The Homosexual Dilemma

5. Homosexuality pervades our media, our television, and virtually all facets of American life. Why do these people think they're so important? What if Christians or Jews acted like this?
Then why is Fox News and CNN still on air? Surely they would have been replaced with the Ben Affleck show, Richard Dawkins, a gay fashion show, gay partner swap, and the Playboy channel.

Fox News and CNN drone on and on about gay issues.

Dumbass.
 
We won't, after we fix it for all two people first. You got a problem with that, because you shouldn't. And when one of those daughters of yours gets raped, the rapist is now your son-in-law, if we're going Biblical that is. So, are we?
You really be toopid. WHY FIX IT FOR TWO PEOPLE FIRST? WHY LIMIT IT TO TWO PEOPLE?

Last chance to answer the question, dumb ass.
 
Because marriage, by its very nature, is for reproduction. Now, we understand that people can marry without having children, but that it is the exception to the basis for the existence of marriage. That is doesn't happen every time doesn't change that fact.

There is NOTHING natural about marriage. Marriage is a construct of Monkey evolution as a society - Marriage is 100% human.

Marriage is a vital component of a strong, thriving, and perpetuating society. Animals cannot form the complex communities that humans can. Gazelles will forever run from predators, humans would find a way to kill them and form defenses against them. We don't have 5 or 6 children because at least a few of them will be eaten by something. The apparatus of society has its bedrock on strong families, which are only made possible by marriage.

We can't be compared to animals because we're not animals. Imago Dei, we are superior to them and create superior institutions. Marriage.

Humanity is part of nature, that you lack the means to understand that, doesn't change that.

That humanity is at the top of the food chain, likewise, does not change that much of humanity is what is considered, in greater nature ... FOOD.

With the constituents of the Ideological Left being the bulk of that unenviable herd.
 
We won't, after we fix it for all two people first. You got a problem with that, because you shouldn't. And when one of those daughters of yours gets raped, the rapist is now your son-in-law, if we're going Biblical that is. So, are we?
You really be toopid. WHY FIX IT FOR TWO PEOPLE FIRST? WHY LIMIT IT TO TWO PEOPLE?

Last chance to answer the question, dumb ass.
Your question has been answered, there is no reason, we just aren't there yet. Now answer my questions dumbass.
 
5. Homosexuality pervades our media, our television, and virtually all facets of American life. Why do these people think they're so important? What if Christians or Jews acted like this?
Then why is Fox News and CNN still on air? Surely they would have been replaced with the Ben Affleck show, Richard Dawkins, a gay fashion show, gay partner swap, and the Playboy channel.

The nature of evil is to deceive, the nature of good is truth... Fox News defends good... thus it consistently prospers.

Need anything else?
Fox, who broadcasts that the FDA is going to ban donut sprinkles and actually believes it. No wonder you are such a dumbass.
Fox has to be the dominant news channel in America, yet per usual, we hear the 'we are oppressed by liberal media line': 2013 Ratings Fox News 1 For 12 Straight Years Sheds Viewers Too - TVNewser
Fox News remained on top in 2013, capping off its 12th consecutive year as the most-watched cable news network among both total viewers and A25-54 viewers.
 
We were discussing your idiot God, idiot.
The Jewish God made the rules.

"Therefore a man leaves his father and his mother and cleaves to his wife, and they become one flesh."

It's in Genesis.
Adam and Eve weren't married, and Cain and Abel fucked their sisters. Now what?
The law wasn't given until Genesis 2:24. Now what?
Same answer as before, it doesn't fucking matter since marriage in the Bible would make the Mormons and Muslims jump for joy. And you never answered the question, are you for Biblical Marriage, and that means more than one spouse.
You didn't answer my question. Why carry on a tradition at all? Why limit it to two people?
Issues of property rights and child custody come to mind on this one.
 
5. Homosexuality pervades our media, our television, and virtually all facets of American life. Why do these people think they're so important? What if Christians or Jews acted like this?
Then why is Fox News and CNN still on air? Surely they would have been replaced with the Ben Affleck show, Richard Dawkins, a gay fashion show, gay partner swap, and the Playboy channel.

The nature of evil is to deceive, the nature of good is truth... Fox News defends good... thus it consistently prospers.

Need anything else?
Fox, who broadcasts that the FDA is going to ban donut sprinkles and actually believes it. No wonder you are such a dumbass.
Fox has to be the dominant news channel in America, yet per usual, we hear the 'we are oppressed by liberal media line': 2013 Ratings Fox News 1 For 12 Straight Years Sheds Viewers Too - TVNewser
Fox News remained on top in 2013, capping off its 12th consecutive year as the most-watched cable news network among both total viewers and A25-54 viewers.

Fox is ONE News Channel...
 
5. Homosexuality pervades our media, our television, and virtually all facets of American life. Why do these people think they're so important? What if Christians or Jews acted like this?
Then why is Fox News and CNN still on air? Surely they would have been replaced with the Ben Affleck show, Richard Dawkins, a gay fashion show, gay partner swap, and the Playboy channel.

The nature of evil is to deceive, the nature of good is truth... Fox News defends good... thus it consistently prospers.

Need anything else?

Good needs to be defended by lies?
 
Our kids are fine and we're having them whether we're married or not. We're also marrying whether we have kids are not...just like straight folks.

Some of us DO have children. Gays are having children exactly like straights do....adoption, artificial insemination, IVF, divorce.

Someone explain why our families, whether with or without children, are less deserving of the rights, benefits and privileges associated with civil marriage than straight families (with or without children)? What is your reasonable person standard you use to justify discriminating against our loving partnerships?

Personally, I believe that kids should be brought up with a man and a woman as the parents. I think that nature devised a plan that has worked since the dawn of humankind, and I believe that kids bought up in a one gender household miss out on the guidance of the other gender.

Mark

Nature doesn't 'devise' shit. Nature focuses on reproduction. If you're reproductively viable, nature's requirements are met. How you reproduce, nature doesn't have much to say about.

We however, do. While rape is a reproductively viable method of passing on DNA, its also quite awful and denounced by most civilizations. While sex with reproductively viable children might be a viable method of passing on DNA, its fits the same bill as rape in most civilizations.

Are you really trying to tell me that nature does not dictate that you need a man and a woman to procreate?

Really?

Mark
 
5. Homosexuality pervades our media, our television, and virtually all facets of American life. Why do these people think they're so important? What if Christians or Jews acted like this?
Then why is Fox News and CNN still on air? Surely they would have been replaced with the Ben Affleck show, Richard Dawkins, a gay fashion show, gay partner swap, and the Playboy channel.

The nature of evil is to deceive, the nature of good is truth... Fox News defends good... thus it consistently prospers.

Need anything else?
Fox, who broadcasts that the FDA is going to ban donut sprinkles and actually believes it. No wonder you are such a dumbass.
Fox has to be the dominant news channel in America, yet per usual, we hear the 'we are oppressed by liberal media line': 2013 Ratings Fox News 1 For 12 Straight Years Sheds Viewers Too - TVNewser
Fox News remained on top in 2013, capping off its 12th consecutive year as the most-watched cable news network among both total viewers and A25-54 viewers.

Fox is ONE News Channel...
No it isn't...only in cable news channel comparison....not close to the Big Three.
 
We won't, after we fix it for all two people first. You got a problem with that, because you shouldn't. And when one of those daughters of yours gets raped, the rapist is now your son-in-law, if we're going Biblical that is. So, are we?
You really be toopid. WHY FIX IT FOR TWO PEOPLE FIRST? WHY LIMIT IT TO TWO PEOPLE?

Last chance to answer the question, dumb ass.
Your question has been answered, there is no reason, we just aren't there yet. Now answer my questions dumbass.
There is no reason. You have lost this argument 1,000 times, dumb ass.
No dumbass, it is you that have lost because you don't want the faggot, the siblings, and the spouse with many spouses to marry. My side won the first one, and that's probably as far as it will go for now. I am the winner here and you've lost. Suck it up pretty panties and move along.
 
We won't, after we fix it for all two people first. You got a problem with that, because you shouldn't. And when one of those daughters of yours gets raped, the rapist is now your son-in-law, if we're going Biblical that is. So, are we?
You really be toopid. WHY FIX IT FOR TWO PEOPLE FIRST? WHY LIMIT IT TO TWO PEOPLE?

Last chance to answer the question, dumb ass.
Your question has been answered, there is no reason, we just aren't there yet. Now answer my questions dumbass.
There is no reason. You have lost this argument 1,000 times, dumb ass.
No dumbass, it is you that have lost because you don't want the faggot, the siblings, and the spouse with many spouses to marry. My side won the first one, and that's probably as far as it will go for now. I am the winner here and you've lost. Suck it up pretty panties and move along.
there is no reason
lol
 
5. Homosexuality pervades our media, our television, and virtually all facets of American life. Why do these people think they're so important? What if Christians or Jews acted like this?
Then why is Fox News and CNN still on air? Surely they would have been replaced with the Ben Affleck show, Richard Dawkins, a gay fashion show, gay partner swap, and the Playboy channel.

The nature of evil is to deceive, the nature of good is truth... Fox News defends good... thus it consistently prospers.

Need anything else?
Fox, who broadcasts that the FDA is going to ban donut sprinkles and actually believes it. No wonder you are such a dumbass.
Fox has to be the dominant news channel in America, yet per usual, we hear the 'we are oppressed by liberal media line': 2013 Ratings Fox News 1 For 12 Straight Years Sheds Viewers Too - TVNewser
Fox News remained on top in 2013, capping off its 12th consecutive year as the most-watched cable news network among both total viewers and A25-54 viewers.
Americans are dumb as dog shit asswipe, what else would they be watching.
 
5. Homosexuality pervades our media, our television, and virtually all facets of American life. Why do these people think they're so important? What if Christians or Jews acted like this?
Then why is Fox News and CNN still on air? Surely they would have been replaced with the Ben Affleck show, Richard Dawkins, a gay fashion show, gay partner swap, and the Playboy channel.

The nature of evil is to deceive, the nature of good is truth... Fox News defends good... thus it consistently prospers.

Need anything else?

Good needs to be defended by lies?


"Fox News lies!" Yes, go...ride that into the sunset.

Forward the light brigade!
 
We won't, after we fix it for all two people first. You got a problem with that, because you shouldn't. And when one of those daughters of yours gets raped, the rapist is now your son-in-law, if we're going Biblical that is. So, are we?
You really be toopid. WHY FIX IT FOR TWO PEOPLE FIRST? WHY LIMIT IT TO TWO PEOPLE?

Last chance to answer the question, dumb ass.
Your question has been answered, there is no reason, we just aren't there yet. Now answer my questions dumbass.
There is no reason. You have lost this argument 1,000 times, dumb ass.
No dumbass, it is you that have lost because you don't want the faggot, the siblings, and the spouse with many spouses to marry. My side won the first one, and that's probably as far as it will go for now. I am the winner here and you've lost. Suck it up pretty panties and move along.
there is no reason
lol
If you've got a reason, you'd better find it and post it. You'll lose that fight as well eventually.
 
The Jewish God made the rules.

"Therefore a man leaves his father and his mother and cleaves to his wife, and they become one flesh."

It's in Genesis.
Adam and Eve weren't married, and Cain and Abel fucked their sisters. Now what?
The law wasn't given until Genesis 2:24. Now what?
Same answer as before, it doesn't fucking matter since marriage in the Bible would make the Mormons and Muslims jump for joy. And you never answered the question, are you for Biblical Marriage, and that means more than one spouse.
You didn't answer my question. Why carry on a tradition at all? Why limit it to two people?
Issues of property rights and child custody come to mind on this one.
Those aren't that hard to solve. All the kids can make claims now. A bastard has just as much claim as the rest of them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top