Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Da pathetic sissy swing and, as always with you, a laughable miss.There's a clause in there that says, "Anyone named Biden", because that's the only difference between him and the thousands of other people who had a problem but didn't check that box.
It is unlikely that you’re aware of it, but I vaguely recall that he was the first to be charged under the specific subdivision of that law. The trial would have been a slam dunk, factually. But our disgraceful Department of the Miscarriage of Justice didn’t even try.
Wrong. That’s not “the point.” It’s not even A point. You are brain damaged. Perhaps he is the first one to legally qualify for being so charged. (There’s always one person who is the first to be charged for any crime.)But, that's the point, if they never charge anyone on this specific subdivision, why is he being singled out unless his name was- Biden?
Your “legal analysis” is devoid of legal authority or logic.The defense he has for these charges is that at the time he did it, he didn't think he had a problem, like most addicts, being in denial. So he has a diminished capacity defense built in.
Wrong. That’s not “the point.” It’s not even A point. You are brain damaged. Perhaps he is the first one to legally qualify for being so charged. (There’s always one person who is the first to be charged for any crime.)
They dismissed the charge because any sensible jury would see it as singling out a celebrity for a non-crime.There was no defense. He is actually guilty although, since they dismissed the charge, he can never be found guilty, now.
www.nbcnews.com
Nobody cares what you “doubt.”I doubt he was the first person who checked that box who had a substance abuse problem, who later either got busted for drugs or public intoxication.
That’s not the reality at all. Making shit up is your stock in trade.The reality is the only time the ATF goes after people for falsifying those forms is if the prohibited person went on to commit a crime with that gun. That wasn't the case here.
No. That’s not why the charge got dismissed. First a judge caught them trying to sweep a diversion under the rug. Then they elected to more forthrightly just outright dismiss the charge. Hunter got special treatment on a federal gun crime because pappy is President.They dismissed the charge because any sensible jury would see it as singling out a celebrity for a non-crime.
False. The charge has been dismissed. Try to keep current you ignorant shit.Also, the charges have not been dismissed. The judge killed the original indictment for a three count indictment the Special Prosecutor has filed
Irrelevant.Hunter is going on the offensive. He's requesting documentation to see if Trump and Barr influenced the investigation.
I posted a link that said exactly that, but it probably had too many big words for you.That’s not the reality at all. Making shit up is your stock in trade.
Do you have a link to that. The initial charge was ONLY dismissed because the Special Prosecutor filed a three count indictment.False. The charge has been dismissed. Try to keep current you ignorant shit.
Nah. Once again, utter lack of comprehension is a “you” problem, all the time.I posted a link that said exactly that, but it probably had too many big words for you.
The judge rejected the plea deal. Later, the special prosecutor simply dismissed the gun charge. Why do you insist on links for public information?Do you have a link to that. The initial charge was ONLY dismissed because the Special Prosecutor filed a three count indictment.
The judge rejected the plea deal. Later, the special prosecutor simply dismissed the gun charge. Why do you insist on links for public information?
Your ignorance is hysterical.
You are ignorant. The judge approved the dismissal of the gun count, you imbecile.Do you NOT know how to read? From your own article.
WASHINGTON -- A gun count that had been part of a collapsed plea deal in the Hunter Biden case was dismissed Wednesday as a judge signed off on a prosecution request.
The order from U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika formally removes a gun-possession charge that has now been replaced by a three-count indictment.
The president's son is charged with violating measures against drug users having guns when he bought and kept a revolver for about 11 days in 2018, a period where he has acknowledged struggling with addiction.
You are ignorant. The judge approved the dismissal of the gun count, you imbecile.
Gawd. Bu a clue.
Your idiocy is on display.After NEW gun charges were brought. English comprehension is not your strong suit, but now you are being obstinate.
Your idiocy is on display.
I didn’t quibble (like you are straining to do) ahout new or old. He had a gun charge which was to be subject to diversion in a sneaky shitass deal. The judge said “no” to that.
Then the “new” gun charge was brought. The fact that it is a new charge is clearly of no consequence. That one was dismissed on the motion of the not so special counsel and with the ok of the judge.
Yawn. You’re lucky they aren’t calling Hillary back. She’d make them all look like the foolish twits they are. Repugnants have this thing for “H” and making up shit.
House to subpoena James and Hunter Biden as special counsel prepares to testify in GOP-led probe
David Weiss, who is investigating the president's son, will appear for a closed-door interview Tuesday as House Republicans ramp up their impeachment probe this week.
Just when you think you've got these slippery weasels, they figure a way to get out of it. Likely Hunter will take the simplest route and refuse to show up. The only thing Congress could do about that, is refer for a charge of contempt of congress.
That will do about as much as when they referred Obama's wingman for contempt of congress. The doj is currently run by a puppet. Not even cool enough for Biden to claim him as his wingman, but still just as much under control of the white house. By the White House I mean whoever is controlling Biden himself.
Um, it's completely relevant to the point.
Wrong again. The charge was dismissed. He’s out of woods. Period.He isn't out of legal jeopardy for this bullshit charge that isn't prosecuted 99% of the time. (Even in cases where an actual crime was committed with said gun!)
I realize you have difficulty with that. Despite all the practice you have at always being wrong. Oh well. That’s a you problem.But some people just can't admit when they were wrong.
Someone should have taught you at an early age contradiction isn't an argument.You have no point. Ergo, nothing you post can possibly be “relevant” to that hypothetical but nonexistent thing.
Wrong again. The charge was dismissed. He’s out of woods. Period.
I realize you have difficulty with that. Despite all the practice you have at always being wrong. Oh well. That’s a you problem.
Somebody failed to tell you that your making of unsupported claims also isn’t argument.Someone should have taught you at an early age contradiction isn't an argument.
Dude, I used your own fucking link to show you didn't know what you were talking about.Somebody failed to tell you that your making of unsupported claims also isn’t argument.
Dude. You still don’t get it.Dude, I used your own fucking link to show you didn't know what you were talking about.
Let’s have the hearing live and televised the way Hunter said he would like to. What is Comer afraid of?House to subpoena James and Hunter Biden as special counsel prepares to testify in GOP-led probe
David Weiss, who is investigating the president's son, will appear for a closed-door interview Tuesday as House Republicans ramp up their impeachment probe this week.
Just when you think you've got these slippery weasels, they figure a way to get out of it. Likely Hunter will take the simplest route and refuse to show up. The only thing Congress could do about that, is refer for a charge of contempt of congress.
That will do about as much as when they referred Obama's wingman for contempt of congress. The doj is currently run by a puppet. Not even cool enough for Biden to claim him as his wingman, but still just as much under control of the white house. By the White House I mean whoever is controlling Biden himself.
He makes perfect sense. It's been years since either party sent be out a genuine non politically motivated subpoena. The process has been permanently beclowned.Captain Caveman said: Imagine the person subpoenaed was to do with Trump, should the House be fucked off?
You don't make sense.
