The house will subpoena Hunter Biden. I have little hopes that anything will come of that.

You can use the expected excuses such as "technical violations" of gun and tax fraud. That's expected from Dems / Socialists. Tax fraud and making false statements on a federal firearms application are not "technical violations".

Those are federal crimes. You didn't know that?
Federal crimes that are almost never prosecuted.

The ATF identified 112,000 cases of false statements on federal gun forms, and referred exactly 12 of them for prosecution. (All cases where the guns were used in an actual crime.)
 
Federal crimes that are almost never prosecuted.

The ATF identified 112,000 cases of false statements on federal gun forms, and referred exactly 12 of them for prosecution. (All cases where the guns were used in an actual crime.)

You realized your buffoonish "technical violation" was nonsense so back to other excuses.

It's hilarious to watch you completely waffle from one nonsense claim to the next.
 
Trump broke the actual law... 91 times, at least. More if you count his rape and civil fraud causes.
Haven't read of 91 convictions.

Maybe your claim to Trump breaking the actual law 91 times is actually another of your hysterial, nonsense claims?
 
Trump broke the actual law... 91 times, at least. More if you count his rape and civil fraud causes.
You scumbag asshole libturds never seem to grasp the meaning of “presumed innocent.”

So, to correct you yet again, President Trump has merely been accused of 91 different counts. No. That’s not the same as “breaking” the law. You moron.

I know this will also sail over your pin head, but if you want to talk about Trump breaking the law, start by counting the number of his convictions. Start at zero. Good. Now stop. You’re stuck at zero.

There’s good reason for that. You moron.
 
You scumbag asshole libturds never seem to grasp the meaning of “presumed innocent.”

So, to correct you yet again, President Trump has merely been accused of 91 different counts. No. That’s not the same as “breaking” the law. You moron.

I know this will also sail over your pin head, but if you want to talk about Trump breaking the law, start by counting the number of his convictions. Start at zero. Good. Now stop. You’re stuck at zero.

There’s good reason for that. You moron.
Sheesh. After that shredding, there won't be enough of the boy left to sweep up into a dust pan to toss in the garbage.
 

Just when you think you've got these slippery weasels, they figure a way to get out of it. Likely Hunter will take the simplest route and refuse to show up. The only thing Congress could do about that, is refer for a charge of contempt of congress.

That will do about as much as when they referred Obama's wingman for contempt of congress. The doj is currently run by a puppet. Not even cool enough for Biden to claim him as his wingman, but still just as much under control of the white house. By the White House I mean whoever is controlling Biden himself.
WTF does son Biden have to do with national security? Who gives a shit about his sex fantasy? Stop wasting my tax payer dollars on this nonsense.
 
What did he do that is so bad it requires this much attention?
Let’s take it slow. Just for you.

The investigation is focused on corruption. The corruption was mainly financial.

But it entails political corruption to the extent (if any) that Potato was involved. Thus, the investigation really needs to continue.
 
Let’s take it slow. Just for you.

The investigation is focused on corruption. The corruption was mainly financial.

But it entails political corruption to the extent (if any) that Potato was involved. Thus, the investigation really needs to continue.
And yet, no charges have been filed.
 
You realized your buffoonish "technical violation" was nonsense so back to other excuses.
Oh, Chatbot, quit trying to move the goalposts. If Hunter was guilty of something, Trump would have indicted him. See. Trump got indicted. That's what happens to guilty people.
You scumbag asshole libturds never seem to grasp the meaning of “presumed innocent.”

So, to correct you yet again, President Trump has merely been accused of 91 different counts. No. That’s not the same as “breaking” the law. You moron.

Um, he had to do something to get indicted for. There's no doubt that he did those things. There's no doubt a jury will convict him. Your hope is that an appeals court will have enough Heritage Foundation Mutants on it to ignore findings lof law.

I know this will also sail over your pin head, but if you want to talk about Trump breaking the law, start by counting the number of his convictions. Start at zero. Good. Now stop. You’re stuck at zero.
Actually, he's already been found liable in the rape case and the bank fraud cases in NY.
 
Oh, Chatbot, quit trying to move the goalposts. If Hunter was guilty of something, Trump would have indicted him. See. Trump got indicted. That's what happens to guilty people.


Um, he had to do something to get indicted for. There's no doubt that he did those things. There's no doubt a jury will convict him. Your hope is that an appeals court will have enough Heritage Foundation Mutants on it to ignore findings lof law.


Actually, he's already been found liable in the rape case and the bank fraud cases in NY.

Get it together. Chatbot. Your TDS convinces you that your world revives around Trump.

The facts remain that Biden's lackeys in the IRS and DOJ stalled an investigation into Hunter Biden's earnings during his time at Burisma to protect both him and Sloppy Joe.
 

Just when you think you've got these slippery weasels, they figure a way to get out of it. Likely Hunter will take the simplest route and refuse to show up. The only thing Congress could do about that, is refer for a charge of contempt of congress.

That will do about as much as when they referred Obama's wingman for contempt of congress. The doj is currently run by a puppet. Not even cool enough for Biden to claim him as his wingman, but still just as much under control of the white house. By the White House I mean whoever is controlling Biden himself.
Dog and pony.
 
Oh, Chatbot, quit trying to move the goalposts. If Hunter was guilty of something, Trump would have indicted him. See. Trump got indicted. That's what happens to guilty people.


Um, he had to do something to get indicted for.

Nope. False.
There's no doubt that he did those things.
Huge doubt. And what things he did do, aren’t criminal.
There's no doubt a jury will convict him.

Maybe a small doubt. Irrelevant anyway. The jury verdict won’t mean shit on appeal.
Your hope is that an appeals court will have enough Heritage Foundation Mutants on it to ignore findings lof law.
No. My belief is that real judges (not motivated by corrupt partisan political fuckery) will refuse to tolerate what the corrupted persecutions have done.
Actually, he's already been found liable in the rape case and the bank fraud cases in NY.
He was never found liable for rape.

And the bank case in NY has so far only resulted in a partial summary judgment ruling by the mutant hack judge.
 

Forum List

Back
Top