★★★★★
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
★★★★★
juror says zimmerman 'got away with murder'
william m. Welch, usa today 5:25 p.m. Edt july 25, 2013
the lone minority member of the jury that acquitted george zimmerman says zimmerman "got away with murder" in the killing of teenager trayvon martin.
In an interview with abc news scheduled to air thursday evening, the woman identified as juror b29 said she feels she owes an apology to trayvon's parents over the verdict that touched off protest demonstrations around the country.
The juror said the six-member, all-female jury followed florida law and found the evidence did not warrant a murder conviction.
"you can't put the man in jail even though in our hearts we felt he was guilty,'' said the juror.
She declined to be identified by her full name and was referred to in the interview as "maddy." she allowed her face to be shown in the interviews to air on world news and friday on good morning america.
She was interviewed by gma anchor robin roberts.
The identities of the jurors were sealed by the florida court and have not yet been made public. Abc news said she did not allow her full name to be used out of concern for her safety.
She was described as a 36-year-old nursing assistant and mother of eight children. A puerto rican, she had moved to seminole county, fla., from chicago only five months before her selection to the jury.
...
juror says zimmerman 'got away with murder'
if she was that convinced it was murder, she should have held out, caused a hung jury, and given the state a do-over.
But she didn't, so i think she's only prattling on about this to spur her future book sales.
she said the evidence did not warrant a conviction. In other words, she weighed the evidence and even though she believed he was guilty based on the law she could not vote to convict.
I have thought all along that he was most likely at least partially responsible for the events of that night, but based on our laws there was reasonable doubt and thus he walked. Juror b29 seems to have it right in my book.
Immie
Here, for you dillo:
Paranoid much?You're funny. Conservatives take turns and let others go first.I would be afraid to go to the store with you people. I would be afraid you would blow my head off if i bought the last item on the shelf of something you wanted to buy. Scary.
So they can sneak up on them from the rear.
Does that mean sluts are partially responsale if they are raped?Juror says Zimmerman 'got away with murder'
William M. Welch, USA TODAY 5:25 p.m. EDT July 25, 2013
The lone minority member of the jury that acquitted George Zimmerman says Zimmerman "got away with murder" in the killing of teenager Trayvon Martin.
In an interview with ABC News scheduled to air Thursday evening, the woman identified as Juror B29 said she feels she owes an apology to Trayvon's parents over the verdict that touched off protest demonstrations around the country.
The juror said the six-member, all-female jury followed Florida law and found the evidence did not warrant a murder conviction.
"You can't put the man in jail even though in our hearts we felt he was guilty,'' said the juror.
She declined to be identified by her full name and was referred to in the interview as "Maddy." She allowed her face to be shown in the interviews to air on World News and Friday on Good Morning America.
She was interviewed by GMA anchor Robin Roberts.
The identities of the jurors were sealed by the Florida court and have not yet been made public. ABC News said she did not allow her full name to be used out of concern for her safety.
She was described as a 36-year-old nursing assistant and mother of eight children. A Puerto Rican, she had moved to Seminole County, Fla., from Chicago only five months before her selection to the jury.
...
Juror says Zimmerman 'got away with murder'
If she was that convinced it was murder, she should have held out, caused a hung jury, and given the state a do-over.
But she didn't, so I think she's only prattling on about this to spur her future book sales.
She said the evidence did not warrant a conviction. In other words, she weighed the evidence and even though she believed he was guilty based on the law she could not vote to convict.
I have thought all along that he was most likely at least partially responsible for the events of that night, but based on our laws there was reasonable doubt and thus he walked. Juror B29 seems to have it right in my book.
Immie
Sorry guys.. When the page count in a thread goes past my birth year --- I gotta go..
You kids play nice now --- and share the chicken...
I still have some time on that clock. Holding down the fried chicken and unicorn fort.
Does that mean sluts are partially responsale if they are raped?If she was that convinced it was murder, she should have held out, caused a hung jury, and given the state a do-over.
But she didn't, so I think she's only prattling on about this to spur her future book sales.
She said the evidence did not warrant a conviction. In other words, she weighed the evidence and even though she believed he was guilty based on the law she could not vote to convict.
I have thought all along that he was most likely at least partially responsible for the events of that night, but based on our laws there was reasonable doubt and thus he walked. Juror B29 seems to have it right in my book.
Immie
Does that mean sluts are partially responsale if they are raped?She said the evidence did not warrant a conviction. In other words, she weighed the evidence and even though she believed he was guilty based on the law she could not vote to convict.
I have thought all along that he was most likely at least partially responsible for the events of that night, but based on our laws there was reasonable doubt and thus he walked. Juror B29 seems to have it right in my book.
Immie
★★
What if the slut had a gun. Game changer.
Here, for you dillo:
Santy gets a ★★★★★
Five out of five
I'm sorry.
I have a point. The point is this has become the stupidest thread merge ever.
Rehashing a trial when the evidence and instructions and LAW from two weeks ago is and what's done annoys me to the point of trying to be even more stupid than this.
It is over.
The only thing still at question is how far the Feds will go to persecute a citizen who had a trial of his peers as we are all entitled to as citizens.
POTUS, HOLDER, AL, JESSE, AGENDA have zero business here.
This was a local event turned to monster by the media, Crump exploitation which is what he does for a living, and the monster continuining to be fed by stupidity.
If you don't get that by now then all I have is stupidity and jokes back at ya.
Here, for you dillo:
Santy gets a ★★★★★
Five out of five
Or six out of six?
I'm sorry.
I have a point. The point is this has become the stupidest thread merge ever.
Rehashing a trial when the evidence and instructions and LAW from two weeks ago is and what's done annoys me to the point of trying to be even more stupid than this.
It is over.
The only thing still at question is how far the Feds will go to persecute a citizen who had a trial of his peers as we are all entitled to as citizens.
POTUS, HOLDER, AL, JESSE, AGENDA have zero business here.
This was a local event turned to monster by the media, Crump exploitation which is what he does for a living, and the monster continuining to be fed by stupidity.
If you don't get that by now then all I have is stupidity and jokes back at ya.
You coulda just came right out and said it ya know ......
I'm sorry.
I have a point. The point is this has become the stupidest thread merge ever.
Rehashing a trial when the evidence and instructions and LAW from two weeks ago is and what's done annoys me to the point of trying to be even more stupid than this.
It is over.
The only thing still at question is how far the Feds will go to persecute a citizen who had a trial of his peers as we are all entitled to as citizens.
POTUS, HOLDER, AL, JESSE, AGENDA have zero business here.
This was a local event turned to monster by the media, Crump exploitation which is what he does for a living, and the monster continuining to be fed by stupidity.
If you don't get that by now then all I have is stupidity and jokes back at ya.
I'm sorry.
I have a point. The point is this has become the stupidest thread merge ever.
Rehashing a trial when the evidence and instructions and LAW from two weeks ago is and what's done annoys me to the point of trying to be even more stupid than this.
It is over.
The only thing still at question is how far the Feds will go to persecute a citizen who had a trial of his peers as we are all entitled to as citizens.
POTUS, HOLDER, AL, JESSE, AGENDA have zero business here.
This was a local event turned to monster by the media, Crump exploitation which is what he does for a living, and the monster continuining to be fed by stupidity.
If you don't get that by now then all I have is stupidity and jokes back at ya.
You coulda just came right out and said it ya know ......
Aint my fault people don't get shit.
I'm just posting turtles new shorts and ★★★★
Does that mean sluts are partially responsale if they are raped?
★★
What if the slut had a gun. Game changer.
which "holster" is she using?