Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Change, change, change... WHY put a black woman in the mother superior role... WHY? What MESSAGE were they sending by doing so? Was there no QUALIFIED WHITE women to fit the role? What is it about this never ending NEED to CHANGE things?The fictional Santa Claus legend is intended for indulgence by children -- not mentally competent adults. The fictional Santa Claus character I am familiar with is a fat, "jolly," White man with a beard. I dismiss any deviation from the traditional incarnation of Santa Claus as either nonsense or purposeful deception.
I'm just saying that he's a fictional character, and that people aught to have the freedom to change attributes of that fictional character if they want to.
You don't have to accept a black Santa, but if a family wants to tell their kids Santa is black/asian, they aught to have the right to do that without getting criticized for it. No one is suggesting that you be forced to do anything.
Well I think I know as well as YOU do. It's AGENDA DRIVEN, PERIOD. It's POLITICALLY CORRECT. They put a black women in that role so blacks wouldn't feel LEFT OUT. No you say? Then why, recently, was there just a huge stink about no BLACK WOMEN on SNL? Same thing... you BETTER put a black woman in these roles or you're RACIST.
That is what's at the CORE of this issue.
Jesus has to be BLACK
Santa Claus has to be BLACK
obama isn't half white, he's BLACK
NOTHING can remain WHITE. It's RACIST, it's not POLITICALLY CORRECT, and we can't have that.
If a White actor stuffed a sock in the mouth of a Black actor's character, took a knife and cut along the top of his forehead, and then ripped his scalp off...all hell would break loose.
Go see "The Butler". Black Son sees his father shot dead before his eyes for picking cotton "too slow" for the white overseer. Based on a true story.
I saw it at a theatre where the packed audience was integrated, and "all hell did not break loose". Just adult people of all types watching a movie, that all went home peacefully after it was over.
Why do you Yanks not distinguish between a 'theatre' - real live actors on a stage, and a 'cinema' - actors not present, just projected onto a screen? I had to read your post twice to make sure you were not talking about a play but a film.
If a White actor stuffed a sock in the mouth of a Black actor's character, took a knife and cut along the top of his forehead, and then ripped his scalp off...all hell would break loose.
Go see "The Butler". Black Son sees his father shot dead before his eyes for picking cotton "too slow" for the white overseer. Based on a true story.
I saw it at a theatre where the packed audience was integrated, and "all hell did not break loose". Just adult people of all types watching a movie, that all went home peacefully after it was over.
Why do you Yanks not distinguish between a 'theatre' - real live actors on a stage, and a 'cinema' - actors not present, just projected onto a screen? I had to read your post twice to make sure you were not talking about a play but a film.
If a White actor stuffed a sock in the mouth of a Black actor's character, took a knife and cut along the top of his forehead, and then ripped his scalp off...all hell would break loose.
Go see "The Butler". Black Son sees his father shot dead before his eyes for picking cotton "too slow" for the white overseer. Based on a true story.
I saw it at a theatre where the packed audience was integrated, and "all hell did not break loose". Just adult people of all types watching a movie, that all went home peacefully after it was over.
Have you seen 12 years as a slave? Everyone in the theatre was in tears. Integrated audience as well.
Go see "The Butler". Black Son sees his father shot dead before his eyes for picking cotton "too slow" for the white overseer. Based on a true story.
I saw it at a theatre where the packed audience was integrated, and "all hell did not break loose". Just adult people of all types watching a movie, that all went home peacefully after it was over.
Have you seen 12 years as a slave? Everyone in the theatre was in tears. Integrated audience as well.
"Integrated"? What, did they bus people in from different neighborhoods?
Have you seen 12 years as a slave? Everyone in the theatre was in tears. Integrated audience as well.
"Integrated"? What, did they bus people in from different neighborhoods?
no, they brought their own cars.
That would depend on what you mean by "racist." As I've previously mentioned, that word is so over-used and mis-used it has evolved to mean different things to different people.Personally I don't think calling someone racist for starting a thread entitled "The Negrification of Television" is all that unfair. He clearly has an agenda against black folks.
Whether or not his argument is "racist" depends on what you mean by "racist." (I once heard a young Black girl on a radio call-in program complain her father was "racist" against cats!)He complains about the fact that only blacks with perfect bone structure are on TV - as if it's just an issue isolated to black people - and completely ignores the fact that ALL people, black, white, latino, asian, etc are generally beautiful on screen. When was the last time a 230 lb white woman won best actress?
His argument is racist at the core....
More liberal progaganda to convince us that blacks can do things other than sports and welfare and crime. Not fooling anyone.
That would depend on what you mean by "racist." As I've previously mentioned, that word is so over-used and mis-used it has evolved to mean different things to different people.Personally I don't think calling someone racist for starting a thread entitled "The Negrification of Television" is all that unfair. He clearly has an agenda against black folks.
Whether or not his argument is "racist" depends on what you mean by "racist." (I once heard a young Black girl on a radio call-in program complain her father was "racist" against cats!)He complains about the fact that only blacks with perfect bone structure are on TV - as if it's just an issue isolated to black people - and completely ignores the fact that ALL people, black, white, latino, asian, etc are generally beautiful on screen. When was the last time a 230 lb white woman won best actress?
His argument is racist at the core....
I believe what DGS49 is saying is tv and print media advertisements which seem to promote accelerated integration always feature a White person coupled with a Black person who is an obvious hybrid (mulatto) rather than representative of the typical African anthropological type.
Also, it should be noted that DGS49 did not make reference to that which is or is not "beautiful." He referred only to anthropological stereotypes, in which mention of such physiological characteristics as bone structure, etc., are perfectly valid distinctions.
Again, please be specific about what you mean by "racist."
The process of societal degradation as manifested by the exaltation of all things relating to negro "culture". White persons opposing this phenomenon and it's effects upon their cultures/nations are to be quickly smeared as "racists" and ostracized from polite society.
Go see "The Butler". Black Son sees his father shot dead before his eyes for picking cotton "too slow" for the white overseer. Based on a true story.
I saw it at a theatre where the packed audience was integrated, and "all hell did not break loose". Just adult people of all types watching a movie, that all went home peacefully after it was over.
Have you seen 12 years as a slave? Everyone in the theatre was in tears. Integrated audience as well.
"Integrated"? What, did they bus people in from different neighborhoods?
Yes. Those are two good ones.I gave up on TV and movies several years ago. I can't say I've missed anything.
I would say you have missed the years when American TV grew up. Rising from worst in the world to some of the best. Masterpieces like Band of Brothers, The Wire and several more.
