The Hoax of Record Temperatures

[Dagosa]

LOL!!!

Still cannot answer the question

WHY is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska


You won't answer BECAUSE YOU CANNOT ANSWER because YOUR SIDE HAS NO ANSWER....

It is a stupid question and irrelevant . It’s the sea ice that is dwindling. You’re talking about snow ice idiot. Your picture is of snow/ snow ice dufus. Greenland is getting warmer.

 

[EMH]

It is a stupid question and irrelevant . It’s the sea ice that is dwindling. You’re talking about snow ice idiot. Your picture is of snow/ snow ice dufus. Greenland is getting warmer.

LOL!!!

Greenland is 7% of Earth ice.

If you sum together Arctic Sea Ice and Alaska ice, you do not get to 1%....

You fail. You and your side cannot explain a map of the Arctic.


Tell us, genius, what happens to sea ice when these go off...

arctic ocean undersea volcanoes - Google Search

Since the record high for Antarctic sea ice is 2014, are you now claiming "Global Warming" started in 2015???

LOL!!!

 

[Flopper]

As a nitwit science invalid parrot, you have tried to wordsmith. I do not deny climate change, I simply explain it, and document it, and out Co2 as doing ABSOLUTELY NOTHING regarding it...

Co2 does NOTHING = highly correlated satellite and balloon data.


Already posted what does....

Since Co2 does nothing, what does cause Earth climate change?

The first part is understanding what is climate and what is weather. Climate is the parameters of Earth that allow certain ranges of weather. We don't get Cat 10 canes now, but we would if Earth had no ice. What are the parameters of climate that can change? Ocean levels Atmospheric...

www.usmessageboard.com

Your side cannot even explain a map of the Arctic, pretty pathetic given $20 billion bilked from the American taxpayer and counting

The warmers need to explain the Arctic Circle's ice pattern, and how Co2 is responsible...

The map is clear. 7% of Earth ice is on Greenland. Why is there ice on Greenland south of the Arctic Circle, and no ice north of the Arctic Circle on Alaska? Co2 and sun do not explain this. The only explanation is the Greenland is within 600 miles of the pole at the top, and hence...

www.usmessageboard.com

You are a pathetic waste of human life, a sub human incapable of the most basic analytical thought....

Name calling does not help your argument

 

[Dagosa]

LOL!!!

Greenland is 7% of Earth ice.

If you sum together Arctic Sea Ice and Alaska ice, you do not get to 1%....

You fail. You and your side cannot explain a map of the Arctic.


Tell us, genius, what happens to sea ice when these go off...

arctic ocean undersea volcanoes - Google Search

Since the record high for Antarctic sea ice is 2014, are you now claiming "Global Warming" started in 2015???

LOL!!!

Ha ba

Key Takeaway:​

Antarctica is losing ice mass (melting) at an average rate of about 150 billion tons per year, and Greenland is losing about 270 billion tons per year, adding to sea level rise.
You still don’t know the difference between sea and snow ice do you ?
Your ignorance is stunning. You pretend just because areas have some ice left, it proves what ?

Ice Sheets | NASA Global Climate Change

Vital Signs of the Planet: Global Climate Change and Global Warming. Current news and data streams about global warming and climate change from NASA.

climate.nasa.gov

 

[Dagosa]

The question remains unanswered by the science invalids here who support the Co2 fraud.

Jeopardy! music still playing.

the Co2 fraud cannot explain a map of the Arctic, but it can lie, it can change the question to avoid answering it, it can have biased sick in the head liars as mods who do nothing about such behavior here, but everyone with an IQ over 40 who reads this topic knows ever word of this post is 100% accurate...

Snow ice vs sea ice.....you’re making up shit. You are the fraud.

 

[Dagosa]

The question remains unanswered by the science invalids here who support the Co2 fraud.

Jeopardy! music still playing.

the Co2 fraud cannot explain a map of the Arctic, but it can lie, it can change the question to avoid answering it, it can have biased sick in the head liars as mods who do nothing about such behavior here, but everyone with an IQ over 40 who reads this topic knows ever word of this post is 100% accurate...

No question about it.
You frauds are batshit crazy

 

[Dagosa]

You cannot explain a map of the Arctic, because you are a beaked birdbrain liar and coward, and your opinion isn't yours, it is always PARROTED...

A map that shows white on Greenland. Wow, they get snow. There is still no link from you showing what it represents.....you’re just a pawn.
Go ahead, give us just one link from any ligit climate science institute that supports anything you say. Bing just posted pictures. They aren’t a science institute.....you’re a fraud.

 

[Dagosa]

You didn’t, you haven’t and you won’t. More made up shit. Go ahead. Produce it.

You produce a link that describes the map. You produced nothing but

You and your side cannot explain a map of the Arctic.

Ah, we did. It snows, fraud.
Your map says nothing about the thickness of the snow ice over Greenland and the sea ice at the poles.

 

[EMH]

Name calling does not help your argument

Being a complete idiot and parroting lies, fudge, and fraud does not help yours.

 

[EMH]

any ligit climate science institute

LOL!!!

Translation - Dag only parrots the Co2 fraud, nothing else, and has no clue about anything...

Jeopardy! music still playing.

The Co2 fraud cannot explain a map of the Arctic, and tries to change the question to avoid it...

 

[EMH]

Antarctica is losing ice mass (melting

Since it is "melting" then YOU can show us LIQUID WATER there.

LOL!!!

NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses

A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.

www.nasa.gov

We also went to court on the issue AA's ice, and the COURT found in favor of, those opposing the Co2 FRAUD...

Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’

Here's something American media are virtually guaranteed to not report: a British court has determined that Al Gore's schlockumentary "An Inconvenient Truth" contains at least eleven material falsehoods. It seems a safe bet Matt Lauer and Diane Sawyer won't be discussing this Tuesday morning...

www.newsbusters.org

• The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.

 

[Dagosa]

Since it is "melting" then YOU can show us LIQUID WATER there.

LOL!!!

NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses

A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.

www.nasa.gov

We also went to court on the issue AA's ice, and the COURT found in favor of, those opposing the Co2 FRAUD...

Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’

Here's something American media are virtually guaranteed to not report: a British court has determined that Al Gore's schlockumentary "An Inconvenient Truth" contains at least eleven material falsehoods. It seems a safe bet Matt Lauer and Diane Sawyer won't be discussing this Tuesday morning...

www.newsbusters.org

• The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.

“News busters”
Wow, another line of made up shit. You mtherfks use nothing but gossip for your links.
It’s hilarious. Your previous evidence were two other quotes from this board. You’re frauds.

 

[EMH]

“News busters”
Wow, another line of made up shit. You mtherfks use nothing but gossip for your links.
It’s hilarious. Your previous evidence were two other quotes from this board. You’re frauds.

LOL!!!

The British Court spoke in 2007.

This is the full ruling.




And what are those inaccuracies?

• The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
• The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
• The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that it was "not possible" to attribute one-off events to global warming.
• The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that this was not the case.
• The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
• The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant's evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
• The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
• The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.
• The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
• The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
• The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.

As Crusader Frank has noted many times, the ice cores show Co2 lagged temp hikes, the opposite of the Co2 fraud's narrative.


Court Certified Truth

90% of Earth ice on Antarctica INCREASING

Co2 did not cause past warmings, but rather increases in Co2 happened AFTER the warming...



LOL!!!


ChickenSHIT coward Algore did NOT APPEAL

 

[Dagosa]

LOL!!!

The British Court spoke in 2007.

This is the full ruling.




And what are those inaccuracies?

• The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
• The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
• The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that it was "not possible" to attribute one-off events to global warming.
• The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that this was not the case.
• The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
• The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant's evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
• The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
• The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.
• The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
• The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
• The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.

As Crusader Frank has noted many times, the ice cores show Co2 lagged temp hikes, the opposite of the Co2 fraud's narrative.


Court Certified Truth

90% of Earth ice on Antarctica INCREASING

Co2 did not cause past warmings, but rather increases in Co2 happened AFTER the warming...



LOL!!!


ChickenSHIT coward Algore did NOT APPEAL

Address your crazy irrelevant comments to someone who cares, lunatic.

 

[EMH]

your crazy irrelevant comments

= Court ruling your side did not appeal

LOL!!!

 

[Dagosa]

= Court ruling your side did not appeal

LOL!!!

Now you’re saying a court ruling decides global warming ? .

 

[EMH]

Now you’re saying a court ruling decides global warming ? .

In theory, a court is where BOTH SIDES get to show evidence to a JURY/JUDGE.

THAT was the EVIDENCE and YOUR SIDE DID NOT APPEAL... it just kept right on lying and fudging data, and still is...

 

[Dagosa]

In theory, a court is where BOTH SIDES get to show evidence to a JURY/JUDGE.

THAT was the EVIDENCE and YOUR SIDE DID NOT APPEAL... it just kept right on lying and fudging data, and still is...

When it comes to evidence in court, you lose. You have no case, zero, nada, nix. Your silly little statements work here simply because a forum will allow you to post made up shit.
In a court of law, you’re a laughing stock.

 

[EMH]

When it comes to evidence in court, you lose. You have no case, zero, nada, nix. Your silly little statements work here simply because a forum will allow you to post made up shit.
In a court of law, you’re a laughing stock.

We went to court once.

The score is 1-0, with the Co2 FRAUD with the ZERO...

Your side HAS NEVER WON IN COURT...

 

[Dagosa]

We went to court once.

The score is 1-0, with the Co2 FRAUD with the ZERO...

Your side HAS NEVER WON IN COURT...

Link or is it made up shit again. There is no climate science institute or accredited institute of higher learning or govt agency or major related corporation in the world that doesn’t think you are FOS. Case closed.
Supreme court decision does no such thing.