RoshawnMarkwees
Assimilationist
His wife is pretty stupid, so…That Obama estate is super close to the ocean. And also his mansion in the East of the USA is really close to the ocean. Does it make sense he of all people would take such risks?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
His wife is pretty stupid, so…That Obama estate is super close to the ocean. And also his mansion in the East of the USA is really close to the ocean. Does it make sense he of all people would take such risks?
I would believe they made a joint decision.His wife is pretty stupid, so…
She’s a lot bigger than he is.I would believe they made a joint decision.
Does she have the deeper voice?She’s a lot bigger than he is.
I don't understand why these questions are so hard. If you have missed them thus far, they are:
1) Is there evidence of a steady rise in the Earth's temperature, say since the industrial revolution?
2) Is there proof that this rise is caused by human activity, and that nothing else could be the cause?
3) What are the steps we should take to stop or reverse this human-caused global warming?
4) How much will those steps cost, in terms of tax dollars spent, and lost opportunities, including lost opportunities for developing nations to grow and prosper, and for developed countries to innovate?
5) By how much will that proposed expendature reduce the Earth's temperature, and how do we know that?
If you cannot answer each of these questions, with evidence, not just guesses or links, then any policy you advocate based on "global warming" have no basis in evidence.
Here is a post showing a chart based on the GISP ice core data,
The historical record also indicates that temperatures fluctuate up and down without any relationship to the CO2 level. (click on image to enlarge)
View attachment 937387
LINK
We are at THEE Warmest since the last Interglacial. (100,000 years ago)
1) Is there evidence of a steady rise in the Earth's temperature, say since the industrial revolution?
2) Is there proof that this rise is caused by human activity, and that nothing else could be the cause?
3) What are the steps we should take to stop or reverse this human-caused global warming?
4) How much will those steps cost, in terms of tax dollars spent, and lost opportunities, including lost opportunities for developing nations to grow and prosper, and for developed countries to innovate?
5) By how much will that proposed expendature reduce the Earth's temperature, and how do we know that?
... SunsetMommy is DISHONEST. (like ding) ...
You Physics Terms Dropping A$$holeThey're using Stefan-Boltzmann's Law ... irradiation is proportional to temperature raised to the fourth power ... which relationship are you using? ... you gain nothing with logarithms ...
S'Tommy's right ... it's called "quantum saturation" ... one photon, one molecule ... and there's no where close to enough carbon dioxide molecules in the atmosphere to effect thermometer readings at the world's airports ... that's ± 0.5ºC in case you didn't know ...
1ºC is laughably small ...
You Physics Terms Dropping A$$hole
You try so hard to ambiguate/name drop your posts are Incoherent.
But the mechanics of AGW are quite simple to understand and their effect is born out by the global rise (in Temp/GHGs) over time.
`
Notice these fools constantly deal in just temperature. When for a fact Clouds make up by far most of the climate drivers. Clouds cover a huge part of Earth and CO2 is so tiny it measures in million parts. This is for extremely tiny particles.Post your evidence.
You Physics Terms Dropping A$$hole
You try so hard to ambiguate/name drop your posts are Incoherent.
But the mechanics of AGW are quite simple to understand and their effect is born out by the global rise (in Temp/GHGs) over time.
`
Climate is so much more than Temperature and that is part of the reason your posts are always debunked.You Physics Terms Dropping A$$hole
You try so hard to ambiguate/name drop your posts are Incoherent.
But the mechanics of AGW are quite simple to understand and their effect is born out by the global rise (in Temp/GHGs) over time.
`
cool let's see it!So which is it ... PROOF or EVIDENCE ??? ... because there's plenty of evidence of man-kind causing global warming* ... but that's not scientific proof ... not until the math is settled ... "what's the numerical relationship between carbon dioxide concentration and SB's emissivity ratio?" ...
what does that actually mean?Sounds like you're reducing your sample pool to drive up percentages ... the average temperature between 1880 and 1950 is 1ºC lower than the average between 1950 and 2020 ... any averages less than this ∆t = 70 years would be contaminated by dynamic factors ... many of these factors we do not understand and cannot reliably predict ... for example El Nino and sunspots ...
cool let's see it!
what does that actually mean?
you have no idea that the sand or dirt that was there before would have had the same effect. So no, you don't.Put a thermometer in the middle of the parking lot ... and one in the near-by expanse of grass ... same weather, different temperatures ...
Evidence of AGW, not proof ...
you have no idea that the sand or dirt that was there before would have had the same effect. So no, you don't.
When one must be rightMaybe you don't ... east of the Mississippi River, it was forestlands before humans ... cooler than black asphalt ...
Does it hurt to be wrong? ... in science it shouldn't ...