The news is out Trump Campaign obstructed

[Billiejeens]

Investigation of Russian interference in 2016 election SENATE INTEL .....Which means traitors your own senate knows it was crooked,,,,but we know you don't give a damn He's your crook

Oh Lordy!

The lord won't help you meat......It is what it is

And, what it is, is nothing. Just like the other 10,000 times they've said, "we've got him NOW!"

How exactly is it nothing, when both parties concluded Trump obstructed the investigation?

They'll sort it out then, won't they?

They'll conduct their investigation and, discover what isn't there, just like every other time they've had him, dead to rights.

They've already found what is there. The report by the senate and the Mueller investigation, and the campaign finance crimes with Cohen, have already been proven.

The Mueller investigation completely exonerated everyone they looked at.
Sadly they overlooked all the real crimes that the Dems committed.

There were no campaign finance violations
Cohen pleaded guilty to non-proven-crimes in an attempt to curry favor with the Mueller Team.

those are what we call facts.

Negative! You are functionally brain dead if you cannot understand what Mueller said in this video. You are totally clueless;

Look you little cock sucker
at the break Mueller held a short press conf. where he explained to all but the stupidest little cock suckers that the OC Opinion, while true, was NOT, spelled N-O-T the reason that he found no crimes.

I can’t believe people actually think this is true.

The OLC opinion and therefore DoJ policy prevented Mueller from indicting Trump. Given that Mueller was bound to that policy, he decided not to make any determination one way or the other about whether Trump committed a crime.

Everything else is semantics for the weak minded.

The weak minded hear in one ear, and what comes out the other ear is their convenient outcome. Mueller clearly acknowledged that Trump could clearly be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office, and the senate report bears that out.

It was a semantics game clearly intended to give them the wrong impression which was skillfully played by Bill Barr.

Barr asked the one question that made it sound like Mueller declared Trump innocent.

He asked of Mueller (paraphrasing): are you saying that if not for the OLC opinion you would have indicted Trump?

The answer is no. Mueller is not “saying” that. Mueller is saying something different. But if all you hear is the “no” then you assume the wrong thing.

Barr is so damn slimy.

We'll, yes and no. He never fooled anyone, nor will he in the future. People with functioning brains, who are honest, and who follow the law, understood one big important detail. Mueller said he could be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office. All the mumbo jumbo garbled nonsense by Barr cancels out his initial opinions on the subject. Honest, law bidding officials who really care about this country, will hold Trump to account for exactly what all of us know what Mueller meant. Trump is prosecution material after he leaves office. That is crystal clear to anyone who is honest.

Moron, the democrat party lawyers who pretend to be States Attorneys have already shown they will use the law to persecute their enemies...you don't have to tell us that...we already know.

Are we watching, instead of listening to a broken record folks? This crowd of pathetic, unprepared, Right wing ignoramuses always say nothing.

You guys are really funny....the Russia Helped Trump train left the station months ago....and like a Japanese soldier fighting World War 2 on an isolated island years after the war ended...there you are...

Like the slaves that didn't know that the Republicans freed them for years
One day we should have a juneteenth for them, when these idiots find out.

How long will it take you to admit trump is a crook and liar?

About the time that you admit that Hillary is a bigger one....

So, never

 

[colfax_m]

Investigation of Russian interference in 2016 election SENATE INTEL .....Which means traitors your own senate knows it was crooked,,,,but we know you don't give a damn He's your crook

Oh Lordy!

The lord won't help you meat......It is what it is

And, what it is, is nothing. Just like the other 10,000 times they've said, "we've got him NOW!"

How exactly is it nothing, when both parties concluded Trump obstructed the investigation?

They'll sort it out then, won't they?

They'll conduct their investigation and, discover what isn't there, just like every other time they've had him, dead to rights.

They've already found what is there. The report by the senate and the Mueller investigation, and the campaign finance crimes with Cohen, have already been proven.

The Mueller investigation completely exonerated everyone they looked at.
Sadly they overlooked all the real crimes that the Dems committed.

There were no campaign finance violations
Cohen pleaded guilty to non-proven-crimes in an attempt to curry favor with the Mueller Team.

those are what we call facts.

Negative! You are functionally brain dead if you cannot understand what Mueller said in this video. You are totally clueless;

Look you little cock sucker
at the break Mueller held a short press conf. where he explained to all but the stupidest little cock suckers that the OC Opinion, while true, was NOT, spelled N-O-T the reason that he found no crimes.

I can’t believe people actually think this is true.

The OLC opinion and therefore DoJ policy prevented Mueller from indicting Trump. Given that Mueller was bound to that policy, he decided not to make any determination one way or the other about whether Trump committed a crime.

Everything else is semantics for the weak minded.

The weak minded hear in one ear, and what comes out the other ear is their convenient outcome. Mueller clearly acknowledged that Trump could clearly be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office, and the senate report bears that out.

It was a semantics game clearly intended to give them the wrong impression which was skillfully played by Bill Barr.

Barr asked the one question that made it sound like Mueller declared Trump innocent.

He asked of Mueller (paraphrasing): are you saying that if not for the OLC opinion you would have indicted Trump?

The answer is no. Mueller is not “saying” that. Mueller is saying something different. But if all you hear is the “no” then you assume the wrong thing.

Barr is so damn slimy.

Poor baby
Barr had literally no involvement in the actions being discussed

Barr very much was involved in softening the blow of the Mueller report by deliberately mischaracterizing the findings.

 

[Billiejeens]

Investigation of Russian interference in 2016 election SENATE INTEL .....Which means traitors your own senate knows it was crooked,,,,but we know you don't give a damn He's your crook

Oh Lordy!

The lord won't help you meat......It is what it is

And, what it is, is nothing. Just like the other 10,000 times they've said, "we've got him NOW!"

How exactly is it nothing, when both parties concluded Trump obstructed the investigation?

They'll sort it out then, won't they?

They'll conduct their investigation and, discover what isn't there, just like every other time they've had him, dead to rights.

They've already found what is there. The report by the senate and the Mueller investigation, and the campaign finance crimes with Cohen, have already been proven.

The Mueller investigation completely exonerated everyone they looked at.
Sadly they overlooked all the real crimes that the Dems committed.

There were no campaign finance violations
Cohen pleaded guilty to non-proven-crimes in an attempt to curry favor with the Mueller Team.

those are what we call facts.

Negative! You are functionally brain dead if you cannot understand what Mueller said in this video. You are totally clueless;

Look you little cock sucker
at the break Mueller held a short press conf. where he explained to all but the stupidest little cock suckers that the OC Opinion, while true, was NOT, spelled N-O-T the reason that he found no crimes.

I can’t believe people actually think this is true.

The OLC opinion and therefore DoJ policy prevented Mueller from indicting Trump. Given that Mueller was bound to that policy, he decided not to make any determination one way or the other about whether Trump committed a crime.

Everything else is semantics for the weak minded.

The weak minded hear in one ear, and what comes out the other ear is their convenient outcome. Mueller clearly acknowledged that Trump could clearly be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office, and the senate report bears that out.

It was a semantics game clearly intended to give them the wrong impression which was skillfully played by Bill Barr.

Barr asked the one question that made it sound like Mueller declared Trump innocent.

He asked of Mueller (paraphrasing): are you saying that if not for the OLC opinion you would have indicted Trump?

The answer is no. Mueller is not “saying” that. Mueller is saying something different. But if all you hear is the “no” then you assume the wrong thing.

Barr is so damn slimy.

Poor baby
Barr had literally no involvement in the actions being discussed

Barr very much was involved in softening the blow of the Mueller report by deliberately mischaracterizing the findings.

Not what is being discussed.

 

[colfax_m]

Investigation of Russian interference in 2016 election SENATE INTEL .....Which means traitors your own senate knows it was crooked,,,,but we know you don't give a damn He's your crook

Oh Lordy!

The lord won't help you meat......It is what it is

And, what it is, is nothing. Just like the other 10,000 times they've said, "we've got him NOW!"

How exactly is it nothing, when both parties concluded Trump obstructed the investigation?

They'll sort it out then, won't they?

They'll conduct their investigation and, discover what isn't there, just like every other time they've had him, dead to rights.

They've already found what is there. The report by the senate and the Mueller investigation, and the campaign finance crimes with Cohen, have already been proven.

The Mueller investigation completely exonerated everyone they looked at.
Sadly they overlooked all the real crimes that the Dems committed.

There were no campaign finance violations
Cohen pleaded guilty to non-proven-crimes in an attempt to curry favor with the Mueller Team.

those are what we call facts.

Negative! You are functionally brain dead if you cannot understand what Mueller said in this video. You are totally clueless;

Look you little cock sucker
at the break Mueller held a short press conf. where he explained to all but the stupidest little cock suckers that the OC Opinion, while true, was NOT, spelled N-O-T the reason that he found no crimes.

I can’t believe people actually think this is true.

The OLC opinion and therefore DoJ policy prevented Mueller from indicting Trump. Given that Mueller was bound to that policy, he decided not to make any determination one way or the other about whether Trump committed a crime.

Everything else is semantics for the weak minded.

The weak minded hear in one ear, and what comes out the other ear is their convenient outcome. Mueller clearly acknowledged that Trump could clearly be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office, and the senate report bears that out.

It was a semantics game clearly intended to give them the wrong impression which was skillfully played by Bill Barr.

Barr asked the one question that made it sound like Mueller declared Trump innocent.

He asked of Mueller (paraphrasing): are you saying that if not for the OLC opinion you would have indicted Trump?

The answer is no. Mueller is not “saying” that. Mueller is saying something different. But if all you hear is the “no” then you assume the wrong thing.

Barr is so damn slimy.

We'll, yes and no. He never fooled anyone, nor will he in the future. People with functioning brains, who are honest, and who follow the law, understood one big important detail. Mueller said he could be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office. All the mumbo jumbo garbled nonsense by Barr cancels out his initial opinions on the subject. Honest, law bidding officials who really care about this country, will hold Trump to account for exactly what all of us know what Mueller meant. Trump is prosecution material after he leaves office. That is crystal clear to anyone who is honest.

Moron, the democrat party lawyers who pretend to be States Attorneys have already shown they will use the law to persecute their enemies...you don't have to tell us that...we already know.

This is a new legal defense for Republicans.

The “yeah I did it but I was only caught and held responsible because I’m a Republican”. It doesn’t really work.

No, the defense is they are innocent but the democrat party lawyers pretending to be States Attorneys will use the power of their office to wrongly accuse and then convict the innocent republican...and if they can't lie convincingly to a jury, they will simply destroy the republican by bankrupting them.

Like Dinesh D’Souza?

 

[colfax_m]

Investigation of Russian interference in 2016 election SENATE INTEL .....Which means traitors your own senate knows it was crooked,,,,but we know you don't give a damn He's your crook

Oh Lordy!

The lord won't help you meat......It is what it is

And, what it is, is nothing. Just like the other 10,000 times they've said, "we've got him NOW!"

How exactly is it nothing, when both parties concluded Trump obstructed the investigation?

They'll sort it out then, won't they?

They'll conduct their investigation and, discover what isn't there, just like every other time they've had him, dead to rights.

They've already found what is there. The report by the senate and the Mueller investigation, and the campaign finance crimes with Cohen, have already been proven.

The Mueller investigation completely exonerated everyone they looked at.
Sadly they overlooked all the real crimes that the Dems committed.

There were no campaign finance violations
Cohen pleaded guilty to non-proven-crimes in an attempt to curry favor with the Mueller Team.

those are what we call facts.

Negative! You are functionally brain dead if you cannot understand what Mueller said in this video. You are totally clueless;

Look you little cock sucker
at the break Mueller held a short press conf. where he explained to all but the stupidest little cock suckers that the OC Opinion, while true, was NOT, spelled N-O-T the reason that he found no crimes.

I can’t believe people actually think this is true.

The OLC opinion and therefore DoJ policy prevented Mueller from indicting Trump. Given that Mueller was bound to that policy, he decided not to make any determination one way or the other about whether Trump committed a crime.

Everything else is semantics for the weak minded.

The weak minded hear in one ear, and what comes out the other ear is their convenient outcome. Mueller clearly acknowledged that Trump could clearly be prosecuted for obstruction after he left office, and the senate report bears that out.

It was a semantics game clearly intended to give them the wrong impression which was skillfully played by Bill Barr.

Barr asked the one question that made it sound like Mueller declared Trump innocent.

He asked of Mueller (paraphrasing): are you saying that if not for the OLC opinion you would have indicted Trump?

The answer is no. Mueller is not “saying” that. Mueller is saying something different. But if all you hear is the “no” then you assume the wrong thing.

Barr is so damn slimy.

Poor baby
Barr had literally no involvement in the actions being discussed

Barr very much was involved in softening the blow of the Mueller report by deliberately mischaracterizing the findings.

Not what is being discussed.

Poor child, you don’t even know who is manipulating you.

 

[colfax_m]

Hillary's campaign used Russian intelligence misinformation to get the Obama administration to corruptly investigate an opposing party during a presidential campaign?

Hillary’s campaign could not “get” the FBI to do anything and the investigation was kept secret and had no relevance on the campaign.

 

[Crepitus]

Have a link for that?

Senate intel leaders said Trump associates may have presented misleading testimony during Russia probe: report

Republican and Democratic leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee reportedly told federal prosecutors last year that they believed President Trump’s family and associates may have presented mi…

thehill.com

Gee who would suspect the trumps are lying scum ..?....Only ones who ignore it are called repubs ,his base

That article says nothing specific at all. It doesn't name any of the Republican Senators or what was said that was supposedly misleading. And it says nothing about it being material to Russia. Did you read it? Or you just didn't care. Oh yeah, you admitted you went by the headline ...

The Communist Democrats are showing how desperate they are going into the November 3rd Elections. They know Senile Joe and Kamala are going to take a bad beating.

You know that was a bipartisan report, right? Signed off on by both sides?

 

[Oddball]

 

[OKTexas]

How's this Will You put the eye there Trump lover?
Republican-led Senate committee backs U.S. intelligence ...
www.cbc.ca › news › world › senate-intel-report-russia...

Apr 21, 2020 - The heavily redacted report from the Senate Intelligence Committee is ... a crime — specifically, obstruction of justice — after the president left ...

So this earth shattering news is almost 4 months old? REALLY?????? LMAO

.

 

[Crepitus]

Have a link for that?

I'll look but it was just a headline on MCNBC Let me ask you IF it is true as stated would you give a damn???

Should I?

I seem to remember Obamas Administration was in charge during the Russian investigation.

No comment on them dropping the ball, by FBI agents texting love notes to each other?

How does them texting love notes affect the investigation? I've never figured out why that was supposed to matter.

Come on Man!!!!
That was a weak dodge.

No, it was a serious question.

Why does it matter? How could it have affected anything?

 

[Arresmillao]

Investigation of Russian interference in 2016 election SENATE INTEL .....Which means traitors your own senate knows it was crooked,,,,but we know you don't give a damn He's your crook

pussygrabber will be convicted on Nov 3 by the american people, and after that by the southern district in NY....

 

[kaz]

Have a link for that?

Senate intel leaders said Trump associates may have presented misleading testimony during Russia probe: report

Republican and Democratic leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee reportedly told federal prosecutors last year that they believed President Trump’s family and associates may have presented mi…

thehill.com

Gee who would suspect the trumps are lying scum ..?....Only ones who ignore it are called repubs ,his base

That article says nothing specific at all. It doesn't name any of the Republican Senators or what was said that was supposedly misleading. And it says nothing about it being material to Russia. Did you read it? Or you just didn't care. Oh yeah, you admitted you went by the headline ...

The Communist Democrats are showing how desperate they are going into the November 3rd Elections. They know Senile Joe and Kamala are going to take a bad beating.

You know that was a bipartisan report, right? Signed off on by both sides?

You know the link wasn't to the report and the post offered no quotes from the report, right? It was an opinion piece on a blog. You know that, right, Creep?

 

[Marion Morrison]

I can play the straight man.
Be ded srs.

 

[Jitss617]

and what Trump's base keeps denying..U.S. Senate committee concludes Russia used Manafort, WikiLeaks to boost Trump in 2016

It shows manafort sold information for his own self profiting.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Investigation of Russian interference in 2016 election SENATE INTEL .....Which means traitors your own senate knows it was crooked,,,,but we know you don't give a damn He's your crook

The funny thing is Trump didn’t think he was going to win – so why not solicit foreign intervention to help him win; no one would notice or care and would be forgotten about after the election.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Investigation of Russian interference in 2016 election SENATE INTEL .....Which means traitors your own senate knows it was crooked,,,,but we know you don't give a damn He's your crook

We won't know the full extent of Trump's collusion with Russian intelligence until his financial statements become available.

G.O.P.-Led Senate Panel Details Ties Between 2016 Trump Campaign and Russia

"But the report showed extensive evidence of contacts between Trump campaign advisers and people tied to the Kremlin — including a longstanding associate of the onetime Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, Konstantin V. Kilimnik, whom the report identifies as a 'Russian intelligence officer....'"

"The Senate report for the first time identified Mr. Kilimnik as an intelligence officer. Mr. Mueller’s report had labeled him as someone with ties to Russian intelligence.

"Democrats highlighted those ties in their own appendix to the report, noting that Mr. Manafort discussed campaign strategy and shared internal campaign polling data with Mr. Kilimnik, and later lied to federal investigators about his actions."

We won't know the full extent of Trump's collusion with Russian intelligence until his financial statements become available.

His financial statements will have a line item called "Russian collusion"? LOL!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Do you think that campaigns for the US Presidency should work with Russian intelligence?

Do you think that campaigns for the US Presidency should work with Russian intelligence?

Hillary's campaign shouldn't have built the dossier using Russian intelligence?

Hillary's campaign didnt use it during campaign, but they did give it to authorities.
It was actually Steele who worked with anti-Putin contacts within Russia, but was likely fed some misinformation from Russian intelligence as well.

its completely legal to get opposition research from foreign sources.
What makes it illegal is to receive it as a gift instead of paying for it.
Because if its a gift, there can be quid-pro-quo.

Hillary's campaign didnt use it during campaign, but they did give it to authorities.

Hillary's campaign used Russian intelligence misinformation to get the Obama administration to corruptly investigate an opposing party during a presidential campaign?

It was actually Steele who worked with anti-Putin contacts within Russia, but was likely fed some misinformation from Russian intelligence as well.

I know, Dems using Russian intelligence.......there ought to be a law!!!

its completely legal to get opposition research from foreign sources.

Foreign interference is legal? So why were Dems whining about a meeting in Trump Tower?

What makes it illegal is to receive it as a gift instead of paying for it.

Oh, paying for foreign interference makes it legal.

Because if its a gift, there can be quid-pro-quo.

If a Russian gifts a Facebook meme, it's illegal, but if he's paid for the meme, it's legal?

The Steele dossier did not interfere with 2016 election, because nobody in the public knew that it existed (or at least what was in it) prior to the vote. Nor was the dossier used by the campaign. The dossier only became public after Trump entered into office.

Our intelligence agencies are duty bound to investigate foreign interference in our elections; if US citizens are detected during that process, its the fault of those US citizens for communicating with foreigners.

However, the actual foreign interference is details here.

Six revelations in Senate intel report on 2016 Russian interference

The bipartisan report provides new details on Trump’s conversations with Roger Stone and the activities of the president’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

www.nbcnews.com

The Steele dossier did not interfere with 2016 election,

But Facebook memes did?

Nor was the dossier used by the campaign.

Weren't parts of it leaked before the election?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Hillary's campaign used Russian intelligence misinformation to get the Obama administration to corruptly investigate an opposing party during a presidential campaign?

Hillary’s campaign could not “get” the FBI to do anything and the investigation was kept secret and had no relevance on the campaign.

Hillary’s campaign could not “get” the FBI to do anything

Keep telling yourself that.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Have a link for that?

I'll look but it was just a headline on MCNBC Let me ask you IF it is true as stated would you give a damn???

Should I?

I seem to remember Obamas Administration was in charge during the Russian investigation.

No comment on them dropping the ball, by FBI agents texting love notes to each other?

How does them texting love notes affect the investigation? I've never figured out why that was supposed to matter.

Come on Man!!!!
That was a weak dodge.

No, it was a serious question.

Why does it matter? How could it have affected anything?

I'm guessing you haven't read the contents of the emails.
Or you have and are just refusing to admit the seriousness of the content of those emails.
So tell me,does this sound familiar to you?

 Aug. 8, 2016: L. Page texts Strzok, “[Trump's] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” and Strzok replies, “No. No he's not. We'll stop it.”21

And here's the rest if you dare to read it.

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/abbreviated%20timeline%20horowitz.pdf

Fuck Strzok and his Insurance policy he admited to and fuck you ya lying weasel.

 

[Orangecat]

Starting this, letting you all know you follow lying un american ah's isn't informative enough for you??? You want blood?

Blood?
How about we start with you posting in coherent English?
Is that too much to ask and/or above your ability?