got hit with some of the debris that made it feasible to pull down. Why not do some research and find out why that building was taken down? And why not read how the person who leased those buildings from the New York Port Authority still had to pay on his lease even though he was not collecting anything from sublessees on the buildings which were no longer there. I don't think even you would pull down a building if you thought you would still have to pay the authorities from whom you leased the building if there was not some good reason to do so.. How nice, though, that there are so many conspiracy nuts in this country!!! Maybe instead of telling us that Elvis is still alive, Tinnie will tell us he spotted Arafat wandering around Pennsylvania.

...you don't think that Bldg. 7 got hit with some of the debris that made it feasible to pull down.

Sure, there was some damage to the building on one side. If that damage was enough to cause a collapse it would have fallen over to that side. Falling straight down was impossible.

Except bldg 7 didn't get knocked over from the debris but rather set ablaze which, after hours of unimpeded burning, weakened the floor supports at the outer walls causing collapse. You knew that TinHorn but lamely attempted to muddy the waters. I consider that lying. To this posting there remains no evidence of demo rigging, no evidence of conspiracy to destroy or cover-up (other than that of al Qaeda) and no evidence of controlled demo, much to the chagrin of al Qaeda apologists like TinHorn. None.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZeUy_pwRFQ]9/11 - Uncovering Ten Years Of Deception, Episode 4/5 - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Hossfly]

Sure, there was some damage to the building on one side. If that damage was enough to cause a collapse it would have fallen over to that side. Falling straight down was impossible.

Except bldg 7 didn't get knocked over from the debris but rather set ablaze which, after hours of unimpeded burning, weakened the floor supports at the outer walls causing collapse. You knew that TinHorn but lamely attempted to muddy the waters. I consider that lying. To this posting there remains no evidence of demo rigging, no evidence of conspiracy to destroy or cover-up (other than that of al Qaeda) and no evidence of controlled demo, much to the chagrin of al Qaeda apologists like TinHorn. None.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZeUy_pwRFQ]9/11 - Uncovering Ten Years Of Deception, Episode 4/5 - YouTube[/ame]

Looks like Tinnie is a conspiracy fellow (probably one of those who also believes that man never landed on the moon). No doubt he would have been one of those pointing their fingers even before the dust began to settle at the U.S. and Israel on a forum to discuss the atrocity committed by his Muslim friends. Since Tinnie seems to be the East coast representative of Hamas, I wonder if he was also privy to what his friends were going to do on 9/11. Maybe he even wished he was able to help that other Muslim sitting in jail right now for the previous bombing in one of the buildings of the WTC complex. Meanwhile, Tinnie, have you ever spent any time researching those who are debunking all the myths of 9/11, or do you just prefer to accept what the others are saying about 9/11 because it fits your agenda. Since Tinnie's friends committed this atrocity, it's a shame that Tinnie and those with the same mind set couldn't have taken up a collection to help the person who held the master lease on those buildings. After all, since after this atrocity, with the buildings destroyed, he wasn't able to sublease the offices but still had to pay the New York Port Authority on his lease. Can you imagine the huge sum of money this was, especially since the insurance money on his NNN lease didn't cover the costs of rebuilding.

 

[georgephillip]

with all that "thermite" why did anyone bother to crash planes into the towers?

"The progressive detonation of so many tons of energetic material would explain the mushrooming explosions that so systematically shattered each Tower from top to bottom, and the incredible thoroughness of the destruction, which left virtually no recognizable building components other than the heavy steelwork and cladding, and no traceable fragment of more than 1000 human bodies."

Active Thermitics Made Simple

"(N)o traceable fragment of more than 1000 human bodies."

Nessie has an alibi...what about you?

 

[Hossfly]

with all that "thermite" why did anyone bother to crash planes into the towers?

"The progressive detonation of so many tons of energetic material would explain the mushrooming explosions that so systematically shattered each Tower from top to bottom, and the incredible thoroughness of the destruction, which left virtually no recognizable building components other than the heavy steelwork and cladding, and no traceable fragment of more than 1000 human bodies."

Active Thermitics Made Simple

"(N)o traceable fragment of more than 1000 human bodies."

Nessie has an alibi...what about you?

Why Georgie Boy is so consumed with 9/11 at this moment is anyone's quess. i guess he ran out of things to whine about. Let him and his fellow conspiracy travelers believe what they want to believe, and the rest of us can believe what we want to believe. After all, we are a free country and wouldn't get arrested for what we believe. I would think that the majority of people in this country are not obsessed conspiracy theorists, but are more concerned with what is happened today -- not over ten years ago. Let us just be happy that our Intelligence Agencies have been able to pick up the terrorists before they had a chance to commit another atrocity like 9/11 and let us hope that their luck holds out because no doubt these terrorists will keep on trying.

9/11 Conspiracy Theories - Debunking the Myths - World Trade Center - Pentagon - Flight 93 - Popular Mechanics

 

[P F Tinmore]

Except bldg 7 didn't get knocked over from the debris but rather set ablaze which, after hours of unimpeded burning, weakened the floor supports at the outer walls causing collapse. You knew that TinHorn but lamely attempted to muddy the waters. I consider that lying. To this posting there remains no evidence of demo rigging, no evidence of conspiracy to destroy or cover-up (other than that of al Qaeda) and no evidence of controlled demo, much to the chagrin of al Qaeda apologists like TinHorn. None.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZeUy_pwRFQ]9/11 - Uncovering Ten Years Of Deception, Episode 4/5 - YouTube[/ame]

Looks like Tinnie is a conspiracy fellow (probably one of those who also believes that man never landed on the moon). No doubt he would have been one of those pointing their fingers even before the dust began to settle at the U.S. and Israel on a forum to discuss the atrocity committed by his Muslim friends. Since Tinnie seems to be the East coast representative of Hamas, I wonder if he was also privy to what his friends were going to do on 9/11. Maybe he even wished he was able to help that other Muslim sitting in jail right now for the previous bombing in one of the buildings of the WTC complex. Meanwhile, Tinnie, have you ever spent any time researching those who are debunking all the myths of 9/11, or do you just prefer to accept what the others are saying about 9/11 because it fits your agenda. Since Tinnie's friends committed this atrocity, it's a shame that Tinnie and those with the same mind set couldn't have taken up a collection to help the person who held the master lease on those buildings. After all, since after this atrocity, with the buildings destroyed, he wasn't able to sublease the offices but still had to pay the New York Port Authority on his lease. Can you imagine the huge sum of money this was, especially since the insurance money on his NNN lease didn't cover the costs of rebuilding.

Since Tinnie's friends committed this atrocity, it's a shame that Tinnie and those with the same mind set couldn't have taken up a collection to help the person who held the master lease on those buildings. After all, since after this atrocity, with the buildings destroyed, he wasn't able to sublease the offices but still had to pay the New York Port Authority on his lease. Can you imagine the huge sum of money this was, especially since the insurance money on his NNN lease didn't cover the costs of rebuilding.

Indeed, poor guy. Start at 4:00

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hszDUyJJ2cU]9 11 Follow the Money find the criminals - YouTube[/ame]

 

[georgephillip]

with all that "thermite" why did anyone bother to crash planes into the towers?

"The progressive detonation of so many tons of energetic material would explain the mushrooming explosions that so systematically shattered each Tower from top to bottom, and the incredible thoroughness of the destruction, which left virtually no recognizable building components other than the heavy steelwork and cladding, and no traceable fragment of more than 1000 human bodies."

Active Thermitics Made Simple

"(N)o traceable fragment of more than 1000 human bodies."

Nessie has an alibi...what about you?

Why Georgie Boy is so consumed with 9/11 at this moment is anyone's quess. i guess he ran out of things to whine about. Let him and his fellow conspiracy travelers believe what they want to believe, and the rest of us can believe what we want to believe. After all, we are a free country and wouldn't get arrested for what we believe. I would think that the majority of people in this country are not obsessed conspiracy theorists, but are more concerned with what is happened today -- not over ten years ago. Let us just be happy that our Intelligence Agencies have been able to pick up the terrorists before they had a chance to commit another atrocity like 9/11 and let us hope that their luck holds out because no doubt these terrorists will keep on trying.

9/11 Conspiracy Theories - Debunking the Myths - World Trade Center - Pentagon - Flight 93 - Popular Mechanics

Why is Hossie afraid of the fact that elites who control the US government have no compunctions about killing American civilians in New York or service members on board the USS Liberty? Is it possible he's spent his entire useless life serving a gold-plated lie? Maybe he should take his taxpayer-subsidized pensions in Tel Aviv?

 

[Hossfly]

9/11 - Uncovering Ten Years Of Deception, Episode 4/5 - YouTube

Looks like Tinnie is a conspiracy fellow (probably one of those who also believes that man never landed on the moon). No doubt he would have been one of those pointing their fingers even before the dust began to settle at the U.S. and Israel on a forum to discuss the atrocity committed by his Muslim friends. Since Tinnie seems to be the East coast representative of Hamas, I wonder if he was also privy to what his friends were going to do on 9/11. Maybe he even wished he was able to help that other Muslim sitting in jail right now for the previous bombing in one of the buildings of the WTC complex. Meanwhile, Tinnie, have you ever spent any time researching those who are debunking all the myths of 9/11, or do you just prefer to accept what the others are saying about 9/11 because it fits your agenda. Since Tinnie's friends committed this atrocity, it's a shame that Tinnie and those with the same mind set couldn't have taken up a collection to help the person who held the master lease on those buildings. After all, since after this atrocity, with the buildings destroyed, he wasn't able to sublease the offices but still had to pay the New York Port Authority on his lease. Can you imagine the huge sum of money this was, especially since the insurance money on his NNN lease didn't cover the costs of rebuilding.

Since Tinnie's friends committed this atrocity, it's a shame that Tinnie and those with the same mind set couldn't have taken up a collection to help the person who held the master lease on those buildings. After all, since after this atrocity, with the buildings destroyed, he wasn't able to sublease the offices but still had to pay the New York Port Authority on his lease. Can you imagine the huge sum of money this was, especially since the insurance money on his NNN lease didn't cover the costs of rebuilding.

Indeed, poor guy. Start at 4:00

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hszDUyJJ2cU]9 11 Follow the Money find the criminals - YouTube[/ame]

Looks like Tinnie is also one of those conspiracy nuts? Did you ever do any research Tinnie on the debunking of these 9/11 myths? Meanwhile, I hope you and your like-minded pals took up a collection for Silverstein since it is costing him millions and millions of dollars that he has to pay the New York Port Authority on the master lease he holds and the insurance money will not cover all the costs to rebuild. After all, how can you collect money from your sub lessees when the buildings are not even there? Say, Tinnie can contact that Port Authority on his magic computer that really isn't there and ask them how much must be paid each year on the lease. By the way, someone in real estate in New York said that an Arab group was also competing for the lease on the WTC. Do you think if the Arabs had won the competition that the terrorists who plotted and planned this atrocity would have still carried it out?

 

[Hossfly]

"The progressive detonation of so many tons of energetic material would explain the mushrooming explosions that so systematically shattered each Tower from top to bottom, and the incredible thoroughness of the destruction, which left virtually no recognizable building components other than the heavy steelwork and cladding, and no traceable fragment of more than 1000 human bodies."

Active Thermitics Made Simple

"(N)o traceable fragment of more than 1000 human bodies."

Nessie has an alibi...what about you?

Why Georgie Boy is so consumed with 9/11 at this moment is anyone's quess. i guess he ran out of things to whine about. Let him and his fellow conspiracy travelers believe what they want to believe, and the rest of us can believe what we want to believe. After all, we are a free country and wouldn't get arrested for what we believe. I would think that the majority of people in this country are not obsessed conspiracy theorists, but are more concerned with what is happened today -- not over ten years ago. Let us just be happy that our Intelligence Agencies have been able to pick up the terrorists before they had a chance to commit another atrocity like 9/11 and let us hope that their luck holds out because no doubt these terrorists will keep on trying.

9/11 Conspiracy Theories - Debunking the Myths - World Trade Center - Pentagon - Flight 93 - Popular Mechanics

Why is Hossie afraid of the fact that elites who control the US government have no compunctions about killing American civilians in New York or service members on board the USS Liberty? Is it possible he's spent his entire useless life serving a gold-plated lie? Maybe he should take his taxpayer-subsidized pensions in Tel Aviv?

And why is Georgie Boy so obsessed with 9/11 right now? I wonder if the brave Georgie Boy would volunteer to be thrown into the cell with that tough looking hombre who was one of the plotters of 9/11 and tell him all the conspiracy theories. I can just imagine what would happen to Georgie Boy since this terrorist and his other terrorist associates are so happy that they brought this country to its knees for a while. Georgie Boy himself is not grateful that these terrorists who planned to also commit another atrocity in his own city didn't have the time to carry it out. Georgie Boy might have been in the vicinity when it occurred. Is it possible, Georgie Boy, that you have spent your own useless life blaming everything on the Jews instead of putting in some effort to better yourself? Just be happy that the citizens of Los Angeles who actually pushed themselves to be able to get decent jobs are helping you out with having a subsidized apartment or else where would you be? By the way, since Georgie Boy is so obsessed with talking about 9/11 instead of what is actually happening in the world of today, let us take a moment to remember Guy Tazzoli who just passed away.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/07/n...m-that-built-twin-towers-dies-at-90.html?_r=0

 

[georgephillip]

My sympathy is reserved for the more deserving:

"Remember Building 7 is a non-partisan campaign led by 9/11 family members to raise awareness of the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 through television and other forms of advertising, and to shift public opinion such that the New York City Council and Manhattan District Attorney will be compelled to open an investigation into Building 7′s destruction."

Care to add your voice to the call for an independent investigation into WTC7's collapse?

Remember Building 7 | Stand with the 9-11 families demanding a NEW Building 7 investigation - About