The liberal march towards EXTREME fascism

[hadit]

Unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed, can help solve that loss of liberty.

You're talking about welfare. We already have that.

no, we don't. and, it isn't welfare. it should be, compensation for capitalism's, Natural rate of unemployment.

What you want really is welfare because it is paying you for not working and has nothing to do with employment. You want to be paid simply for existing. You've had this pointed out to you multiple times.

 

[danielpalos]

Unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed, can help solve that loss of liberty.

You're talking about welfare. We already have that.

no, we don't. and, it isn't welfare. it should be, compensation for capitalism's, Natural rate of unemployment.

What you want really is welfare because it is paying you for not working and has nothing to do with employment. You want to be paid simply for existing. You've had this pointed out to you multiple times.

that is Your story, bro. Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment, has every Thing to do with it.

 

[hadit]

Unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed, can help solve that loss of liberty.

You're talking about welfare. We already have that.

no, we don't. and, it isn't welfare. it should be, compensation for capitalism's, Natural rate of unemployment.

What you want really is welfare because it is paying you for not working and has nothing to do with employment. You want to be paid simply for existing. You've had this pointed out to you multiple times.

that is Your story, bro. Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment, has every Thing to do with it.

You're using words that don't mean what you want them to mean. The bottom line is, you want a free ride from society.

 

[danielpalos]

Unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed, can help solve that loss of liberty.

You're talking about welfare. We already have that.

no, we don't. and, it isn't welfare. it should be, compensation for capitalism's, Natural rate of unemployment.

What you want really is welfare because it is paying you for not working and has nothing to do with employment. You want to be paid simply for existing. You've had this pointed out to you multiple times.

that is Your story, bro. Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment, has every Thing to do with it.

You're using words that don't mean what you want them to mean. The bottom line is, you want a free ride from society.

only if You want the rich to get richer faster, at the expense of the poor.

 

[P@triot]

stop complaining about welfare costs.

Stop mooching off of society. Have an ounce of dignity and take responsibility for supporting yourself.

Not with a Natural rate of Unemployment, under Capitalism. don't be so, irresponsible, right wingers.

What you really want to say is the “natural percentage of parasites such as yourself who want to mooch off of society”.

 

[P@triot]

only if You want the rich to get richer faster, at the expense of the poor.

Nobody gets anything “at the expense of the poor”. You’re not exploited. You’re lazy.

 

[danielpalos]

stop complaining about welfare costs.

Stop mooching off of society. Have an ounce of dignity and take responsibility for supporting yourself.

Not with a Natural rate of Unemployment, under Capitalism. don't be so, irresponsible, right wingers.

What you really want to say is the “natural percentage of parasites such as yourself who want to mooch off of society”.

Capitalism only needs capital to circulate, not a work ethic from the Age of Iron.

 

[danielpalos]

only if You want the rich to get richer faster, at the expense of the poor.

Nobody gets anything “at the expense of the poor”. You’re not exploited. You’re lazy.

that is Your story. My story is, the rich are getting richer faster and the right wing wants to cut social services for the poor, to help balance the budget.

 

[P@triot]

Capitalism only needs capital to circulate

If that were even remotely true, the government could pay the American people to dig a hole in their backyard Monday, Wednesday, and Friday and fill it back in Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Everyone would have money to spend, the government could tax it all to pay for the hole digging, and the economy would flourish.

Of course, “circulation” of capital is not what drives capitalism. What makes capitalism the most successful system ever created is that it has unimaginable rewards for those who innovate and do it efficiently. This results in the products and services that society requires in order to survive and thrive.

You are the perfect example of why nobody takes the left seriously about economics (or anything else for that matter).

 

[danielpalos]

Capitalism only needs capital to circulate

If that were even remotely true, the government could pay the American people to dig a hole in their backyard Monday, Wednesday, and Friday and fill it back in Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Everyone would have money to spend, the government could tax it all to pay for the hole digging, and the economy would flourish.

Of course, “circulation” of capital is not what drives capitalism. What makes capitalism the most successful system ever created is that it has unimaginable rewards for those who innovate and do it efficiently. This results in the products and services that society requires in order to survive and thrive.

You are the perfect example of why nobody takes the left seriously about economics (or anything else for that matter).

employment is at will; not, for-cause, in any, at-will employment State.

unequal protection of the law, is simply stealing from the poor, to help the rich get richer faster.

 

[P@triot]

Capitalism only needs capital to circulate

If that were even remotely true, the government could pay the American people to dig a hole in their backyard Monday, Wednesday, and Friday and fill it back in Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Everyone would have money to spend, the government could tax it all to pay for the hole digging, and the economy would flourish.

Of course, “circulation” of capital is not what drives capitalism. What makes capitalism the most successful system ever created is that it has unimaginable rewards for those who innovate and do it efficiently. This results in the products and services that society requires in order to survive and thrive.

You are the perfect example of why nobody takes the left seriously about economics (or anything else for that matter).

employment is at will; not, for-cause, in any, at-will employment State.

unequal protection of the law, is simply stealing from the poor, to help the rich get richer faster.

You didn’t address the issue. You hysterically claimed capitalism only requires capital to “circulate”. If that were true, then government could pay the American people to dig a hole in their backyard Monday, Wednesday, and Friday and fill it back in Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Everyone would have money to spend, the government could tax it all to pay for the hole digging, and the economy would flourish. Right? Right?

 

[danielpalos]

Capitalism only needs capital to circulate

If that were even remotely true, the government could pay the American people to dig a hole in their backyard Monday, Wednesday, and Friday and fill it back in Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Everyone would have money to spend, the government could tax it all to pay for the hole digging, and the economy would flourish.

Of course, “circulation” of capital is not what drives capitalism. What makes capitalism the most successful system ever created is that it has unimaginable rewards for those who innovate and do it efficiently. This results in the products and services that society requires in order to survive and thrive.

You are the perfect example of why nobody takes the left seriously about economics (or anything else for that matter).

employment is at will; not, for-cause, in any, at-will employment State.

unequal protection of the law, is simply stealing from the poor, to help the rich get richer faster.

You didn’t address the issue. You hysterically claimed capitalism only requires capital to “circulate”. If that were true, then government could pay the American people to dig a hole in their backyard Monday, Wednesday, and Friday and fill it back in Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Everyone would have money to spend, the government could tax it all to pay for the hole digging, and the economy would flourish. Right? Right?

Our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror; do just what you claim of the left. And, the right wing doesn't even want to pay taxes for them.

 

[ph3iron]

The left has always been fascist in nature (obviously - since fascism is a form of government oppression). But in the past few years, the left has made a rapid march towards extreme fascism.

They engage in massive speech control campaigns. If Donald Trump attempts to hold a political rally - they riot (costing a fortune in damage to public and private property). If someone attempts to merely attend a Donald Trump political rally, the left engages in violent assaults. Fascism.

They engage in massive thought control campaigns. If someone wishes to avoid homosexual acts or homosexual celebrations (whether it be for religious reasons, comfort reasons, or just plain old hate), the left attempts to turn that into a crime and advocates for the government to place a gun to the head of those individuals and force them to take part in the homosexual activities. And of course - they've advocated for and manufactured the comical "hate crime" fallacy. Fascism.

This story here is a remarkable indication of the left's embrace of extreme fascism. It revolves around the "Soldiers of Odin". A group rightfully concerned with radical islam. And yet despite being peaceful while liberals engage in violent assaults, the left wants to label these individuals as a "hate" group. So what happened when this group deployed members to a mosque in Denver? Did they brutally attack and bloody muslims like liberals do? Nope. Quite the contrary - the imam of the mosque invited the group in to sit down and talk. They had a peaceful and cordial interaction?

This "incident" is literally the shining example of America at its finest. Concerned citizens form a group of their own free will. The muslims not only continue to engage in their right to religious freedom - but they invite the concerned group into their mosque to see for themselves and to engage in dialect. Everything America was built on and intended to be. And yet the left is angry about this - desperate to falsely label the group a "hate" group and to eliminate them.

A Growing Vigilante Group Is Targeting U.S. Mosques

Amusing when liberal def is small gov and individual responsibility
Guess our scribe never took Latin in college

 

[ph3iron]

fascism
noun

1. an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.

It's a cute left-wing propaganda campaign. Doesn't change the fact that fascism is the polar opposite of right-wing extremism. Would you like to try again? Let me guess - you need me to explain the basic political spectrum for you?

Darn these dictionary's.
All run by commies

 

[hadit]

You're talking about welfare. We already have that.

no, we don't. and, it isn't welfare. it should be, compensation for capitalism's, Natural rate of unemployment.

What you want really is welfare because it is paying you for not working and has nothing to do with employment. You want to be paid simply for existing. You've had this pointed out to you multiple times.

that is Your story, bro. Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment, has every Thing to do with it.

You're using words that don't mean what you want them to mean. The bottom line is, you want a free ride from society.

only if You want the rich to get richer faster, at the expense of the poor.

Now you're (again) trying to change the subject. I'll repeat, you want a free ride from society. Deal with that first.

 

[danielpalos]

no, we don't. and, it isn't welfare. it should be, compensation for capitalism's, Natural rate of unemployment.

What you want really is welfare because it is paying you for not working and has nothing to do with employment. You want to be paid simply for existing. You've had this pointed out to you multiple times.

that is Your story, bro. Compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment, has every Thing to do with it.

You're using words that don't mean what you want them to mean. The bottom line is, you want a free ride from society.

only if You want the rich to get richer faster, at the expense of the poor.

Now you're (again) trying to change the subject. I'll repeat, you want a free ride from society. Deal with that first.

Capitalists want a tax break for their natural rate of unemployment.

 

[P@triot]

Capitalism only needs capital to circulate

If that were even remotely true, the government could pay the American people to dig a hole in their backyard Monday, Wednesday, and Friday and fill it back in Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Everyone would have money to spend, the government could tax it all to pay for the hole digging, and the economy would flourish.

Of course, “circulation” of capital is not what drives capitalism. What makes capitalism the most successful system ever created is that it has unimaginable rewards for those who innovate and do it efficiently. This results in the products and services that society requires in order to survive and thrive.

You are the perfect example of why nobody takes the left seriously about economics (or anything else for that matter).

employment is at will; not, for-cause, in any, at-will employment State.

unequal protection of the law, is simply stealing from the poor, to help the rich get richer faster.

You didn’t address the issue. You hysterically claimed capitalism only requires capital to “circulate”. If that were true, then government could pay the American people to dig a hole in their backyard Monday, Wednesday, and Friday and fill it back in Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Everyone would have money to spend, the government could tax it all to pay for the hole digging, and the economy would flourish. Right? Right?

Our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror; do just what you claim of the left. And, the right wing doesn't even want to pay taxes for them.

You’re still not addressing the issue. You hysterically claimed capitalism only requires capital to “circulate”. If that were true, then government could pay the American people to dig a hole in their backyard Monday, Wednesday, and Friday and fill it back in Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Everyone would have money to spend, the government could tax it all to pay for the hole digging, and the economy would flourish. Right? Right?

 

[P@triot]

Capitalists want a tax break for their natural rate of unemployment.

No...we want a “tax break” because progressives were stealing far too much of our money. It’s already our money. We deserve to keep more of it.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

The left has always been fascist in nature (obviously - since fascism is a form of government oppression). But in the past few years, the left has made a rapid march towards extreme fascism.

They engage in massive speech control campaigns. If Donald Trump attempts to hold a political rally - they riot (costing a fortune in damage to public and private property). If someone attempts to merely attend a Donald Trump political rally, the left engages in violent assaults. Fascism.

They engage in massive thought control campaigns. If someone wishes to avoid homosexual acts or homosexual celebrations (whether it be for religious reasons, comfort reasons, or just plain old hate), the left attempts to turn that into a crime and advocates for the government to place a gun to the head of those individuals and force them to take part in the homosexual activities. And of course - they've advocated for and manufactured the comical "hate crime" fallacy. Fascism.

This story here is a remarkable indication of the left's embrace of extreme fascism. It revolves around the "Soldiers of Odin". A group rightfully concerned with radical islam. And yet despite being peaceful while liberals engage in violent assaults, the left wants to label these individuals as a "hate" group. So what happened when this group deployed members to a mosque in Denver? Did they brutally attack and bloody muslims like liberals do? Nope. Quite the contrary - the imam of the mosque invited the group in to sit down and talk. They had a peaceful and cordial interaction?

This "incident" is literally the shining example of America at its finest. Concerned citizens form a group of their own free will. The muslims not only continue to engage in their right to religious freedom - but they invite the concerned group into their mosque to see for themselves and to engage in dialect. Everything America was built on and intended to be. And yet the left is angry about this - desperate to falsely label the group a "hate" group and to eliminate them.

A Growing Vigilante Group Is Targeting U.S. Mosques

Fuck the left.

We'll never see their bullshit at that level.

There will be blood first.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

fascism
noun

1. an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.

How can something right-wing be nationalistic when right wingers claim to be for decentrailization.

Get another book of bullshit.