The list of names of all 51 intelligence “experts” who claimed Hunter Biden laptop was a Russian/Putin fake

[SeaMajor7]

Just killing time at work waiting for someone to post where those officials said it was Russian disinformation...or to admit they were duped and hop on the bus, Gus.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Splits

 

[struth]

Splits

Why do you think these 51 folks wrote and letter and signed it? Why do you think Joey Xiden mentioned it during a debate, knowing it was his son’s?

 

[Catsnmeters]

Why do you think these 51 folks wrote and letter and signed it?

Because it has the appearance of Russian propaganda.

Why do you think Joey Xiden mentioned it during a debate, knowing it was his son’s?

Not familiar with this so can't comment. Need context. Link please.

 

[struth]

Because it has the appearance of Russian propaganda.


Not familiar with this so can't comment. Need context. Link please.

But it wasn’t…it was literally a laptop, a real computer, in the position of the govt.

How does that appear to be russian???

 

[Catsnmeters]

But it wasn’t…it was literally a laptop, a real computer, in the position of the govt.

How does that appear to be russian???

Well, let see.

If a lifelong democrat half blind computer shop owner in a podunk town claimed he had Ivanka's laptop so he called Biden's lawyer and gave him the laptop, then Biden's lawyer gave it to Rachel Madow who held on to it for a bit before sending it to MSNBC for a while before finally turning it over to the FBI under Biden's administration; would you believe it? Would you buy into its contents?

Honestly, even now knowing it is legit, I still believe it has the "appearance" of Russian disinformation...but it isn't.

 

[marvin martian]

Because it has the appearance of Russian propaganda.

How so?

 

[MisterBeale]

Named and Shamed: The 51 Intel Officials Who Lied About the Hunter Biden Laptop Emails - Election Central

www.uspresidentialelectionnews.com

Yet, it is being used in a Federal firearms case.

So these 51 people must have apologized, right?

What terrible liars….and zero contrition. It is like they lied intentionally to help Biden in the 2020 election.

1. Mike Hayden, former CIA director, now analyst for CNN
2. Jim Clapper, former director of national intelligence, now CNN pundit
3. Leon Panetta, former CIA director and defense secretary
4. John Brennan, former CIA director, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC
5. Thomas Fingar, former National Intelligence Council chair, now teaches at Stanford University
6. Rick Ledgett, former National Security Agency deputy director, now a director at M&T Bank
7. John McLaughlin, former CIA acting director, now teaches at Johns Hopkins University
   
   
8. Michael Morell, former CIA acting director, now at George Mason University
9. Mike Vickers, former defense undersecretary for intelligence, now on board of BAE Systems
10. Doug Wise, former Defense Intelligence Agency deputy director, teaches at University of New Mexico
11. Nick Rasmussen, former National Counterterrorism Center director, now executive director, Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism
12. Russ Travers, former National Counterterrorism Center acting director
13. Andy Liepman, former National Counterterrorism Center deputy director
14. John Moseman, former CIA chief of staf
15. Larry Pfeiffer, former CIA chief of staff, now senior advisor to The Chertoff Group
16. Jeremy Bash, former CIA chief of staff, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC
17. Rodney Snyder, former CIA chief of staff
18. Glenn Gerstell, former National Security Agency general counsel
19. David Priess, former CIA analyst and manager
20. Pam Purcilly, former CIA deputy director of analysis
21. Marc Polymeropoulos, former CIA senior operations officer
22. Chris Savos, former CIA senior operations officer
23. John Tullius, former CIA senior intelligence officer
24. David A. Vanell, former CIA senior operations officer
25. Kristin Wood, former CIA senior intelligence officer, now non-resident fellow, Harvard
26. David Buckley, former CIA inspector general
27. Nada Bakos, former CIA analyst and targeting officer, now senior fellow, Foreign Policy Research Institute
28. Patty Brandmaier, former CIA senior intelligence officer
29. James B. Bruce, former CIA senior intelligence office
    
    
30. David Cariens, former CIA intelligence analyst
31. Janice Cariens, former CIA operational support officer
32. Paul Kolbe, former CIA senior operations officer
33. Peter Corsell, former CIA analyst
34. Brett Davis, former CIA senior intelligence officer
35. Roger Zane George, former national intelligence officer:
36. Steven L. Hall, former CIA senior intelligence officer
37. Kent Harrington, former national intelligence officer
38. Don Hepburn, former national security executive, now president of Boanerges Solutions LLC
39. Timothy D. Kilbourn, former dean of CIA’s Kent School of Intelligence Analysis
40. Ron Marks, former CIA officer
41. Jonna Hiestand Mendez, former CIA technical operations officer, now on board of the International Spy Museum
    
    
42. Emile Nakhleh, former director of CIA’s Political Islam Strategic Analysis Program, now at University of New Mexico
43. Gerald A. O’Shea, former CIA senior operations officer
44. Nick Shapiro, former CIA deputy chief of staff and senior adviser to the director
45. John Sipher, former CIA senior operations officer
46. Stephen Slick, former National Security Council senior director for intelligence programs
47. Cynthia Strand, former CIA deputy assistant director for global issues
48. Greg Tarbell, former CIA deputy executive director
49. David Terry, former National Intelligence Collection Board chairman
50. Greg Treverton, former National Intelligence Council chair, now senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies
51. Winston Wiley, former CIA director of analysis

IMO? All those folks that they are putting on trial for forwarding "fake electors," as a conspiracy to commit forgery, etc., then it would seem only fair for all of the state prosecutors to also, in turn, to do to these folks a prosecution for the Russia conspiracy as well.

They not only lied about the lap-top? They knowingly lied about the 2016 election as well. And now we are in a proxy war based on this lie.

And Hillary was in on that bullshit. . . It was all bullshit, and none of them have been held to account.



. . . . otherwise, yeah, banana republic. Two-tiered justice system. Hillary was clearly in on it too. She needs prison time as well.

They all knew what they were doing, and all of this narrative was orchestrated, well in advance.

We are all barreling toward WWIII all based on these lies. These folks belong in prison, yet we have a corrupt legal system that won't hold these psychopaths to account for their lies.

 

[Catsnmeters]

How so?

See post 186.

 

[Catsnmeters]

IMO? All those folks that they are putting on trial for forwarding "fake electors," as a conspiracy to commit forgery, etc., then it would seem only fair for all of the state prosecutors to also, in turn, to do to these folks a prosecution for the Russia conspiracy as well.

They not only lied about the lap-top? They knowingly lied about the 2016 election as well. And now we are in a proxy war based on this lie.

And Hillary was in on that bullshit. . . It was all bullshit, and none of them have held to account.



. . . . otherwise, yeah, banana republic. Two-tiered justice system. Hillary was clearly in on it too. She needs prison time as well.

They all knew what they were doing, and all of this narrative was orchestrated, well in advance.

We are all barreling toward WWIII all based on these lies. These folks belong in prison, yet we have a corrupt legal system that won't hold these psychopaths to account for their lies.

They didn't lie about the laptop.

You got duped as well.

 

[marvin martian]

See post 186.

So you have no idea, just like the 51 other insurrectionists who fabricated the lie to help Joe Biden win an election.

You're all scum.

 

[Catsnmeters]

So you have no idea, just like the 51 other insurrectionists who fabricated the lie to help Joe Biden win an election.

You're all scum.

I have no idea?

That is literally what those 51 said; it had the "appearance" of Russian disinformation.

Your media outlets remove the word appearance to completely change the narrative, you did not investigate, and then tell me I have no idea? ROFL.

Trump supporters crack me up. Good grief.

 

[MisterBeale]

Well, let see.

If a lifelong democrat half blind computer shop owner in a podunk town claimed he had Ivanka's laptop so he called Biden's lawyer and gave him the laptop, then Biden's lawyer gave it to Rachel Madow who held on to it for a bit before sending it to MSNBC for a while before finally turning it over to the FBI under Biden's administration; would you believe it? Would you buy into its contents?

Honestly, even now knowing it is legit, I still believe it has the "appearance" of Russian disinformation...but it isn't.

Because. . . well, Russians are just nasty and wish us all ill, right?

Just as we want to subvert them? Yeah?

 

[Catsnmeters]

Because. . . well, Russians are just nasty and wish us all ill, right?

Just as we want to subvert them? Yeah?

Russians in general?

Probably not, but Putin? Definitely.

Do you think Putin is our friend?

 

[ColonelAngus]

How can they be EXPERTS when they are all wrong?

They lied to affect the 2020 election.

 

[Catsnmeters]

How can they be EXPERTS when they are all wrong?

They lied to affect the 2020 election.

They weren't wrong.

You lied.

 

[MisterBeale]

They didn't lie about the laptop.

You got duped as well.

Nope. The FBI took Crowdstike at its word, it never even investigated that shit.

The only person that was duped, is you. You have even admitted it in this thread. You even said, you still have a problem believing that Hunter laptop isn't Russian disinfo. Yet folks that followed the story before the election, saw the photos from it.

You have to be suffering from serious cognitive dissonance.

Likewise, folks that understood the technical breakdown of data transfer rates, and actually listened to Assange tell them, that the Wikileaks did not come from Russia now know, everything you bleev is a lie. . . and yet?

You persist, and when folks tell you that you are being unreasonable, and defending crooks, liars and psychopaths, simply because they are yoar partisan heroes and you are in cognitive dissonance. . . Yoar last grasping straw to protect yoar cognitive dissonance?

An ad hom attack. You know you have got nothing left but psychopathic criminals who have now been shown to be nothing but evil, and only fools and loathsome dirtbags would defend them at this point.

No wonder the state wants Julian dead.

 

[MisterBeale]

Russians in general?

Probably not, but Putin? Definitely.

Do you think Putin is our friend?

Nope, not our friend, but certainly not out to get us.

I haven't seen any evidence of that.

You want to show me some?

 

[ColonelAngus]

They weren't wrong.

You lied.

They said it was Russian disinformation. It was censored by social media.

Then is was used in a FEDERAL FIREARMS CASE TO CONVICT HUNTER.

Did you miss the verdict yesterday?

 

[Catsnmeters]

Nope. The FBI took Crowdstike at its word, it never even investigated that shit.

The FBI said it had the appearance of Russian disinformation. They were correct.

The only person that was duped, is you. You have even admitted it in this thread. You even said, you still have a problem believe that Hunter lapstop isn't Russian disinfo, yet folks that followed the story before the election, say the photos from it.

That isn't what I said.

You are doing it again. Claiming I said something when it is clear I did not. Very dishonest of you.

What I said was...

"Honestly, even now knowing it is legit, I still believe it has the "appearance" of Russian disinformation...but it isn't."

You have to be suffering from serious cognitive dissonance.

Likewise, folks that understood the technical breakdown of data transfer rates, and actually listened to Assange tell them, that the wikileaks did not come from Russia now know, everything you bleev is a lie. . . and yet?

I am not that familiar with wiki leaks. It was a long time ago.

Did it have the appearance of Russian disinformation too?

You persist, and when folks tell you that you are being unreasonable, and defending crooks, liars and psychopaths, simply because they are yoar partisan heroes and you are in cognitive dissonance. . . Yoar last grasping straw to protect yoar cognitive dissonance?

They are lying. They keep posting that those 51 people said it was disinformation when in fact they said it had the appearance of Russian disinformation.

Two very distinct claims and the right wing media knows it.

An ad hom attack. You know you have got nothing left but psychopathic criminals who have now been shown to be nothing but evil, and only fools and loathsome dirtbags would defend them at this point.

It wasn't ad hominem.

It was fact. They lied about what those 51 people stated.

No wonder the state wants Julian dead.

I don't care about Julian.