The Greate Debate: Climate Change

[orogenicman]

Are we beyond the tipping point for survivable climate change? How will our nation thrive the coming food and national security threats tied to climate change?

7pm Saturday, February 2, 2013 - ASU Gammage Auditorium

Join an exciting panel of scientists and leaders affiliated with NASA, NOAA, The Earth Institute, E3G, and The Global Institute of Sustainability for what is sure to be a lively conversation on the future of the nation and the world in our changing climate. The Origins Project at ASU is proud to host esteemed scientists and intellectuals Prof. Jim Hansen, Prof. Susan Solomon, Prof. Wallace Broecker, Mr. John Ashton CBE, and Prof. Sander Van Der Leeuw as they discuss these controversial issues in the field of climate change. Origins Project director Lawrence Krauss will moderate the evening.

This event has been generously co-sponsored by the Rob and Melani Walton Sustainability Solutions Initiatives and the School of Earth and Space Exploration at Arizona State University.

Get the most recent updates from the Origins Project by following us on Facebook (/ASUOriginsProject) and Twitter (@asuORIGINS). Contact [email protected]h questions.

Part One:

Part Two:

 

[orogenicman]

Bump.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Debate in a nutshell.

AGWCult claims to have reduced all variables in climate change down to incremental changes in the atmospheric rounding error of a gas CO2. When you ask them to replicate these conditions in a lab, they tell us weather is far too complicated with too many variables to replicate in a lab. (The lab is very unkind to their theory and refuses to cooperate)

Um, so how could they possibly have eliminated all other variables save for incremental changes in CO2?

 

[orogenicman]

Debate in a nutshell.

AGWCult claims to have reduced all variables in climate change down to incremental changes in the atmospheric rounding error of a gas CO2. When you ask them to replicate these conditions in a lab, they tell us weather is far too complicated with too many variables to replicate in a lab. (The lab is very unkind to their theory and refuses to cooperate)

Um, so how could they possibly have eliminated all other variables save for incremental changes in CO2?

In a nutshell, nothing in your rant was discussed in the videos, demonstrating that you not only didn't watch them, but that you're only intent in posting here is to disrupt the thread. There is a five letter word for people like you...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Debate in a nutshell.

AGWCult claims to have reduced all variables in climate change down to incremental changes in the atmospheric rounding error of a gas CO2. When you ask them to replicate these conditions in a lab, they tell us weather is far too complicated with too many variables to replicate in a lab. (The lab is very unkind to their theory and refuses to cooperate)

Um, so how could they possibly have eliminated all other variables save for incremental changes in CO2?

In a nutshell, nothing in your rant was discussed in the videos, demonstrating that you not only didn't watch them, but that you're only intent in posting here is to disrupt the thread. There is a five letter word for people like you...

I question the basic notion behind your "Science", your theory fails in the real world. Why the fuck should I watch 2 1/2 hours of mindless babbling about hiding the decline and redistributing wealth based upon a fraud