BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 96,084
- 32,128
- 2,250
I aint defending neither. They're both from a book that is thousands of years old and a fairly tale!
I haven't seen one ounce of criticism against satanism yet... Sorry the shit you just thrown isn't flying.
Probably because the satanists aren't trying to tell women what they can do with their own bodies of who a person can or can't love. As soon as they become overbearing hypocritical dicks like the religious nuts are, you will hear plenty of criticism.
No where in the Bible does it say that women Can Not get an abortion. And no where in the Bible does it say that women Can Not engage in same sex sexual encounters. But it DOES say in the Bible that man who lays with man as with womankind is an abomination. And it DOES say in the Bible that men ought to NOT wear women's clothing as well as women not wearing mens' clothing.
But keep in mind that before all of the above mentioned is to come into any 'court' hearing, the person would have probably never followed in the way of pleasing God.
It also says you can't have two different types of cloth in a garment---no cotton blends, no shrimp, oysters or lobster. You're supposed to kill your kid if he back talks, and if your wife is on her period, she can't sleep in the house. You can sell your daughter, or rape an unmarried woman if you pay her father. What method do you use to decide which rules to obey and which ones to ignore?
And once again, the learned teaching the learned about Sacred Scriptures which pertain to God and Holy Sacredness. Do you know what the term 'sacred and Holy' mean?
Sure I do, but what does that have to do with choosing which laws to ignore?