jon_berzerk
Platinum Member
- Mar 5, 2013
- 31,401
- 7,369
- 1,130
now I wondering about the jury. It seems like some experience with 'fighting' would have been a criteria for selection.
Banging a human head on concrete--yes, I agree with yesterday's expert that said more damage could result regardless of superficial injuries. Difficult for me to imagine how/what a person would respond other than fear--but since I would not have been there in the first place I can't be rational, I suppose.
Someone --probably on a panel from HLN was saying--'Any mother would try to find out who started the fight...' Implying George Zimmerman did by following Trayvon. That seems too simplistic at this point.
If the investigation wasn't handle properly it seems like no verdict can be reached.
That's about all I can get out of this. shrug.
the use of self defense does not require injury
many people who claimed self defense had no injuries at all
This should be in the instructions. Part of being a juror is following the instructions.
yes it should be
it is already in the testimony on record