The Pattern of installing a Marxist government

Votto

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2012
54,069
53,105
3,605


This former KGB official who defected to the US in the 1970's, gives a brief description of the plan the former USSR had in introducing Marxism into the US.

The stages are:

1. Demoralization: Make it so facts do not prevent people from using the facts to be able to defend themselves and their country. Basically, it is brainwashing people into a cult. They focus at the university level because those are you leaders in the next 10 or so years. And once in place, there is no getting rid of them in academia or government.

2. Destabilization: Those who have been "demoralized" at the leadership position will then begin to make decisions, bad ones, that will destabilize the nation in such areas as the economy and defense of the nation.

3. Crisis: People will be forced into change because of a said crisis. Herbert Hoover once said, "Every collectivist revolution rides in on a Trojan horse of 'emergency'. It was the tactic of Lenin, Hitler, and Mussolini. In the collectivist sweep over a dozen minor countries of Europe, it was the cry of men striving to get on horseback. And 'emergency' became the justification of the subsequent steps. This technique of creating emergency is the greatest achievement that demagoguery attains."

After all, no one likes change so for people to embrace change, you must have them begging for it to help them survive the said crisis. Or as Rahm Emanuel under Obama once said, "Never let a good crisis go to waste", as that is the time to implement change that you wanted before the said crisis, especially a manufactured crisis to do just that.

4. Normalization: Once the Marxist are firmly in place, they normalize everything. That means that no matter if there is a crisis, it will not be treated as such. Any future crisis that is bound to happen will simply be ignored. If millions die of starvation, for example, like happened in the former USSR, they will just be allowed to die. Also, the useful idiots employed by the Marxist regime that helped them gain power will simply be shot as happened in other Marxist regimes around the world.

Useful idiots like:

1713986155660.png
 
Look up a phenomenon called "Cultural Marxism." One of it's main thinkers is a radical named Antonio Gramsci.

Gramsci disagreed with Marx and said that economic Marxism would fail. That's because no one wants to stand in line all day for a potato.

Gramsci suggested a back door route for Marxism. He suggested infiltrating all OTHER institutions: education, sports, the workplace, media, etc. If society does all those things in the OP, then economic Marxism will prevail.

This is exactly what is being attempted today.
 
From 1985:
The demoralization process in the United States is basically completed already, for the last 25 years, actually it’s over fulfilled because demoralization now reaches such areas where previously not even Comrade Andropov and all his experts would even dream of such a tremendous success. Most of it is being done by Americans to Americans thanks to a lack of moral standards. As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter any more. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures, even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him a concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it until he’s going to receive a kick in his fat bottom. When a military boot crushes his balls, then he will understand, but not before that. That’s the tragedy of the situation of demoralization.
 


This former KGB official who defected to the US in the 1970's, gives a brief description of the plan the former USSR had in introducing Marxism into the US.

The stages are:

1. Demoralization: Make it so facts do not prevent people from using the facts to be able to defend themselves and their country. Basically, it is brainwashing people into a cult. They focus at the university level because those are you leaders in the next 10 or so years. And once in place, there is no getting rid of them in academia or government.

2. Destabilization: Those who have been "demoralized" at the leadership position will then begin to make decisions, bad ones, that will destabilize the nation in such areas as the economy and defense of the nation.

3. Crisis: People will be forced into change because of a said crisis. Herbert Hoover once said, "Every collectivist revolution rides in on a Trojan horse of 'emergency'. It was the tactic of Lenin, Hitler, and Mussolini. In the collectivist sweep over a dozen minor countries of Europe, it was the cry of men striving to get on horseback. And 'emergency' became the justification of the subsequent steps. This technique of creating emergency is the greatest achievement that demagoguery attains."

After all, no one likes change so for people to embrace change, you must have them begging for it to help them survive the said crisis. Or as Rahm Emanuel under Obama once said, "Never let a good crisis go to waste", as that is the time to implement change that you wanted before the said crisis, especially a manufactured crisis to do just that.

4. Normalization: Once the Marxist are firmly in place, they normalize everything. That means that no matter if there is a crisis, it will not be treated as such. Any future crisis that is bound to happen will simply be ignored. If millions die of starvation, for example, like happened in the former USSR, they will just be allowed to die. Also, the useful idiots employed by the Marxist regime that helped them gain power will simply be shot as happened in other Marxist regimes around the world.

Useful idiots like:

View attachment 937153

Let me guess. This video you Red Hats are sharing is your only knowledge and understanding of Marxism and Communism.
 
Let me guess. This video you Red Hats are sharing is your only knowledge and understanding of Marxism and Communism.
No.

The Reality of Red Subversion

The Reality of Red Subversion
The Recent Confirmation of Soviet Espionage in America
STEPHEN J. SNIEGOSKI • SEPTEMBER 1, 2003

In an apparent effort to illustrate political simple-mindedness, Carroll Quigley derisively wrote in his noted (at least by the John Birch Society) Tragedy and Hope, that the “same groups who were howling about Soviet espionage in 1948-1955 were also claiming that President Roosevelt expected and wanted Pearl Harbor.”[1] In a previous contribution to The Occidental Quarterly, I dealt with the latter; here I will do some “howling” about the former. According to what until recently has passed as conventional wisdom for the liberal establishment, America in the late 1940s and early 1950s was gripped by a terrible Red scare, a period of anti-Communist hysteria and witch hunts. Malicious “red-baiters” slandered innocent liberals as Communists in order to destroy the reforms of the New Deal and impede peace with the Soviet Union. At most, some of the more “anti-Communist” liberals would concede that there may have been a few Communist subversives, but nothing to justify the terrible anti-Communist overreaction, above all the antics of the demagogic Joe McCarthy. From the 1960s through the 1980s, one of the strongest taboos in American political discourse was the subject of Soviet influence within the United States.

During the 1990s, the release of the Venona documents (see p. 49) by the U.S. government and the partial opening of the Soviet archives forced establishment minds to a reconsideration. Yes, Virginia, there really were Communist spies in the United States during the so-called “McCarthy era.” In fact, it now appears that even the slandered and smeared “red-baiters” of the period were unaware of just how far Soviet Communist subversion had penetrated. It must be added that even during the period of the so-called “witch hunt” there was more than enough evidence to prove the reality of Soviet Communist spying to any objective person. But, of course, if one is going to pass for an “educated,” “respectable” person, objective thinking must be eschewed—it’s simply not a Darwinian survival trait in modern America.

From Lenin onward Soviet Communist leaders have preached the necessity of underground activities, with foreign governments the key target for infiltration. The evidence for this from many countries is overwhelming. Communists in government engaged in espionage and acted to influence policy in a pro-Soviet direction. Many of the individuals engaged in these activities were Communist Party members; others were fellow travelers, who despite their lack of party discipline, sought to advance the interests of Soviet Communism.

Franklin Roosevelt’s diplomatic recognition of the Soviet Union in 1933 provided the Soviets with their first opportunity for effective penetration of the U.S. government. With diplomatic recognition, Soviet intelligence could function under legal cover through its embassy and consulates. The liberal New Deal agencies provided a fertile field for the recruitment of Soviet spies. Many of those who staffed these agencies sympathized with the government planning of the Soviet “experiment” and with Soviet opposition to fascism. This sympathy for Communism increased during World War II, when the Soviets could be seen as comrades-in-arms. That the Soviet Union was combating the great evil of Nazism has often been used to explain (and to justify) the disproportionate number of subversives of Jewish ethnicity.

Soviet intelligence benefited immensely from the support of the Communist Party of the United States, many of whose members acted as agents. Thus during the 1930s and 1940s, Communist subversives, under direct Soviet control, came to permeate key agencies of the federal government: the Treasury and State departments, the Office of Strategic Services (forerunner to the CIA), and even the White House itself.

Soviet intelligence consisted of three separate organizations: the KGB (NKVD or NKGB—the leading state security organ),[2] the GRU (military intelligence), and the U.S. Communist Party (technically, the Communist Party of the United States of America, or CPUSA), which was supervised by the Comintern (the Communist International, run by Stalin). The KGB and GRU ran parallel “legal” and “illegal” intelligence networks in the United States. “Legal” networks were run by intelligence officers working under legal, usually diplomatic, cover in “residencies” located clandestinely in Soviet diplomatic missions and other official organizations. “Illegal” networks, in contrast, were run by Soviet intelligence officers who used false identities and had no apparent connection to Soviet organizations.

President Roosevelt was oblivious to the danger of Soviet subversion. In 1939, Adolf A. Berle, Roosevelt’s assistant secretary of state and adviser on internal security, presented the President with a list of leading Soviet agents in the United States, including Alger Hiss and Harry Dexter White, after receiving this information from ex-Communist spy Whittaker Chambers. Roosevelt simply laughed this off as ridiculous.[3].......(continued)
______________________________________________________
This is nothing new.
In FACT, it's OLD NEWS!!!!
What we're witnessing TODAY is the result.
McCarthy was RIGHT!!!
:rolleyes:
 
They use words like "Marxist" and "Communist" to scare themselves and each other. Sometimes when they want to sound extra brilliant they use "Stalinist".

When asked for a specific definition of the terms in their own words, they get angry.

Y16dfci.jpg


bLppuzP.jpg


HSZs9Pz.jpg
Says the demented avenger subverted demoralized zombie asshole without an OUNCE of self-awareness.

:rolleyes:
 

Forum List

Back
Top