The Greatest Lie (Liar)!

The irony of any of the rightwing clowns on this forum accusing liberals of being divisive is priceless.
Actually, the Right proudly takes credit for today's partisan divide!

March 22, 2010
RUSH: * I'll tell you, I'm going to be very honest. I largely blame myself for this.* I do, I'll tell you why I think I'm responsible for this, this partisan divide.* It's a good thing, don't misunderstand, but I'm responsible for it
 
The irony of any of the rightwing clowns on this forum accusing liberals of being divisive is priceless.
Actually, the Right proudly takes credit for today's partisan divide!

March 22, 2010
RUSH: * I'll tell you, I'm going to be very honest. I largely blame myself for this.* I do, I'll tell you why I think I'm responsible for this, this partisan divide.* It's a good thing, don't misunderstand, but I'm responsible for it

The right says "we dont believe laws should be passed that affect just one group of people...laws should be passed for all of the people....."

The left responds with..."that is becuase the right hates blacks, gays and women"...

Yet the right is the divisive side.

Got it.
 
The irony of any of the rightwing clowns on this forum accusing liberals of being divisive is priceless.
Actually, the Right proudly takes credit for today's partisan divide!

March 22, 2010
RUSH: * I'll tell you, I'm going to be very honest. I largely blame myself for this.* I do, I'll tell you why I think I'm responsible for this, this partisan divide.* It's a good thing, don't misunderstand, but I'm responsible for it

The right says "we dont believe laws should be passed that affect just one group of people...laws should be passed for all of the people....."

The left responds with..."that is becuase the right hates blacks, gays and women"...

Yet the right is the divisive side.

Got it.

So the right opposes the marriage laws that were passed just for one group of people...

...the heterosexuals?

lol
 
The irony of any of the rightwing clowns on this forum accusing liberals of being divisive is priceless.
Actually, the Right proudly takes credit for today's partisan divide!

March 22, 2010
RUSH: * I'll tell you, I'm going to be very honest. I largely blame myself for this.* I do, I'll tell you why I think I'm responsible for this, this partisan divide.* It's a good thing, don't misunderstand, but I'm responsible for it

The right says "we dont believe laws should be passed that affect just one group of people...laws should be passed for all of the people....."

The left responds with..."that is becuase the right hates blacks, gays and women"...

Yet the right is the divisive side.

Got it.

no, both are.
 
Actually, the Right proudly takes credit for today's partisan divide!

March 22, 2010
RUSH: * I'll tell you, I'm going to be very honest. I largely blame myself for this.* I do, I'll tell you why I think I'm responsible for this, this partisan divide.* It's a good thing, don't misunderstand, but I'm responsible for it

The right says "we dont believe laws should be passed that affect just one group of people...laws should be passed for all of the people....."

The left responds with..."that is becuase the right hates blacks, gays and women"...

Yet the right is the divisive side.

Got it.

So the right opposes the marriage laws that were passed just for one group of people...

...the heterosexuals?

lol

yeah...the right is certainly showing their hypocrisy with the gay marriage issue.....wont argue that.

However, the right is against gay marriage due to their traditional and religious definition of marriage. Not becuase they are homophobes.

Well.......actually....many are.....but so are many on the left.
 
The right says "we dont believe laws should be passed that affect just one group of people...laws should be passed for all of the people....."

The left responds with..."that is becuase the right hates blacks, gays and women"...

Yet the right is the divisive side.

Got it.

So the right opposes the marriage laws that were passed just for one group of people...

...the heterosexuals?

lol

yeah...the right is certainly showing their hypocrisy with the gay marriage issue.....wont argue that.

However, the right is against gay marriage due to their traditional and religious definition of marriage. Not becuase they are homophobes.

Well.......actually....many are.....but so are many on the left.

Those opposing it on Religious grounds should feel free to oppose it in their private lives and at their Churches, and even speak freely about opposing it.

But should any of them be rational, they'd admit that we shouldn't legislate based on Biblics.
 
So the right opposes the marriage laws that were passed just for one group of people...

...the heterosexuals?

lol

yeah...the right is certainly showing their hypocrisy with the gay marriage issue.....wont argue that.

However, the right is against gay marriage due to their traditional and religious definition of marriage. Not becuase they are homophobes.

Well.......actually....many are.....but so are many on the left.

Those opposing it on Religious grounds should feel free to oppose it in their private lives and at their Churches, and even speak freely about opposing it.

But should any of them be rational, they'd admit that we shouldn't legislate based on Biblics.

I disagree with their argument...their side of the debate.

However, I understand their position.....and understanding their position allows for a more honest debate...and a better chance of them seeing your side.

Many truly believe that the term marriage is religiously defined as a union between a man and a woman....and to change that would be changing what THEIR union has been defined as in the eyes of their God and their community.

It is more selfishness than homophobia.

But I do understand and respect their position.
 
yeah...the right is certainly showing their hypocrisy with the gay marriage issue.....wont argue that.

However, the right is against gay marriage due to their traditional and religious definition of marriage. Not becuase they are homophobes.

Well.......actually....many are.....but so are many on the left.

Those opposing it on Religious grounds should feel free to oppose it in their private lives and at their Churches, and even speak freely about opposing it.

But should any of them be rational, they'd admit that we shouldn't legislate based on Biblics.

I disagree with their argument...their side of the debate.

However, I understand their position.....and understanding their position allows for a more honest debate...and a better chance of them seeing your side.

Many truly believe that the term marriage is religiously defined as a union between a man and a woman....and to change that would be changing what THEIR union has been defined as in the eyes of their God and their community.

It is more selfishness than homophobia.

But I do understand and respect their position.

Selfishness, short sightedness, insecurity and Theocratic dictatorship.

Homophobia is for those arguing against it who dont even have a religious basis, because when you boil down each and every argument (aside from Religious), the logic is not there and its bare skin is always a simple distaste of something different. It's because as a culture we were very wrong to treat is so taboo, and it's hard for persons, especially older persons, to change their minds.

I hope to never dismiss logic and reason because of age.
I see it so much though, it's scary.
 
explain why the vast majority of American votes of color dont like your party?


Why do they SHUN you and your candidates?

Primarily because Democrats treat blacks like slaves.
Democrats provide :
free phones.
free food (SNAP)
free housing (Section 8)
earned income tax credits (free money)

On average the majority of blacks that voted for Obama are like these two examples:
ROGULSKI: And where did Obama get it?
WOMAN #1: I don't know, his stash. I don't know. (laughter) I don't know where he got it from, but he givin' it to us,
WOMAN #2: And we love him.
WOMAN #1: We love him. That's why we voted for him!

Or maybe this person... "I wont have to worry about putting gas in my car, I won't have to worry about paying my mortgage..
You know, If I help him[Obama], he's gonna help me." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slUBWQ1AUEg"

And so is it no wonder the majority of blacks will vote as they are told to??
 
explain why the vast majority of American votes of color dont like your party?


Why do they SHUN you and your candidates?

Primarily because Democrats treat blacks like slaves.
Democrats provide :
free phones.
free food (SNAP)
free housing (Section 8)
earned income tax credits (free money)

On average the majority of blacks that voted for Obama are like these two examples:
ROGULSKI: And where did Obama get it?
WOMAN #1: I don't know, his stash. I don't know. (laughter) I don't know where he got it from, but he givin' it to us,
WOMAN #2: And we love him.
WOMAN #1: We love him. That's why we voted for him!

Or maybe this person... "I wont have to worry about putting gas in my car, I won't have to worry about paying my mortgage..
You know, If I help him[Obama], he's gonna help me." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slUBWQ1AUEg"

And so is it no wonder the majority of blacks will vote as they are told to??



Thats what's racist, moron.

Not all R's, but you certainly.
 
explain why the vast majority of American votes of color dont like your party?


Why do they SHUN you and your candidates?

Primarily because Democrats treat blacks like slaves.
Democrats provide :
free phones.
free food (SNAP)
free housing (Section 8)
earned income tax credits (free money)

On average the majority of blacks that voted for Obama are like these two examples:
ROGULSKI: And where did Obama get it?
WOMAN #1: I don't know, his stash. I don't know. (laughter) I don't know where he got it from, but he givin' it to us,
WOMAN #2: And we love him.
WOMAN #1: We love him. That's why we voted for him!

Or maybe this person... "I wont have to worry about putting gas in my car, I won't have to worry about paying my mortgage..
You know, If I help him[Obama], he's gonna help me." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slUBWQ1AUEg"

And so is it no wonder the majority of blacks will vote as they are told to??
Only in the sick perverted racist mind of the Misinformation Voter could the slave love the slave master!
 
1. The minister chosen by President Obama upon the occasion of his inauguration was the Liberal Reverend Joseph Lowery. He intoned:
"We ask you to help us work for that day when black will not be asked to get in back, when brown can stick around...""When yellow will be mellow, when the red man can get ahead, man; and when white will embrace what is right. That all those who do justice and love mercy say Amen."

The Associated Press noticed liberal Rev. Joseph Lowery's prayer raised eyebrows when he prayed for that day in the hazy future when "white will embrace what is right." AP Describes Black Minister's Mockery of Whites as Not Right As 'Note of Racial Caution' | NewsBusters

a. Who OK'd that racist view? Well....who selected the speaker?




2. Speaking of religious racists, there was Obama's Easter Sunday speaker, the the Rev. Luis León, pastor of the Episcopal church the Obama family attended for the holiday. He 'honored' the President with a sermon in which he said it drives him "crazy when the captains of the religious right are always calling us back ... for blacks to be back in the back of the bus ... for women to be back in the kitchen ... for immigrants to be back on their side of the border."
Obama Easter Service Pastor, Luis León, Criticized For Remarks Against Religious Right

a. Exactly who are the leaders of the religious right espousing that?
Any?
Or is this another divisive lie from the Left?

b. Did I miss the disavowal of that slander from the President?
No?
Well...why didn't he disavow it?





3. Why the need to divide America?

" To see the secular socialist building his machine, one need only note the appeal to the self-interest of each of their various interest groups rather than appealing to any unifying vision for the future of the nation. The reason for ‘identity politics’ is that the intellectual mindset of the Leftists is hardly the same as that of the vast majority of Americans." Gingrich, "To Save America," chapter two.

a. Like this: " “If Latinos sit out the election instead of saying, ‘We’re gonna punish our enemies and we’re gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us,’....
Obama to Latinos: "Punish" Your "Enemies" in the Voting Booth | The Weekly Standard




4. The "Greatest Lie"?
" Obama is the president of all Americans, not just the ones who agree with him, so shut up"

Obama is the president of all Americans, not just the ones who agree with him, so shut up | The Daily Caller

So you believe racism is a thing of the past? All whites are fully accepting of minorities? You must be kidding.

I have a novel idea....

...how about you deal with what I actually said....not what you'd like to pretend what I said.


Otherwise, you're nothing but either a fraud, or a simple-minded individual with a reading comprehension problem.


So...have I proven my premise? This dishonorable windbag in the White House pulled the wool over your eyes, pretending to endorse unity among our people...while in reality he is following his mentor:

[Saul] Alinsky, echoing Lenin, justifies almost any immoral act, especially dishonesty and hypocrisy:
“…a true community organizer "does not have a fixed truth truth to him is relative and changing; everything to him is relative and changing. He is a political relativist.” http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnew...re-a-saul-alinsky-portrait-in-the-white-house
 
explain why the vast majority of American votes of color dont like your party?


Why do they SHUN you and your candidates?

Primarily because Democrats treat blacks like slaves.
Democrats provide :
free phones.
free food (SNAP)
free housing (Section 8)
earned income tax credits (free money)

On average the majority of blacks that voted for Obama are like these two examples:
ROGULSKI: And where did Obama get it?
WOMAN #1: I don't know, his stash. I don't know. (laughter) I don't know where he got it from, but he givin' it to us,
WOMAN #2: And we love him.
WOMAN #1: We love him. That's why we voted for him!

Or maybe this person... "I wont have to worry about putting gas in my car, I won't have to worry about paying my mortgage..
You know, If I help him[Obama], he's gonna help me." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slUBWQ1AUEg"

And so is it no wonder the majority of blacks will vote as they are told to??

really?

A few misguided, unintelligent freeloaders define an entire race?

Heck, I know some very misguided unintelligent freeloading white people.....are we defined as the same?

There were just as many white people who voted for McCain becuase Obama was black as there were black people who voted for Obama becuase he was black.

Why do black people vote primarily democratic?

Becuase the intentiins of the right are spun by the democrats as racist.

And as long as both parties spin the motives and intentions of the opposing party, we will never have an honest debate about anything.

Its getting old.
 
1. The minister chosen by President Obama upon the occasion of his inauguration was the Liberal Reverend Joseph Lowery. He intoned:
"We ask you to help us work for that day when black will not be asked to get in back, when brown can stick around...""When yellow will be mellow, when the red man can get ahead, man; and when white will embrace what is right. That all those who do justice and love mercy say Amen."

The Associated Press noticed liberal Rev. Joseph Lowery's prayer raised eyebrows when he prayed for that day in the hazy future when "white will embrace what is right." AP Describes Black Minister's Mockery of Whites as Not Right As 'Note of Racial Caution' | NewsBusters

a. Who OK'd that racist view? Well....who selected the speaker?


2. Speaking of religious racists, there was Obama's Easter Sunday speaker, the the Rev. Luis León, pastor of the Episcopal church the Obama family attended for the holiday. He 'honored' the President with a sermon in which he said it drives him "crazy when the captains of the religious right are always calling us back ... for blacks to be back in the back of the bus ... for women to be back in the kitchen ... for immigrants to be back on their side of the border."
Obama Easter Service Pastor, Luis León, Criticized For Remarks Against Religious Right

a. Exactly who are the leaders of the religious right espousing that?
Any?
Or is this another divisive lie from the Left?

b. Did I miss the disavowal of that slander from the President?
No?

Well...why didn't he disavow it?





3. Why the need to divide America?

" To see the secular socialist building his machine, one need only note the appeal to the self-interest of each of their various interest groups rather than appealing to any unifying vision for the future of the nation. The reason for ‘identity politics’ is that the intellectual mindset of the Leftists is hardly the same as that of the vast majority of Americans." Gingrich, "To Save America," chapter two.

a. Like this: " “If Latinos sit out the election instead of saying, ‘We’re gonna punish our enemies and we’re gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us,’....
Obama to Latinos: "Punish" Your "Enemies" in the Voting Booth | The Weekly Standard




4. The "Greatest Lie"?
" Obama is the president of all Americans, not just the ones who agree with him, so shut up"

Obama is the president of all Americans, not just the ones who agree with him, so shut up | The Daily Caller

Dr. Luis Leon, from St John's church, is as white as I am....he is NOT black, he is NOT a racist against whites, he was President Bush's chosen Pastor on many occasions while President Bush was in office...

there was no claim of him being black.
Honestly, his color plays absolutely no role in this discussion.

I see him as an example of a man who spoke on a topic using generalities with no actual fact to work with.

Are there racists in the religious right?

Of course.

There are racists in every walk of life...every ideology......every corner of the earth.

BNut to say the "Captains" of the religious right have those sentiments?

That is the same as painting the entire religious right as racists, sexists and homophobes.

Afterall, the Captains define the subordinates.

And in my eyes? One who can do that without anything to back it up? Is a racist, sexist, homophobe looking to feel rightous...




I don't know why you'd give up the high ground so easily.

It is provable that the Democrats, historically the party of slavery, segregation, and sedition...
....still are:


While talking a great game, it is well known by all except liberals in general, and the Black community specifically, that the Democrat Party claims to be concerned with support of blacks, their record with respect to blacks tells a different story…


1. In 2005, the Democrats did not name Donna Brazile to head the Democratic National Committee. They chose Howard Dean.

2. “Gov. David A. Paterson defiantly vowed to run for election next year despite the White House‘s urging that he withdraw from the New York governor’s race.” http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/20/nyregion/20paterson.html

3. President Barack Obama has kept mum on the fate of Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) for days -- but he tells CBS News that it's time for the embattled 80-year-old former Ways and Means Chairman to end his career "with dignity."
"I think Charlie Rangel served a very long time and served-- his constituents very well. But these-- allegations are very troubling," Obama told Harry Smith in an interview to be aired on the "Early Show." and first broadcast on the CBS Evening News with Katie Couric. Obama: Time for Rangel to end career "with dignity" - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com



4 Harold Ford told not to run for Senator from New York:
“From the start, Mr. Ford’s potential candidacy angered national Democratic Party leaders by disrupting plans for what was planned as a seamless Gillibrand nomination. Harry Reid of Nevada, the Senate majority leader, called Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg to discourage him from supporting Mr. Ford, and Senator Charles E. Schumer of New York met personally with Mr. Ford to argue against his candidacy.” http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/02/nyregion/02ford.html

5. “As state comptroller, [Carl] McCall earned the distinction of being the first African American ever elected to a statewide office in New York. Four years later voters overwhelmingly supported McCall over Republican Bruce Blakeman 64.75 to 32.1%. McCall's reelection in 1998 may have given him the confidence he needed in order to pursue the governor's mansion….The McCall campaign had the support of the Democratic Party; whether or not McCall had the party's full support has been the subject of much debate….Still one wonders just how committed the party was to McCall's campaign….shunned by some of the state's most respected Democrats…McCall blamed his money woes on the national Democratic Party, claiming that the party had abandoned his campaign….” H. Carl McCall for Governor: a lesson to all black high-profile statewide office seekers. - Free Online Library

6. And, most telling, Bill Clinton’s remarks about the black candidate for the presidency:
“[A]s Hillary bungled Caroline, Bill’s handling of Ted was even worse. The day after Iowa, he phoned Kennedy and pressed for an endorsement, making the case for his wife. But Bill then went on, belittling Obama in a manner that deeply offended Kennedy. Recounting the conversation later to a friend, Teddy fumed that Clinton had said, A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee.”
Teddy's anger - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com




7. Three staffers working for embattled Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) were asked by security officers to leave an event in downtown Washington on Thursday after they tried to display large campaign signs just as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) was about to speak. .. Waters told The Hill afterward that the staffers had been displaying the signs at the annual legislative conference for the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation, which was held at the Washington convention center a few blocks away. “It ain’t about Nancy. It’s about black people,” Waters said.
Waters aides expelled from Pelosi event - The Hill


8. And what Governor of Arkansas made the Saturday before Easter "Confederate Flag Day"?
The Arkansas Code, Section 1-5-107. Confederate Flag Day.
(a) The Saturday immediately preceding Easter Sunday of each year is designated as "Confederate Flag Day" in this state.
No person, firm, or corporation shall display any Confederate flag or replica thereof in connection with any advertisement of any commercial enterprise, or in any manner for any purpose except to honor the Confederate States of America.
Any person, firm, or corporation violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).

"In April 1985, Governor Bill Clinton signed Act 985 into law...'
Mark R. Levin on Trent Lott & Moral Outrage on National Review Online






9. Do Democrats in Congress support blacks by practicing affirmative action in their hiring…and of course this would be our of moral convictions, as they are legally exempt from affirmative action requirements. More than passing interesting, the ‘National Journal,’ a survey of congressional staffers revealed that Democrats hired black employees at the same rate as Republicans: 2 percent. “The Racial Breakdown of Congressional Staffs,” National Journal, June 21, 2005
Schweitzer, “Do As I Say,” p. 9

10. Clinton pushed black candidate to drop out of Florida race:
“Bill Clinton sought to persuade Rep. Kendrick Meek to drop out of the race for Senate during a trip to Florida last week — and nearly succeeded…Clinton did not dangle a job in front of Meek, who gave up a safe House seat to run for the Senate, but instead made the case that the move would advance the congressman’s future prospects, said a third Democrat familiar with the conversations. Clinton campaigned with Meek in Florida on Oct. 19 and 20, and thought he had won Meek over. But as the week wore on, Meek lost his enthusiasm for the arrangement, spurred in part, a third Democratic source said, by his wife’s belief that he could still win the race. Clinton spoke with Meek again at week’s end, three Democrats said, and again Meek said he would drop out.”
Read more: Bill Clinton pushed Kendrick Meek to quit Florida race - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com

By some strange coincidence, the Democrats, again, force a black to the back:
11. “Under an arrangement reached two days ago, Steny Hoyer of Maryland, the current majority leader, would get the No. 2 job of minority whip come January. Clyburn, now majority whip, would hold the post of assistant leader, newly created for the purpose of heading off a contest for the whip position.” Businessweek - Business News, Stock market & Financial Advice



I'm sure you see the pattern....the reality...here.
 
The irony of any of the rightwing clowns on this forum accusing liberals of being divisive is priceless.



Do you have any idea what 'irony' means??

"...accusing liberals of being divisive..."
It's clear you don't understand the term 'accusing'....when your statement is
only correct when the operative term is 'proving.'


You know what your problem is?
Your mouth is writing checks that your intellect can't cash.
 

Forum List

Back
Top