Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Read the law
Contrary to popular belief which states that “an email is not copyright protected once it is sent”, surprisingly, emails are protected by intellectual property laws, by default; it's protected by copyright laws once penned down or created by the sender. Dec 12, 2019
I don’t think he can read the law.Read the law
Contrary to popular belief which states that “an email is not copyright protected once it is sent”, surprisingly, emails are protected by intellectual property laws, by default; it's protected by copyright laws once penned down or created by the sender. Dec 12, 2019
That isn’t true. Police, DoJ, FBI. Not a lawyer for the political opposition.As a lawyer, Guiliani is a officer of the court, and so then is an appropriate person to ask if a crime has been committed or not.
Of the laptop, but not personal papers and documents of Hunters. The shop owner can not just give out Hunters social security number, or business deals arrangements, or medical records, or naked pictures and other personal information. He can remove Hunter's personal property information and then sell the laptop to recover any money loss for the transaction....from all I've read on it.
The IRS under rule, was suppose to audit the president and vice president's taxes every year they are in office. they have done so with every president and vice president taxes since President Reagan.The IRS doesn't look at Trump's taxes?
Gotta link to that?
It proves theft. So the evidence is stolen. That puts a taint on it's credibility.
...or they are once again running clearance for the Biden Crime Family Syndicate.If the laptop contained evidence of a crime, and the FBI was investigating Hunter, they are required by law to send Hunter a "target" letter. Which they didn't do.
So either they found no crimes on the laptop.
Or they didn't look at the laptop.
Trump did that? Gotta link?The IRS under rule, was suppose to audit the president and vice president's taxes every year they are in office. they have done so with every president and vice president taxes since President Reagan.
Trump with the help of his crony friends he put in office, prevented the Mandatory IRS rule to audit his taxes each year.
I don’t think he can read the law.
I had no idea about that though.
That isn’t true. Police, DoJ, FBI. Not a lawyer for the political opposition.
So, when you find evidence of something illegal, the first thought is to contact a lawyer working for the political opposition? Really?As officer's of the court, you are supposed to be able to trust lawyers to only do what is legal.
So far I have not heard of anyone claiming Guliani did anything wrong with this laptop.
The only evidence of a crime involving Hunter's business, would not be known, unless it is investigated by law enforcement..... And proven to have been illegal, under the law.I agree that it would be an invasion of privacy to make all the contents of the laptop public normally.
But it is never illegal to share anything with authorities, lawyers, police, journalists, etc.
It there is evidence of a crime, then all privacy constraints are void.
The IRS under rule, was suppose to audit the president and vice president's taxes every year they are in office. they have done so with every president and vice president taxes since President Reagan.
Trump with the help of his crony friends he put in office, prevented the Mandatory IRS rule to audit his taxes each year.
No stupid, his first thought was to turn it over to the FBI. Are you really this ignorant of the topic, or just a pathetic troll?So, when you find evidence of something illegal, the first thought is to contact a lawyer working for the political opposition? Really?
Copyright law is long, but it does NOT at all provide for privacy.
Which is an entirely different issue, which was forfeit by being abandoned.
Copyrights means you retain ownership of artistic or creative material of value....
Link?E-mails are creative material of value. And are protected under law from unauthorized use or disclosure.
So, when you find evidence of something illegal, the first thought is to contact a lawyer working for the political opposition? Really?
The contract says the laptop is the shop owner's if the client failed to pay and or pick up, after X amount of time. It DOES NOT SAY the personal content on the laptop, was the shop owner's to do as they please.Wrong.
When a person fails to pay for work done, the contract comes into play that the device then belongs to the repair man.
The contents of the laptop then was not stolen, but given to the repair man by failing to pay up.
So then there is no "taint" at all on its credibility.
The only evidence of a crime involving Hunter's business, would not be known, unless it is investigated by law enforcement..... And proven to have been illegal, under the law.
The campaign lawyer of a political opponent is not law enforcement, nor are journalists Rigby.
It doesn't? Have you read the contract?The contract says the laptop is the shop owner's if the client failed to pay and or pick up, after X amount of time. It DOES NOT SAY the personal content on the laptop, was the shop owner's to do as they please.
