The Moment Sandy Hook Parents start cashing in their kids..

[Brain357]

Well they should probably be suing the government for making it legal for him to have he weapon. Guns with hi cap mags are only used to kill lots of innocent people. I've never heard of one needed for defense.

Things are legal unless there's a good reason to make them illegal and he couldn't buy the gun legally, his idiot mom had a nutty kid that had access to her gun. I like my 30rd Pmags just fine, you can't have them, I might need them someday. I'd rather not rely on your assurance.

I know. Nobody has ever needed one and you don't care how many innocent people die. That is not the attitude of a good person.

 

[Iceweasel]

I know. Nobody has ever needed one and you don't care how many innocent people die. That is not the attitude of a good person.

You made the claim no one ever needed one, not me. You don't care about the innocents because as a lib, you make it difficult for teachers to arm themselves and put nut cases away. Libs create the shit we have to endure and think more of the same will solve it.

We didn't have these problems before and guns were more available with no background checks or waiting periods. You're just too fucking stupid to figure it out.

 

[RKMBrown]

Well they should probably be suing the government for making it legal for him to have he weapon. Guns with hi cap mags are only used to kill lots of innocent people. I've never heard of one needed for defense.

Things are legal unless there's a good reason to make them illegal and he couldn't buy the gun legally, his idiot mom had a nutty kid that had access to her gun. I like my 30rd Pmags just fine, you can't have them, I might need them someday. I'd rather not rely on your assurance.

I know. Nobody has ever needed one and you don't care how many innocent people die. That is not the attitude of a good person.

Just the other day Wilson needed 12 rounds in one magazine to stop an unarmed teenager named Mike Brown. What if the other guy Mike Brown was with came at him too? Simple math says Wilson would have needed 24 rounds. What if there were three thugs? Should we condemn Wilson to death? Refuse Wilson the right to defend himself from thugs?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

..they became assholes. Some law firm enticed them with a bunch of zeros and now they're going to exploit the "good fortune" of their children being killed and laugh all the way to the bank.

I have the utmost compassion for anyone who loses a child, especially to a senseless act of violence. But that compassion dries up quickly when the victims become the agressors, filing a lawsuit that has no merit because people generally understand you can't hold manufacturers responsible for the misuse of their product because that is entirely out of their control.

So to those nine families I would say, don't plan on meeting your little angels in heaven because avarice is the shortest route to hell.

It is probably because politicians have done nothing. They probably just want to do something.

The politicians have done something. They passed a law so gun manufacturers can't be held liable for people misusing their products. That makes it better for those who use them legally.

As far as the deterioration of society, that isn't the politicians fault, you get what you vote for.

Well they should probably be suing the government for making it legal for him to have he weapon. Guns with hi cap mags are only used to kill lots of innocent people. I've never heard of one needed for defense.

You have no idea what the 2nd Amendment is about, do you?

 

[Wry Catcher]

Gee...how much has the NRA made off the deaths of those innocent children? Billions?

OPINION ^^^. Keys has no clue how much money was donated to the NRA subsequent to every mass murder at school, theaters and malls!!

Zero. The NRA has not made a cent from the deaths of even one innocent person. The assertion that they have is absurd on its face.

Yep, another lie by Keys

And this without regard to the perversion in human reasoning published in the Guardian. Let us not forget that it was only a decade or so ago that the same 'source' informed us of how Muggers in the Streets of London were merely tradesmen, practicing their craft and that as such they should be celebrated for their 'honest work', which "the Guardian" saw as representing much needed relief on the British Social Justice System.

As with all professions of the lowly Leftists, your feelings are rooted in Deceit, which is fraudulently advanced as a means to influence the Ignorant.

Again, a partisan smear by a very partisan ignorant and arrogant asshole!

.
.
.

Deceit, FRAUD and Ignorance... the fundamental elements of socialism.

OPINION ^^^. Keys has no clue how much money was donated to the NRA subsequent to every mass murder at school, theaters and malls!!




A non sequitur ^^^ irrelevant and untrue.

It seems to me that people are responding to the Leftists capitalizing on tragedy to pass gun control legislation that wouldn't have prevented the event to begin with. Amazing how the demonic Left accuses the NRA of doing precisely what the Left is doing, exploiting a tragedy to further an ulterior agenda.

Being Left or Right has no bearing on having empathy (only callous conservatives are devoid of this very human emotion). I hesitate (only for a moment) in characterizing this obsession with guns and gun rights as a mental disorder, but the more callous and angry are those so afflicted, suggests they are not humane and thus mentally 'different' than the rest of us.

I reflect on the horror of the murder yesterday of over 130 children, it's obvious that those who carried out this mass murder also lack empathy, are also callous and their mental state is little different than that of those who dismiss the annihilation of human life in mass killings in the US with an "Oh well, shit happens" attitude. Something is wrong with them and I doubt it is fixable.

 

[Wry Catcher]

^^^AMEN^^^

 

[paulitician]

One more step in the march towards a complete gun grab. The Communists will exhaust all means to ban guns. In this case, they're using grieving parents and dead children to advance their agenda. It's always 'For the children.'

Hopefully this latest attack will fail. But that's why i always tell Pro-Constitution Americans to stay vigilant. Our Constitution is under all-out assault from the Communists. If you wanna keep your rights, you'll have to fight for em.

 

[Brain357]

I know. Nobody has ever needed one and you don't care how many innocent people die. That is not the attitude of a good person.

You made the claim no one ever needed one, not me. You don't care about the innocents because as a lib, you make it difficult for teachers to arm themselves and put nut cases away. Libs create the shit we have to endure and think more of the same will solve it.

We didn't have these problems before and guns were more available with no background checks or waiting periods. You're just too fucking stupid to figure it out.

The shootings have gotten worse now that semi-autos with huge mags are the norm.

 

[Brain357]

Well they should probably be suing the government for making it legal for him to have he weapon. Guns with hi cap mags are only used to kill lots of innocent people. I've never heard of one needed for defense.

Things are legal unless there's a good reason to make them illegal and he couldn't buy the gun legally, his idiot mom had a nutty kid that had access to her gun. I like my 30rd Pmags just fine, you can't have them, I might need them someday. I'd rather not rely on your assurance.

I know. Nobody has ever needed one and you don't care how many innocent people die. That is not the attitude of a good person.

Just the other day Wilson needed 12 rounds in one magazine to stop an unarmed teenager named Mike Brown. What if the other guy Mike Brown was with came at him too? Simple math says Wilson would have needed 24 rounds. What if there were three thugs? Should we condemn Wilson to death? Refuse Wilson the right to defend himself from thugs?

That is not a civilian defense. Stats show 2-3 shots for defense. Now mass shooters they love the hi cap mags.

 

[RKMBrown]

Well they should probably be suing the government for making it legal for him to have he weapon. Guns with hi cap mags are only used to kill lots of innocent people. I've never heard of one needed for defense.

Things are legal unless there's a good reason to make them illegal and he couldn't buy the gun legally, his idiot mom had a nutty kid that had access to her gun. I like my 30rd Pmags just fine, you can't have them, I might need them someday. I'd rather not rely on your assurance.

I know. Nobody has ever needed one and you don't care how many innocent people die. That is not the attitude of a good person.

Just the other day Wilson needed 12 rounds in one magazine to stop an unarmed teenager named Mike Brown. What if the other guy Mike Brown was with came at him too? Simple math says Wilson would have needed 24 rounds. What if there were three thugs? Should we condemn Wilson to death? Refuse Wilson the right to defend himself from thugs?

That is not a civilian defense. Stats show 2-3 shots for defense. Now mass shooters they love the hi cap mags.

I see so you are saying civilians are more efficient and effective at using their guns for self defense than trained cops.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Gee...how much has the NRA made off the deaths of those innocent children? Billions?

OPINION ^^^. Keys has no clue how much money was donated to the NRA subsequent to every mass murder at school, theaters and malls!!

Zero. The NRA has not made a cent from the deaths of even one innocent person. The assertion that they have is absurd on its face.

Yep, another lie by Keys

And this without regard to the perversion in human reasoning published in the Guardian. Let us not forget that it was only a decade or so ago that the same 'source' informed us of how Muggers in the Streets of London were merely tradesmen, practicing their craft and that as such they should be celebrated for their 'honest work', which "the Guardian" saw as representing much needed relief on the British Social Justice System.

As with all professions of the lowly Leftists, your feelings are rooted in Deceit, which is fraudulently advanced as a means to influence the Ignorant.

Again, a partisan smear by a very partisan ignorant and arrogant asshole!

.
.
.

Deceit, FRAUD and Ignorance... the fundamental elements of socialism.

OPINION ^^^. Keys has no clue how much money was donated to the NRA subsequent to every mass murder at school, theaters and malls!!




A non sequitur ^^^ irrelevant and untrue.

It seems to me that people are responding to the Leftists capitalizing on tragedy to pass gun control legislation that wouldn't have prevented the event to begin with. Amazing how the demonic Left accuses the NRA of doing precisely what the Left is doing, exploiting a tragedy to further an ulterior agenda.

Being Left or Right has no bearing on having empathy (only callous conservatives are devoid of this very human emotion). I hesitate (only for a moment) in characterizing this obsession with guns and gun rights as a mental disorder, but the more callous and angry are those so afflicted, suggests they are not humane and thus mentally 'different' than the rest of us.

I reflect on the horror of the murder yesterday of over 130 children, it's obvious that those who carried out this mass murder also lack empathy, are also callous and their mental state is little different than that of those who dismiss the annihilation of human life in mass killings in the US with an "Oh well, shit happens" attitude. Something is wrong with them and I doubt it is fixable.

Sorry, didn't make it past your claim that only conservatives can lack empathy. You're a leftwat hack. Bye.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Well they should probably be suing the government for making it legal for him to have he weapon. Guns with hi cap mags are only used to kill lots of innocent people. I've never heard of one needed for defense.

Things are legal unless there's a good reason to make them illegal and he couldn't buy the gun legally, his idiot mom had a nutty kid that had access to her gun. I like my 30rd Pmags just fine, you can't have them, I might need them someday. I'd rather not rely on your assurance.

I know. Nobody has ever needed one and you don't care how many innocent people die. That is not the attitude of a good person.

To the leftist retard,

Conservatives care very deeply about the loss of innocent life which is why we oppose gun free zones, the very kind that murderous cowards seek out. It's you on the left who strive to maintain these cherry opportunities for killing sprees. Leftism kills by the millions and this is but one example.

 

[Brain357]

Well they should probably be suing the government for making it legal for him to have he weapon. Guns with hi cap mags are only used to kill lots of innocent people. I've never heard of one needed for defense.

Things are legal unless there's a good reason to make them illegal and he couldn't buy the gun legally, his idiot mom had a nutty kid that had access to her gun. I like my 30rd Pmags just fine, you can't have them, I might need them someday. I'd rather not rely on your assurance.

I know. Nobody has ever needed one and you don't care how many innocent people die. That is not the attitude of a good person.

Just the other day Wilson needed 12 rounds in one magazine to stop an unarmed teenager named Mike Brown. What if the other guy Mike Brown was with came at him too? Simple math says Wilson would have needed 24 rounds. What if there were three thugs? Should we condemn Wilson to death? Refuse Wilson the right to defend himself from thugs?

That is not a civilian defense. Stats show 2-3 shots for defense. Now mass shooters they love the hi cap mags.

I see so you are saying civilians are more efficient and effective at using their guns for self defense than trained cops.

I'm saying defending yourself and police work are very different. A citizen wouldn't have been messing with him in the first place. Please share examples of civilian defenders needing more than 10 rds for defense.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Things are legal unless there's a good reason to make them illegal and he couldn't buy the gun legally, his idiot mom had a nutty kid that had access to her gun. I like my 30rd Pmags just fine, you can't have them, I might need them someday. I'd rather not rely on your assurance.

I know. Nobody has ever needed one and you don't care how many innocent people die. That is not the attitude of a good person.

Just the other day Wilson needed 12 rounds in one magazine to stop an unarmed teenager named Mike Brown. What if the other guy Mike Brown was with came at him too? Simple math says Wilson would have needed 24 rounds. What if there were three thugs? Should we condemn Wilson to death? Refuse Wilson the right to defend himself from thugs?

That is not a civilian defense. Stats show 2-3 shots for defense. Now mass shooters they love the hi cap mags.

I see so you are saying civilians are more efficient and effective at using their guns for self defense than trained cops.

I'm saying defending yourself and police work are very different. A citizen wouldn't have been messing with him in the first place. Please share examples of civilian defenders needing more than 10 rds for defense.

The very premise of your question is a lie. 2nd Amendment rights aren't predicated on how much ammunition the government says we need, the very same government that the 2nd Amendment is designed to defend the people against. There are 30 rounds in my combat weapon's magazine, the same number as police and those in the military. This is precisely the kind of balance of firepower the ratifiers envisioned. The capacity of my gun magazines is not something I ever have to justify to government.

 

[Brain357]

I know. Nobody has ever needed one and you don't care how many innocent people die. That is not the attitude of a good person.

Just the other day Wilson needed 12 rounds in one magazine to stop an unarmed teenager named Mike Brown. What if the other guy Mike Brown was with came at him too? Simple math says Wilson would have needed 24 rounds. What if there were three thugs? Should we condemn Wilson to death? Refuse Wilson the right to defend himself from thugs?

That is not a civilian defense. Stats show 2-3 shots for defense. Now mass shooters they love the hi cap mags.

I see so you are saying civilians are more efficient and effective at using their guns for self defense than trained cops.

I'm saying defending yourself and police work are very different. A citizen wouldn't have been messing with him in the first place. Please share examples of civilian defenders needing more than 10 rds for defense.

The very premise of your question is a lie. 2nd Amendment rights aren't predicated on how much ammunition the government says we need, the very same government that the 2nd Amendment is designed to defend the people against. There are 30 rounds in my combat weapon's magazine, the same number as police and those in the military. This is precisely the kind of balance of firepower the ratifiers envisioned. The capacity of my gun magazines is not something I ever have to justify to government.

The list of murderers using hi cap magazines is extremely long, while there are no examples I know of anyone needing one for defense. I guess you want to keep the bad guys very well armed.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Just the other day Wilson needed 12 rounds in one magazine to stop an unarmed teenager named Mike Brown. What if the other guy Mike Brown was with came at him too? Simple math says Wilson would have needed 24 rounds. What if there were three thugs? Should we condemn Wilson to death? Refuse Wilson the right to defend himself from thugs?

That is not a civilian defense. Stats show 2-3 shots for defense. Now mass shooters they love the hi cap mags.

I see so you are saying civilians are more efficient and effective at using their guns for self defense than trained cops.

I'm saying defending yourself and police work are very different. A citizen wouldn't have been messing with him in the first place. Please share examples of civilian defenders needing more than 10 rds for defense.

The very premise of your question is a lie. 2nd Amendment rights aren't predicated on how much ammunition the government says we need, the very same government that the 2nd Amendment is designed to defend the people against. There are 30 rounds in my combat weapon's magazine, the same number as police and those in the military. This is precisely the kind of balance of firepower the ratifiers envisioned. The capacity of my gun magazines is not something I ever have to justify to government.

The list of murderers using hi cap magazines is extremely long, while there are no examples I know of anyone needing one for defense. I guess you want to keep the bad guys very well armed.

Your laws won't disarm the bad guys, dumbass. The same crime could have been accomplished with 10 round magazines which take only 3 seconds to change out. That's why this lawsuit will fail, the greed addled plaintiffs not being able to demonstrate that an assault rifle is the only weapon capable of killing that many people.

 

[TooTall]

It't not the gun lobby's fault either. Hint: it starts with the shooter and his upbringing.

Bzzzzzz. Wrong. There are poor and mentally unstable people all over the world. Want to try again?

How can any company control the misuse of their product?

By themselves lobbying for tighter and more meaningful gun control laws.

ROFL waves hands, says it must be more meaningful. ROFL you libtards are so GD funny. WTF does "more meaningful" mean, ya dumb ass?

Effective


Better?

Better, but no cigar. Are you going to spell out what laws you want? The ban on the manufacture of certain guns, if so, which ones. The confiscation of all of the guns that fit your description of what is acceptable? Good luck with that one. Just asking.

 

[Iceweasel]

I know. Nobody has ever needed one and you don't care how many innocent people die. That is not the attitude of a good person.

You made the claim no one ever needed one, not me. You don't care about the innocents because as a lib, you make it difficult for teachers to arm themselves and put nut cases away. Libs create the shit we have to endure and think more of the same will solve it.

We didn't have these problems before and guns were more available with no background checks or waiting periods. You're just too fucking stupid to figure it out.

The shootings have gotten worse now that semi-autos with huge mags are the norm.

You are completely full of shit. Thompson .45cal full auto machine guns had 50 round drums and something like 30 round stick magazines. ARs have been around since the 60s. The Browning High Power held 13+1. Takes about two seconds to swap out.

Liberals refuse to acknowledge any social and must blame inanimate objects, lie about them and hope no one notices.

 

[Brain357]

That is not a civilian defense. Stats show 2-3 shots for defense. Now mass shooters they love the hi cap mags.

I see so you are saying civilians are more efficient and effective at using their guns for self defense than trained cops.

I'm saying defending yourself and police work are very different. A citizen wouldn't have been messing with him in the first place. Please share examples of civilian defenders needing more than 10 rds for defense.

The very premise of your question is a lie. 2nd Amendment rights aren't predicated on how much ammunition the government says we need, the very same government that the 2nd Amendment is designed to defend the people against. There are 30 rounds in my combat weapon's magazine, the same number as police and those in the military. This is precisely the kind of balance of firepower the ratifiers envisioned. The capacity of my gun magazines is not something I ever have to justify to government.

The list of murderers using hi cap magazines is extremely long, while there are no examples I know of anyone needing one for defense. I guess you want to keep the bad guys very well armed.

Your laws won't disarm the bad guys, dumbass. The same crime could have been accomplished with 10 round magazines which take only 3 seconds to change out. That's why this lawsuit will fail, the greed addled plaintiffs not being able to demonstrate that an assault rifle is the only weapon capable of killing that many people.

Shooter might have been stopped at reload like Giffords shooter. Why arm murderers so well?

 

[Iceweasel]

The list of murderers using hi cap magazines is extremely long, while there are no examples I know of anyone needing one for defense. I guess you want to keep the bad guys very well armed.

Post the extremely long list you speak of. And you don't know how many rounds everyone used. Averages are just that, nothing more. Bottom line, it isn't your call.