The Greatest Lie (Liar)!

[PoliticalChic]

The irony of any of the rightwing clowns on this forum accusing liberals of being divisive is priceless.

Actually, the Right proudly takes credit for today's partisan divide!

March 22, 2010
RUSH: * I'll tell you, I'm going to be very honest. I largely blame myself for this.* I do, I'll tell you why I think I'm responsible for this, this partisan divide.* It's a good thing, don't misunderstand, but I'm responsible for it

I can just see you, sitting there listening to the Limbaugh Show.... your tilted head, that perplexed look on your face, like my dog when he reaches the perimeter line of the invisible fence….like you’re waiting for that testicular zap….

Has Rush ever responded to your love letters?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I noticed to toss a insult was your first reaction.

She's into mutual insulturbation with strangers.

I know, I know, I'm not supose to feed em.......sorry bout dat....

So....you're good at taking orders?

The 'reliable Democrat voter' syndrome.

 

[G.T.]

^ temper tantrum

 

[PoliticalChic]

She's into mutual insulturbation with strangers.

I know, I know, I'm not supose to feed em.......sorry bout dat....

I'm not even sure why sh attacked you to begin with. I thought your post was in agreement with the OP. Weird.

Did you actually have the gall to use the phrase "...I thought..."???

Another pretender.

 

[BlindBoo]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k80nW6AOhTs]Jane you Ignorant slut - YouTube[/ame]

Couldn't help yourself, had to double down didn'tcha?

See what you resort to when your stupidity is revealed?

Your nature.

I noticed to toss a insult was your first reaction.

It's not an insult: it's a description.



Until you came along I always wondered how the dinosaurs survived for millions of years with walnut sized brains.

That's an insult.

 

[PoliticalChic]

So the right opposes the marriage laws that were passed just for one group of people...

...the heterosexuals?

lol

yeah...the right is certainly showing their hypocrisy with the gay marriage issue.....wont argue that.

However, the right is against gay marriage due to their traditional and religious definition of marriage. Not becuase they are homophobes.

Well.......actually....many are.....but so are many on the left.

Those opposing it on Religious grounds should feel free to oppose it in their private lives and at their Churches, and even speak freely about opposing it.

But should any of them be rational, they'd admit that we shouldn't legislate based on Biblics.

Like a blind squirrel finding a nut from time to time...you approach rectitude with equal frequency!

Oh....you won't understand that: it means you may be close to correct this time.

The question of gay marriage should be settled by the electorate....not by judicial fiat.


Based on the federalism inherent in our system, any state that votes in favor of gay marriage should have such.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Jane you Ignorant slut - YouTube

Couldn't help yourself, had to double down didn'tcha?

I noticed to toss a insult was your first reaction.

It's not an insult: it's a description.



Until you came along I always wondered how the dinosaurs survived for millions of years with walnut sized brains.

That's an insult.

"Couldn't help yourself, had to double down didn'tcha?"

Brobdingnagianly incorrect!


What ever makes you believe that I resist calling you what you are?

I'm always totally honest.
And...I like doing it.

 

[BlindBoo]

Jane you Ignorant slut - YouTube

Couldn't help yourself, had to double down didn'tcha?

It's not an insult: it's a description.



Until you came along I always wondered how the dinosaurs survived for millions of years with walnut sized brains.

That's an insult.

"Couldn't help yourself, had to double down didn'tcha?"

Brobdingnagianly incorrect!


What ever makes you believe that I resist calling you what you are?

I'm always totally honest.
And...I like doing it.

I understand, you just give in to your impulse to insult others. Like Jane and Dan, it's just they way you are. Sometimes I can'thelp myself and I give in to the impulse too.

Were you lying to yourself about your first impulsive insult?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Jane you Ignorant slut - YouTube

Couldn't help yourself, had to double down didn'tcha?

"Couldn't help yourself, had to double down didn'tcha?"

Brobdingnagianly incorrect!


What ever makes you believe that I resist calling you what you are?

I'm always totally honest.
And...I like doing it.

I understand, you just give in to your impulse to insult others. Like Jane and Dan, it's just they way you are. Sometimes I can'thelp myself and I give in to the impulse too.

Were you lying to yourself about your first impulsive insult?

Did you actually want to re-live your unbelievably stupid post #6...the one where you endorsed the President-elect allowing a racist rant???

...and you chalked it up to some sort of freedom??
Clearly you have mistaken license for liberty.

And I said:
'You are a dunce.
Why wasn't David Duke selected to speak.....he could have been just as vile.'


Actually....dunce was far too mild.

A moron who doesn't recognize that racism from either side is evil has a one-way ticket on the Disoriented Express.

 

[edthecynic]

Pat Robsyoursons knows women should be baby machines under the thumb of their man or Lesbians!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=murKRfTfGQs]Robertson: Liberals Support Abortion To Make Lesbians Equal - YouTube[/ame]

"(T)he feminist agenda is not about equal rights for women. It is about a socialist, anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians." –Pat Robertson

"I know this is painful for the ladies to hear, but if you get married, you have accepted the headship of a man, your husband. Christ is the head of the household and the husband is the head of the wife, and that's the way it is, period." –Pat Robertson

 

[PoliticalChic]

Pat Robsyoursons knows women should be baby machines under the thumb of their man or Lesbians!

Robertson: Liberals Support Abortion To Make Lesbians Equal - YouTube

"(T)he feminist agenda is not about equal rights for women. It is about a socialist, anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians." –Pat Robertson

"I know this is painful for the ladies to hear, but if you get married, you have accepted the headship of a man, your husband. Christ is the head of the household and the husband is the head of the wife, and that's the way it is, period." –Pat Robertson

I found this interesting...you will probably find it scary:

1. The United States birth rate is rising and Evangelical families in the Quiverfull movement (named after a verse of Psalm 127) are playing their part in the trend -- to the alarm of the greens, no doubt. A few weeks after the New York Times looked at the subject of large families, National Public Radio has run a feature on the movement, which comprises about 10,000 families, mainly in the Midwest and South of the United States.

2. The average family at their church has 8.5 kids, which compares with a national total fertility rate of 2.2 children per woman. (In 1976, 20 per cent of American women had five or more children, but by 2006 that figure had fallen to 4 per cent.) American evangelicals with large families



3. It costs today's US middle-class family more than US$1 million to raise a university-educated child, including more than $800,000 in lost wages, according to a study cited by Longman. He proposes tax incentives to families with children, but these seem tiny next to the costs. The reader must fall back on his argument that faith, not pecuniary calculation, will motivate today's prospective parents. The reproductive power of an increasingly Christian United States will enhance the strategic position of the US over the next two generations, leaving infertile Western Europe to sink slowly into insignificance.

The Empty Cradle by Phillip Longman (Basic Books; New York, 2004). ISBN: 0465050506; 240 pages, US$26. Asia Times - Asia's most trusted news source



4. A number of demographers, journalists, and sociologists have noted a strong correlation between religious values and fertility rates. The more frequent the church attendance, the higher the birthrate. "White fundamentalist Protestants" who attend services weekly show a fertility rate 27 percent higher than the national average. Mormons show twice the national birth rate.

5. David Brooks, in a New York Times opinion piece, calls this "little- known" movement natalism. The significant difference in fertility between the religious and the secular has some alarmed, notably Phillip Longman, author of The Empty Cradle: How Falling Birthrates Threaten World Prosperity and What to Do About It. In the March 13, 2006, issue of USA Today, he solemnly warns that this disparity will continue to fuel the rise of "fundamentalism and social conservatism," which may herald the end of the culture war and nothing less than the "death of the Enlightenment.” A Counter Trend?Sort Of | Christianity Today



Now, now....turn that frown upside down.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

The Greatest Lie (Liar)!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpdjFV6nYB4]Bush saw first plane hit tower ! - YouTube[/ame]

​

 

[Avatar4321]

explain why the vast majority of American votes of color dont like your party?


Why do they SHUN you and your candidates?

Explain why you make determinations about people based on the color of their skin.

 

[Avatar4321]

Thank god we live in a land where anyone can be a critic without fear of jail.

I concur. Otherwise, the president would have thrown me in jail years ago.

 

[Avatar4321]

The irony of any of the rightwing clowns on this forum accusing liberals of being divisive is priceless.

Ironic that someone would be honest? I suppose in a way it is.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"The survey also found significant divides over attitudes toward discrimination, particularly over the question of whether whites currently face significant discrimination. Forty-four percent of Americans believe that today discrimination against whites has become as big a problem as discrimination against blacks and other minorities.


A majority of those identifying with the Tea Party (61%) and Republicans (56%) say that discrimination against whites is as big a problem as discrimination against blacks and other minorities, a view shared by only 28% of Democrats and 49% of independents.

White evangelicals are the only religious group in which a majority (57%) agree that discrimination against whites has become as big a problem as discrimination against minorities."
Survey | Old Alignments, Emerging Fault Lines: Religion in the 2010 Election and Beyond

 

[Avatar4321]

Only in the sick perverted racist mind of the Misinformation Voter could the slave love the slave master!

And yet, we have countless millenia of history showing that many slaves did love the slave masters.

Take the Israeli Exodus from Egypt. Records indicate only 20% actually left slavery. 80% prefered to remain in Egypt. Of those 20% that left, Most wanted to go back to the life they had Egypt and were terrified of obtaining what they could have, which is why they had to wander 40 years in the wilderness until the generation that was enslaved had died off until they could truly be free and obtain the land.

This is hardly the only example of history. During the revolution against Great Britain, there were a large member of people who prefered their subservient status to Great Britain over the Founder's vision of Liberty and self determination.

Stockholm Syndrome very much exists. Why do you think it would be any less prevelant when the captured person is a slave and the captor is a slaveholder than it would in any other situation?

 

[NYcarbineer]

The irony of any of the rightwing clowns on this forum accusing liberals of being divisive is priceless.

Ironic that someone would be honest? I suppose in a way it is.

How many identifiable conservatives have you ever seen on this forum that you can show are for cooperation, moderation, compromise, working together with their political opponents, etc., etc., etc.,

IOW, they are non-divisive. Start with the OP.

Make me a list. Show me that the Right is so much more conciliatory than the left.

 

[Amelia]

The irony of any of the rightwing clowns on this forum accusing liberals of being divisive is priceless.

Ironic that someone would be honest? I suppose in a way it is.

How many identifiable conservatives have you ever seen on this forum that you can show are for cooperation, moderation, compromise, working together with their political opponents, etc., etc., etc.,

IOW, they are non-divisive. Start with the OP.

Make me a list. Show me that the Right is so much more conciliatory than the left.

Who is claiming the Right is more conciliatory than the left?

They don't need to be more into compromise than the left in order to accurately point out that the left is profoundly divisive.

 

[Avatar4321]

The irony of any of the rightwing clowns on this forum accusing liberals of being divisive is priceless.

Ironic that someone would be honest? I suppose in a way it is.

How many identifiable conservatives have you ever seen on this forum that you can show are for cooperation, moderation, compromise, working together with their political opponents, etc., etc., etc.,

IOW, they are non-divisive. Start with the OP.

Make me a list. Show me that the Right is so much more conciliatory than the left.

How does that change the fact that liberals are divisive? What the right does or doesnt do has absolutely no effect on what liberals do.