The liberal march towards EXTREME fascism

[hadit]

fascism
noun

1. an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.

It's a cute left-wing propaganda campaign. Doesn't change the fact that fascism is the polar opposite of right-wing extremism. Would you like to try again? Let me guess - you need me to explain the basic political spectrum for you?

I am truly sorry for making you look foolish but;

fascism
: a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts NATION and often RACE above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a DICTATORIAL LEADER, severe economic and social regimentation, and FORCIBLE SUPPRESION of opposition

Do you understand english?

EXALTS NATION and often RACE
FORCIBLE SUPPRESSION

Sounds more much right wing than it does left wing

Who gives a wet donkey fart?

The problem is you right wing guys believe a 12 year old in other words brand new theory that Nazis are socialists filed originally and only in the book liberal fascism which is total garbage anywhere but pure GOP bs propaganda world. so socialists and Nazis and Communists are leftists and you have that stupid political Spectrum where right-wing is freedom and unicorns and left-wing is everything bad fascists who are always right wing communist you name it are all leftists. Pure garbage and fear-mongering and hate baiting. Our enemies love it. And it is absolutely idiocy right in there with college makes people stupid or whatever that is lol. A disgrace.

Obviously, it bothers you a great deal that someone may associate your wing with the Nazis. Apparently, you give a wet donkey fart, to the extent of falsely accusing me of something about which you know nothing. To be clear, you know nothing of what I believe about the Nazis.

Ignorance is correctable. Refusing to correct it is stupidity.

 

[boedicca]

The problem is you right wing guys believe a 12 year old in other words brand new theory that Nazis are socialists...

The real problem is that you are astoundingly ignorant of history. Nazi was short for National Socialists. Only the dumbest of the dumb (in other words, the left) is unaware of that commonly known fact.

In addition to that basic reality, the further right you go on the political spectrum, government gets smaller and less powerful until it ceases to exist at all (anarchy). That is why libertarians are further to the right than Republicans. Therefore, it takes a very special kind of stupid asshole to declare that total government control is even further to the right of the libertarian.

Furthermore, this is not some 12 year old “theory” as you claimed (once again out of pure ignorance). F.A. Hayek wrote “The Road to Serfdom” in the 1940’s. The man held THREE PhD’s, one of which was in political science, and clearly outlined that fascism and communism were the exact same ideology (big government controlling every facet of society).

There is a reason why I can easily and accurately articulate how and why fascism is exclusively a left-wing ideology and why you can’t articulate how it is “right-wing”. You’ve yet to explain how libertarianism is to the right of Republicans but then how fascism could be to the right of libertarianism. And you’ll never be able to either.

Indeed. I'll note how the Prog Loons attempt to smear and demonize patriotic Americans who support nationalism over globalism by pointing to the first word of Nationalist Socialist German Workers' Party. The most ideological significant word is actually Socialist.

 

[P@triot]

Patriot: how's your silly campaign coming that attempts to make people believe Fascism is left wing? It must be difficult; with so many reliable ideological sources about that insist fascism is right wing. But it is an interesting campaign, and let us know how it's coming. I don't think it can be done, but we'll see.

Telling the truth is very easy to do. That’s why you and Franco are so upset and struggling while I’m just gliding...

 

[sparky]

The liberal march towards EXTREME fascism

more the sheepeople march towards EXTREME OC targeting of whom the powers that be wish them to here.....

~S~

 

[P@triot]

I’m quite certain you’ll run from this like you have everything else in this thread, regent but I have to ask anyway. For a girl who started this thread spouting sooooo much about “academia” and the “books on your shelf”, why have you failed to address F.A. Hayek and Dinesh D’Souza? Hayek held 3 PhD’s (including one in political science) and wrote “The Road to Serfdom” which clearly outlines that fascism is left-wing. D’Souza is a PhD and also has a book out, outlining that fascism is clearly left-wing.

It’s ok hon. We all know the answer already.

 

[regent]

Patriot: how's your silly campaign coming that attempts to make people believe Fascism is left wing? It must be difficult; with so many reliable ideological sources about that insist fascism is right wing. But it is an interesting campaign, and let us know how it's coming. I don't think it can be done, but we'll see.

Telling the truth is very easy to do. That’s why you and Franco are so upset and struggling while I’m just gliding...

Telling your truth is easy but is it the scientific truth? Might try exploring how the experts in ideologies define fascism.

 

[P@triot]

Telling your truth is easy but is it the scientific truth? Might try exploring how the experts in ideologies define fascism.

Oh I did! I “explored” the writings and teachings of F.A. Hayek (three PhD’s) and Dinesh D’Souza (PhD). I would urge you to consider doing the same.

 

[P@triot]

Here is the left engaging in propaganda (a favorite tactic of fascists).

Charging documents obtained by WBAL said Arthur confessed to the crimes, stating he had "built-up anger" that prompted the first act of vandalism and had been drinking during the second.

Yep. That’s the left! Full of anger. Always abusing substances. And using lies to frame people so they can get what they want (totalitarianism).

Black student charged with writing racist graffiti — KKK, swastika — in college dorm

 

[P@triot]

So should America trust historians for history; if not, who should Americans trust for that subject?

Perfect example here, Reg. Look at this "historian" claiming that Lyndon B. Johnson was the shining example of "empathy". Anyone who actually knows history knows that LBJ would scream "n*gger" 24x7, berate his staff, and belittle anyone near him. Adolf Hitler showed more empathy (and that is not an exaggeration).

See Reg, Doris Kearns Goodwin isn't really a "historian". She's just a political activist with an agenda. Your problem is, you were duped and now you don't want to hear the truth. Your loss.

 

[regent]

So should America trust historians for history; if not, who should Americans trust for that subject?

Perfect example here, Reg. Look at this "historian" claiming that Lyndon B. Johnson was the shining example of "empathy". Anyone who actually knows history knows that LBJ would scream "n*gger" 24x7, berate his staff, and belittle anyone near him. Adolf Hitler showed more empathy (and that is not an exaggeration).

View attachment 232766

See Reg, Doris Kearns Goodwin isn't really a "historian". She's just a political activist with an agenda. Your problem is, you were duped and now you don't want to hear the truth. Your loss.

 

[regent]

So should America trust historians for history; if not, who should Americans trust for that subject?

Perfect example here, Reg. Look at this "historian" claiming that Lyndon B. Johnson was the shining example of "empathy". Anyone who actually knows history knows that LBJ would scream "n*gger" 24x7, berate his staff, and belittle anyone near him. Adolf Hitler showed more empathy (and that is not an exaggeration).

View attachment 232766

See Reg, Doris Kearns Goodwin isn't really a "historian". She's just a political activist with an agenda. Your problem is, you were duped and now you don't want to hear the truth. Your loss.

Most historians write with a political purpose including Hayek, and it would be strange for an historian to not have political beliefs, and I would suspect that real historians write history with other historians looking over their shoulders.

 

[P@triot]

Most historians write with a political purpose including Hayek

Hayek wasn’t a historian.

And no...most (actual) historians do not “write with a political purpose”. You’re sounding life a typical left-wing lunatic right now. A historian outlines exactly what happened in history. Nothing less. Nothing more.

 

[danielpalos]

Our Constitution is Express not Implied.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises,

to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States;
​

but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

How is any laissez-fair school of thought relevant to our US economy?

We have a Command Economy. Congress Commands fiscal policy and the Fed Commands monetary policy.

Government should fix the goalposts for Capitalism.

 

[regent]

Most historians write with a political purpose including Hayek

Hayek wasn’t a historian.

And no...most (actual) historians do not “write with a political purpose”. You’re sounding life a typical left-wing lunatic right now. A historian outlines exactly what happened in history. Nothing less. Nothing more.

Seems your knowledge of history is on a par with your knowledge of ideologies.
When does a writer of history become an historian? If a writer of history inserts his or her opinion of an historical event is it still history? Are there rules for historians, if so, who devises the rules?

 

[Jolly Roger]

This board is amazing. Entertainment at it's finest. You can't make this stuff up. There are actually posters who firmly believe that socialism and fascism are together on the political spectrum. That they are working toward the same goals. Priceless! Seriously, some of you need to take a political science class, go to the library, do some research at a REPUTABLE web site....something. There is no shame in being ignorant, but showing off your ignorance like it's a badge of honor is just not cool.

 

[P@triot]

Seems your knowledge of history is on a par with your knowledge of ideologies.

Oh...so you mean thorough and superior? Yeah, I guess you could say my knowledge of history is on par with my knowledge of political ideologies then if that is your critieria.

By the way sweetie...speaking of “political ideologies”. Here is a little something for you to chew on. Careful not to choke on the facts here.

Twitter

 

[P@triot]

There are actually posters who firmly believe that socialism and fascism are together on the political spectrum.

Your astounding ignorance is palpable. Nazi was short for National Socialists.

 

[P@triot]

There is no shame in being ignorant

Yes there is. Perhaps if you realized that, you wouldn’t be so ignorant?

but showing off your ignorance like it's a badge of honor is just not cool.

Right? So go study junior.

 

[MarathonMike]

This board is amazing. Entertainment at it's finest. You can't make this stuff up. There are actually posters who firmly believe that socialism and fascism are together on the political spectrum. That they are working toward the same goals. Priceless! Seriously, some of you need to take a political science class, go to the library, do some research at a REPUTABLE web site....something. There is no shame in being ignorant, but showing off your ignorance like it's a badge of honor is just not cool.

If you are going to be snooty, make sure you are right. Since Fascism is not an economic philosophy but a totalitarian one, they can and HAVE coexisted in the same regime. Have you ever heard of the National Socialist German Workers Party headed by Adolf Hitler? They were also Fascists. Ring the bell, schools in son.

 

[danielpalos]

The right wing blames anyone but themselves. They would prefer to mine the border yet it is Liberals who are marching toward extremism.