The John Kennedy assassination ..who's who on the Grassy Knoll

[7forever]

A massive hole in the film does show an exit wound as most of the evidence confirms.

An exit wound is captured in the film and is in the right rear.

The red blob was faked because no exit wound was there.

A massive hole does prove an exit wound and once again the AR was right.

The observations of doctors performing emergency procedures is definitive evidence against the autopsy concluding a low entrance to the skull.

You are crushed and mocked as always.

A massive hole is a massive hole and does not prove exit or entrance poi9nt that is fact.

No evidence proves it is an exit wound as all of your posts shows.

You have totally failed to produce a speck of evidence to support this idiotic idea.

There is no exit wound captured on film only a wound no matter how much you scream otherwise.

There is no evidence of anything being faked.

The AR was correct and proves that the bullet entered from above and behind.

Casual observations are not evidence against a professional autopsy.

You are beaten as always.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The exit wound was not the rear the bullet entered from above and behind and exited the side.

That is fact proven by evidence and the skull bursting open from such a wound does not refute the facts or dictate another scenario is

It exited the rear and that is proven by the AR alone. No need for any corroboration.

You just lied as always.

The AR concluded with evidence that the bullet entered from above and behind

It doesn't matter what it concluded unless it can be verified. An entrance in the rear cannot be corroborated by any other evidence. You have no entrance wound.

 

[7forever]

A massive hole in the film does show an exit wound as most of the evidence confirms.

An exit wound is captured in the film and is in the right rear.

The red blob was faked because no exit wound was there.

A massive hole does prove an exit wound and once again the AR was right.

The observations of doctors performing emergency procedures is definitive evidence against the autopsy concluding a low entrance to the skull.

You are crushed and mocked as always.

A massive hole is a massive hole and does not prove exit or entrance poi9nt that is fact.

No evidence proves it is an exit wound as all of your posts shows.

You have totally failed to produce a speck of evidence to support this idiotic idea.

There is no exit wound captured on film only a wound no matter how much you scream otherwise.

There is no evidence of anything being faked.

The AR was correct and proves that the bullet entered from above and behind.

Casual observations are not evidence against a professional autopsy.

You are beaten as always.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The exit wound was not the rear the bullet entered from above and behind and exited the side.

That is fact proven by evidence and the skull bursting open from such a wound does not refute the facts or dictate another scenario is

The rear blew out and you can't offer any evidence it could have entered there, because you know it didn't.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The skull will typically burst regardless.


The evidence proves you wrong .

The bullet entered from behind and your efforts to claim otherwise fail.

You can say it all day long but you can't prove it because it's not true. A bullet will typically leave a small entry and large exit and won't be below and above each other.

 

[Soupnazi630]

A massive hole is a massive hole and does not prove exit or entrance poi9nt that is fact.

No evidence proves it is an exit wound as all of your posts shows.

You have totally failed to produce a speck of evidence to support this idiotic idea.

There is no exit wound captured on film only a wound no matter how much you scream otherwise.

There is no evidence of anything being faked.

The AR was correct and proves that the bullet entered from above and behind.

Casual observations are not evidence against a professional autopsy.

You are beaten as always.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The exit wound was not the rear the bullet entered from above and behind and exited the side.

That is fact proven by evidence and the skull bursting open from such a wound does not refute the facts or dictate another scenario is

It exited the rear and that is proven by the AR alone. No need for any corroboration.

You just lied as always.

The AR concluded with evidence that the bullet entered from above and behind

It doesn't matter what it concluded unless it can be verified. An entrance in the rear cannot be corroborated by any other evidence. You have no entrance wound.

Yes it can and has been proven by all of the evidence

 

[Soupnazi630]

A massive hole is a massive hole and does not prove exit or entrance poi9nt that is fact.

No evidence proves it is an exit wound as all of your posts shows.

You have totally failed to produce a speck of evidence to support this idiotic idea.

There is no exit wound captured on film only a wound no matter how much you scream otherwise.

There is no evidence of anything being faked.

The AR was correct and proves that the bullet entered from above and behind.

Casual observations are not evidence against a professional autopsy.

You are beaten as always.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The exit wound was not the rear the bullet entered from above and behind and exited the side.

That is fact proven by evidence and the skull bursting open from such a wound does not refute the facts or dictate another scenario is

The rear blew out and you can't offer any evidence it could have entered there, because you know it didn't.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The skull will typically burst regardless.


The evidence proves you wrong .

The bullet entered from behind and your efforts to claim otherwise fail.

You can say it all day long but you can't prove it because it's not true.

Yes it is true and proven by evidence and you know it is

 

[7forever]

A massive hole in the film does show an exit wound as most of the evidence confirms.

An exit wound is captured in the film and is in the right rear.

The red blob was faked because no exit wound was there.

A massive hole does prove an exit wound and once again the AR was right.

The observations of doctors performing emergency procedures is definitive evidence against the autopsy concluding a low entrance to the skull.

You are crushed and mocked as always.

A massive hole is a massive hole and does not prove exit or entrance poi9nt that is fact.

No evidence proves it is an exit wound as all of your posts shows.

You have totally failed to produce a speck of evidence to support this idiotic idea.

There is no exit wound captured on film only a wound no matter how much you scream otherwise.

There is no evidence of anything being faked.

The AR was correct and proves that the bullet entered from above and behind.

Casual observations are not evidence against a professional autopsy.

You are beaten as always.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The exit wound was not the rear the bullet entered from above and behind and exited the side.

That is fact proven by evidence and the skull bursting open from such a wound does not refute the facts or dictate another scenario is

It exited the rear and that is proven by the AR alone. No need for any corroboration.

You just lied as always.

The AR concluded with evidence that the bullet entered from above and behind

It was wrong because a bullet cannot enter and exit the rear.

 

[7forever]

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The exit wound was not the rear the bullet entered from above and behind and exited the side.

That is fact proven by evidence and the skull bursting open from such a wound does not refute the facts or dictate another scenario is

The rear blew out and you can't offer any evidence it could have entered there, because you know it didn't.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The skull will typically burst regardless.


The evidence proves you wrong .

The bullet entered from behind and your efforts to claim otherwise fail.

You can say it all day long but you can't prove it because it's not true.

Yes it is true and proven by evidence and you know it is

Yes it is true and proven by evidence and you know it is. The rear was an exit wound.

Until recently, I never could find a good capture of frame 319 that depicts the rear exit wound. Frames 311-319.

Zapruder Frames - Costella Combined Edit

 

[7forever]

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The exit wound was not the rear the bullet entered from above and behind and exited the side.

That is fact proven by evidence and the skull bursting open from such a wound does not refute the facts or dictate another scenario is

It exited the rear and that is proven by the AR alone. No need for any corroboration.

You just lied as always.

The AR concluded with evidence that the bullet entered from above and behind

It doesn't matter what it concluded unless it can be verified. An entrance in the rear cannot be corroborated by any other evidence. You have no entrance wound.

Yes it can and has been proven by all of the evidence

Yes it can and has been proven by all of the evidence. The bullet entered above the right eye where the fragments were recovered.

 

[Soupnazi630]

A massive hole is a massive hole and does not prove exit or entrance poi9nt that is fact.

No evidence proves it is an exit wound as all of your posts shows.

You have totally failed to produce a speck of evidence to support this idiotic idea.

There is no exit wound captured on film only a wound no matter how much you scream otherwise.

There is no evidence of anything being faked.

The AR was correct and proves that the bullet entered from above and behind.

Casual observations are not evidence against a professional autopsy.

You are beaten as always.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The exit wound was not the rear the bullet entered from above and behind and exited the side.

That is fact proven by evidence and the skull bursting open from such a wound does not refute the facts or dictate another scenario is

The rear blew out and you can't offer any evidence it could have entered there, because you know it didn't.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The skull will typically burst regardless.


The evidence proves you wrong .

The bullet entered from behind and your efforts to claim otherwise fail.

You can say it all day long but you can't prove it because it's not true. A bullet will typically leave a small entry and large exit and won't be below and above each other.

When a bullet hits the skull it typically bursts the skull open leaving a mess everywhere which is why autopsies are necessary and definitive.

The autopsy proves the bullet entered from above and behind.

7/11/forever crushed like a bug as always

 

[Soupnazi630]

The exit wound was not the rear the bullet entered from above and behind and exited the side.

That is fact proven by evidence and the skull bursting open from such a wound does not refute the facts or dictate another scenario is

It exited the rear and that is proven by the AR alone. No need for any corroboration.

You just lied as always.

The AR concluded with evidence that the bullet entered from above and behind

It doesn't matter what it concluded unless it can be verified. An entrance in the rear cannot be corroborated by any other evidence. You have no entrance wound.

Yes it can and has been proven by all of the evidence

Yes it can and has been proven by all of the evidence. The bullet entered above the right eye where the fragments were recovered.

There was no wound above the right eye the bullet entered from above and behind

 

[Soupnazi630]

The exit wound was not the rear the bullet entered from above and behind and exited the side.

That is fact proven by evidence and the skull bursting open from such a wound does not refute the facts or dictate another scenario is

The rear blew out and you can't offer any evidence it could have entered there, because you know it didn't.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The skull will typically burst regardless.


The evidence proves you wrong .

The bullet entered from behind and your efforts to claim otherwise fail.

You can say it all day long but you can't prove it because it's not true.

Yes it is true and proven by evidence and you know it is

Yes it is true and proven by evidence and you know it is. The rear was an exit wound.

Nope if there were evidence of this it would have been found by now

 

[7forever]

It exited the rear and that is proven by the AR alone. No need for any corroboration.

You just lied as always.

The AR concluded with evidence that the bullet entered from above and behind

It doesn't matter what it concluded unless it can be verified. An entrance in the rear cannot be corroborated by any other evidence. You have no entrance wound.

Yes it can and has been proven by all of the evidence

Yes it can and has been proven by all of the evidence. The bullet entered above the right eye where the fragments were recovered.

There was no wound above the right eye the bullet entered from above and behind

According to the x-rays there was.

 

[7forever]

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The exit wound was not the rear the bullet entered from above and behind and exited the side.

That is fact proven by evidence and the skull bursting open from such a wound does not refute the facts or dictate another scenario is

The rear blew out and you can't offer any evidence it could have entered there, because you know it didn't.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The skull will typically burst regardless.


The evidence proves you wrong .

The bullet entered from behind and your efforts to claim otherwise fail.

You can say it all day long but you can't prove it because it's not true. A bullet will typically leave a small entry and large exit and won't be below and above each other.

When a bullet hits the skull it typically bursts the skull open leaving a mess everywhere which is why autopsies are necessary and definitive.

The autopsy proves the bullet entered from above and behind.

7/11/forever crushed like a bug as always

It doesn't burst with one bullet. You are lying and have no evidence of such nonsense.

 

[7forever]

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The exit wound was not the rear the bullet entered from above and behind and exited the side.

That is fact proven by evidence and the skull bursting open from such a wound does not refute the facts or dictate another scenario is

The rear blew out and you can't offer any evidence it could have entered there, because you know it didn't.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The skull will typically burst regardless.


The evidence proves you wrong .

The bullet entered from behind and your efforts to claim otherwise fail.

You can say it all day long but you can't prove it because it's not true. A bullet will typically leave a small entry and large exit and won't be below and above each other.

When a bullet hits the skull it typically bursts the skull open leaving a mess everywhere which is why autopsies are necessary and definitive.

The autopsy proves the bullet entered from above and behind.

7/11/forever crushed like a bug as always

The AR doesn't prove anything on its own. It reached conclusions, most of which are refuted by other evidence.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The exit wound was not the rear the bullet entered from above and behind and exited the side.

That is fact proven by evidence and the skull bursting open from such a wound does not refute the facts or dictate another scenario is

The rear blew out and you can't offer any evidence it could have entered there, because you know it didn't.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The skull will typically burst regardless.


The evidence proves you wrong .

The bullet entered from behind and your efforts to claim otherwise fail.

You can say it all day long but you can't prove it because it's not true. A bullet will typically leave a small entry and large exit and won't be below and above each other.

When a bullet hits the skull it typically bursts the skull open leaving a mess everywhere which is why autopsies are necessary and definitive.

The autopsy proves the bullet entered from above and behind.

7/11/forever crushed like a bug as always

It doesn't burst with one bullet. You are lying and have no evidence of such nonsense.

Yes it does typically burst with one bullet as the vast history of gunshot wounds proves

 

[Soupnazi630]

The exit wound was not the rear the bullet entered from above and behind and exited the side.

That is fact proven by evidence and the skull bursting open from such a wound does not refute the facts or dictate another scenario is

The rear blew out and you can't offer any evidence it could have entered there, because you know it didn't.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The skull will typically burst regardless.


The evidence proves you wrong .

The bullet entered from behind and your efforts to claim otherwise fail.

You can say it all day long but you can't prove it because it's not true. A bullet will typically leave a small entry and large exit and won't be below and above each other.

When a bullet hits the skull it typically bursts the skull open leaving a mess everywhere which is why autopsies are necessary and definitive.

The autopsy proves the bullet entered from above and behind.

7/11/forever crushed like a bug as always

The AR doesn't prove anything on its own. It reached conclusions, most of which are refuted by other evidence.

Yes the AR is evidence and you have failed to offer any evidence refuting it

 

[7forever]

The rear blew out and you can't offer any evidence it could have entered there, because you know it didn't.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The skull will typically burst regardless.


The evidence proves you wrong .

The bullet entered from behind and your efforts to claim otherwise fail.

You can say it all day long but you can't prove it because it's not true. A bullet will typically leave a small entry and large exit and won't be below and above each other.

When a bullet hits the skull it typically bursts the skull open leaving a mess everywhere which is why autopsies are necessary and definitive.

The autopsy proves the bullet entered from above and behind.

7/11/forever crushed like a bug as always

It doesn't burst with one bullet. You are lying and have no evidence of such nonsense.

Yes it does typically burst with one bullet as the vast history of gunshot wounds proves

It does not and you can't show one example similar to jfk's. You are a lying retard.LOL

 

[Soupnazi630]

You just lied as always.

The AR concluded with evidence that the bullet entered from above and behind

It doesn't matter what it concluded unless it can be verified. An entrance in the rear cannot be corroborated by any other evidence. You have no entrance wound.

Yes it can and has been proven by all of the evidence

Yes it can and has been proven by all of the evidence. The bullet entered above the right eye where the fragments were recovered.

There was no wound above the right eye the bullet entered from above and behind

According to the x-rays there was.

That is an outright lie there is no X-ray image showing a wound over the right eye

 

[Soupnazi630]

The skull will typically burst regardless.


The evidence proves you wrong .

The bullet entered from behind and your efforts to claim otherwise fail.

You can say it all day long but you can't prove it because it's not true. A bullet will typically leave a small entry and large exit and won't be below and above each other.

When a bullet hits the skull it typically bursts the skull open leaving a mess everywhere which is why autopsies are necessary and definitive.

The autopsy proves the bullet entered from above and behind.

7/11/forever crushed like a bug as always

It doesn't burst with one bullet. You are lying and have no evidence of such nonsense.

Yes it does typically burst with one bullet as the vast history of gunshot wounds proves

It does not and you can't show one example similar to jfk's. You are a lying retard.LOL

Yes it does and many such examples exist liar

 

[7forever]

The rear blew out and you can't offer any evidence it could have entered there, because you know it didn't.

If the exit wound wasn't in the rear, then the rear would not have blown off, but it did. The exit wound was in the rear.

The skull will typically burst regardless.


The evidence proves you wrong .

The bullet entered from behind and your efforts to claim otherwise fail.

You can say it all day long but you can't prove it because it's not true. A bullet will typically leave a small entry and large exit and won't be below and above each other.

When a bullet hits the skull it typically bursts the skull open leaving a mess everywhere which is why autopsies are necessary and definitive.

The autopsy proves the bullet entered from above and behind.

7/11/forever crushed like a bug as always

The AR doesn't prove anything on its own. It reached conclusions, most of which are refuted by other evidence.

Yes the AR is evidence and you have failed to offer any evidence refuting it

The AR says a hole at the rear existed and that was a wound of exit. You have no entrance wound at the rear because they made it up.

 

[7forever]

You can say it all day long but you can't prove it because it's not true. A bullet will typically leave a small entry and large exit and won't be below and above each other.

When a bullet hits the skull it typically bursts the skull open leaving a mess everywhere which is why autopsies are necessary and definitive.

The autopsy proves the bullet entered from above and behind.

7/11/forever crushed like a bug as always

It doesn't burst with one bullet. You are lying and have no evidence of such nonsense.

Yes it does typically burst with one bullet as the vast history of gunshot wounds proves

It does not and you can't show one example similar to jfk's. You are a lying retard.LOL

Yes it does and many such examples exist liar

You haven't provided any examples ya little retard because it could not have happened that way.