Oklahoma’s Superintendent of “Education” will require Bible Study in all Public schools.

[WinterBorn]

it isnt a compliment if you give it to yourself,,,

Oh, so you saying I lack credibility overrides 13 years of history here?

 

[WinterBorn]

I didnt change topics,,

Yes, you did. The topic is the constitutionality of putting the 10 Commandments in schools and requiring Bibles in every classroom and requiring Bible study.

The topic is NOT the 2nd amendment.

 

[progressive hunter]

Yes, that is me answering and refusing to follow your change of topic.

your answer is an answer,,

if you support the constitution then all laws are unconstitutional,,

you trying to pick and choose which laws you support and dont support means you dont support the 2nd A as written under its original intent,,
ie the constitution,,

now that being the case how can anything you say about the 1st A in the current discussion be believable??

youve lost all credibility,,

 

[progressive hunter]

Yes, you did. The topic is the constitutionality of putting the 10 Commandments in schools and requiring Bibles in every classroom and requiring Bible study.

The topic is NOT the 2nd amendment.

I was checking your credibility to see if it was really about the constitution to you or just religion,,

now we know its about religion not the constitution for you,,

knowing is half the battle

 

[Lord-Humungus]

the 2nd A question was to determine your credibility,,

and it did as promised and showed this isnt about the constitution for you and just another anti religion rant from a lunatic that could really use some religion about now,,

More of your lies. You wanted to change the subject and it was shit down now you want to whine about it

 

[WinterBorn]

your answer is an answer,,

if you support the constitution then all laws are unconstitutional,,

you trying to pick and choose which laws you support and dont support means you dont support the 2nd A as written under its original intent,,
ie the constitution,,

now that being the case how can anything you say about the 1st A in the current discussion be believable??

youve lost all credibility,,

I did not answer your 2A question except to say I support the 2nd amendment.

I never addressed "all the gun laws". Not addressing them does not mean I support them.

However, you making shit up does make you a liar.

 

[progressive hunter]

More of your lies. You wanted to change the subject and it was shit down now you want to whine about it

so tell us,,

what made you hate religions so much you would have dbl standards to when you will support the constitution??

 

[WinterBorn]

I was checking your credibility to see if it was really about the constitution to you or just religion,,

now we know its about religion not the constitution for you,,

knowing is half the battle

No, you were trolling and got mad when I refused to play along with your topic change.

I have said I am a strong supporter of the 2nd amendment. But I did not address "all the gun laws" as you wanted. To bad.

As I said, I am a hunter, a shooter, and a gun collector. But somehow, according to you, I hate the 2nd amendment and want the population disarmed?

 

[progressive hunter]

I did not answer your 2A question except to say I support the 2nd amendment.

I never addressed "all the gun laws". Not addressing them does not mean I support them.

However, you making shit up does make you a liar.

that is answering it,,

under the 2n A all gun laws are in violation of the constitution,,

you wanting to split them up and say which ones you do and dont support means you dont support the 2nd A,,

just like now on the topic at hand where its about religion to you not the constitution,,

 

[Lord-Humungus]

so tell us,,

what made you hate religions so much you would have dbl standards to when you will support the constitution??

I don’t hate religions, people are free to practice whatever they want in their own homes. Just keep it out of the schools it’s not that hard.

 

[WinterBorn]

so tell us,,

what made you hate religions so much you would have dbl standards to when you will support the constitution??

Maybe it was meeting religious idiots like you?

 

[progressive hunter]

No, you were trolling and got mad when I refused to play along with your topic change.

I have said I am a strong supporter of the 2nd amendment. But I did not address "all the gun laws" as you wanted. To bad.

As I said, I am a hunter, a shooter, and a gun collector. But somehow, according to you, I hate the 2nd amendment and want the population disarmed?

none of that means you support the 2nd A,,

now youre the one derailing the thread,,
I was finished because youve shown its not about the constitution but about religion to you,,

 

[progressive hunter]

I don’t hate religions, people are free to practice whatever they want in their own homes. Just keep it out of the schools it’s not that hard.

then why the dbl standard on when you support the constitution??

 

[Lord-Humungus]

Maybe it was meeting religious idiots like you?

He isn’t a religious person

 

[WinterBorn]

that is answering it,,

under the 2n A all gun laws are in violation of the constitution,,

you wanting to split them up and say which ones you do and dont support means you dont support the 2nd A,,

just like now on the topic at hand where its about religion to you not the constitution,,

Have I said I support all those gun laws? No. I have not.

The topic at hand is the constitutionality of what is happening in Louisianna schools. Period.

 

[WinterBorn]

He isn’t a religious person

He isn't a lot of things.

 

[progressive hunter]

Maybe it was meeting religious idiots like you?

see,, now we are getting somewhere,,

just for the record I am not religious,,
I would burst into flames if I walked into a church,,

I am sure theres a special place in hell for me,,

 

[WinterBorn]

none of that means you support the 2nd A,,

now youre the one derailing the thread,,
I was finished because youve shown its not about the constitution but about religion to you,,

And none of that is on topic for this thread.

 

[progressive hunter]

Have I said I support all those gun laws? No. I have not.

The topic at hand is the constitutionality of what is happening in Louisianna schools. Period.

then why did you want me to be more specific on which laws when all of them are in violation??

 

[Lord-Humungus]

then why the dbl standard on when you support the constitution??

You keep making that claim but have no proof to back it up. Keeping you on topic is not a double standard. If you want to discuss gun laws there is a area for you to do so instead of trying to derail this discussion