The Republican Revenge Impeachment Of President Joe Biden

Should Republicans impeach President Joe Biden?


  • Total voters
    49
BS. She was force to use it when Benedict Donald was caught attempting to weaponize Foreign Military aid against his fellow countrymen. The country would have been better served by Pence from that point on but the Neo-GOP are simply too corrupt to do what is good for the country.
Weaponizing military aid? You mean like Joe Biden did?
(Trump's phone call was legitimate, investigating corruption in Ukraine)

 
Weaponizing military aid? You mean like Joe Biden did?
(Trump's phone call was legitimate, investigating corruption in Ukraine)


That wasn't military aid. Those were loan guarantees by the US, the EU and the IMF to help the new regime.

The plot to elicit a false public announcement of an investigation into Joe Biden by the President of the Ukraine was what Benedict Donald was impeached for the first time. Not a phone call. Like Nixon would not have been impeached for the Break in at the Watergate Hotel.......but he would have been impeached. Too bad we don't have Republicans these days who will put country over party.
 
That wasn't military aid. Those were loan guarantees by the US, the EU and the IMF to help the new regime.

The plot to elicit a false public announcement of an investigation into Joe Biden by the President of the Ukraine was what Benedict Donald was impeached for the first time. Not a phone call. Like Nixon would not have been impeached for the Break in at the Watergate Hotel.......but he would have been impeached. Too bad we don't have Republicans these days who will put country over party.
He was impeached for a big fucking lie. Investigating criminals is part of the President's job. Biden is definitely a criminal. He got a quid-pro-quo from the government of Ukraine.
 
He was impeached for
"... solicited the interference of a foreign government, Ukraine, in the 2020 United States Presidential election. He did so through a scheme or course of conduct that included soliciting the Government of Ukraine to publicly announce investigations that would benefit his reelection, harm the election prospects of a political opponent, and influence the 2020 United States Presidential election to his advantage. President Trump also sought to pressure the Government of Ukraine to take these steps by conditioning official United States Government acts of significant value to Ukraine on its public announcement of the investigations. President Trump engaged in this scheme or course of conduct for corrupt purposes in pursuit of personal political benefit. In so doing, President Trump used the powers of the Presidency in a manner that compromised the national security of the United States and undermined the integrity of the United States democratic process. He thus ignored and injured the interests of the Nation.

 
That wasn't military aid. Those were loan guarantees by the US, the EU and the IMF to help the new regime.
The plot to elicit a false public announcement of an investigation into Joe Biden by the President of the Ukraine was what Benedict Donald was impeached for the first time. Not a phone call. Like Nixon would not have been impeached for the Break in at the Watergate Hotel.......but he would have been impeached. Too bad we don't have Republicans these days who will put country over party.
1. Biden extorted Ukraine to fire the prosecutor (Shokin) who was investigating Burisma, Hunter Biden's cash cow.

2. What false public announcement from Ukraine? Ukraine was corrupt. Trump legitimately wanted an investigation. Why did Hunter Biden get $83,000 a month for a no-show job? A job he wasn't even qualified for. The Biden Crime Family was peddling influence. Just ask the banks who reported many suspicious money transfers, that the FBI ignored.

3. We'll see how many democrats vote to impeach Biden for his crimes, then we'll discuss country over party.
 
"... solicited the interference of a foreign government, Ukraine, in the 2020 United States Presidential election. He did so through a scheme or course of conduct that included soliciting the Government of Ukraine to publicly announce investigations that would benefit his reelection, harm the election prospects of a political opponent, and influence the 2020 United States Presidential election to his advantage. President Trump also sought to pressure the Government of Ukraine to take these steps by conditioning official United States Government acts of significant value to Ukraine on its public announcement of the investigations. President Trump engaged in this scheme or course of conduct for corrupt purposes in pursuit of personal political benefit. In so doing, President Trump used the powers of the Presidency in a manner that compromised the national security of the United States and undermined the integrity of the United States democratic process. He thus ignored and injured the interests of the Nation.

American-Staffordshire-Terrier.20191216200722717-500x486.jpg
 
Biden extorted Ukraine to fire the prosecutor
That may be true but that was a bipartisan US foreign policy objective made in cooperation with the EU and the IMF. All foreign policy is a a quid pro quo, not for the personal gain of the president or the political gain of one party
Why did Hunter Biden get......

The is no law in the Ukraine forbidding them from hiring the relatives of prominent politicians. The US has no law forbidding reletives from accepting the jobs based on their last name. People make money on their families names all the time. Do you have a problem with relatives of famous people making money off their names, and do you think we should outlaw the practice?

It's not what you know, it's who you know. Sadly.
 
That may be true but that was a bipartisan US foreign policy objective made in cooperation with the EU and the IMF. All foreign policy is a a quid pro quo, not for the personal gain of the president or the political gain of one party
Prog turds like you keep saying this, but I haven't seen any evidence of it.

The is no law in the Ukraine forbidding them from hiring the relatives of prominent politicians. The US has no law forbidding reletives from accepting the jobs based on their last name. People make money on their families names all the time. Do you have a problem with relatives of famous people making money off their names, and do you think we should outlaw the practice?

It's not what you know, it's who you know. Sadly.
There is a US law that says that the vice president cannot accept gifts to his family members as a condition of government policy, dumbass.
 
Prog turds like you keep saying this, but I haven't seen any evidence of it.


There is a US law that says that the vice president cannot accept gifts to his family members as a condition of government policy, dumbass.
You're always whining about proof. Here you go. Now, where is the law that forbid Hunter from taking the Job at Burisma?




Gonna accept it now? LOL.
 
Really? Please provide "credible" proof of his so-called crimes and abuses of power that rise to the level of impeachment!
Despite the Supreme Court’s explicit warning that any executive extension of the federal eviction moratorium would be struck down, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention decided this week to implement a new moratorium anyway for two months. When asked about the legal obstacles this policy would inevitably run into, President Joe Biden admitted that what his administration is doing is illegal, but he said he doesn’t care.
One of Joe Biden’s first acts as President of the United States, the removal of National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) general counsel Peter Robb, was probably unconstitutional. It was certainly highly unethical. Biden fired Robb despite the NLRB being an independent federal agency. And Biden apparently did it because his union friends don’t like Robb.
Since President Joe Biden took office in January 2021, his administration has acted on a number of fronts to reverse Trump-era restrictions on immigration to the United States. The steps include plans to boost refugee admissions, preserving deportation relief for unauthorized immigrants who came to the U.S. as children and not enforcing the “public charge” rule that denies green cards to immigrants who might use public benefits like Medicaid.
During the 2020 presidential campaign, then-candidate Joe Biden told voters that the choice between him and Donald Trump was between the lawful and the lawless. He called for voters to support “the rule of law, our Constitution,” a choice repeated mantralike by the media to “end Trump’s assault on the rule of law.” Now, six months into his presidency, Biden is openly flouting the Constitution with a knowingly invalid extension of the eviction moratorium — and some law professors and advocates on the left are cheering him for it.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued the Biden administration Tuesday, alleging that federal authorities are illegally declining to take custody of immigrants subject to deportation who are about to be released from Texas prisons.
The result, Paxton argued, leaves Texas in a bind — forced to release "criminal aliens" or continue holding them in custody at taxpayer expense.
"President Biden’s outright refusal to enforce the law is exacerbating an unprecedented border crisis," Paxton said in a statement. "By failing to take custody of criminal aliens and giving no explanation for this reckless policy change, the Biden administration is demonstrating a blatant disregard for Texans’ and Americans’ safety."
 
Last edited:
If Republicans regain power - will the House impeach Biden? Will the Senate convict Biden? How many times will they impeach Biden: One time? Two times? Three times? Until he's convicted and removed?

As has been widely reported - many Republican leaders are threatening to impeach Biden if they regain power. Having an impeachable "reason" seems irrelevant to them. They just want to impeach Biden.

Some Republican leaders are also threatening to impeach VP Kamala Harris, Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, AG Merrick Garland, and Dr. Anthony Fauci.

Personally, I feel more and more like I'm living in a third-world country.

REVENGE should not be grounds for impeachment.

1667853275930.png
 
Really? Please provide "credible" proof of his so-called crimes and abuses of power that rise to the level of impeachment!
Here's one Article, violating the Guarantee Clause:

Article IV, Section 4:

“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.”

This provision is known as the Guarantee Clause.
 

Forum List

Back
Top