The Select Committee Has Sedition Caucus Nervous

[bigrebnc1775]

So, after you listened to Barr and Ginsberg's separate testimonies yesterday you believe those under-oath declarations were merely, in your words, a "political stunt"?
Does that mean you think both men were lying in their testimony?
Everything they said?
Or were there just parts of their testimonies that you found untruthful?
Which parts?
And which parts did you think had real traction and the ring of truth to it?

And that's just Barr's and Ginsberg's testimony. What did you think of Stempien's.....Trump's campaign manager?

Political stunt says otherwise.

 

[Chillicothe]

CALL:

"Political stunt says otherwise."

RESPONSE:
"....once you come to an opinion about what you watched with Barr's and/or Ginsberg's testimonies....well, myself, along with many on the forum would be interested in your thoughtful considered opinion."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What a discussion forum is intended for, poster bigrench, is that there be adult level discussion over selected topics. Today's topic is your opinion of the actual testimony of only three of the many Republican witnesses at yesterday's Select Committee hearing.

So give it another try.

• What did you think....after you had watched and listened ....to each of the testimonies of Wm. Barr, Benjamin Ginsburg, and Bill Stempien?
• What did you think was credible within their under-oath testimonies?
• What was not?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

CALL:



RESPONSE:
"....once you come to an opinion about what you watched with Barr's and/or Ginsberg's testimonies....well, myself, along with many on the forum would be interested in your thoughtful considered opinion."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What a discussion forum is intended for, poster bigrench, is that there be adult level discussion over selected topics. Today's topic is your opinion of the actual testimony of only three of the many Republican witnesses at yesterday's Select Committee hearing.

So give it another try.

• What did you think....after you had watched and listened ....to each of the testimonies of Wm. Barr, Benjamin Ginsburg, and Bill Stempien?
• What did you think was credible within their under-oath testimonies?
• What was not?

It's a political stunt period.

 

[Chillicothe]

It's a political stunt period.

So, you offer this forum your opinion.
And opinion unmoored from actual experience in watching the hearings or listening to the testimony.

You wish to offer us an opinion on something you know nothing about?
Sure.
That figures.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

So, you offer this forum your opinion.
And opinion unmoored from actual experience in watching the hearings or listening to the testimony.

You wish to offer us an opinion on something you know nothing about?
Sure.
That figures.

It's a political stunt because if their was any validity to their accusations they would have produced something valid 20 investigations ago

 

[Astrostar]

Yup. Nervous as a long-tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs.

There is a major difference between this Committee and Trump's screeches of a "stolen election." The Committee is presenting proof of Trump's sedition; he has no proof, none, nada, of a "stolen election." Bigly!!!

 

[Astrostar]

Yup. Preeeetty nervous, indeed.

Don't you just love seeing Tuck and Mighty Tough Girl with their panties in a wad!

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[Curried Goats]

Nothing at all sus about that....

 

[Lastamender]

Yup. Nervous as a long-tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs.

Why do you spam this board with Twitter articles?

 

[Synthaholic]

BUT HER EMAILS!!!

 

[dudmuck]

BUT HER EMAILS!!!

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[Synthaholic]

Bwahahahahahaha!!!!!

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[Synthaholic]