Soupnazi630
Gold Member
- Dec 9, 2013
- 17,424
- 4,995
The AR does not say that the hole in the rear was an exit wound you lie again.When a bullet hits the skull it typically bursts the skull open leaving a mess everywhere which is why autopsies are necessary and definitive.The skull will typically burst regardless.
The evidence proves you wrong .
The bullet entered from behind and your efforts to claim otherwise fail.
You can say it all day long but you can't prove it because it's not true. A bullet will typically leave a small entry and large exit and won't be below and above each other.
The autopsy proves the bullet entered from above and behind.
7/11/forever crushed like a bug as always
The AR doesn't prove anything on its own. It reached conclusions, most of which are refuted by other evidence.
Yes the AR is evidence and you have failed to offer any evidence refuting it
The AR says a hole at the rear existed and that was a wound of exit. You have no entrance wound at the rear because they made it up.
The AR proves the bullet entered from above and behind