the Impeachment inquiry of Joe Biden !

[marvin martian]

This is a badly executed, pathetic, desperate tit for tat attempt by republicans to get revenge for TFG's impeachments. Nothing more.

Angry children are currently running the party. Sad.

LOL

 

[schmidlap]

Of course you know that the articles of impeachment don't really matter. The Senate would NEVER vote to remove anyway.
The trial needs to include as many articles as possible to show voters how horrible and unlawful the Biden presidency is.

It is entirely understandable that Trump lickspittles, amidst the court-ruled sexual abuser's multiple fact-based indictments (based upon documented evidence and sworn testimony of dozens of Republicans) try to contrive charges against the popularly-elected President, but their smear campaign is conspicuously lacking in credibility.

Hating the dude for whom Americans cast over seven million more certified votes in 2020 is not enough.

Regardless of the febrile, hyper-partisan media hype aimed at the President's family,

• There is no public evidence to date that the President ever personally received any money or acted in any official capacity to further his family's interests.

There is clear evidence that Hunter Biden, leveraged his famous name while pursuing lucrative foreign deals (as other Presidents' relatives have done.) That's not illegal. He is not nor has ever been a government official.

House Republicans have not presented any proof that Joe Biden ever profited off his son’s business deals, or was influenced while in office by his son’s business dealings.

Strident partisan outrage demands actual credible evidence before any actual indictments are ever contrived under America's system of justice.

Screeching, "Lock him up! Lock him up!" absent indictment, prosecution, and conviction is blatant contempt for the United States Constitution, and an assault upon the will of the People as depraved as the attack by Trump goons upon outnumbered police defending democracy on January 6, 2021.

 

[kyzr]

"Former national security adviser John Bolton wanted no part of what he derided as the White House's "drug deal" to pressure Ukraine into investigating Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, a former White House official told congressional investigators on Monday, according to reports of her testimony from The New York Times and NBC News."
Why do you still think that phone call was the only evidence they had in the Trumpybear plot to strong arm the Ukrainian president into falsely besmirching Joe Biden?

Because all Trump asked for was for Z to announce that he was going to investigate corruption in Burisma.
You read the call transcript dumbass. The phone call was not impeachable.

 

[kyzr]

Trump was impeached for breaking the law on military funds for other nations, passed by Congress and signed by a president.
Under the Law all military aid passed that Congress initiated, has to be distributed to the foreign nation by the executive, within 3 months of the bill passing. If the president can not do so in that time period, under the law, he must notify Congress that the president can't do that....
Trump HID that he was not distributing the congressionally passed military aid within the three months and failed to notify congress....
He hid it, Because He was illegally holding the military aid back until president ,Zelensky made an announcement on CNN international, that he opened an investigation in to Hunter and Joe biden, Trump's political opponent..... Trump said that he did not care if Zelensky opened an investigation or not in to the Bidens, he only cared that Zelensky would just SAY that he was....so Trump and Giuliani could use it, politically against his opponent.

Trump used our diplomats to try to do this for him, and Giuliani his campaign lawyer. The one diplomat who refused to use her position to illegally be involved in Trump's political campaign run, trump fired. ALL OF THAT WAS AN ABUSE OF POWER AND ILLEGAL.

1. Trump broke no law during that phone call to Z. Ukraine got their money on time. Read the call transcript.
2. Trump did NOTHING illegal for the 1st impeachment. It was total bullshit.

First impeachment of Donald Trump - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

You want to see something impeachable:

 

[BlindBoo]

Because all Trump asked for was for Z to announce that he was going to investigate corruption in Burisma.
You read the call transcript dumbass. The phone call was not impeachable.

I did read it. He was not impeached for the phone call. Feel free to show where in the Articles of Impeachment his phone call was listed as one of the impeachable offenses.

https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/hres755/BILLS-116hres755enr.pdf

 

[kyzr]

It is entirely understandable that Trump lickspittles, amidst the court-ruled sexual abuser's multiple fact-based indictments (based upon documented evidence and sworn testimony of dozens of Republicans) try to contrive charges against the popularly-elected President, but their smear campaign is conspicuously lacking in credibility.

Hating the dude for whom Americans cast over seven million more certified votes in 2020 is not enough.

Regardless of the febrile, hyper-partisan media hype aimed at the President's family,

There is clear evidence that Hunter Biden, leveraged his famous name while pursuing lucrative foreign deals (as other Presidents' relatives have done.) That's not illegal. He is not nor has ever been a government official.

House Republicans have not presented any proof that Joe Biden ever profited off his son’s business deals, or was influenced while in office by his son’s business dealings.

Strident partisan outrage demands actual credible evidence before any actual indictments are ever contrived under America's system of justice.

Screeching, "Lock him up! Lock him up!" absent indictment, prosecution, and conviction is blatant contempt for the United States Constitution, and an assault upon the will of the People as depraved as the attack by Trump goons upon outnumbered police defending democracy on January 6, 2021.

1. The president does NOT have to personally receive the money. If family members receive money that is just as illegal. Can you imagine subpoenas for the Biden Crime Family to explain how they earned that $27,000,000?

2. Impeachable offenses do NOT need to be "crimes". If you watched the Impeachment Inquiry you would see that there is more than enough evidence to justify the Impeachment Inquiry. Influence Peddling is impeachable.

 

[kyzr]

I did read it. He was not impeached for the phone call. Feel free to show where in the Articles of Impeachment his phone call was listed as one of the impeachable offenses.

Article-1 The "Phone Call" asking for an investigation into probable corruption




Article-2 Obstructing about the legitimate phone call.

Total Bullshit.

 

[BlindBoo]

If family members receive money that is just as illegal.

It can be, but mostly it's legal as long as they follow the laws and pay the taxes.

Impeachable offenses do NOT need to be "crimes".

That's true. Beating the Trumpybear in a fair and free election is not a crime. For the Party of Retribution it is an impeachable offense. But then again the Pity Party Trumpers want to make him the law so they can execute Milley..........so good luck with that.

 

[BlindBoo]

Article-1

Nope, no mention of a phone call.

He did so through a scheme or course of conduct that included soliciting the Government of Ukraine to publicly announce investigations that would benefit his reelection, harm the election prospects of a political opponent, and influence the 2020 United States Presidential election to his advantage. President Trump also sought to pressure the Government of Ukraine to take these steps by conditioning official United States Government acts of significant value to Ukraine on its public announcement of the investigations. President Trump engaged in this scheme or course of conduct for corrupt purposes in pursuit of personal political benefit. In so doing, President Trump used the powers of the Presidency in a manner that compromised the national security of the United States and undermined the integrity of the United States democratic process. He thus ignored and injured the interests of the Nation. President Trump engaged in this scheme or course of conduct through the following means:

(1) President Trump—acting both directly and through his agents within and outside the United States Government—corruptly solicited the Government of Ukraine to publicly announce investigations into—
(A) a political opponent, former Vice President Joseph R. Biden, Jr.; and
(B) a discredited theory promoted by Russia alleging that Ukraine—rather than Russia—interfered in the 2016 United States Presidential election.

(2) With the same corrupt motives, President Trump—acting both directly and through his agents within and outside the United States Government—conditioned two official acts on the public announcements that he had requested—

(A) the release of $391 million of United States taxpayer funds that Congress had appropriated on a bipartisan basis for the purpose of providing vital military and security assistance to Ukraine to oppose Russian aggression and which President Trump had ordered suspended; and

(B) a head of state meeting at the White House, which the President of Ukraine sought to demonstrate continued United States support for the Government of Ukraine in the face of Russian aggression.

(3) Faced with the public revelation of his actions, President Trump ultimately released the military and security assistance to the Government of Ukraine, but has persisted in openly and corruptly urging and soliciting Ukraine to under take investigations for his personal political benefit. These actions were consistent with President Trump’s previous invitations of foreign interference in United States elections. In all of this, President Trump abused the powers of the Presidency by ignoring and injuring national security and other vital national interests to obtain an improper personal political benefit. He has also betrayed the Nation by abusing his high office to enlist a foreign power in corrupting democratic elections. Wherefore President Trump, by such conduct, has demonstrated that he will remain a threat to national security and the Constitution if allowed to remain in office, and has acted in a manner grossly incompatible with self-governance and the rule of law. President Trump thus warrants impeachment and trial, removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.

 

[yidnar]

1 not impeachable, policy settled in the courts with suits to determine constitutionally
2 Not impeachable, settles in the court with suits etc.....
3 Not impeachable, he was left by Trump with only 2500 military there....for the withdrawal.

Those are things that are policy decisions, not high crimes and misdemeanors .....which are settled by the courts if they break the constitution.... This is not corruption, but policy decisions as mentioned.

And mistakes and policy decisions are simply settled by us voting whomever, out, at the ballot box.

and normal sane Americans will vote against the left in 2024 .

 

[yidnar]

They are claiming their witnesses will show they were held back on Hunter charges, and that Biden corruptly abused his power to cover up for his son. The problem is Biden was not in office when the witness alleges being stalled, not as VP and not as President....Trump's DOJ and William Barr were in charge when she was allegedly stalled.

the inquiry will tell the American people if the Big Guy is corrupt and selling out the country .. if they dont find evidence that Biden is corrupt it will be a major embarrassment for the gop ... we shall see ..

 

[yidnar]

I am hoping that those Dem Senators that have already turned on Menendez will do the same against Biden in order to save themselves.

they wont turn on Biden ..

 

[RhodyPatriot]

 

[yidnar]

It can be, but mostly it's legal as long as they follow the laws and pay the taxes.



That's true. Beating the Trumpybear in a fair and free election is not a crime. For the Party of Retribution it is an impeachable offense. But then again the Pity Party Trumpers want to make him the law so they can execute Milley..........so good luck with that.

the doj let the statute of limitations run out on a lot of Hunters unpaid taxes ... millions in unpaid taxes ..

 

[schmidlap]

1. The president does NOT have to personally receive the money. If family members receive money that is just as illegal. Can you imagine subpoenas for the Biden Crime Family to explain how they earned that $27,000,000?

2. Impeachable offenses do NOT need to be "crimes". If you watched the Impeachment Inquiry you would see that there is more than enough evidence to justify the Impeachment Inquiry. Influence Peddling is impeachable.

​

... House Republicans kicked off their first impeachment inquiry hearing Thursday. laying out the allegations they will pursue against President Joe Biden, though their expert witnesses acknowledged Republicans don’t yet have the evidence to prove the accusation they’re leveling.​

​

Thursday’s hearing in the House Oversight Committee didn’t include witnesses who could speak directly to Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealing at the center of the inquiry, but the hearing offered Republicans the chance to show some of the evidence they’ve uncovered to date.​

​

None of that evidence has shown Joe Biden received any financial benefit from his son’s business dealings...​

​

​

... [T]he California Republican previously said he believed the full House should vote on the matter. In 2019, he criticized then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) for launching Trump’s first impeachment inquiry without a full House vote.​

​

The decision to skip a floor vote underlined the divisions within the GOP, where some more moderate members have expressed skepticism about moving forward with proceedings unless investigators could provide evidence of wrongdoing.​

​

If credible evidence is ever contrived against the President (as with the multiple indictments against his predecessor), formal charges against him will be filed.

The hyper-partisan retaliatory spite may well prove baseless, as in the case of years of "Lock her up! Lock her up!" hysterics targeting Hillary Clinton, no pretexts for charges ever being contrived. A sordid political smear campaign.

​

Let's wait and see.

 

[HaShev]

Satire:
New York Congressman Dan Goldman has his car broken into, his pharmacy and his grocery robbed but zero are arrested zero DA's impeached that are letting criminals go to repeat such crimes, but hey NOW go in front of congressional impeachment inquiries and use your joke chart that Biden'$ crimes are 0 indictments and 0 impeachments as an excuse and argument to allow him to continue to sell out our country to China...brilliant argument!
-TREASON IS NO LAUGHING MATTER.

 

[HaShev]

the doj let the statute of limitations run out on a lot of Hunters unpaid taxes ... millions in unpaid taxes ..

However his lying in court about the amount and lying about his income in his child support case might extend the limitations?? At minimum be a wash to how much jail time they thought they saved him and how much these new charges might bring.

 

[Care4all]

Where did your fantasy originate? Did you make it up yourself or get it from someone else?

Oh silly one! Your eyes were blind and your ears deaf during the impeachment trial, eh?

 

[Care4all]

I find it funny you say that when everything Trumps said or did accuse Biden of doing, has come true!

Fooled again! Shame on you!

 

[j-mac]

It’s stunning to see dems claim ‘nothing to see here’ as they have already set the precedent for this….

Not to mention that Biden is guilty as hell…