The reaction of the right to the Paris attacks

[TemplarKormac]

So, it's been a few days, there's been a lot of talk about the Paris attacks.

From the right it's been pretty uninspiring.

For the most part it's been short sentences, a lot of "kill all the Muslims" or stuff that isn't backed up with substance, like "they're not condemning the attacks" and then they find out loads of people and countries have condemned then it's "they say one thing and think something else" and basically finding any route to have all Muslims as bad.

The question is why.

Why do these people NEED Islam to be the new enemy? Why do they need it to be so simple?

They want to hark back to the days of Communism where any Russian was a Commie and needed to be feared.

Is it nationalism? The desire to keep the US on top by destroying everyone else who is in their path? A desire to have battles which they can cheer about. A team sport needs goals, it needs baskets, it needs home runs, and you only get these by being big and powerful and fighting the evil people. If there aren't enough evil people you make more of them?

This should be America's reaction to ISIS after that:

You know someone is going to accuse you of being anti Islam or racist for posting that.

So?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Yeah , Isis territory is contained .

Wow, so ISIS has new territory in France?

 

[TemplarKormac]

A. Oh yeah, the same Right Wing hypocrites who now pretend go give a shit about France.

You know, France was the last thing on your mind when Obama said "ISIS is contained."

 

[Timmy]

The actual caliphate , Templar.

 

[GWV5903]

Notice they will say something that is easily proven wrong like blaming all muslims.

No one is blaming ALL MUSLIMS, but you already knew that...

Just fanatical MUSLIMS...

Are you a Liberal or a fanatical LIBERAL...

 

[TemplarKormac]

The actual caliphate , Templar.

Seriously, not even Dianne Feinstein agrees with you. Give up, you've lost.

Feinstein: "I Have Never Been More Concerned. I Read The Intelligence Faithfully. ISIS Is Not Contained. ISIS Is Expanding"

 

[blackhawk]

Relax everyone ISIS is conatined and Obama's strategy is working it's all good in the neighborhood.

Yeah , Isis territory is contained . Nice how you conservatives cherry pick lines and run with your lies and misinformation .

Yeah Obama's strategy is not working nice how liberals cherry pick and run with lies like that FYI when George Bush was on the USS Abraham Lincoln under the mission accomplished banner which was in regards to the carriers 10 month deployment not the war in Iraq you liberals went above and beyond to misrepresent the facts and lie about that so spare us your holier than thou bullshit.

 

[Yarddog]

So, it's been a few days, there's been a lot of talk about the Paris attacks.

From the right it's been pretty uninspiring.

For the most part it's been short sentences, a lot of "kill all the Muslims" or stuff that isn't backed up with substance, like "they're not condemning the attacks" and then they find out loads of people and countries have condemned then it's "they say one thing and think something else" and basically finding any route to have all Muslims as bad.

The question is why.

Why do these people NEED Islam to be the new enemy? Why do they need it to be so simple?

They want to hark back to the days of Communism where any Russian was a Commie and needed to be feared.

Is it nationalism? The desire to keep the US on top by destroying everyone else who is in their path? A desire to have battles which they can cheer about. A team sport needs goals, it needs baskets, it needs home runs, and you only get these by being big and powerful and fighting the evil people. If there aren't enough evil people you make more of them?

"Kill ALL the Muslims". And all the other criap you just made up. Maybe it seems like people are talking in short sentences to you because you only hear the little parts you want to hear.

We don't need to make Muslims our enemy , radical elements of Islam have been doing what their doing for a very long time

 

[frigidweirdo]

So, it's been a few days, there's been a lot of talk about the Paris attacks.

From the right it's been pretty uninspiring.

For the most part it's been short sentences, a lot of "kill all the Muslims" or stuff that isn't backed up with substance, like "they're not condemning the attacks" and then they find out loads of people and countries have condemned then it's "they say one thing and think something else" and basically finding any route to have all Muslims as bad.

The question is why.

Why do these people NEED Islam to be the new enemy? Why do they need it to be so simple?

They want to hark back to the days of Communism where any Russian was a Commie and needed to be feared.

Is it nationalism? The desire to keep the US on top by destroying everyone else who is in their path? A desire to have battles which they can cheer about. A team sport needs goals, it needs baskets, it needs home runs, and you only get these by being big and powerful and fighting the evil people. If there aren't enough evil people you make more of them?

This should be America's reaction to ISIS after that:

Didn't you learn in high school that violence doesn't solve problems?

 

[frigidweirdo]

So, it's been a few days, there's been a lot of talk about the Paris attacks.

From the right it's been pretty uninspiring.

For the most part it's been short sentences, a lot of "kill all the Muslims" or stuff that isn't backed up with substance, like "they're not condemning the attacks" and then they find out loads of people and countries have condemned then it's "they say one thing and think something else" and basically finding any route to have all Muslims as bad.

The question is why.

Why do these people NEED Islam to be the new enemy? Why do they need it to be so simple?

They want to hark back to the days of Communism where any Russian was a Commie and needed to be feared.

Is it nationalism? The desire to keep the US on top by destroying everyone else who is in their path? A desire to have battles which they can cheer about. A team sport needs goals, it needs baskets, it needs home runs, and you only get these by being big and powerful and fighting the evil people. If there aren't enough evil people you make more of them?

"Kill ALL the Muslims". And all the other criap you just made up. Maybe it seems like people are talking in short sentences to you because you only hear the little parts you want to hear.

We don't need to make Muslims our enemy , radical elements of Islam have been doing what their doing for a very long time

Er.... maybe you need to go read what some people are writing.

You say radical Islam is making Islam the enemy. Why is Islam the enemy and not radical Islam?

It's like, men start most wars, why not go to war against men then? They're the enemy. Kill yourself because you are your own enemy.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Didn't you learn in high school that violence doesn't solve problems?

No, it solved quite a few of them actually.

 

[TemplarKormac]

So, it's been a few days, there's been a lot of talk about the Paris attacks.

From the right it's been pretty uninspiring.

For the most part it's been short sentences, a lot of "kill all the Muslims" or stuff that isn't backed up with substance, like "they're not condemning the attacks" and then they find out loads of people and countries have condemned then it's "they say one thing and think something else" and basically finding any route to have all Muslims as bad.

The question is why.

Why do these people NEED Islam to be the new enemy? Why do they need it to be so simple?

They want to hark back to the days of Communism where any Russian was a Commie and needed to be feared.

Is it nationalism? The desire to keep the US on top by destroying everyone else who is in their path? A desire to have battles which they can cheer about. A team sport needs goals, it needs baskets, it needs home runs, and you only get these by being big and powerful and fighting the evil people. If there aren't enough evil people you make more of them?

This should be America's reaction to ISIS after that:

Didn't you learn in high school that violence doesn't solve problems?

Apparently ISIS tends to disagree...

 

[ClosedCaption]

Notice they will say something that is easily proven wrong like blaming all muslims.

No one is blaming ALL MUSLIMS, but you already knew that...

Just fanatical MUSLIMS...

Are you a Liberal or a fanatical LIBERAL...

You can pretend you don't see the sarcastic shit like "pshaw, Islam. .the religion of peace MY ASS" but I'm not here to show you around.

 

[Wildman]

Notice they will say something that is easily proven wrong like blaming all muslims.

when "all muslimes" reject their shit for brains koran, i'll quit blaming them!

 

[frigidweirdo]

Didn't you learn in high school that violence doesn't solve problems?

No, it solved quite a few of them actually.

Oh god, humanity at its worst.

 

[frigidweirdo]

So, it's been a few days, there's been a lot of talk about the Paris attacks.

From the right it's been pretty uninspiring.

For the most part it's been short sentences, a lot of "kill all the Muslims" or stuff that isn't backed up with substance, like "they're not condemning the attacks" and then they find out loads of people and countries have condemned then it's "they say one thing and think something else" and basically finding any route to have all Muslims as bad.

The question is why.

Why do these people NEED Islam to be the new enemy? Why do they need it to be so simple?

They want to hark back to the days of Communism where any Russian was a Commie and needed to be feared.

Is it nationalism? The desire to keep the US on top by destroying everyone else who is in their path? A desire to have battles which they can cheer about. A team sport needs goals, it needs baskets, it needs home runs, and you only get these by being big and powerful and fighting the evil people. If there aren't enough evil people you make more of them?

This should be America's reaction to ISIS after that:

Didn't you learn in high school that violence doesn't solve problems?

Apparently ISIS tends to disagree...

Apparently the US and ISIS don't agree. Doesn't make them right either.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Didn't you learn in high school that violence doesn't solve problems?

No, it solved quite a few of them actually.

Oh god, humanity at its worst.

Not everything can be solved by playing pattycake. Starting to get the pattern here?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Apparently the US and ISIS don't agree.

What better reason then for us to go over there and kick their asses? Of course they don't agree with us, they want to kill us.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Didn't you learn in high school that violence doesn't solve problems?

No, it solved quite a few of them actually.

Oh god, humanity at its worst.

Not everything can be solved by playing pattycake. Starting to get the pattern here?

Why do you think violence will solve the problem when violence made the problem worse?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Violence Never Solved Anything ...Yeah Right.