Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
Why you asking us?
You're the ones who repealed Glass-Steegall.
I'm Bill Clinton?
Billo - even for a racist fuck, you're a stupid one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why you asking us?
You're the ones who repealed Glass-Steegall.
Clinton gutted and then signed the repeal of Glass-Steagall to enable his CRA...which ended up crashing the mortgage markets when the banks decided to bundle up his crap loans and sell them to the world.
We're producing as much as we ever were, it just takes fewer people to do it and much of the lower tech production has been shifted overseas.
We're producing as much as we ever were, it just takes fewer people to do it and much of the lower tech production has been shifted overseas.
The closet queen pipes in again but can't tell us why it's almost impossible to find an American-made:
televison, computer, radio, cell phone, pair of shoes, pair of socks, t-shirt, lawnmover, motorcycle, bicycle, power tool, wrench, hammer, microwave oven, leather furniture....etc etc etc. And we almost lost our auto industry because fruits like SteadyMercury who drive some pile of tin from S. Korea. Hell, we even import almost 70% of our OIL. Yeah, American industry is doing just fine.
While the leftists enjoy waiting like buzzards to approach a thread that's no longer active to "thank" each other for idiot-wind, notice they said nothing when it counted. Just like the halfrican they've put in the WH....runs their mouth, says nothing, and then does nothing while $6T vanishes.
Does it really matter?
The debt will never be paid off.
Republicans only care about it when a Democrat is President. Then there are fiscal cliffs and disasters looming.
When a Republican is President, they spend like drunken sailors (only they borrow every penny instead of through taxation).
When a Democrat becomes President, suddenly they discover that there is a debt, although they deny any responsibility in creating it.
If a Republican becomes President in 2016, the debt will cease being a problem once again.
HOW MUCH DEBT are you willing to allow the government shysters to put us in?
"We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty or profusion and servitude. If we run into such debt, as that we must be taxed in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labors and our amusements, for our calling and our creeds...[we will] have no time to think, no means of calling our miss-managers to account but be glad to obtain subsistence by hiring ourselves to rivet their chains on the necks of our fellow-sufferers...And this is the tendency of all human governments.
A departure from principle in one instance becomes a precedent for [another ]...till the bulk of society is reduced to be mere automatons of misery...And the fore-horse of this frightful team is public debt. Taxation follows that, and in its train wretchedness and oppression." Thomas Jefferson
1. They already increased the debt through legislation. That is the way our government works.HOW MUCH DEBT are you willing to allow the government shysters to put us in?
Not a dime more. We should live within our means.
"We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty or profusion and servitude. If we run into such debt, as that we must be taxed in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labors and our amusements, for our calling and our creeds...[we will] have no time to think, no means of calling our miss-managers to account but be glad to obtain subsistence by hiring ourselves to rivet their chains on the necks of our fellow-sufferers...And this is the tendency of all human governments.
A departure from principle in one instance becomes a precedent for [another ]...till the bulk of society is reduced to be mere automatons of misery...And the fore-horse of this frightful team is public debt. Taxation follows that, and in its train wretchedness and oppression." Thomas Jefferson
1. They already increased the debt through legislation. That is the way our government works.HOW MUCH DEBT are you willing to allow the government shysters to put us in?
Not a dime more. We should live within our means.
"We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty or profusion and servitude. If we run into such debt, as that we must be taxed in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labors and our amusements, for our calling and our creeds...[we will] have no time to think, no means of calling our miss-managers to account but be glad to obtain subsistence by hiring ourselves to rivet their chains on the necks of our fellow-sufferers...And this is the tendency of all human governments.
A departure from principle in one instance becomes a precedent for [another ]...till the bulk of society is reduced to be mere automatons of misery...And the fore-horse of this frightful team is public debt. Taxation follows that, and in its train wretchedness and oppression." Thomas Jefferson
2. You have absolutly NO idea of what the deficit really is. You are expecting armageden when it reaches some level, but can not point to a time when it has ever, ever happened before based on deficit to gdp. Which, of course, has been much larger than today.
3. You seem to be completely good on seeing our economy hurt badly. Which is the ONLY thing that not increasing the debt limit will accomplish. That, of course, according to every economist writing about and discussing the subject these days.
4. You are a libertarian, hoping to push our economy more in the direction of that illusion. If you see your political heroes, the tea party repubs, get their way, we will once again see why libertarian economies do not and will never exist.
1. They already increased the debt through legislation. That is the way our government works.HOW MUCH DEBT are you willing to allow the government shysters to put us in?
Not a dime more. We should live within our means.
"We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty or profusion and servitude. If we run into such debt, as that we must be taxed in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labors and our amusements, for our calling and our creeds...[we will] have no time to think, no means of calling our miss-managers to account but be glad to obtain subsistence by hiring ourselves to rivet their chains on the necks of our fellow-sufferers...And this is the tendency of all human governments.
A departure from principle in one instance becomes a precedent for [another ]...till the bulk of society is reduced to be mere automatons of misery...And the fore-horse of this frightful team is public debt. Taxation follows that, and in its train wretchedness and oppression." Thomas Jefferson
2. You have absolutly NO idea of what the deficit really is. You are expecting armageden when it reaches some level, but can not point to a time when it has ever, ever happened before based on deficit to gdp. Which, of course, has been much larger than today.
3. You seem to be completely good on seeing our economy hurt badly. Which is the ONLY thing that not increasing the debt limit will accomplish. That, of course, according to every economist writing about and discussing the subject these days.
4. You are a libertarian, hoping to push our economy more in the direction of that illusion. If you see your political heroes, the tea party repubs, get their way, we will once again see why libertarian economies do not and will never exist.
1. They already increased the debt through legislation. That is the way our government works.Not a dime more. We should live within our means.
2. You have absolutly NO idea of what the deficit really is. You are expecting armageden when it reaches some level, but can not point to a time when it has ever, ever happened before based on deficit to gdp. Which, of course, has been much larger than today.
3. You seem to be completely good on seeing our economy hurt badly. Which is the ONLY thing that not increasing the debt limit will accomplish. That, of course, according to every economist writing about and discussing the subject these days.
4. You are a libertarian, hoping to push our economy more in the direction of that illusion. If you see your political heroes, the tea party repubs, get their way, we will once again see why libertarian economies do not and will never exist.
You know about as much about how our economy works as you do the Bible....what the fuck is "armageden"? The debt has NEVER been 107% of a year's GDP in the history of the United States. You've gotten away with that garbage several times and it's over. Hussein, Reid, and Pelousy put us in this mess by killing jobs and borrowing to grow their bureaucracy, while making millions themselves. Running cover for them makes you just another broke-ass sucker fish who's too dull to know better.
Soo, Bullkurtz says the following:1. They already increased the debt through legislation. That is the way our government works.Not a dime more. We should live within our means.
2. You have absolutly NO idea of what the deficit really is. You are expecting armageden when it reaches some level, but can not point to a time when it has ever, ever happened before based on deficit to gdp. Which, of course, has been much larger than today.
3. You seem to be completely good on seeing our economy hurt badly. Which is the ONLY thing that not increasing the debt limit will accomplish. That, of course, according to every economist writing about and discussing the subject these days.
4. You are a libertarian, hoping to push our economy more in the direction of that illusion. If you see your political heroes, the tea party repubs, get their way, we will once again see why libertarian economies do not and will never exist.
You know about as much about how our economy works as you do the Bible....what the fuck is "armageden"? The debt has NEVER been 107% of a year's GDP in the history of the United States. You've gotten away with that garbage several times and it's over. Hussein, Reid, and Pelousy put us in this mess by killing jobs and borrowing to grow their bureaucracy, while making millions themselves. Running cover for them makes you just another broke-ass sucker fish who's too dull to know better.
You know about as much about how our economy works as you do the Bible....what the fuck is "armageden"? The debt has NEVER been 107% of a year's GDP in the history of the United States. You've gotten away with that garbage several times and it's over. Hussein, Reid, and Pelousy put us in this mess by killing jobs and borrowing to grow their bureaucracy, while making millions themselves. Running cover for them makes you just another broke-ass sucker fish who's too dull to know better.
The United States is expected to record a Government Debt equivalent to 101.60 percent of the country's Gross Domestic Product in 2012. Government Debt To GDP in the United States is reported by the U.S. Bureau of Public Debt. From 1940 until 2012, the United States Government Debt To GDP averaged 60.3 Percent reaching an all time high of 121.7 Percent in December of 1946
United States Government Debt To GDP | Actual Data | Forecasts
Once again the OP embarrasses himself with his astounding ignorance.
The Long Story of U.S. Debt, From 1790 to 2011, in 1 Little Chart - Matt Phillips - The Atlantic
![]()
Armageddon:
Your welcome.
No, you're welcome ya ignorant putz.....I forced you to learn how to spell the end of mankind...Now keep running your mouth....you're an endless source of entertainment....are you the 4th Stooge by any chance?
Well, dipshit, lets see if you are capable of understanding anything. First, the percent of the gdp that existed in 1946 was 127%. Today, we are at about 101%. So, you say that is only 6% different. See the problem yet, me boy.Once again the OP embarrasses himself with his astounding ignorance.
The Long Story of U.S. Debt, From 1790 to 2011, in 1 Little Chart - Matt Phillips - The Atlantic
![]()
ONE year at the height of borrowing to fight a WORLD WAR....and then only by a measly 6%...it's you who should be embarrassed....it took you what 3 days to find that flimsy shit? Pitiful little leftists grabbing at (soda) straws because they drink like women same as their guru BarryOh.
![]()
1. They already increased the debt through legislation. That is the way our government works.HOW MUCH DEBT are you willing to allow the government shysters to put us in?
Not a dime more. We should live within our means.
"We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty or profusion and servitude. If we run into such debt, as that we must be taxed in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labors and our amusements, for our calling and our creeds...[we will] have no time to think, no means of calling our miss-managers to account but be glad to obtain subsistence by hiring ourselves to rivet their chains on the necks of our fellow-sufferers...And this is the tendency of all human governments.
A departure from principle in one instance becomes a precedent for [another ]...till the bulk of society is reduced to be mere automatons of misery...And the fore-horse of this frightful team is public debt. Taxation follows that, and in its train wretchedness and oppression." Thomas Jefferson
2. You have absolutly NO idea of what the deficit really is. You are expecting armageden when it reaches some level, but can not point to a time when it has ever, ever happened before based on deficit to gdp. Which, of course, has been much larger than today.
3. You seem to be completely good on seeing our economy hurt badly. Which is the ONLY thing that not increasing the debt limit will accomplish. That, of course, according to every economist writing about and discussing the subject these days.
4. You are a libertarian, hoping to push our economy more in the direction of that illusion. If you see your political heroes, the tea party repubs, get their way, we will once again see why libertarian economies do not and will never exist
Well, dipshit, lets see if you are capable of understanding anything. First, the percent of the gdp that existed in 1946 was 127%. Today, we are at about 101%. So, you say that is only 6% different. See the problem yet, me boy.Once again the OP embarrasses himself with his astounding ignorance.
The Long Story of U.S. Debt, From 1790 to 2011, in 1 Little Chart - Matt Phillips - The Atlantic
![]()
ONE year at the height of borrowing to fight a WORLD WAR....and then only by a measly 6%...it's you who should be embarrassed....it took you what 3 days to find that flimsy shit? Pitiful little leftists grabbing at (soda) straws because they drink like women same as their guru BarryOh.
![]()
As I suggested, you need to find a remedial math class. You really need to take my recommendation. Because, me poor ignorant con, you are making a fool of your self.
So, you adamantly stated that I was nuts for not knowing that the current national debt to gdp rate was not the highest ever. Now you are misquoting the source I provided you and missing the actual difference by about 20%.
See why we worry about you, bull. We worry because you are obviously on the loose, and you are obviously mentally ill.
Then there was the math suggesting that it took me three days to find a link. In fact, it took less than 2 minutes to find the link, dipshit. Hardly a task. That you think it would be again shows your lack of brain activity.
You see, dipshit, I knew about the national debt, and when it had been at it's highest. And I knew, as you are unwilling to consider, that it did not cause a problem of any kind with the economy.
Now, you just made the statement that the increase in the national debt was because of borrowing. It was not, of course. It was mostly due to SPENDING.
Maybe if you took your head out of your ass and spent a little time looking at impartial data, you could actually learn something. Though I seriously doubt that you have the mental capacity.
Sorry, me boy. The national debt has never reached unsustainable levels. Except in your mind. And hyperinflation has not occurred since the gold standard has been gone. Even before then, it was a real stretch to call any inflationary period hyperinflation. And, by the way, the debt was NOT HIGH THEN.Now, I never said "Armageddon"...I said hyperinflation, which is what always happens when debt reaches unsustainable levels as even a cursory understanding of economic history shows.
Fairly well, actually. If you follow what the cbo is saying. And the deficit is decreasing at really fast levels. What has not happened, of course, is greatly increasing revenues.The brief period at the height of WWII when debt surpassed GDP was followed by reduced spending. How's that going today?
Further, we NEVER had the unfunded liabilities that we have today. Those promises will come due...and when they do, we're fucked.
Bullshit. That's according to every KEYNESIAN economist. I, and every economist of the Chicago and Austrian school, would strongly disagree.
You seem to be suggesting MORE debt is the answer. Don't buy it, never will. Jefferson knew better. You don't.