The President with the lowest overall average approval rating in history is......

[Papageorgio]

President, commander in chief, your daddy.

If you're happy with that dunce being your commander in chief so be it

Right, a man who became a multi billionaire, defeated over a dozen GOP candidates in the primary, then whooped Hillary's ass in the general is a dunce? Do you realize how stupid that sounds. You don't like Trump that's fine, but don't be stupid about it.

He doesn't read, he humiliates and insults those he disagrees with , and multi billionaire is in doubt too How much do you think he owes his russian handlers

Hillary humiliates, and insults, remember the deplorables? Obama with the clinging to guns and bibles? Politicians humiliate, its what they do. Hell, 99% of the people here insult those that disagree with them. You call others here on the board names. If you want a high standard, start with yourself.

I assure you pap if I ran for office there'd be no insults from me Here is quite another thing So many people I could never agree with

So you have a double standard and put on a facade if running for office. Figures.

 

[BluesLegend]

President, commander in chief, your daddy.

If you're happy with that dunce being your commander in chief so be it

Right, a man who became a multi billionaire, defeated over a dozen GOP candidates in the primary, then whooped Hillary's ass in the general is a dunce? Do you realize how stupid that sounds. You don't like Trump that's fine, but don't be stupid about it.

He doesn't read, he humiliates and insults those he disagrees with , and multi billionaire is in doubt too How much do you think he owes his russian handlers

Hillary humiliates, and insults, remember the deplorables? Obama with the clinging to guns and bibles? Politicians humiliate, its what they do. Hell, 99% of the people here insult those that disagree with them. You call others here on the board names. If you want a high standard, start with yourself.

I assure you pap if I ran for office there'd be no insults from me Here is quite another thing So many people I could never agree with

LMAO as demonstrated by your 40 Trump insult posts a day, sure Eddie

 

[edward37]

If you're happy with that dunce being your commander in chief so be it

Right, a man who became a multi billionaire, defeated over a dozen GOP candidates in the primary, then whooped Hillary's ass in the general is a dunce? Do you realize how stupid that sounds. You don't like Trump that's fine, but don't be stupid about it.

He doesn't read, he humiliates and insults those he disagrees with , and multi billionaire is in doubt too How much do you think he owes his russian handlers

Hillary humiliates, and insults, remember the deplorables? Obama with the clinging to guns and bibles? Politicians humiliate, its what they do. Hell, 99% of the people here insult those that disagree with them. You call others here on the board names. If you want a high standard, start with yourself.

I assure you pap if I ran for office there'd be no insults from me Here is quite another thing So many people I could never agree with

LMAO as demonstrated by your 40 Trump insult posts a day, sure Eddie

You keeping score???

 

[BluesLegend]

Right, a man who became a multi billionaire, defeated over a dozen GOP candidates in the primary, then whooped Hillary's ass in the general is a dunce? Do you realize how stupid that sounds. You don't like Trump that's fine, but don't be stupid about it.

He doesn't read, he humiliates and insults those he disagrees with , and multi billionaire is in doubt too How much do you think he owes his russian handlers

Hillary humiliates, and insults, remember the deplorables? Obama with the clinging to guns and bibles? Politicians humiliate, its what they do. Hell, 99% of the people here insult those that disagree with them. You call others here on the board names. If you want a high standard, start with yourself.

I assure you pap if I ran for office there'd be no insults from me Here is quite another thing So many people I could never agree with

LMAO as demonstrated by your 40 Trump insult posts a day, sure Eddie

You keeping score???

Yes, we won, you lost, that's the score.

 

[edward37]

Uncouth ,uncaring ,inhumane, uneducated braggart who needs lost of attention are some glowing terms I can come up with

President, commander in chief, your daddy.

If you're happy with that dunce being your commander in chief so be it

Right, a man who became a multi billionaire, defeated over a dozen GOP candidates in the primary, then whooped Hillary's ass in the general is a dunce? Do you realize how stupid that sounds. You don't like Trump that's fine, but don't be stupid about it.

He doesn't read, he humiliates and insults those he disagrees with , and multi billionaire is in doubt too How much do you think he owes his russian handlers

Lib please you are doubling down on stupid. You people don't have the education or integrity to just admit it, Trump became POTUS largely without the help of the Republican party. Trump took on everyone, Hillary and her $1.2 billion dollar campaign war chest, the media who was nearly 100% in the tank for Hillary, the entire Dem party and part of the Rep party, he battled them all and won and you people are too petty and butthurt to give him credit.

How much did Trumps russian friends help him out with ?? Slimebag should go to jail in a decent and honest America

 

[edward37]

He doesn't read, he humiliates and insults those he disagrees with , and multi billionaire is in doubt too How much do you think he owes his russian handlers

Hillary humiliates, and insults, remember the deplorables? Obama with the clinging to guns and bibles? Politicians humiliate, its what they do. Hell, 99% of the people here insult those that disagree with them. You call others here on the board names. If you want a high standard, start with yourself.

I assure you pap if I ran for office there'd be no insults from me Here is quite another thing So many people I could never agree with

LMAO as demonstrated by your 40 Trump insult posts a day, sure Eddie

You keeping score???

Yes, we won, you lost, that's the score.

Wrong again blues ,,We BOTH lost

 

[BluesLegend]

President, commander in chief, your daddy.

If you're happy with that dunce being your commander in chief so be it

Right, a man who became a multi billionaire, defeated over a dozen GOP candidates in the primary, then whooped Hillary's ass in the general is a dunce? Do you realize how stupid that sounds. You don't like Trump that's fine, but don't be stupid about it.

He doesn't read, he humiliates and insults those he disagrees with , and multi billionaire is in doubt too How much do you think he owes his russian handlers

Lib please you are doubling down on stupid. You people don't have the education or integrity to just admit it, Trump became POTUS largely without the help of the Republican party. Trump took on everyone, Hillary and her $1.2 billion dollar campaign war chest, the media who was nearly 100% in the tank for Hillary, the entire Dem party and part of the Rep party, he battled them all and won and you people are too petty and butthurt to give him credit.

How much did Trumps russian friends help him out with ?? Slimebag should go to jail in a decent and honest America

LMAO the Russian's forced 3 blue states to vote for Trump instead of Hillary? Losing just one of those states is an upset, but all three PA, WI, and MI you can't blame that on the Russians.

 

[Muhammed]

The gallup poll has been measuring Presidential approval ratings since the 1940s, longer than any other company or organization involved in polling. Here is how the Presidents rank:

OVERALL AVERAGE APPROVAL RATING WHILE PRESIDENT:

John F. Kennedy - 70%
Dwight D. Eisenhower - 65%
George H.W. Bush - 61%
Lyndon B. Johnson - 55%
Bill Clinton - 55%
Ronald Reagan - 53%
George W. Bush - 49%
Richard Nixon - 49%
Barack Obama - 48%
Gerald Ford - 47%
Jimmy Carter - 46%
Harry S. Truman - 45%
Donald J. Trump - 39%

After nearly 2 years as President, having an overall approval rating of 39% is not a good place to be at. It may go up or down from here, but as time goes back, its likely to solidify around this number of 39%. Donald Trump has never had even a daily or weekly approval rating above 45%. There has never been a President with such a low probability of being re-elected based on the latest data.

Ridiculous propaganda.

They never provide any evidence to back up their claims.

 

[BluesLegend]

Hillary humiliates, and insults, remember the deplorables? Obama with the clinging to guns and bibles? Politicians humiliate, its what they do. Hell, 99% of the people here insult those that disagree with them. You call others here on the board names. If you want a high standard, start with yourself.

I assure you pap if I ran for office there'd be no insults from me Here is quite another thing So many people I could never agree with

LMAO as demonstrated by your 40 Trump insult posts a day, sure Eddie

You keeping score???

Yes, we won, you lost, that's the score.

Wrong again blues ,,We BOTH lost

Dem's lost control of the House, Dem's lost control of the Senate, Dem's lost the White House and SCOTUS nominations. Dem's jobs killing regulations overturned by Trump. Dem's jobs killing trade deals re-negotiated by Trump. President Trump has rolled over you Dem's like a King Tiger Tank Eddie. You people need to get your shit together or there won't be a Dem party.

 

[Wry Catcher]

The gallup poll has been measuring Presidential approval ratings since the 1940s, longer than any other company or organization involved in polling. Here is how the Presidents rank:

OVERALL AVERAGE APPROVAL RATING WHILE PRESIDENT:

John F. Kennedy - 70%
Dwight D. Eisenhower - 65%
George H.W. Bush - 61%
Lyndon B. Johnson - 55%
Bill Clinton - 55%
Ronald Reagan - 53%
George W. Bush - 49%
Richard Nixon - 49%
Barack Obama - 48%
Gerald Ford - 47%
Jimmy Carter - 46%
Harry S. Truman - 45%
Donald J. Trump - 39%

After nearly 2 years as President, having an overall approval rating of 39% is not a good place to be at. It may go up or down from here, but as time goes back, its likely to solidify around this number of 39%. Donald Trump has never had even a daily or weekly approval rating above 45%. There has never been a President with such a low probability of being re-elected based on the latest data.

Who cares. The polls we have found out are crap, and the media is complicit in an orchestrated propaganda campaign. They rely on ignorant people listening to them for their news. The non ignorant no longer pay them heed.

Do you really believe this ^^^?

To the readers: consider if you can and are not willfully ignorance this link, or find a link a bit less abstruse:

http://math.arizona.edu/~jwatkins/505d/Lesson_12.pdf

 

[U2Edge]

The gallup poll has been measuring Presidential approval ratings since the 1940s, longer than any other company or organization involved in polling. Here is how the Presidents rank:

OVERALL AVERAGE APPROVAL RATING WHILE PRESIDENT:

John F. Kennedy - 70%
Dwight D. Eisenhower - 65%
George H.W. Bush - 61%
Lyndon B. Johnson - 55%
Bill Clinton - 55%
Ronald Reagan - 53%
George W. Bush - 49%
Richard Nixon - 49%
Barack Obama - 48%
Gerald Ford - 47%
Jimmy Carter - 46%
Harry S. Truman - 45%
Donald J. Trump - 39%

After nearly 2 years as President, having an overall approval rating of 39% is not a good place to be at. It may go up or down from here, but as time goes back, its likely to solidify around this number of 39%. Donald Trump has never had even a daily or weekly approval rating above 45%. There has never been a President with such a low probability of being re-elected based on the latest data.

/——/ Fake poll of 1100 random adults, meaningless.

Actually, the list is the total results and averages of THOUSANDS of polls taken since the 1940s. Trumps poll number here is the average of several hundred polls taken on his approval rating since he entered office 19 months ago. You will not find a more accurate or comprehensive list as this because there is no organization in the world that has done this much polling for this long as GALLUP has done.

/——/ Rasmussen is the most accurate and consistent

Rasmussen has not been doing polling as long as Gallup and can't produce a list like this based on results of polling done from the 1940s to today.

 

[U2Edge]

I try to clean it up PC but there are just some words that describe him best and as far as desperate goes I'm far from it Try listening to his daughter speak of him in church this morning and hear about the man who also believed Trump is a vile dishonest man

If you would concentrate on the success of his policies, and how they've benefited the nation, and the world, you'd have no trouble in using glowing terms.

Uncouth ,uncaring ,inhumane, uneducated braggart who needs lost of attention are some glowing terms I can come up with

President, commander in chief, your daddy.

If you're happy with that dunce being your commander in chief so be it

Right, a man who became a multi billionaire, defeated over a dozen GOP candidates in the primary, then whooped Hillary's ass in the general is a dunce? Do you realize how stupid that sounds. You don't like Trump that's fine, but don't be stupid about it.

Trump lost the popular vote in 2016 by 3 million votes. He narrowly won the electoral college due to VERY narrow margins of victory in 3 states, Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

 

[U2Edge]

The gallup poll has been measuring Presidential approval ratings since the 1940s, longer than any other company or organization involved in polling. Here is how the Presidents rank:

OVERALL AVERAGE APPROVAL RATING WHILE PRESIDENT:

John F. Kennedy - 70%
Dwight D. Eisenhower - 65%
George H.W. Bush - 61%
Lyndon B. Johnson - 55%
Bill Clinton - 55%
Ronald Reagan - 53%
George W. Bush - 49%
Richard Nixon - 49%
Barack Obama - 48%
Gerald Ford - 47%
Jimmy Carter - 46%
Harry S. Truman - 45%
Donald J. Trump - 39%

After nearly 2 years as President, having an overall approval rating of 39% is not a good place to be at. It may go up or down from here, but as time goes back, its likely to solidify around this number of 39%. Donald Trump has never had even a daily or weekly approval rating above 45%. There has never been a President with such a low probability of being re-elected based on the latest data.

The same polls that predicted a Hillary landslide

Gallup did not actually poll the 2016 race.

 

[edward37]

I assure you pap if I ran for office there'd be no insults from me Here is quite another thing So many people I could never agree with

LMAO as demonstrated by your 40 Trump insult posts a day, sure Eddie

You keeping score???

Yes, we won, you lost, that's the score.

Wrong again blues ,,We BOTH lost

Dem's lost control of the House, Dem's lost control of the Senate, Dem's lost the White House and SCOTUS nominations. Dem's jobs killing regulations overturned by Trump. Dem's jobs killing trade deals re-negotiated by Trump. President Trump has rolled over you Dem's like a King Tiger Tank Eddie. You people need to get your shit together or there won't be a Dem party.

We're trying We won't let it happen again

 

[amethyst]

The gallup poll has been measuring Presidential approval ratings since the 1940s, longer than any other company or organization involved in polling. Here is how the Presidents rank:

OVERALL AVERAGE APPROVAL RATING WHILE PRESIDENT:

John F. Kennedy - 70%
Dwight D. Eisenhower - 65%
George H.W. Bush - 61%
Lyndon B. Johnson - 55%
Bill Clinton - 55%
Ronald Reagan - 53%
George W. Bush - 49%
Richard Nixon - 49%
Barack Obama - 48%
Gerald Ford - 47%
Jimmy Carter - 46%
Harry S. Truman - 45%
Donald J. Trump - 39%

After nearly 2 years as President, having an overall approval rating of 39% is not a good place to be at. It may go up or down from here, but as time goes back, its likely to solidify around this number of 39%. Donald Trump has never had even a daily or weekly approval rating above 45%. There has never been a President with such a low probability of being re-elected based on the latest data.

/——/ Fake poll of 1100 random adults, meaningless.

Actually, the list is the total results and averages of THOUSANDS of polls taken since the 1940s. Trumps poll number here is the average of several hundred polls taken on his approval rating since he entered office 19 months ago. You will not find a more accurate or comprehensive list as this because there is no organization in the world that has done this much polling for this long as GALLUP has done.

/——/ Rasmussen is the most accurate and consistent

Rasmussen has not been doing polling as long as Gallup and can't produce a list like this based on results of polling done from the 1940s to today.

Rasmussen polls were the only ones on the money in 2016.

 

[U2Edge]

The gallup poll has been measuring Presidential approval ratings since the 1940s, longer than any other company or organization involved in polling. Here is how the Presidents rank:

OVERALL AVERAGE APPROVAL RATING WHILE PRESIDENT:

John F. Kennedy - 70%
Dwight D. Eisenhower - 65%
George H.W. Bush - 61%
Lyndon B. Johnson - 55%
Bill Clinton - 55%
Ronald Reagan - 53%
George W. Bush - 49%
Richard Nixon - 49%
Barack Obama - 48%
Gerald Ford - 47%
Jimmy Carter - 46%
Harry S. Truman - 45%
Donald J. Trump - 39%

After nearly 2 years as President, having an overall approval rating of 39% is not a good place to be at. It may go up or down from here, but as time goes back, its likely to solidify around this number of 39%. Donald Trump has never had even a daily or weekly approval rating above 45%. There has never been a President with such a low probability of being re-elected based on the latest data.

Ridiculous propaganda.

They never provide any evidence to back up their claims.

Well, you won't be able to conclude its propaganda when the Democrats take back the House in November and Donald Trump is NOT re-elected President in 2020. Stay tuned.

 

[U2Edge]

The gallup poll has been measuring Presidential approval ratings since the 1940s, longer than any other company or organization involved in polling. Here is how the Presidents rank:

OVERALL AVERAGE APPROVAL RATING WHILE PRESIDENT:

John F. Kennedy - 70%
Dwight D. Eisenhower - 65%
George H.W. Bush - 61%
Lyndon B. Johnson - 55%
Bill Clinton - 55%
Ronald Reagan - 53%
George W. Bush - 49%
Richard Nixon - 49%
Barack Obama - 48%
Gerald Ford - 47%
Jimmy Carter - 46%
Harry S. Truman - 45%
Donald J. Trump - 39%

After nearly 2 years as President, having an overall approval rating of 39% is not a good place to be at. It may go up or down from here, but as time goes back, its likely to solidify around this number of 39%. Donald Trump has never had even a daily or weekly approval rating above 45%. There has never been a President with such a low probability of being re-elected based on the latest data.

/——/ Fake poll of 1100 random adults, meaningless.

Actually, the list is the total results and averages of THOUSANDS of polls taken since the 1940s. Trumps poll number here is the average of several hundred polls taken on his approval rating since he entered office 19 months ago. You will not find a more accurate or comprehensive list as this because there is no organization in the world that has done this much polling for this long as GALLUP has done.

/——/ Rasmussen is the most accurate and consistent

Rasmussen has not been doing polling as long as Gallup and can't produce a list like this based on results of polling done from the 1940s to today.

Rasmussen polls were the only ones on the money in 2016.

Probably because Gallup chose not to poll the 2016 election race.

 

[westwall]

The gallup poll has been measuring Presidential approval ratings since the 1940s, longer than any other company or organization involved in polling. Here is how the Presidents rank:

OVERALL AVERAGE APPROVAL RATING WHILE PRESIDENT:

John F. Kennedy - 70%
Dwight D. Eisenhower - 65%
George H.W. Bush - 61%
Lyndon B. Johnson - 55%
Bill Clinton - 55%
Ronald Reagan - 53%
George W. Bush - 49%
Richard Nixon - 49%
Barack Obama - 48%
Gerald Ford - 47%
Jimmy Carter - 46%
Harry S. Truman - 45%
Donald J. Trump - 39%

After nearly 2 years as President, having an overall approval rating of 39% is not a good place to be at. It may go up or down from here, but as time goes back, its likely to solidify around this number of 39%. Donald Trump has never had even a daily or weekly approval rating above 45%. There has never been a President with such a low probability of being re-elected based on the latest data.

Who cares. The polls we have found out are crap, and the media is complicit in an orchestrated propaganda campaign. They rely on ignorant people listening to them for their news. The non ignorant no longer pay them heed.

Do you really believe this ^^^?

To the readers: consider if you can and are not willfully ignorance this link, or find a link a bit less abstruse:

http://math.arizona.edu/~jwatkins/505d/Lesson_12.pdf

Yes, because it is obviously true. I wish the Soup was still on so they could create a montage of all the MSM talking heads saying the exact same thing over and over and over.... Why do they do that you might ask if you were truly the thinking person you claim to be?

• Repetition: It is when the product name is repeated many times during an advertisement. This technique may use a jingle, which is appealing to the masses and fits in their minds.

And then of course there are these other well known techniques the MSM uses to attack trump, and those who agree with him....




1. NAME CALLING or STEREOTYPING: Giving a person or an idea a bad label by using an easy to remember pejorative name. This is used to make us reject and condemn a person or idea without examining what the label really means. Examples: "Republican", "Tree-Hugger", "Nazi", "Environmentalist", "Special-Interest Group".

2. VIRTUE WORDS or GLITTERING GENERALITY: These words are used to dupe us into accepting and approving of things without examining the evidence carefully. Examples: "Natural", "Democratic", "Organic", "Scientific", "Ecological", "Sustainable".

3. DEIFICATION: This is when an idea is made to appear holy, sacred, or very special and therefore above all law. Any alternative or opposite points of view are thereby given the appearance of treason or blasphemy. Examples: "God-given right to...", "Mother Earth", "Gia".

4. TRANSFER: Transfer is when a symbol that carries respect, authority, sanction, and prestige is used along with and idea or argument to make it look more acceptable. Examples: American Flag, University Seal, Medical Association Symbol (or something that looks like it). This method is also called GUILT- or VIRTUE-BY-ASSOCIATION.

5. TESTIMONIAL: When some respected celebrity (or alternatively someone generally hated) claims that an idea or product is good (or bad). This technique is used to convince us without examining the facts more carefully.

6. PLAIN FOLKS: This is a way that a speaker convinces an audience that an idea is good because they are the same ideas of the vast majority of people like yourself. Examples: "This is the will of the People", "Most Americans...". Another example would be when the speaker tells a story about a family or people that are "just like you" to reinforce the speaker's point of view.

7. BAND WAGON: This common propaganda method is when the speaker tries to convince us to accept their point of view or else we will miss out on something really good. The Band-Wagon technique is often used in advertising. Examples: "This is the wave of the future", "Be the first on your block", "Act Now!". You might ask yourself "What if I was the only one on my block because no one else was interested (duped)?".

8. ARTIFICIAL DICHOTOMY: This is when someone tries to claim there are only two sides to an issue and that both sides must have equal presentation in order to be evaluated. This technique is used to dupe us into believing there is only one way to look at an issue, when in fact there may be many alternative viewpoints or "sides". Like most propaganda techniques it simplifies reality and therefore distorts it, often to the advantage of the speaker. A classic example is the "intelligent design" versus "evolution" controversy.

9. HOT POTATO: This is an inflammatory (often untrue) statement or question used to throw an opponent off guard, or to embarrass them. Examples "Have you stopped beating your spouse", "When will you pay the taxes you owe?" The fact that it may be utterly untrue is irrelevant, because it still brings controversy to the opponent.

10. STALLING or IGNORING THE QUESTION : This technique is used to play for more time or to avoid answering a pointed question. Examples: "More research is needed...", "A fact-finding committee is working on this issue..." "I am calling for an investigation on this failure.." When asked about a tax increase possibility a senator replies: "I have always met the obligations I have to those I represent."

11. LEAST-OF-EVILS is used to justify an otherwise unpleasant or unpopular point of view. Example: '"War is hell but appeasement leads to worse disasters".

12. SCAPEGOAT: This often use with Guilt-by-association to deflect scrutiny away from the issues. It transfers blame to one person or group of people without investigating the complexities of the issue. Examples: "George W. Bush got us into Iraq", "President Reagan caused the national debt".

13. CAUSE AND EFFECT MISMATCH: This technique confuses the audience about what is really cause and effect. In fact the causes of most phenomena are complex, and it is misleading to say just one of the following: "Tuberculosis is caused by bacteria", "Tuberculosis is caused by un-regulated capitalism that creates poor working conditions", "Tuberculosis is caused by a lack of effective antibiotics".

14. DISTORTION OF DATA or OUT OF CONTEXT or CARD STACKING or CHERRY PICKING: This technique is used to convince the audience by using selected information and not presenting the complete story. Examples: "A study was done that showed eating peanut butter causes liver cancer" (the fact that later the study was later shown to be flawed or funded by the peanut butter haters and therefore suspect, is not revealed). A variation would be "Raising the speed limit to 65 mph resulted in many fewer traffic fatalities". Such statements need to be checked with how many people were driving before and after the change in speed limit. Fewer people may be driving after the speed limit change, even though the fatality rates (deaths per 100,000) may be higher, leading to the overall result of fewer fatalities.

15. WEAK INFERENCE (or False Cause): Weak inference is when a judgment is made with insufficient evidence, or that the conclusion does not necessarily follow from the evidence given. For example: Ducks and geese migrate south for the winter, therefore all waterfowl migrate south for the winter. Or, most rich folks vote republican, therefore most people who vote republican are rich.

16. FAULTY ANALOGY: This is when a comparison is carried to far. Example: "The economy is following the same path as right before the great depression, therefore we will experience a stock market crash soon!" SLIPPERY SLOPE would be an example of faulty analogy. Slippery slope makes the argument that a shift in one direction will continue to lead to extremes (ex. smoking pot will lead to heroine addiction). It is not necessarily so.

17. MISUSE OF STATISTICS: Some examples: Average results are reported, but not the amount of variation around the averages. A percent or fraction is presented, but not the sample size as in "9 out of 10 dentists recommend...". Absolute and proportional quantities are mixed as in "3,400 more robberies occurred in our town last year, whereas other cities hand an increase of less than one percent". Graphs are used that, by chopping off part of the scale or using unusual units or no scale, distort the appearance of the result. Results are reported with misleading precision. For example, representing 13 out of 19 students as 68.42105 percent.

18. FEAR: "Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger."
-- Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials (http://www.snopes.com/quotes/goering.htm)

19. ad hominem ATTACK (also called Deflection): You attack the messenger, instead of the argument or evidence that is presented.

20. tu quoque ATTACK: Pronounced too-kwo-kwee. This technique is when you respond to your opponent by accusing them of committing a logical fallacy or propaganda technique instead of addressing the claim of your opponent's argument and evidence. Ex. "You too are using fear as a propaganda technique"

21. Preemptive Framing: "Frame an issue before other people get a chance to"

22. Diversion: When a major issue comes up that is embarrassing or threatening, so a diversion is created so attention is directed away from the issue.



propoaganda

 

[PoliticalChic]

If you would concentrate on the success of his policies, and how they've benefited the nation, and the world, you'd have no trouble in using glowing terms.

Uncouth ,uncaring ,inhumane, uneducated braggart who needs lost of attention are some glowing terms I can come up with

President, commander in chief, your daddy.

If you're happy with that dunce being your commander in chief so be it

Right, a man who became a multi billionaire, defeated over a dozen GOP candidates in the primary, then whooped Hillary's ass in the general is a dunce? Do you realize how stupid that sounds. You don't like Trump that's fine, but don't be stupid about it.

Trump lost the popular vote in 2016 by 3 million votes. He narrowly won the electoral college due to VERY narrow margins of victory in 3 states, Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

Actually, he didn't.

We don't count the votes of illegal aliens that Obama told to go and vote.

You didn't know that?

 

[BluesLegend]

If you would concentrate on the success of his policies, and how they've benefited the nation, and the world, you'd have no trouble in using glowing terms.

Uncouth ,uncaring ,inhumane, uneducated braggart who needs lost of attention are some glowing terms I can come up with

President, commander in chief, your daddy.

If you're happy with that dunce being your commander in chief so be it

Right, a man who became a multi billionaire, defeated over a dozen GOP candidates in the primary, then whooped Hillary's ass in the general is a dunce? Do you realize how stupid that sounds. You don't like Trump that's fine, but don't be stupid about it.

Trump lost the popular vote in 2016 by 3 million votes. He narrowly won the electoral college due to VERY narrow margins of victory in 3 states, Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

No he didn't.