The guy who bought Kyle Rittenhouse's rifle......likely walking without felonies, and only 2 citations and a 2,000 dollar fine, anti-gunners weep.

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
112,241
52,463
And the judge may even throw out several of these things since it was found at trial that Kyle did not break the law when he had that rifle........

The man who bought Kyle Rittenhouse an assault-style rifle when he was only 17 has agreed to plead no contest to contributing to the delinquency of a minor, a non-criminal citation, and avoid convictions on the two felonies he’d been facing.
-----------

On Friday, Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger filed a proposed plea agreement. It suggested Black would plead no contest to a pair of citations, and pay a $2,000 fine, and the felony counts would be dismissed.


A hearing is scheduled Monday morning. Schroeder could reject the deal, or dismiss the original felony counts based on his ruling about the minors-with-firearms law in the Rittenhouse case.

 
LOL at the dem toadies that think the scum that was put down/injured are going to win a wrongful death/injury civil suit in a Kenosha court.
 
LOL at the dem toadies that think the scum that was put down/injured are going to win a wrongful death/injury civil suit in a Kenosha court.


I'm not sure how they get there..........if Kyle had the rifle legally, then this guy is removed from the actually shootings..........they can take him to court....I hope they lose.
 
Care to elaborate?

Why do you think that?

People get sued for mistakes all the time. This guy knew he was giving a gun to a minor. It wasn't even a mistake.


If Kyle possessing the rifle wasn't a crime, buying it for him may not be a crime either........considering they aren't charging him for that particular felony as well....
 
It opens him up to civil suits.

If he has anything worth money.

Or wages they can attach for the rest of his life.
Who is going sue him? The families of the dead perps that tried to kill Rittenhouse? If anything the lack of felony charges lessens the thought of filing a lawsuit.
 
There is just no basis for any kind of civil suit. What do you think was the negligent or wrongful action that would give rise to a civil suit? All the charges should have been tossed as soon as the wrong statute was used.

Giving a gun to a minor.

He's already plead guilty. You don't even need to prove he did it. He's admitted it.
 
Giving a gun to a minor.

He's already plead guilty. You don't even need to prove he did it. He's admitted it.
Soo this is what he was convicted of? The particular firearm he gave to the minor is one that the minor could have.

This is like all those lawsuits against Kenosha and the police department. It's just not happening.
 
Giving a gun to a minor.

He's already plead guilty. You don't even need to prove he did it. He's admitted it.
No contest is not a guilty plea though it may be considered as such by the court that a person pleads no contest in when it comes to sentencing.

You like to split hairs, you should know this. ;)
 
The guy who bought Kyle Rittenhouse's rifle......likely walking without felonies, and only 2 citations and a 2,000 dollar fine…

He shouldn't even accept a conviction for that much.

The entire basis of all the charges agai8nst him is that by providing Mr. Rittenhouse with a rifle, he was an accomplish to crimes committed by Mr. Rittenhouse using that rifle.

Now that it is established as a legal fact that Mr. Rittenhouse did not commit any crimes using that rifle, the basis for these charges simply does not exist.

It was an act of malfeasance and corruption to pursue these charges, once Mr. Rittenhouse was acquitted.
 
And the judge may even throw out several of these things since it was found at trial that Kyle did not break the law when he had that rifle........

The man who bought Kyle Rittenhouse an assault-style rifle when he was only 17 has agreed to plead no contest to contributing to the delinquency of a minor, a non-criminal citation, and avoid convictions on the two felonies he’d been facing.
-----------

On Friday, Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger filed a proposed plea agreement. It suggested Black would plead no contest to a pair of citations, and pay a $2,000 fine, and the felony counts would be dismissed.

A hearing is scheduled Monday morning. Schroeder could reject the deal, or dismiss the original felony counts based on his ruling about the minors-with-firearms law in the Rittenhouse case.


Kind of shows what a fraud you are.

"We should just enforce the gun laws we have"

Well, know we know THAT's a lie.
 
Giving a gun to a minor.

He's already plead guilty. You don't even need to prove he did it. He's admitted it.


You'd still have to prove damages. Chomo Joseph Rosenbaum is better off dead, his estate would be entitled to nominal damages at best.
 
Kind of shows what a fraud you are.

"We should just enforce the gun laws we have"

Well, know we know THAT's a lie.
It was enforced. The guy was charged and is working on a plea deal dummy. Grosskrues whatever the fuck his name is was illegally carrying a firearm. Why has he not been charged? And he should have been charged with attempted murder.
 
And the judge may even throw out several of these things since it was found at trial that Kyle did not break the law when he had that rifle........

The man who bought Kyle Rittenhouse an assault-style rifle when he was only 17 has agreed to plead no contest to contributing to the delinquency of a minor, a non-criminal citation, and avoid convictions on the two felonies he’d been facing.
-----------

On Friday, Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger filed a proposed plea agreement. It suggested Black would plead no contest to a pair of citations, and pay a $2,000 fine, and the felony counts would be dismissed.

A hearing is scheduled Monday morning. Schroeder could reject the deal, or dismiss the original felony counts based on his ruling about the minors-with-firearms law in the Rittenhouse case.


I have no problem with this. The goal of laws, trials and punishment is to keep people from breaking the law again and stand as a message to others that might break that law. Fine. So he walks on the felonies, pays a $2,000 dollar fine, is still open to civil lawsuit. Good solution. Does anybody think you could make a profit, selling a $700.00 weapon (at best, from what I saw) illegally to an out of state under aged kid, paying for the weapon and then paying the state another $2,000 dollar? This doesn't take into account lost time, going to jail, posting bond, attorney fees, negative impact on what used to be his good name? It is unlikely he will be the out-of-state straw buyer for Illinois kids again. If this deal is acceptable to the prosecutors and judges that have to buy off on it, I'm good. I expect his lesson is learned and he will not repeat.
 

Forum List

Back
Top